Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16359 v3 pith:CAE42JQZ submitted 2024-01-29 cs.DL

Jack Culbert , Anne Hobert , Najko Jahn , Nick Haupka , Marion Schmidt , Paul Donner , Philipp Mayr This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DL
keywords openalexsciencescopusmetadatareferencesourcecomparedcoverage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to established proprietary sources, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and also quickly changing, the question naturally arises as to the trustworthiness of its data. In this report, we will study the reference coverage and selected metadata within each database and compare them with each other to help address this open question in bibliometrics. In our large-scale study, we demonstrate that, when restricted to a cleaned dataset of 16.8 million recent publications shared by all three databases, OpenAlex has average source reference numbers and internal coverage rates comparable to both Web of Science and Scopus. We further analyse the metadata in OpenAlex, the Web of Science and Scopus by journal, finding a similarity in the distribution of source reference counts in the Web of Science and Scopus as compared to OpenAlex. We also demonstrate that the comparison of other core metadata covered by OpenAlex shows mixed results when broken down by journal, capturing more ORCID identifiers, fewer abstracts and a similar number of Open Access status indicators per article when compared to both the Web of Science and Scopus.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Citation Parsing and Analysis with Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Open-weight language models, including a 0.6B-parameter model, reach higher field-level citation-parsing accuracy than GROBID and Crossref search, with the small model succeeding within 64 sampled attempts.

  2. From Static Bibliometrics to Dynamic Knowledge Graphs: An LLM-Powered Framework for Modernizing Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) Analytics

    cs.DL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A conceptual framework for STI analytics that uses LLMs only to propose semantic edges into a versioned knowledge graph, admitting them only after structural, evidentiary, comparative, and expert validation.

Pith tools