The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2405.01655 · v1 · pith:2HKJIHZU · submitted 2024-05-02 · econ.TH

Manipulation of Belief Aggregation Rules

Christopher P. Chambers , Federico Echenique , Takashi Hayashi This is my paper

Reviewed by Pithpith:2HKJIHZUopen to challenge →

classification econ.TH
keywords beliefaggregationrulescommonequilibriumfirstmanipulationthen
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper studies manipulation of belief aggregation rules in the setting where the society first collects individual's probabilistic opinions and then solves a public portfolio choice problem with common utility based on the aggregate belief. First, we show that belief reporting in Nash equilibrium under the linear opinion pool and log utility is identified as the profile of state-contingent wealth shares in parimutuel equilibrium with risk-neutral preference. Then we characterize belief aggregation rules which are Nash-implementable. We provide a necessary and essentially sufficient condition for implementability, which is independent of the common risk attitude.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fairness and Strategy-Proofness in Automated Market Makers

    cs.GT 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    For weighted-product AMMs with n≥3 assets, no aggregation rule satisfies both Arrovian fairness and strategy-proofness except single-provider dictators; the obstruction vanishes at n=2 and transfers to logarithmic opi...