REVIEW 4 cited by
Rank and symmetries of signature tensors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The signature of a path is a sequence of tensors which allows to uniquely reconstruct the path. In this paper we propose a systematic study of basic properties of signature tensors, starting from their rank, symmetries and conciseness. We prove a sharp upper bound on the rank of signature tensors of piecewise linear paths. We show that there are no skew-symmetric signature tensors of order three or more, and we also prove that specific instances of partial symmetry can only happen for tensors of order three. Finally, we give a simple geometric characterization of paths whose signature tensors are not concise.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Path signatures of ODE solutions
The paper asserts that a path is a solution of a polynomial Cauchy problem if and only if its signature satisfies holonomic and algebraic-variety conditions, but the sufficient direction is false as stated.
-
Computing Path Signature Varieties in Macaulay2
PathSignatures is a new Macaulay2 package for computing signature tensors and signature varieties of piecewise polynomial paths, demonstrated on examples that match known results.
-
Discrete signature tensors for persistence landscapes
Discrete signature tensors of persistence-landscape critical points give a feature map that is injective up to time-warping and translation and separates knotted-protein structural classes with an ARI of 0.958.
-
Scalable Machine Learning Algorithms using Path Signatures
Path signatures can be embedded in Gaussian process, deep learning, kernel, and graph diffusion models to match or beat established baselines on time series and graph benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.