Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Classifying Images with CoLaNET Spiking Neural Network -- the MNIST Example

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.07833 v1 pith:HQVNTRNS submitted 2024-09-12 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords colanetimageclassclassificationlearningmnistnetworkneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the present paper, it is shown how the columnar/layered CoLaNET spiking neural network (SNN) architecture can be used in supervised learning image classification tasks. Image pixel brightness is coded by the spike count during image presentation period. Image class label is indicated by activity of special SNN input nodes (one node per class). The CoLaNET classification accuracy is evaluated on the MNIST benchmark. It is demonstrated that CoLaNET is almost as accurate as the most advanced machine learning algorithms (not using convolutional approach).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spiffy: Efficient Implementation of CoLaNET for Raspberry Pi

    cs.NE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A single CoLaNET network reimplemented in Rust with a linear synaptic resource function, random weight initialization, and group-based reward reaches 91.08% MNIST accuracy and sub-millisecond per-timestep latency on a...

  2. Continual Learning with Columnar Spiking Neural Networks

    cs.NE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A columnar spiking neural network with local learning rules reaches 92% average accuracy and about 4% forgetting on ten permuted-MNIST tasks, but only when tasks share no features.

Pith tools