Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 4 cited by

X-ray and Radio Campaign of the Z-source GX 340+0 II: the X-ray polarization in the normal branch

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read X-ray polarization in GX 340+0 during the normal branch originates from either the blackbody or Comptonized emission component.

desk verdict The paper gives the first polarization measurement of GX 340+0 in the normal branch at 1.22±0.25% with PA 38±6°, weaker than the HB result but aligned, plus radio flux drop in NB. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.00350 v2 submitted 2024-11-01 astro-ph.HE

Yash Bhargava , Thomas D. Russell , Mason Ng , Arvind Balasubramanian , Liang Zhang , Swati Ravi , Vishal Jadoliya , Sudip Bhattacharyya
show 6 more authors
Mayukh Pahari Jeroen Homan Herman L. Marshall Deepto Chakrabarty Francesco Carotenuto Aman Kaushik
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords X-raypolarizationZ-sourceGX340+0normalbranchneutronstarspectro-polarimetryaccretion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper measures X-ray polarization from the Z-source GX 340+0 while the source spends most of its time in the normal branch. The degree reaches 1.22 percent at an angle of 38 degrees in the 2-8 keV band. Joint modeling of the spectrum and polarization shows that this signal arises from a single component, either the blackbody or the Comptonized emission. The accretion disk contributes no measurable polarization. Radio flux drops from the horizontal branch to the normal branch, indicating the jet changes with position on the Z-track.

What carries the argument

Joint spectro-polarimetric modeling that isolates polarization contributions from individual spectral components (blackbody, disk, Comptonized).

What would settle it

A spectro-polarimetric fit in which allowing the disk a nonzero polarization contribution improves the match to the data by more than the single-component model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The joint spectro-polarimetric modeling is consistent with the observed X-ray polarization originating from a single spectral component from the blackbody or the Comptonized emission while the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization.

Load-bearing premise

The X-ray spectrum can be decomposed into distinct blackbody, disk, and Comptonized components whose polarization can be attributed reliably to only one of them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Polarization degree is weaker in the normal branch than in the horizontal branch but the angle remains the same.
  • Polarization degree shows a marginal rise with energy while the angle stays constant.
  • Radio flux is lower in the normal branch than in the horizontal branch, consistent with an evolving jet.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single-component origin would constrain the geometry of the inner flow or corona around the neutron star.
  • Absence of disk polarization suggests either the disk itself produces little polarized light or its contribution is diluted in the observed band.
  • Repeating the campaign on other Z-sources could test whether polarization attribution follows the same pattern across the class.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first IXPE X-ray polarization measurement of the Z-source GX 340+0 in the normal branch (NB), yielding PD = 1.22 ± 0.25% and PA = 38 ± 6° in 2–8 keV from a 200 ks observation. Simultaneous NICER, AstroSat, Insight-HXMT, ATCA, and GMRT data show the source tracing a full Z-track, with radio flux decreasing from HB to NB. Joint spectro-polarimetric fits indicate the observed polarization is consistent with arising from a single component (blackbody or Comptonized emission) while the diskbb component contributes zero polarization; PD is weaker than in the HB but PA is aligned.

Significance. If the component attribution holds, the result supplies the first direct polarization constraint on emission geometry in the NB of a Z-source and shows continuity of PA across branches, tightening models of Comptonization and boundary-layer emission. The multi-instrument campaign and energy-dependent PD trend are additional strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3] §4.3 (joint spectro-polarimetric modeling): the claim that 'the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization' is load-bearing for the central interpretation yet rests on a single continuum parametrization (diskbb + bbody + comptt/nthcomp). No Δχ² or posterior comparison is reported when PD of the diskbb component is left free, nor when seed-photon temperature or optical depth are varied within their 1σ ranges; given known 2–8 keV degeneracies among the three continua, this leaves the attribution model-dependent rather than data-driven.
  2. [Table 2 / Figure 5] Table 2 / Figure 5 (polarization vs. component flux fractions): the reported PD values for individual components assume the best-fit fluxes from the joint IXPE+NICER+AstroSat+HXMT continuum model; no systematic test is shown for how ±10% shifts in NH or blackbody normalization (within the quoted uncertainties) re-partition flux and alter which component is required to carry the polarization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2.1] §2.1: the energy band for the quoted PD/PA (2–8 keV) should be stated explicitly in the abstract as well.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the radio light-curve panels lack error bars on the non-detections; clarify whether they are 3σ upper limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The comments identify important aspects of the spectro-polarimetric analysis that require additional robustness checks. We address each point below and will incorporate the suggested tests in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 (joint spectro-polarimetric modeling): the claim that 'the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization' is load-bearing for the central interpretation yet rests on a single continuum parametrization (diskbb + bbody + comptt/nthcomp). No Δχ² or posterior comparison is reported when PD of the diskbb component is left free, nor when seed-photon temperature or optical depth are varied within their 1σ ranges; given known 2–8 keV degeneracies among the three continua, this leaves the attribution model-dependent rather than data-driven.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation relies on the best-fit continuum model without explicit tests of the diskbb polarization degree. In the revised manuscript we will add fits in which the PD of the diskbb component is left free, report the resulting Δχ² (or Bayesian evidence) relative to the baseline model, and repeat the exercise after shifting the seed-photon temperature and optical depth within their 1σ uncertainties. These new results will be presented in an expanded §4.3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 2 / Figure 5] Table 2 / Figure 5 (polarization vs. component flux fractions): the reported PD values for individual components assume the best-fit fluxes from the joint IXPE+NICER+AstroSat+HXMT continuum model; no systematic test is shown for how ±10% shifts in NH or blackbody normalization (within the quoted uncertainties) re-partition flux and alter which component is required to carry the polarization.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the flux partitioning between components is sensitive to the adopted N_H and blackbody normalization. In the revision we will perform the requested systematic test: we will vary N_H and the blackbody normalization by ±10% (and within their quoted 1σ uncertainties), re-fit the polarized components, and show how the required PD values for each component change. The updated results will be added to the discussion of Table 2 and Figure 5. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: direct observational measurement and standard spectral modeling

full rationale

The paper reports a direct IXPE polarization measurement (PD 1.22±0.25%, PA 38±6°) and uses joint spectro-polarimetric fitting across instruments to test component contributions. No equation or modeling step reduces by construction to a parameter defined in terms of the target polarization attribution; the disk-non-contribution conclusion follows from comparing model fits to the observed Stokes parameters rather than from any self-referential definition or fitted-input prediction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claim, which remains externally falsifiable against the raw polarization data.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard instrument calibration and spectral component separation rather than new postulates or free parameters introduced by the paper.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption IXPE instrument response and calibration allow accurate polarization measurements in the 2-8 keV band.
    Required for any reported polarization degree and angle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray and Radio Campaign of the Z-source GX 340+0 II: the X-ray polarization in the normal branch." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2411.00350

@misc{pith2026241100350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray and Radio Campaign of the Z-source GX 340+0 II: the X-ray polarization in the normal branch},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2411.00350}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.00350}
}
abstract

We present the first X-ray polarization measurement of the neutron star low-mass X-ray binary and Z-source, GX 340$+$0, in the normal branch (NB) using a 200 ks observation with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetric Explorer (IXPE). This observation was performed in 2024 August. Along with IXPE, we also conducted simultaneous observations with NICER, AstroSat, Insight-HXMT, ATCA, and GMRT to investigate the broadband spectral and timing properties in the X-ray and radio wavelengths. During the campaign, the source traced a complete Z-track during the IXPE observation but spent most of the time in the NB. We measure X-ray polarization degree (PD) of $1.22\pm0.25\%$ in the 2-8 keV energy band with a polarization angle (PA) of $38\pm6^\circ$. The PD in the NB is observed to be weaker than in the horizontal branch (HB) but aligned in the same direction. The PD of the source exhibits a marginal increase with energy while the PA shows no energy dependence. The joint spectro-polarimetric modeling is consistent with the observed X-ray polarization originating from a single spectral component from the blackbody or the Comptonized emission while the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization. GMRT observations at 1.26 GHz during HB had a tentative detection at 4.5$\pm$0.7 mJy while ATCA observations a day later during the NB detected the source at 0.70$\pm$0.05 mJy and 0.59$\pm$0.05 mJy in the 5.5 & 9 GHz bands, respectively, suggesting an evolving jet structure depending on the Z-track position.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.00350 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The evolution of GX 340+0 as seen by IXPE is shown as black diamonds. The IXPE observation was supplemented with joint observations with NICER (in orange circles), AstroSat (LAXPC light curve as green crosses), and Insight-HXMT (LE light curve as purple squares). The observation log of these instruments is noted in table 1. The light curves from NICER, AstroSat-LAXPC and Insight-HXMT/LE are scaled to highlight the s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hardness intensity diagrams (HIDs) of GX 340+0 as seen by different observatories during the X-ray and radio campaign. The NICER and AstroSat HIDs (top left and bottom left, respectively) indicate that the source traversed through all the states during the campaign. Comparing the HID and light curve in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top-left: Count spectra of GX 340+0 as observed during the NB by various instruments (depicted in different colors and markers indicated in the legend). Bottom-left: Best fit model (tbabs*(diskbb+bbodyrad+nthcomp+gaussian)*edge) used to fit the count spectra is shown in the black solid curve, individual components are shown as various lines (indicated in the legend). Right panels: Residuals (χ = data−model error ) a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Model-independent polarization of GX 340+0 during the NB. The markers depict the estimated PD and PA in the corresponding energy bins while the solid and the dashed lines correspond to 1 and 3σ confidence intervals. Polarization was detected at > 3σ level in the 3.2–5 …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: HID of GX 340+0 as seen by AstroSat-LAXPC in the soft energy range. To highlight the overlap of the FB/EFB and the NB in the soft energy range, we depict the FB/EFB (as seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. X-ray polarization of Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries -- II. Spectropolarimetric analysis

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Comptonized component in Z-type neutron-star X-ray binaries is polarized at 3–6% (up to ~6% in the horizontal branch), exceeding spreading-layer model predictions, while disk polarization stays below ~4% with a no...

  2. The Structure of the Relativistic Fe Line in GX 340+0 as Viewed with XRISM/Resolve, NICER, and NuSTAR

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Fe K line of GX 340+0 shows a dual-peaked structure with residual narrow emission features at the ~5% level that RELXILLNS reflection modeling alone does not reproduce.

  3. X-ray polarization of Z-type neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries -- I. Model-independent, time-resolved X-ray polarimetry

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Z-sources show decreasing X-ray polarization from the horizontal to the normal branch, then an increase in the flaring branch, with state-dependent polarization angle rotations in Sco X-1 and GX 349+2.

  4. X-ray polarization study of the neutron star low-mass X-ray binary GX 349+2

    astro-ph.HE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GX 349+2 shows 2-8 keV X-ray polarization of 1.1 +/- 0.3% at angle 32 +/- 6 degrees; branch-resolved and component-level polarization are mostly unconstrained.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    v+R. " "

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2021

  4. [4]

    M., Agrawal , P

    Antia , H. M., Agrawal , P. C., Dedhia , D., et al. 2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 32, 10.1007/s12036-021-09712-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-021-09712-8 2021

  5. [5]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  6. [6]

    D., et al

    Baldini , L., Bucciantini , N., Lalla , N. D., et al. 2022, SoftwareX, 19, 101194, 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194

    work page doi:10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194 2022

  7. [7]

    K., & Church , M

    Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., Gibiec , A., Jackson , N. K., & Church , M. J. 2010, , 512, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913199

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913199 2010

  8. [8]

    Berendsen , S. G. H., Fender , R., Kuulkers , E., Heise , J., & van der Klis , M. 2000, , 318, 599, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03850.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03850.x 2000

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    2023, , 955, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/acee7a

    Bhargava , Y., Bhattacharyya , S., Homan , J., & Pahari , M. 2023, , 955, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/acee7a

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19324, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19324

    Bhargava , Y., Ng , M., Zhang , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19324, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19324

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16023, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16023

    Bobrikova , A., Poutanen , J., & Loktev , V. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16023, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16023

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    F., Geldzahler , B

    Bradshaw , C. F., Geldzahler , B. J., & Fomalont , E. B. 2003, , 592, 486, 10.1086/375577

    2003 doi

  5. [13]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    2011, , 418, 490, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19499.x

    Chakraborty, M., Bhattacharyya, S., & Mukherjee, A. 2011, , 418, 490, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19499.x

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    P., Zhang , S., Qu , J

    Chen , Y. P., Zhang , S., Qu , J. L., et al. 2018, , 864, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/aadc0e

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Dimbylow , O., Peach , C., & Balucinska-Church , M

    Church , M. J., Dimbylow , O., Peach , C., & Balucinska-Church , M. 2010, , 81, 275, 10.48550/arXiv.0910.4260

    2010 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    J., Gibiec , A., Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., & Jackson , N

    Church , M. J., Gibiec , A., Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., & Jackson , N. K. 2012, , 546, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201218987

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Halai , G

    Church , M. J., Halai , G. S., & Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M. 2006, , 460, 233, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065035

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    2023, , 674, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346275

    Cocchi , M., Gnarini , A., Fabiani , S., et al. 2023, , 674, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346275

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    2022, , 164, 103, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7719

    Di Marco , A., Fabiani , S., La Monaca , F., et al. 2022, , 164, 103, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7719

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    2023, , 165, 143, 10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f

    Di Marco , A., Soffitta , P., Costa , E., et al. 2023, , 165, 143, 10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    2024, , 684, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347374

    Fabiani , S., Capitanio , F., Iaria , R., et al. 2024, , 684, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347374

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    2023, , 519, 3681, 10.1093/mnras/stac3726

    Farinelli , R., Fabiani , S., Poutanen , J., et al. 2023, , 519, 3681, 10.1093/mnras/stac3726

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    2004 a , , 427, 222, 10.1038/nature02137

    Fender , R., Wu , K., Johnston , H., et al. 2004 a , , 427, 222, 10.1038/nature02137

    2004 doi

  17. [25]

    P., Belloni , T

    Fender , R. P., Belloni , T. M., & Gallo , E. 2004 b , , 355, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    B., Geldzahler , B

    Fomalont , E. B., Geldzahler , B. J., & Bradshaw , C. F. 2001 a , , 553, L27, 10.1086/320490

    2001 doi

  19. [27]

    2001 b , , 558, 283, 10.1086/322479

    ---. 2001 b , , 558, 283, 10.1086/322479

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    V., Tsygankov , S

    Forsblom , S. V., Tsygankov , S. S., Poutanen , J., et al. 2024, , 691, A216, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450937

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    K., Homan , J., & Remillard , R

    Fridriksson , J. K., Homan , J., & Remillard , R. A. 2015, , 809, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/52

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    C., Arzoumanian , Z., Adkins , P

    Gendreau , K. C., Arzoumanian , Z., Adkins , P. W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 99051H, 10.1117/12.2231304

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    2011, in The X-ray Universe 2011, ed

    Gibiec , A., Balucinska-Church , M., & Church , M. 2011, in The X-ray Universe 2011, ed. J.-U. Ness & M. Ehle , 212

    2011

  24. [32]

    2022, , 514, 2561, 10.1093/mnras/stac1523

    Gnarini , A., Ursini , F., Matt , G., et al. 2022, , 514, 2561, 10.1093/mnras/stac1523

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    1989, , 225, 79

    Hasinger , G., & van der Klis , M. 1989, , 225, 79

    1989

  26. [34]

    2016, , 594, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    HI4PI Collaboration , Ben Bekhti , N., Fl \"o er , L., et al. 2016, , 594, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Han , X

    Hjellming , R. M., Han , X. H., Cordova , F. A., & Hasinger , G. 1990 a , , 235, 147

    1990

  28. [36]

    M., Stewart , R

    Hjellming , R. M., Stewart , R. T., White , G. L., et al. 1990 b , , 365, 681, 10.1086/169522

    1990 doi

  29. [37]

    2007, , 656, 420, 10.1086/510447

    Homan , J., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R., et al. 2007, , 656, 420, 10.1086/510447

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    K., et al

    Homan , J., van der Klis , M., Fridriksson , J. K., et al. 2010, , 719, 201, 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/201

    2010 doi

  31. [39]

    2019 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1393, 10.21105/joss.01393

    Huppenkothen , D., Bachetti , M., Stevens , A., et al. 2019 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1393, 10.21105/joss.01393

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    L., et al

    Huppenkothen , D., Bachetti , M., Stevens , A. L., et al. 2019 b , , 881, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d

    2019 doi

  33. [41]

    2006, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 6, 257, 10.1088/1009-9271/6/S1/33

    Iaria , R., Lavagetto , G., Di Salvo , T., et al. 2006, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 6, 257, 10.1088/1009-9271/6/S1/33

    2006 doi

  34. [42]

    A., & Sunyaev , R

    Inogamov , N. A., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1999, Astronomy Letters, 25, 269, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9904333

    1999 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    G., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R., et al

    Jonker , P. G., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R., et al. 2000, , 537, 374, 10.1086/309029

    2000 doi

  36. [44]

    S., & Bleeker , J

    Kaastra , J. S., & Bleeker , J. A. M. 2016, , 587, A151, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    A., Sudha , M., & Ludlam , R

    Kaddouh , M. A., Sudha , M., & Ludlam , R. M. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 243, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad7e22

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Kale , R., & Ishwara-Chandra , C. H. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 95, 10.1007/s10686-020-09677-6

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    2015, Astroparticle Physics, 68, 45, 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.007

    Kislat , F., Clark , B., Beilicke , M., & Krawczynski , H. 2015, Astroparticle Physics, 68, 45, 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.007

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    M., et al

    La Monaca , F., Di Marco , A., Ludlam , R. M., et al. 2024 a , , 691, A253, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451966

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    2024 b , , 960, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad132d

    La Monaca , F., Di Marco , A., Poutanen , J., et al. 2024 b , , 960, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad132d

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Lapidus , I. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1985, , 217, 291, 10.1093/mnras/217.2.291

    1985 doi

  43. [51]

    Li , L.-X., Narayan , R., & McClintock , J. E. 2009, , 691, 847, 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/847

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    A., & Homan , J

    Lin , D., Remillard , R. A., & Homan , J. 2009, , 696, 1257, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1257

    2009 doi

  45. [53]

    A., Homan , J., & Barret , D

    Lin , D., Remillard , R. A., Homan , J., & Barret , D. 2012, , 756, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/34

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    2024, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol

    Markwardt , C., Arzoumanian , Z., Gendreau , K., Hare , J., & Nicer Team . 2024, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol. 21, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, 105.36

    2024

  47. [55]

    Migliari , S., & Fender , R. P. 2006, , 366, 79, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09777.x

    2006 doi

  48. [56]

    Migliari , S., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., Fender , R. P., et al. 2007, , 671, 706, 10.1086/522516

    2007 doi

  49. [57]

    W., Margon , B., & Burton , M

    Miller , B. W., Margon , B., & Burton , M. G. 1993, , 106, 28, 10.1086/116617

    1993 doi

  50. [58]

    M., Raymond , J., Cackett , E., Grinberg , V., & Nowak , M

    Miller , J. M., Raymond , J., Cackett , E., Grinberg , V., & Nowak , M. 2016, , 822, L18, 10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L18

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    Misra , R., Roy , J., & Yadav , J. S. 2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 55, 10.1007/s12036-021-09734-2

    2021 doi

  52. [60]

    1989, , 41, 97

    Mitsuda , K., Inoue , H., Nakamura , N., & Tanaka , Y. 1989, , 41, 97

    1989

  53. [61]

    E., & Fender , R

    Motta , S. E., & Fender , R. P. 2019, , 483, 3686, 10.1093/mnras/sty3331

    2019 doi

  54. [62]

    K., Homan , J., et al

    Ng , M., Hughes , A. K., Homan , J., et al. 2024, , 966, 232, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad35bd

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    Oosterbroek , T., Lewin , W. H. G., van Paradijs , J., et al. 1994, , 281, 803

    1994

  56. [64]

    Penninx , W., Zwarthoed , G. A. A., van Paradijs , J., et al. 1993, , 267, 92

    1993

  57. [65]

    Priedhorsky , W., Hasinger , G., Lewin , W. H. G., et al. 1986, , 306, L91, 10.1086/184712

    1986 doi

  58. [66]

    2024, , 961, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1832

    Rankin , J., La Monaca , F., Di Marco , A., et al. 2024, , 961, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1832

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    2013, , 766, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/63

    Seifina , E., Titarchuk , L., & Frontera , F. 2013, , 766, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/63

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Shakura , N. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1988, Advances in Space Research, 8, 135, 10.1016/0273-1177(88)90396-1

    1988 doi

  61. [69]

    P., Tandon , S

    Singh , K. P., Tandon , S. N., Agrawal , P. C., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9144, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. T. Takahashi , J.-W. A. den Herder , & M. Bautz , 91...

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    P., Homan , J., & Kuulkers , E

    Smale , A. P., Homan , J., & Kuulkers , E. 2003, , 590, 1035, 10.1086/375047

    2003 doi

  63. [71]

    R., & Choi , C

    Sriram , K., Rao , A. R., & Choi , C. S. 2011, , 743, L31, 10.1088/2041-8205/743/2/L31

    2011 doi

  64. [72]

    2004, arXiv e-prints, astro

    van der Klis , M. 2004, arXiv e-prints, astro. astro-ph/0410551

    2004 arXiv

  65. [73]

    A., Ferland , G

    Verner , D. A., Ferland , G. J., Korista , K. T., & Yakovlev , D. G. 1996, , 465, 487, 10.1086/177435

    1996 doi

  66. [74]

    E., Stella , L., & Parmar , A

    White , N. E., Stella , L., & Parmar , A. N. 1988, , 324, 363, 10.1086/165901

    1988 doi

  67. [75]

    2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    2000 doi

  68. [76]

    S., Agrawal , P

    Yadav , J. S., Agrawal , P. C., Antia , H. M., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 591, 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/591-594

    2017 doi

  69. [77]

    S., Agrawal , P

    Yadav , J. S., Agrawal , P. C., Antia , H. M., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder , T. Takahashi , & M. Bautz , 990...

    2016 doi

  70. [78]

    A., Johnson , W

    Zdziarski , A. A., Johnson , W. N., & Magdziarz , P. 1996, , 283, 193, 10.1093/mnras/283.1.193

    1996 doi

  71. [79]

    2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249502, 10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6

    Zhang , S.-N., Li , T., Lu , F., et al. 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249502, 10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6

    2020 doi

  72. [80]

    T., Done , C., & Smith , D

    \.Z ycki , P. T., Done , C., & Smith , D. A. 1999, , 309, 561, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02885.x

    1999 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.