pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.12906 · v3 · submitted 2024-11-19 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Experimental Study of Underwater Acoustic Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces with Synthetic Reflection

Yu Luo , Lina Pu , Aijun Song This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 08:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords underwater acoustic communicationreconfigurable intelligent surfacesynthetic reflectionbeam steeringrange extensionfield experimentacoustic reflector array
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 4x6 underwater acoustic reconfigurable surface using synthetic reflection extends communication ranges by 28 to 66 percent in lake field tests.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds and tests a prototype UA-RIS made of paired acoustic reflectors that apply a synthetic reflection method to set the amplitude and phase of returning sound waves. This control lets the surface steer beams toward chosen directions while cutting side lobes. Tank and lake experiments with a continuous-wave source show the device works as intended. When mounted near the transmitter the surface lengthens range by 28 percent in deep water and 46 percent in shallow water and raises received SNR by roughly 2 dB on average. Placement near the receiver produces still larger range gains of 40.6 percent in shallow water and 66 percent in deep water together with SNR increases averaging 2.56 dB.

Core claim

A prototype UA-RIS composed of 4 by 6 reflection units implements synthetic reflection to control the amplitude and phase of acoustic waves, enabling directed beam steering; lake and tank measurements confirm that sender-side deployment increases range by 28 percent in deep water and 46 percent in shallow water while receiver-side deployment increases range by 40.6 percent in shallow water and 66 percent in deep water, with corresponding SNR gains of 2.13 dB and 2.56 dB on average.

What carries the argument

Synthetic reflection scheme implemented with multiple pairs of acoustic reflectors that jointly set amplitude and phase of the reflected wavefront.

If this is right

  • Sender-side UA-RIS placement raises received SNR by an average of 2.13 dB with peaks near 2.92 dB at fixed distance.
  • Receiver-side placement raises SNR by an average of 2.56 dB with peaks near 4.2 dB.
  • The same 4x6 unit array produces usable beam steering in both tank and open-lake conditions.
  • Range-extension percentages hold across the two water-depth regimes examined in the field trials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same control approach could be scaled to larger arrays to reach still greater distances without raising transmit power.
  • Integration with existing underwater sensor networks might allow lower-power nodes by off-loading beam forming to the surface.
  • Tests in moving water with surface waves or strong currents would reveal whether the reported gains remain stable.

Load-bearing premise

The 4x6 prototype actually achieves the intended amplitude and phase shifts on reflected sound waves without unaccounted losses or coupling to the surrounding water that would change the measured ranges and SNR values.

What would settle it

A direct far-field beam-pattern measurement at the test frequencies that shows the main lobe pointing more than a few degrees away from the commanded direction or side-lobe levels higher than those reported in the lake trials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12906 by Aijun Song, Lina Pu, Yu Luo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: UA-RIS assisted long-range underwater acoustic communica [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Typical channel usage of marine life and human-made acoustic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Architecture of the UA-RIS. resistor network has only one stage designed to generate the in￾phase or antiphase component required for synthetic reflection. Conversely, both the capacitive and inductive networks feature three stages each, dedicated to producing the quadrature com￾ponent for synthetic reflection. Resistor network contains an AD8403AR50 programmable potentiometer, whose resistance is managed … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Tonpilz reflector used in our UA-RIS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Power consumption of the UA-RIS at various supply voltages. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 3D structure of the acoustic reflector constructed for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stress distributions of acoustic reflectors under various load [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Normalized reflected beam patterns produced by different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Received signal strength with one selected reflector pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Variation in strength of the received signal with changes in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Waveform of the received signal with variations in load [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Waveform comparison of received signals with and without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Differential signal with inductive and capacitive loads at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Envelopes of received signals with various coding schemes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Load configuration of UA-RIS for beamforming at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Envelopes of received signals with various coding schemes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Load configuration of UA-RIS for beamforming at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents an underwater acoustic reconfigurable intelligent surface (UA-RIS) designed for long-range, high-speed, and environmentally friendly communication in oceanic environments. The proposed UA-RIS comprises multiple pairs of acoustic reflectors that utilize a synthetic reflection scheme to flexibly control the amplitude and phase of reflected waves. This capability enables precise beam steering to enhance or attenuate sound levels in specific directions. A prototype UA-RIS with 4*6 acoustic reflection units is constructed and tested in both tank and lake environments to evaluate performance. Experimental results using a continuous wave (CW) as the source signal demonstrate that the prototype is capable of effectively pointing reflected waves to targeted directions while minimizing side lobes through synthetic reflection. Field tests reveal that deploying the UA-RIS on the sender side considerably extends communication ranges by 28% in deep water and 46% in shallow waters. Furthermore, with a fixed communication distance, positioning the UA-RIS at the transmitter side substantially boosts the receiving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), with an average increase of 2.13 dB and peaks up to 2.92 dB. When positioned on the receiver side, the UA-RIS can expand the communication range in shallow and deep water environments by 40.6% and 66%, respectively. Moreover, placing the UA-RIS close to the receiver enhances SNR by an average of 2.56 dB, reaching up to 4.2 dB under certain circumstances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the design of an underwater acoustic reconfigurable intelligent surface (UA-RIS) using a synthetic reflection scheme for amplitude/phase control and beam steering. A 4x6 prototype is fabricated and evaluated via tank and lake experiments with CW signals, reporting range extensions of 28% (deep water, transmitter-side), 46% (shallow water, transmitter-side), 40.6% (shallow, receiver-side), and 66% (deep, receiver-side), along with SNR gains averaging 2.13–2.56 dB (peaks to 4.2 dB).

Significance. If the measurements are reliable, the work supplies a direct hardware demonstration of UA-RIS feasibility for extending underwater acoustic communication ranges, which is a concrete step toward practical oceanic applications. The use of physical tank and lake trials rather than simulation alone is a strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and field-test results: the reported range extensions (28%, 46%, 40.6%, 66%) and SNR gains are given without error bars, number of trials averaged, or statistical significance, undermining assessment of whether the improvements exceed measurement variability.
  2. [Field tests] Field-test results: no baseline range or SNR data without the UA-RIS are provided, so the claimed percentage extensions cannot be directly verified from the presented measurements.
  3. [Experimental results] Prototype construction and experimental setup: potential confounds (surface reflections, multipath, source/receiver directivity, or environmental coupling) are not quantified or ruled out, leaving open whether the synthetic reflection scheme alone accounts for the observed gains.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the prototype uses a 4*6 array but does not specify operating frequency, reflector dimensions, or control electronics, which would improve reproducibility.
  2. Consider adding a summary table of all range/SNR results across configurations and environments for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of result presentation and experimental rigor. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly where data and analysis permit.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and field-test results: the reported range extensions (28%, 46%, 40.6%, 66%) and SNR gains are given without error bars, number of trials averaged, or statistical significance, undermining assessment of whether the improvements exceed measurement variability.

    Authors: We agree that measures of variability strengthen the interpretation of field results. Our experimental logs contain repeated trials for each configuration (typically 5–8 per setting). In the revised manuscript we will report the number of trials, mean values, and standard deviations (or error bars) for the reported range extensions and SNR gains, allowing readers to evaluate whether the observed improvements exceed measurement variability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Field tests] Field-test results: no baseline range or SNR data without the UA-RIS are provided, so the claimed percentage extensions cannot be directly verified from the presented measurements.

    Authors: Baseline measurements without the UA-RIS were performed under identical conditions to establish reference ranges and SNRs; these data were used internally to compute the percentage extensions. We will add an explicit table (or supplementary figure) in the revised manuscript that lists the without-UA-RIS ranges/SNRs next to the with-UA-RIS values, enabling direct verification of the 28 %, 46 %, 40.6 %, and 66 % figures. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experimental results] Prototype construction and experimental setup: potential confounds (surface reflections, multipath, source/receiver directivity, or environmental coupling) are not quantified or ruled out, leaving open whether the synthetic reflection scheme alone accounts for the observed gains.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original text does not quantify these factors in detail. The tank tests employed acoustic absorbers on boundaries, and lake trials were conducted under low-wind, calm-surface conditions with fixed source/receiver orientations. In the revision we will expand the experimental-setup section with a dedicated paragraph describing these controls and, where possible, providing qualitative estimates of residual multipath from the recorded beam patterns. While complete elimination of all environmental coupling is not feasible in open-water tests, the directional consistency of the gains supports the contribution of the synthetic-reflection scheme. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is an experimental hardware study whose central claims consist of measured range extensions (28-66%) and SNR gains (2.13-4.2 dB) obtained from tank and lake field tests of a 4x6 prototype under the synthetic reflection scheme. These quantities are reported as direct physical observations rather than outputs of any derivation, model, or fitted parameter. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes appear as load-bearing steps in the reported results; the validity therefore rests on measurement fidelity, not on any internal reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work is hardware-driven and introduces no new mathematical axioms or free parameters; the central claims rest on the physical construction and test conditions rather than derived equations.

invented entities (1)
  • synthetic reflection scheme no independent evidence
    purpose: to flexibly control amplitude and phase of reflected acoustic waves using pairs of reflectors
    Described in the abstract as the core mechanism enabling beam steering; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the reported experiments is given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5794 in / 1338 out tokens · 19421 ms · 2026-05-23T08:14:41.641684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ML-ARIS: Multilayer Underwater Acoustic Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface with High-Resolution Reflection Control

    eess.AS 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ML-ARIS uses multiple piezoelectric layers per acoustic reflector with independent impedance control to achieve passive synthetic reflection with high-resolution amplitude and phase for underwater beam steering.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Beyond limitations of 5G with RIS: Field trial in a commercial network, recent advances, and future directions,

    H. Yang, S. Kim, H. Kim, S. Bang, Y . Kim, S. Kim, K. Park, D. Kwon, and J. Oh, “Beyond limitations of 5G with RIS: Field trial in a commercial network, recent advances, and future directions,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 132 – 138, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: recent advances and the road to 6G,

    Q. Wu, B. Zheng, C. You, L. Zhu, K. Shen, X. Shao, W. Mei, B. Di, H. Zhang, E. Basaret al., “Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: recent advances and the road to 6G,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 724 – 763, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    High-data-rate long-range under- water communications via acoustic reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    Z. Sun, H. Guo, and I. F. Akyildiz, “High-data-rate long-range under- water communications via acoustic reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 96–102, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Designing acoustic reconfigurable intelligent surface for underwater communica- tions,

    H. Wang, Z. Sun, H. Guo, P. Wang, and I. F. Akyildiz, “Designing acoustic reconfigurable intelligent surface for underwater communica- tions,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8934 – 8948, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Wirewalker wave-powered profiler,

    D. M. Oceanographic, “Wirewalker wave-powered profiler,” Del Mar Oceanographic LLC, 2021, [Accessed: January, 2024]. [Online]. Available: https://www.delmarocean.com

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Challenges and oppor- tunities of underwater cognitive acoustic networks,

    Y . Luo, L. Pu, M. Zuba, Z. Peng, and J.-H. Cui, “Challenges and oppor- tunities of underwater cognitive acoustic networks,”IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 198–211, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Echolocation in marine mammals,

    W. J. Richardson, C. R. Greene Jr, C. I. Malme, and D. H. Thomson, “Echolocation in marine mammals,” inMarine Mammals and Noise. Academic press, 2013, pp. 159–202

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Prototyping a Power Take-off for the Wirewalker Wave- powered Profiling Vehicle,

    T. Kelly, “Prototyping a Power Take-off for the Wirewalker Wave- powered Profiling Vehicle,” Master’s thesis, University of California, San Diego, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Rotated feed-combined reconfigurable transmit RIS with disparate deployment of 1-bit hybrid units for B5G/6G,

    J. Kim, J. Kim, J. H. Oh, S.-H. Wi, and J. Oh, “Rotated feed-combined reconfigurable transmit RIS with disparate deployment of 1-bit hybrid units for B5G/6G,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 5457–5462, 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Optimum waveform estimation,

    H. L. V . Trees, “Optimum waveform estimation,” inOptimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. New York, NY , USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2002, pp. 428–666

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    Resonance effects in periodic structures,

    B. A. Munk, “Resonance effects in periodic structures,” inFrequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, pp. 63–77

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials,

    T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, and Q. Cheng, “Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials,” Light: science & applications, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. e218–e218, 2014

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: wireless communication perspective,

    S. Hassouna, M. A. Jamshed, J. Rains, J. u. R. Kazim, M. U. Rehman, M. Abualhayja, L. Mohjazi, T. J. Cui, M. A. Imran, and Q. H. Abbasi, “A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: wireless communication perspective,”IET Communications, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 497–537, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Security and privacy for reconfigurable intelligent surface in 6G: a review of prospective applications and challenges,

    F. Naeem, M. Ali, G. Kaddoum, C. Huang, and C. Yuen, “Security and privacy for reconfigurable intelligent surface in 6G: a review of prospective applications and challenges,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 4, pp. 1196–1217, 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Application of varactor diodes for reflectarray phase control,

    L. Boccia, F. Venneri, G. Amendola, and G. Di Massa, “Application of varactor diodes for reflectarray phase control,” inIEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. IEEE, June 2002, p. 132

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Modeling and design of electronically tunable reflectarrays,

    S. V . Hum, M. Okoniewski, and R. J. Davies, “Modeling and design of electronically tunable reflectarrays,”IEEE transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2200–2210, 2007

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    Increasing indoor spectrum sharing capacity using smart reflect-array,

    X. Tan, Z. Sun, J. M. Jornet, and D. Pados, “Increasing indoor spectrum sharing capacity using smart reflect-array,” in2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, May 2016, pp. 1–6

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Ris-aided wireless communications: prototyping, adaptive beamforming, and indoor/outdoor field trials,

    X. Pei, H. Yin, L. Tan, L. Cao, Z. Li, K. Wang, K. Zhang, and E. Bj¨ornson, “Ris-aided wireless communications: prototyping, adaptive beamforming, and indoor/outdoor field trials,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 8627–8640, 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Intelligent reflecting surface: practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,

    S. Abeywickrama, R. Zhang, Q. Wu, and C. Yuen, “Intelligent reflecting surface: practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5849–5863, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Active impedance metasurface with full 360 reflection phase tuning,

    B. O. Zhu, J. Zhao, and Y . Feng, “Active impedance metasurface with full 360 reflection phase tuning,”Scientific reports, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3059, 2013

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Underwater acoustic stealth by a broadband 2-bit coding metasurface,

    G. Yu, Y . Qiu, Y . Li, X. Wang, and N. Wang, “Underwater acoustic stealth by a broadband 2-bit coding metasurface,”Physical Review Applied, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 064064, 2021. 16

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Enabling long-range underwater backscatter via Van Atta acoustic networks,

    A. Eid, J. Rademacher, W. Akbar, P. Wang, A. Allam, and F. Adib, “Enabling long-range underwater backscatter via Van Atta acoustic networks,” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2023 Conference, September 2023, pp. 1–19

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Performance analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted underwater optical communication system,

    K. O. Odeyemi, P. A. Owolawi, and O. O. Olakanmi, “Performance analysis of reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted underwater optical communication system,”Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, vol. 98, pp. 101–111, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Performance evaluation of re- configurable intelligent surface-assisted underwater and free-space wire- less optical communication in the skip-zones,

    P. N. Ramavath and W.-Y . Chung, “Performance evaluation of re- configurable intelligent surface-assisted underwater and free-space wire- less optical communication in the skip-zones,”ICT Express, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 320–329, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Performance analysis of a dual-hop parallel relayed mixed FSO-UWOC system,

    S. Yadav, M. Aggarwal, A. Vats, and S. Ahuja, “Performance analysis of a dual-hop parallel relayed mixed FSO-UWOC system,”Journal of Optical Communications, no. 0, 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Fully electrically driven liquid crystal reconfigurable intelligent surface for terahertz beam steering,

    L. Xu, K. Li, G. Zhang, J. Yang, Z. Yin, M. Zhong, H. Lu, G. Deng, and Y . Li, “Fully electrically driven liquid crystal reconfigurable intelligent surface for terahertz beam steering,”IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    ZETEX Semiconductors,830 series silicon 25V hyperabrupt varactor diodes, ZETEX Semiconductors, Zetex Technology Park, Chadderton Oldham, UK, January 2007

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    NTE Electronics Inc.,NTE618 varactor silicon tuning diode for AM radio, NTE Electronics Inc., Bloomfield, NJ, USA, March 2012

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Analog Devices,1-/2-/4-channel digital Potentiometers AD8400/AD8402/AD8403, Analog Devices Company, Wilmington, MA, USA, 2010

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    ——,256-Position I2C-compatible digital potentiometer, Analog De- vices Company, Wilmington, MA, USA, April 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Maxim Integrated,One-time programmable, linear-taper digital poten- tiometers, Maxim Integrated Company, San Jose, CA, USA, 2005

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    BT-2RCL acoustic transducer,

    B. Acoustics, “BT-2RCL acoustic transducer,” BTech Acoustics LLC, 2024, [Accessed: September, 2024]. [Online]. Available: https://www.btechacoustics.com/products/bt-2rcl

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Transducers and array processing,

    X. Lurton, “Transducers and array processing,” inAn Introduction to Underwater Acoustics: Principles and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2002, pp. 137–172

    work page 2002