REVIEW 1 cited by
Distributed Inference with Minimal Off-Chip Traffic for Transformers on Low-Power MCUs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Contextual Artificial Intelligence (AI) based on emerging Transformer models is predicted to drive the next technology revolution in interactive wearable devices such as new-generation smart glasses. By coupling numerous sensors with small, low-power Micro-Controller Units (MCUs), these devices will enable on-device intelligence and sensor control. A major bottleneck in this class of systems is the small amount of on-chip memory available in the MCUs. In this paper, we propose a methodology to deploy real-world Transformers on low-power wearable devices with minimal off-chip traffic exploiting a distributed system of MCUs, partitioning inference across multiple devices and enabling execution with stationary on-chip weights. We validate the scheme by deploying the TinyLlama-42M decoder-only model on a system of 8 parallel ultra-low-power MCUs. The distributed system achieves an energy consumption of 0.64 mJ, a latency of 0.54 ms per inference, a super-linear speedup of 26.1 x, and an Energy Delay Product (EDP) improvement of 27.2 x, compared to a single-chip system. On MobileBERT, the distributed system's runtime is 38.8 ms, with a super-linear 4.7 x speedup when using 4 MCUs compared to a single-chip system.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Recursive transformers for semiconductor thermo-mechanical reliability
Depth Recursive transformer, which injects the depth index as a state and uses per-step losses, gives the best accuracy-per-FLOP trade-off among three recursive weight-sharing designs on small engineering surrogate be...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.