Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

DrawSpeech: Expressive Speech Synthesis Using Prosodic Sketches as Control Conditions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A sketch-conditioned diffusion TTS model that turns coarse user-drawn pitch and energy trends into natural, precisely controlled speech.

desk verdict A genuinely new sketch-based prosody control for TTS, held back by a missing user study and a misread p-value. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04256 v1 pith:FNPF3HNN submitted 2025-01-08 cs.SD eess.AS

Weidong Chen , Shan Yang , Guangzhi Li , Xixin Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords prosodyspeechdrawspeechcontrolsketchesusersexpectedfine-grained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

DrawSpeech is a text-to-speech system that lets the user draw the general shape of the pitch or energy of a sentence, instead of choosing a reference recording or writing a description. The drawn curve, called a prosody sketch, indicates whether the voice should rise, fall, stress a word, or stay flat. A learned module turns this rough sketch into a detailed pitch and energy contour, and a latent diffusion model uses those contours along with the text to generate the audio.

The system is trained on the LJSpeech dataset, a single-speaker English corpus. During training, the model sees the true phoneme-level pitch and energy contours, and a smoothed version of them that plays the role of the sketch. This teaches the model to reconstruct full detail from a coarse trend. At inference, users can draw their own curve, and the model follows it.

The paper reports naturalness scores close to the original recordings and a subjective measure of how well the audio follows the sketch. The authors also show that the model can place emphasis on different words by drawing a peak on that word. However, the comparison systems were not designed for sketch input, and one headline result (surpassing ground truth) is not statistically significant, so the evidence is promising but not conclusive.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

DrawSpeech can generate speech with a wide variety of prosody and can precisely control the fine-grained prosody in a user-friendly manner (Abstract). The paper further reports a MOS of 4.49 with sketch conditions, exceeding the baseline models and matching ground truth naturalness within statistical noise.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that a Savitzky-Golay smoothed version of the true pitch/energy contour (the 'sketch') retains enough trend information for the sketch-to-contour predictor to reconstruct the detailed contour, and that hand-drawn sketches by users follow the same distribution as these automatically smoothed contours. This enters in Section II-A where the sketch is defined and is the basis for the entire control mechanism; if the smoothing loses load-bearing detail or user sketches are out-of-distribution, the predicted contours will not match user intent.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DrawSpeech, a text-to-speech system that conditions synthesis on a prosody sketch: a smoothed version of the pitch and energy contours. The sketch is intended to be an easy, user-drawn control signal that conveys the desired prosodic trend. The architecture consists of a sketch extractor that produces smoothed contours from ground truth during training, a sketch-to-contour predictor that reconstructs detailed pitch and energy contours from the sketch and text, and a latent diffusion model conditioned on the contours, sketches, and text. The experiments on LJSpeech report that DrawSpeech achieves a MOS of 4.49 under sketch conditions, an SC of 4.30, and lower RMSE than text-only synthesis when reconstructing reference prosody. The paper claims human-level quality and fine-grained, user-friendly prosody control.

Significance. If the method works as claimed, the prosody-sketch control signal is a genuinely novel and user-friendly paradigm for fine-grained prosody control in TTS, addressing a well-known limitation of both reference-speech prompting and natural-language description. The paper provides a clear architecture, open-source implementation, and public audio samples, which are strengths for reproducibility. However, the experimental evidence does not yet substantiate the strongest claim that arbitrary user-drawn sketches can precisely control prosody, and the ground-truth comparison is overstated. The core idea is defensible and likely of interest to the speech-synthesis community, but the presented support is incomplete.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II-A and Section III-B] The central claim that users can draw 'any prosody sketch' to achieve precise control is not supported by the evaluation. Training sketches are produced by Savitzky-Golay smoothing of ground-truth contours, but all quantitative evaluations (Tables I and III) use sketches extracted from reference speech, not user-drawn sketches. Figure 3 uses a few author-drawn sketches but is only a qualitative illustration. This leaves open the possibility that the sketch-to-contour predictor does not generalize to human-drawn sketches, which typically contain sharp corners, piecewise-linear segments, and emphasis patterns not present in smoothed natural contours. Please add a user study where participants draw sketches for a set of sentences and measure the correlation (SC) or the objective match between the drawn sketch and the synthesized speech's prosody, or at least provide a quantitative analysis of the distribution gap between SG-smoothed contours and user sketches.
  2. [Table II and Section III-B-2] The statement that sketch-conditioned DrawSpeech 'even slightly surpasses the ground truth speech' is not supported by the reported p-value of 0.058. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test with p > 0.05 indicates no statistically significant difference, so the correct interpretation is that DrawSpeech is comparable to ground truth, not superior. The text should be revised to avoid the misleading 'surpass' language, and the p-value should be interpreted as evidence of non-inferiority rather than superiority.
  3. [Section III-B-1, Table I] The comparison with FastSpeech 2 and NaturalSpeech 2 is not a head-to-head evaluation of the proposed control signal, because these baselines are given sketches without any training adaptation for such inputs. The resulting low MOS scores are expected and do not establish that DrawSpeech is superior for sketch-based control. The fine-tuned FastSpeech 2 (FT) is a more meaningful baseline, but it still integrates the proposed sketch extractor and predictor, so the comparison is not fully apples-to-apples. To strengthen the significance of the method, the authors should also compare DrawSpeech against state-of-the-art reference-based and text-based prosody control methods, not only against models that are not designed for sketches.
  4. [Section II-A and Section III-A-2] The Savitzky-Golay filter parameters (window size and polynomial order) are not reported. These parameters define the smoothness of the training sketches and therefore directly influence the sketch-to-contour predictor's behavior and the meaning of the control signal. Without these parameters, the method is not fully reproducible and the reader cannot assess whether the chosen smoothing is appropriate for the claimed user-friendly sketch interface. Please specify the filter configuration.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1] There are typos in the figure: 'V ocoder' should be 'Vocoder' and 'Ptich' should be 'Pitch'.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The text 'I did’t say you stole the money' contains a typo; it should be 'I didn’t say you stole the money'.
  3. [Section II-A] The phrase 'It’s much easier for users to draw a pitch sketch' should use 'It is' for formal style, and the sentence beginning 'because it relieve users’ burden' has a subject-verb agreement error; it should be 'because it relieves users’ burden'.
  4. [Section II-B, Eqs. (1) and (2)] The symbol P is used both for the pitch contour (Section II-A) and for the sketch-to-contour predictor (Eq. 2), which is confusing. Please rename the predictor, e.g., to F, to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Section III-A-4] The definition of the sketch correlation (SC) metric is incomplete: it is not stated how many samples were rated per listener, whether the listeners could see the sketch while rating, or how the ratings were aggregated. Please clarify the protocol.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the sketch-to-contour mapping is a supervised conditional model evaluated on held-out data and user-drawn examples; the user-sketch distribution gap is a generalization risk, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical rather than formal. In Section II-A the training sketch is defined as a Savitzky-Golay smoothed version of the ground-truth pitch/energy contour, and in Section II-B the sketch-to-contour predictor is trained on paired (smoothed contour, original contour) examples. This is a self-supervised conditional reconstruction task, but the paper does not present the reconstruction error as a first-principles prediction; it reports held-out RMSE in Table III, subjective MOS and sketch-correlation scores in Tables I-II, and qualitative user-drawn sketches in Fig. 3. The only circularity-adjacent concern is the assumption that hand-drawn sketches lie in the distribution of smoothed natural contours; the paper's direct evidence for user-drawn control is qualitative and limited, which is an external-validity/generalization risk rather than a step where a stated prediction reduces to its input by construction. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears; the architecture references to AudioLDM 2, FastSpeech, and HiFi-GAN are standard external building blocks, and the related-work citations to work by the present authors (e.g., refs. [6] and [22]) are not used to justify the central claim. The central claim is therefore self-contained with respect to its own evaluation protocol, and no specific circular reduction can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the definition of the sketch as a smoothed contour, on the recoverability of detail from that sketch, and on the assumption that user drawings match the training distribution. These are domain assumptions rather than fitted constants. The model parameters themselves are learned from data and are not counted as free parameters in this ledger.

free parameters (4)
  • Savitzky-Golay filter window size and polynomial order = Not specified
    The sketch is defined by smoothing the phoneme-level contour, but the filter parameters are not given. The smoothness of the sketch directly affects what information is retained and what the model must reconstruct.
  • Probability of dropping one sketch during training = 0.2
    Chosen by hand to allow single-sketch inference; affects how robustly the model handles missing pitch or energy sketches.
  • Number of discrete levels for contour quantization = 256
    The contour encoder quantizes pitch and energy into 256 discrete values; the granularity is a design choice with no ablation.
  • Normalization ranges = Contours normalized by dataset mean/variance; sketches normalized to [0,1]
    These choices affect the conditioning distributions but are not justified or ablated.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pitch and energy contours are sufficient to represent the controllable aspects of prosody.
    The paper focuses only on pitch and energy, ignoring duration, voice quality, and other prosodic dimensions. This is stated in the introduction and shapes the entire method.
  • domain assumption A Savitzky-Golay smoothed version of the contour (the sketch) retains the trend information needed to reconstruct the full contour.
    Section II-A assumes the smoothed sketch 'effectively captures the variation trends of the contour'; the entire sketch-to-contour predictor relies on this recoverability.
  • domain assumption User-drawn sketches are distributed similarly to the smoothed contours used in training.
    The model is trained only on automatically smoothed contours; during inference users draw sketches by hand. The paper does not analyze this domain gap.
  • standard math The latent diffusion model and VAE, adopted from AudioLDM 2, are suitable for speech synthesis and were trained as described.
    The paper relies on the correctness and compatibility of the LDM/VAE architecture from [37], with no new theoretical contribution.
invented entities (1)
  • Prosody sketch independent evidence
    purpose: A coarse, user-drawn curve representing pitch or energy trends, used as a conditioning signal for speech synthesis.
    The sketch is a designed input representation; its effect is directly testable by users, and the paper provides audio samples demonstrating it. It is not a hidden explanatory entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DrawSpeech: Expressive Speech Synthesis Using Prosodic Sketches as Control Conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNPF3HNN

@misc{pith2026250104256,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DrawSpeech: Expressive Speech Synthesis Using Prosodic Sketches as Control Conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNPF3HNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04256}
}
read the original abstract

Controlling text-to-speech (TTS) systems to synthesize speech with the prosodic characteristics expected by users has attracted much attention. To achieve controllability, current studies focus on two main directions: (1) using reference speech as prosody prompt to guide speech synthesis, and (2) using natural language descriptions to control the generation process. However, finding reference speech that exactly contains the prosody that users want to synthesize takes a lot of effort. Description-based guidance in TTS systems can only determine the overall prosody, which has difficulty in achieving fine-grained prosody control over the synthesized speech. In this paper, we propose DrawSpeech, a sketch-conditioned diffusion model capable of generating speech based on any prosody sketches drawn by users. Specifically, the prosody sketches are fed to DrawSpeech to provide a rough indication of the expected prosody trends. DrawSpeech then recovers the detailed pitch and energy contours based on the coarse sketches and synthesizes the desired speech. Experimental results show that DrawSpeech can generate speech with a wide variety of prosody and can precisely control the fine-grained prosody in a user-friendly manner. Our implementation and audio samples are publicly available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04256 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview structure of the proposed DrawSpeech. Paired speech and text data are used for training. User-supplied text and drawn pitch or energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrations of (a) pitch contour and (b) pitch sketch. (c) Put the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Drawing different sketches to achieve precise prosody control. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ProsodyLM: Uncovering the Emerging Prosody Processing Capabilities in Speech Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A speech language model trained only on audiobooks with explicit word-level prosody tokens displays emerging abilities in prosody-controlled generation, emphasis and emotion understanding, and prosodic consistency acr...

  2. Improving French Synthetic Speech Quality via SSML Prosody Control

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two fine-tuned LLMs predict SSML prosody tags that raise French TTS naturalness from a 3.20 to 3.87 MOS.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Review: Prosodic patterns in english conversation,

    R. S. Burdin, “Review: Prosodic patterns in english conversation,” Journal of English Linguistics , vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 208–212, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Supervised and unsu- pervised approaches for controlling narrow lexical focus in sequence- to-sequence speech synthesis,

    S. Shechtman, R. Fernandez, and D. Haws, “Supervised and unsu- pervised approaches for controlling narrow lexical focus in sequence- to-sequence speech synthesis,” in IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, 2021, pp. 431–437

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    A survey on neural speech synthesis,

    X. Tan, T. Qin, F. Soong, and T.-Y . Liu, “A survey on neural speech synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.15561 , 2021

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    NaturalSpeech: End-to-end text-to-speech synthesis with human-level quality,

    X. Tan, J. Chen, H. Liu, J. Cong, C. Zhang, Y . Liu, X. Wang, Y . Leng, Y . Yi, L. He, S. Zhao, T. Qin, F. Soong, and T.-Y . Liu, “NaturalSpeech: End-to-end text-to-speech synthesis with human-level quality,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 4234–4245, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Emotion rendering for conversational speech synthesis with heterogeneous graph-based context modeling,

    R. Liu, Y . Hu, Y . Ren, X. Yin, and H. Li, “Emotion rendering for conversational speech synthesis with heterogeneous graph-based context modeling,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 18 698–18 706, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Fine-grained emotion strength transfer, control and prediction for emotional speech synthesis,

    Y . Lei, S. Yang, and L. Xie, “Fine-grained emotion strength transfer, control and prediction for emotional speech synthesis,” in IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, 2021, pp. 423–430

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    RALL-E: Robust codec language modeling with chain-of-thought prompting for text-to-speech synthesis,

    D. Xin, X. Tan, K. Shen, Z. Ju, D. Yang, Y . Wang, S. Takamichi, H. Saruwatari, S. Liu, J. Li, and S. Zhao, “RALL-E: Robust codec language modeling with chain-of-thought prompting for text-to-speech synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03204 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Towards multi-scale style control for expressive speech synthesis,

    X. Li, C. Song, J. Li, Z. Wu, J. Jia, and H. Meng, “Towards multi-scale style control for expressive speech synthesis,” in Interspeech, 2021, pp. 4673–4677

    work page 2021

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Contrastive context-speech pretraining for expressive text-to-speech synthesis,

    Y . Xiao, X. Wang, X. Tan, L. He, X. Zhu, S. Zhao, and T. Lee, “Contrastive context-speech pretraining for expressive text-to-speech synthesis,” in ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    StyleTTS: A style-based generative model for natural and diverse text-to-speech synthesis,

    Y . A. Li, C. Han, and N. Mesgarani, “StyleTTS: A style-based generative model for natural and diverse text-to-speech synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15439, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    NaturalSpeech 3: Zero-shot speech synthesis with factorized codec and diffusion models,

    Z. Ju, Y . Wang, K. Shen, X. Tan, D. Xin, D. Yang, E. Liu, Y . Leng, K. Song, S. Tang, Z. Wu, T. Qin, X. Li, W. Ye, S. Zhang, J. Bian, L. He, J. Li, and sheng zhao, “NaturalSpeech 3: Zero-shot speech synthesis with factorized codec and diffusion models,” in Forty-first Interna...

    2024

  4. [12]

    NaturalSpeech 2: Latent diffusion models are natural and zero-shot speech and singing synthesizers,

    K. Shen, Z. Ju, X. Tan, E. Liu, Y . Leng, L. He, T. Qin, sheng zhao, and J. Bian, “NaturalSpeech 2: Latent diffusion models are natural and zero-shot speech and singing synthesizers,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Principal style components: Expressive style control and cross-speaker transfer in neural tts,

    A. Sorin, S. Shechtman, and R. Hoory, “Principal style components: Expressive style control and cross-speaker transfer in neural tts,” in Interspeech, 2020, pp. 3411–3415

    2020

  6. [14]

    Multi-speaker expressive speech synthesis via multiple factors decoupling,

    X. Zhu, Y . Lei, K. Song, Y . Zhang, T. Li, and L. Xie, “Multi-speaker expressive speech synthesis via multiple factors decoupling,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  7. [15]

    V ALL-E 2: Neural codec language models are human parity zero-shot text to speech synthesizers,

    S. Chen, S. Liu, L. Zhou, Y . Liu, X. Tan, J. Li, S. Zhao, Y . Qian, and F. Wei, “V ALL-E 2: Neural codec language models are human parity zero-shot text to speech synthesizers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05370, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Controllable speaking styles using a large language model,

    A. Sigurgeirsson and S. King, “Controllable speaking styles using a large language model,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , 2024, pp. 10 851–10 855

    2024

  9. [17]

    Seed-TTS: A family of high-quality versatile speech generation models,

    P. Anastassiou, J. Chen, J. Chen, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, Z. Chen, J. Cong, L. Deng, C. Ding, L. Gao, M. Gong, P. Huang, Q. Huang, Z. Huang, Y . Huo, D. Jia, C. Li, F. Li, H. Li, J. Li, X. Li, X. Li, L. Liu, S. Liu, S. Liu, X. Liu, Y . Liu, Z. Liu, L. Lu, J. Pan, X. Wang, Y . Wang,...

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    InstructTTS: Modelling expressive tts in discrete latent space with natural language style prompt,

    D. Yang, S. Liu, R. Huang, C. Weng, and H. Meng, “InstructTTS: Modelling expressive tts in discrete latent space with natural language style prompt,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 32, pp. 2913–2925, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Controlling emotion in text-to-speech with natural language prompts,

    T. Bott, F. Lux, and N. T. Vu, “Controlling emotion in text-to-speech with natural language prompts,” in Interspeech, 2024, pp. 1795–1799

    2024

  12. [20]

    PromptStyle: Controllable style transfer for text-to-speech with natural language descriptions,

    G. Liu, Y . Zhang, Y . Lei, Y . Chen, R. Wang, L. Xie, and Z. Li, “PromptStyle: Controllable style transfer for text-to-speech with natural language descriptions,” in Interspeech, 2023, pp. 4888–4892

    2023

  13. [21]

    Prompttts: Controllable text-to-speech with text descriptions,

    Z. Guo, Y . Leng, Y . Wu, S. Zhao, and X. Tan, “Prompttts: Controllable text-to-speech with text descriptions,” in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  14. [22]

    UniAudio: Towards universal audio generation with large language models,

    D. Yang, J. Tian, X. Tan, R. Huang, S. Liu, H. Guo, X. Chang, J. Shi, sheng zhao, J. Bian, Z. Zhao, X. Wu, and H. M. Meng, “UniAudio: Towards universal audio generation with large language models,” in Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Cosyvoice: A scalable multilingual zero-shot text-to-speech synthesizer based on supervised semantic tokens,

    Z. Du, Q. Chen, S. Zhang, K. Hu, H. Lu, Y . Yang, H. Hu, S. Zheng, Y . Gu, Z. Ma et al. , “Cosyvoice: A scalable multilingual zero-shot text-to-speech synthesizer based on supervised semantic tokens,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05407, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    FunAudioLLM: V oice understanding and generation foundation models for natural interaction between humans and llms,

    T. SpeechTeam, “FunAudioLLM: V oice understanding and generation foundation models for natural interaction between humans and llms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04051 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Towards general-purpose text-instruction- guided voice conversion,

    C.-Y . Kuan, C.-A. Li, T.-Y . Hsu, T.-Y . Lin, H.-L. Chung, K.-W. Chang, S.-Y . Chang, and H.-Y . Lee, “Towards general-purpose text-instruction- guided voice conversion,” in IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop, 2023, pp. 1–8

    2023

  18. [26]

    BERT: Pre- training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre- training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 4171–4186

    2019

  19. [27]

    Communicating emotion: The role of prosodic features,

    R. W. Frick, “Communicating emotion: The role of prosodic features,” Psychological bulletin, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 412–429, 1985

    1985

  20. [28]

    Speech prosody enhances the neural processing of syntax,

    G. Degano, P. W. Donhauser, L. Gwilliams, P. Merlo, and N. Golestani, “Speech prosody enhances the neural processing of syntax,” Communi- cations Biology volume , vol. 7, no. 748, pp. 1–10, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures

    A. Savitzky and M. J. Golay, “Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures.” Analytical chemistry , vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1627–1639, 1964

    1964

  22. [30]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes,

    D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    Fast- Speech: Fast, robust and controllable text to speech,

    Y . Ren, Y . Ruan, X. Tan, T. Qin, S. Zhao, Z. Zhao, and T.-Y . Liu, “Fast- Speech: Fast, robust and controllable text to speech,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, pp. 3171–3180

    2019

  24. [32]

    High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2022, pp. 10 674–10 685

    2022

  25. [33]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    AudioLDM: Text-to-audio generation with latent dif- fusion models,

    H. Liu, Z. Chen, Y . Yuan, X. Mei, X. Liu, D. Mandic, W. Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, “AudioLDM: Text-to-audio generation with latent dif- fusion models,” in Forty International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023, pp. 21 450–21 474

    2023

  27. [35]

    The lj speech dataset,

    K. Ito and L. Johnson, “The lj speech dataset,” https://keithito.com/ LJ-Speech-Dataset/, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 5998–6008

    2017

  29. [37]

    AudioLDM 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining,

    H. Liu, Y . Yuan, X. Liu, X. Mei, Q. Kong, Q. Tian, Y . Wang, W. Wang, Y . Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, “AudioLDM 2: Learning holistic audio generation with self-supervised pretraining,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    HiFi-GAN: Generative adversarial net- works for efficient and high fidelity speech synthesis,

    J. Kong, J. Kim, and J. Bae, “HiFi-GAN: Generative adversarial net- works for efficient and high fidelity speech synthesis,” Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 17 022–17 033, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,

    P. K. Diederik and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2015

    2015

  32. [40]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regularization,” in nternational Conference on Learning Representations , 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    FastSpeech 2: Fast and high-quality end-to-end text to speech,

    Y . Ren, C. Hu, X. Tan, T. Qin, S. Zhao, Z. Zhao, and T.-Y . Liu, “FastSpeech 2: Fast and high-quality end-to-end text to speech,” in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Individual comparisons by ranking methods,

    F. Wilcoxon, “Individual comparisons by ranking methods,” in Break- throughs in statistics , 1992, pp. 196–202

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.