pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.05168 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-07 · 📡 eess.SP

Modeling Micro-Doppler Signature of Multi-Propeller Drones in Distributed ISAC

Heraldo Cesar Alves Costa , Saw J. Myint , Carsten Andrich , Sebastian W. Giehl , Maximilian Engelhardt , Christian Schneider , Reiner S. Thom\"a This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords micro-Dopplerbistatic sensingISACmulti-propeller dronesOFDMthin-wire modelradar signature modelingdrone classification
0
0 comments X

The pith

An adapted thin-wire model produces micro-Doppler signatures for multi-propeller drones that closely match bistatic measurements in OFDM-based ISAC systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a model for generating micro-Doppler signatures of multi-propeller drones in distributed integrated sensing and communication setups. It adapts the classic thin-wire scattering model to handle bistatic configurations, OFDM-like signals, multiple propellers, and the reflectivity of static drone parts. The model is validated by comparing its outputs to actual measurements, showing close resemblance. A reader would care because electromagnetic simulations are too slow for creating the large datasets needed to train machine learning classifiers for drone types in future 6G networks.

Core claim

The proposed OFDM-based bistatic micro-Doppler model, by adapting the thin-wire model to include bistatic sensing, multiple propellers, and static parts reflectivity, generates signatures that closely resemble those from measurements, serving as a scalable tool for data generation and analysis of bistatic effects.

What carries the argument

The OFDM-based bistatic micro-Doppler model adapted from the thin-wire scattering approach, extended for multiple propellers and static reflectivity.

Load-bearing premise

The adaptation of the classic thin-wire model accurately captures the scattering behavior of real drones under bistatic OFDM sensing with multiple propellers and static parts.

What would settle it

A set of bistatic measurements on a multi-propeller drone using an OFDM-like signal where the generated micro-Doppler signatures show significant mismatch with the model's predictions in time-frequency representation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.05168 by Carsten Andrich, Christian Schneider, Heraldo Cesar Alves Costa, Maximilian Engelhardt, Reiner S. Thom\"a, Saw J. Myint, Sebastian W. Giehl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Bistatic rotating point geometry where AB = p 4 cos(β/2)2 − (cos βT + cos βR) 2, RO = RT + RR is the total bistatic range of the rotation center O, and φB = φT − arctan  sin βR sin(φT − φR) sin βT + sin βR cos(φT − φR)  . (7) Two important things to note are that, in this formulation, there is no restriction about the relative position between the rotation plane and the Tx / Rx positions, and that RO is … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of frequency-domain micro-Doppler signatures of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: High Range Resolution comparison between (a) simulation and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HRR comparison between (a) simulation and (b) measurement micro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: VTOL with 6 horizontal propellers and 1 vertical propeller. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of different body models using HRR range-Doppler signatures of a two propellers drone ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mean squared error (MSE) and Pearson correlation coefficient between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Custom-built target with rotation speed control for micro-Doppler [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Measured bistatic reflectivity of Ironman drone at center frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) will be one key feature of future 6G networks, enabling simultaneous communication and radar sensing. The radar sensing geometry of ISAC will be multistatic since that corresponds to the common distributed structure of a mobile communication network. Within this framework, micro-Doppler analysis plays a vital role in classifying targets based on their micromotions, such as rotating propellers, vibration, or moving limbs. However, research on bistatic micro-Doppler effects, particularly in ISAC systems utilizing OFDM waveforms, remains limited. Existing methods, including electromagnetic simulations, often lack scalability for generating the large datasets required to train machine learning algorithms. To address this gap, this work introduces an OFDM-based bistatic micro-Doppler model for multi-propeller drones. The proposed model adapts the classic thin-wire model to include bistatic sensing configuration with an OFDM-like signal. Then, it extends further by incorporating multiple propellers and integrating the reflectivity of the drone's static parts. Measurements were performed to collect ground truth data for verification of the proposed model. Validation results show that the model generates micro-Doppler signatures closely resembling those obtained from measurements, demonstrating its potential as a tool for data generation. In addition, it offers a comprehensive approach to analyzing bistatic micro-Doppler effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an OFDM-based bistatic micro-Doppler model for multi-propeller drones in distributed ISAC systems. It adapts the classic thin-wire scattering model to incorporate bistatic geometry, an OFDM-like waveform, multiple propellers, and the reflectivity of static drone components. Ground-truth measurements are collected and used to verify the model, with the claim that simulated signatures closely resemble measured ones, positioning the model as a scalable tool for generating synthetic data to train machine-learning classifiers.

Significance. If the fidelity claim holds under quantitative scrutiny, the model would supply an efficient analytical alternative to full-wave electromagnetic simulations for producing the large micro-Doppler datasets required for ML-based target classification in multistatic 6G ISAC networks. The approach builds directly on established thin-wire methods while extending them to the specific combination of bistatic sensing, OFDM waveforms, and multi-propeller targets.

major comments (1)
  1. [Validation results] Validation section (and abstract claim): the statement that 'validation results show that the model generates micro-Doppler signatures closely resembling those obtained from measurements' is unsupported by any reported quantitative metrics (e.g., spectrogram correlation, Doppler-spread RMSE, or feature-level error statistics). No details are given on the number of tested geometries, SNR conditions, or propeller configurations. Because the central claim is that the model is suitable for synthetic data generation, the absence of these measures is load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model derivation] The description of how the OFDM waveform is approximated within the micro-Doppler integral should be expanded for reproducibility; the current phrasing 'OFDM-like signal' leaves the exact pulse compression and subcarrier handling ambiguous.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the measured versus simulated spectrograms should include the specific bistatic angle, carrier frequency, and propeller RPM values used in each comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and commit to strengthening the validation section in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Validation results] Validation section (and abstract claim): the statement that 'validation results show that the model generates micro-Doppler signatures closely resembling those obtained from measurements' is unsupported by any reported quantitative metrics (e.g., spectrogram correlation, Doppler-spread RMSE, or feature-level error statistics). No details are given on the number of tested geometries, SNR conditions, or propeller configurations. Because the central claim is that the model is suitable for synthetic data generation, the absence of these measures is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the current validation relies on qualitative visual comparison of spectrograms and that this is insufficient to fully support the claim of suitability for large-scale synthetic data generation. In the revised manuscript we will add quantitative metrics, including spectrogram correlation coefficients and Doppler-spread RMSE between simulated and measured signatures. We will also explicitly report the number of tested geometries, SNR conditions, and propeller configurations used in the experiments. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation starts from classic thin-wire model and is validated against independent measurements

full rationale

The paper adapts the established thin-wire scattering model to bistatic OFDM geometry, multi-propeller kinematics, and static-part reflectivity, then compares generated signatures to separately collected measurement data. No equation or claim reduces to a fitted parameter defined by the target result itself, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and the validation step is external rather than tautological. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the domain assumption that the thin-wire model can be directly adapted to bistatic OFDM geometry and multi-propeller configurations; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The classic thin-wire model can be adapted to bistatic sensing configuration with an OFDM-like signal and multiple propellers
    Explicitly stated as the starting point for the proposed model in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5797 in / 1237 out tokens · 52473 ms · 2026-05-22T20:38:22.318732+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BIRA: A Spherical Bistatic Radar Reflectivity Measurement System

    eess.SP 2024-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BIRA is a bistatic radar facility for spherical positioning of two probes with sub-millimeter accuracy on up to 7 m diameter and 0.7-260 GHz coverage, enabling Doppler and range characterization of dynamic objects for ISAC.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F. Liu, C. Masouros, and Y . C. Eldar,Integrated Sensing and Commu- nications. Springer, 2023, ISBN-13: 9789819925032

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Characterization of Multi- Link Propagation and Bistatic Target Reflectivity for Distributed Multi- Sensor ISAC,

    R. S. Thom ¨a, C. Andrich, J. Beuster, H. C. A. Costa, S. Giehl, S. J. Myint, C. Schneider, and G. Sommerkorn, “Characterization of Multi- Link Propagation and Bistatic Target Reflectivity for Distributed Multi- Sensor ISAC,” 2023, arXiv:2210.11840 [eess.SP]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Joint Radar and Communications: Architectures, Use Cases, Aspects of Radio Access, Signal Processing, and Hardware,

    V . Shatov, B. Nuss, S. Schieler, P. K. Bishoyi, L. Wimmer, M. L ¨ubke, N. Keshtiarast, C. Fischer, D. Lindenschmitt, B. Geiger, R. Thom ¨a, A. Fellan, L. Schmalen, M. Petrova, H. D. Schotten, and N. Franchi, “Joint Radar and Communications: Architectures, Use Cases, Aspects of Radio Access, Signal Processing, and Hardware,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 47 88...

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3383771 2024

  4. [4]

    Accurate 3D Phase Re- covery of Automotive Antennas Through LTE Power Measurements on A Cylindrical Surface,

    R. Thom ¨a and T. Dallmann, “Distributed ISAC Systems – Mul- tisensor Radio Access and Coordination,” in2023 20th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), 2023, pp. 351–354, doi: 10.23919/Eu- RAD58043.2023.10289611

    work page doi:10.23919/eu- 2023

  5. [5]

    MIMO Radar with Widely Separated Antennas,

    A. M. Haimovich, R. S. Blum, and L. J. Cimini, “MIMO Radar with Widely Separated Antennas,”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 116–129, 2008, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2008.4408448

    work page doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408448 2008

  6. [6]

    Cooperative Passive Coherent Location: A Promising 5G Service to Support Road Safety,

    R. S. Thom ¨a, C. Andrich, G. Del Galdo, M. D ¨obereiner, M. A. Hein, M. K ¨aske, G. Sch ¨afer, S. Schieler, C. Schneider, A. Schwind, and P. Wendland, “Cooperative Passive Coherent Location: A Promising 5G Service to Support Road Safety,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 86–92, 2019, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.1800242

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.001.1800242 2019

  7. [7]

    V . C. Chen,The Micro-Doppler Effect in Radar, 2nd ed. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2019, ISBN-13: 9781630815486

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    6G Integrated Sensing and Communications Channel Mod- eling: Challenges and Opportunities,

    T. Liu, K. Guan, D. He, P. T. Mathiopoulos, K. Yu, Z. Zhong, and M. Guizani, “6G Integrated Sensing and Communications Channel Mod- eling: Challenges and Opportunities,”IEEE V ehicular Technology Mag- azine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 31–40, 2024, doi: 10.1109/MVT.2024.3373930

    work page doi:10.1109/mvt.2024.3373930 2024

  9. [9]

    Radar target micro-Doppler signature classification,

    G. E. Smith, “Radar target micro-Doppler signature classification,” Ph.D. dissertation, University College London, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/18688/1/18688.pdf

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    BIRA: A Spherical Bistatic Radar Reflectivity Measurement System

    C. Andrich, T. F. Nowack, A. Ihlow, S. Giehl, M. Engelhardt, G. Som- merkorn, A. Schwind, W. Hofmann, C. Bornkessel, M. A. Hein, and R. S. Thom ¨a, “BIRA: A Spherical Bistatic Radar Reflectivity Measure- ment System,” 2025, arXiv:2407.13749 [eess.SP]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Next-generation deep learning based on simulators and synthetic data,

    C. M. de Melo, A. Torralba, L. Guibas, J. DiCarlo, R. Chellappa, and J. Hodgins, “Next-generation deep learning based on simulators and synthetic data,”Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 174– 187, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Calculation and analysis of electromagnetic scattering by helicopter rotating blades,

    P. Pouliguen, L. Lucas, F. Muller, S. Quete, and C. Terret, “Calculation and analysis of electromagnetic scattering by helicopter rotating blades,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 50, no. 10, 2002, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2002.800693

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2002.800693 2002

  13. [13]

    Micro-Doppler-based classification study on the detections of aerial targets and wind turbines,

    O. Karabayır, S. M. Y ¨uceda˘g, O. M. Y ¨uceda˘g, A. F. Cos ¸kun, and H. A. Serim, “Micro-Doppler-based classification study on the detections of aerial targets and wind turbines,” in2016 17th International Radar Symposium (IRS), 2016, pp. 1–4

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Numerical RCS and micro-Doppler investi- gations of a consumer UA V,

    A. Schr ¨oder, U. Aulenbacher, M. Renker, U. B ¨oniger, R. Oechslin, A. Murk, and P. Wellig, “Numerical RCS and micro-Doppler investi- gations of a consumer UA V,” inTarget and Background Signatures II, vol. 9997, 2016, pp. 35–44

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Com- parisons Between Simulated and Measured X-band Signatures of Quad- , Hexa- and Octocopters,

    P. J. Speirs, A. Schr ¨oder, M. Renker, P. Wellig, and A. Murk, “Com- parisons Between Simulated and Measured X-band Signatures of Quad- , Hexa- and Octocopters,” in2018 15th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), 2018, pp. 325–328, doi: 10.23919/EuRAD.2018.8546612

    work page doi:10.23919/eurad.2018.8546612 2018

  16. [16]

    Electromagnetic Mod- elling of Micro-Doppler Signatures of Commercial Airborne Drones,

    P. Z. Petrovic, S. V . Savic, and M. M. Ilic, “Electromagnetic Mod- elling of Micro-Doppler Signatures of Commercial Airborne Drones,” in2021 29th Telecommunications F orum, TELFOR 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TELFOR52709.2021.9653308

    work page doi:10.1109/telfor52709.2021.9653308 2021

  17. [17]

    Time frequency signatures of micro- Doppler phenomenon for feature extraction,

    V . C. Chen and R. D. Lipps, “Time frequency signatures of micro- Doppler phenomenon for feature extraction,” inWavelet Applications VII, vol. 4056, 2000, pp. 220–226, doi: 10.1117/12.381683

    work page doi:10.1117/12.381683 2000

  18. [18]

    Micro-Doppler effect in radar: phenomenon, model, and simulation study,

    V . C. Chen, F. Li, S.-S. Ho, and H. Wechsler, “Micro-Doppler effect in radar: phenomenon, model, and simulation study,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and electronic systems, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 2–21, 2006, doi: 10.1109/TAES.2006.1603402

    work page doi:10.1109/taes.2006.1603402 2006

  19. [19]

    Multi-rotor Drone Micro-Doppler Simula- tion Incorporating Genuine Motor Speeds and Validation with L-band Staring Radar,

    D. White, M. Jahangir, M. Antoniou, C. Baker, J. Thiyagalingam, S. Harman, and C. Bennett, “Multi-rotor Drone Micro-Doppler Simula- tion Incorporating Genuine Motor Speeds and Validation with L-band Staring Radar,” inProceedings of the IEEE Radar Conference, 2022, doi: 10.1109/RadarConf2248738.2022.9764352

    work page doi:10.1109/radarconf2248738.2022.9764352 2022

  20. [20]

    UA V’s Rotor Micro-Doppler Feature Extraction Using Integrated Sensing and Communication Signal: Algorithm Design and Testbed Evaluation,

    J. Wei, D. Ma, F. He, Q. Zhang, Z. Feng, Z. Liu, and T. Liang, “UA V’s Rotor Micro-Doppler Feature Extraction Using Integrated Sensing and Communication Signal: Algorithm Design and Testbed Evaluation,” pp. 1–13, 2024, arXiv:2408.16415 [eess.SP]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Simulation-based Approach to Classification of Airborne Drones,

    L. Lehmann and J. Dall, “Simulation-based Approach to Classification of Airborne Drones,” inIEEE National Radar Conference, 2020, doi: 10.1109/RadarConf2043947.2020.9266405

    work page doi:10.1109/radarconf2043947.2020.9266405 2020

  22. [22]

    Simulation of Bistatic Signatures from Rotating Blades of Aerial Targets,

    E. Plotnitskaya, E. V orobev, and V . I. Veremyev, “Simulation of Bistatic Signatures from Rotating Blades of Aerial Targets,” inProceedings of the 2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, ElConRus 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ElCon- Rus51938.2021.9396233

    work page doi:10.1109/elcon- 2021

  23. [23]

    Simulating UA V micro-Doppler using dynamic point clouds,

    M. Moore, D. A. Robertson, and S. Rahman, “Simulating UA V micro-Doppler using dynamic point clouds,” in2022 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf22), 2022, pp. 01–06, doi: 10.1109/Radar- Conf2248738.2022.9764284

    work page doi:10.1109/radar- 2022

  24. [24]

    Application of an autoregressive reflection model for the signal analysis of radar echoes from rotating objects,

    H. Schneider, “Application of an autoregressive reflection model for the signal analysis of radar echoes from rotating objects,” inICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1988, pp. 1236–1239 vol.2, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1988.196824

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp.1988.196824 1988

  25. [25]

    Analysis of the theoretical radar return signal form aircraft propeller blades,

    J. Martin and B. Mulgrew, “Analysis of the theoretical radar return signal form aircraft propeller blades,” inIEEE International Conference on Radar, 1990, pp. 569–572

    work page 1990

  26. [26]

    Analysis of recorded helicopter echo,

    J. Misiurewicz, K. Kulpa, and Z. Czekala, “Analysis of recorded helicopter echo,” inRadar 97 (Conf. Publ. No. 449), 1997, pp. 449– 453, doi: 10.1049/cp:19971715

    work page doi:10.1049/cp:19971715 1997

  27. [27]

    Modeling and validation of modulated characteristics for aircraft rotating structure in the air surveillance radars,

    D. Jianjiang, Y . Zhiqiang, Y . Dazhi, and R. Chongji, “Modeling and validation of modulated characteristics for aircraft rotating structure in the air surveillance radars,” inIEEE National Radar Conference, vol. 2005-January, 2005, doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2005.1435905

    work page doi:10.1109/radar.2005.1435905 2005

  28. [28]

    Measuring time between peaks in helicopter classification using continuous wavelet trans- form,

    H. C. Costa and M. C. De Matos, “Measuring time between peaks in helicopter classification using continuous wavelet trans- form,” in2008 IEEE Radar Conference, RADAR 2008, 2008, doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2008.4720899

    work page doi:10.1109/radar.2008.4720899 2008

  29. [29]

    Micro-Doppler analysis and parameter estimation of the rotating linear rigid target,

    G. Chen, H. Yu, and X. Yang, “Micro-Doppler analysis and parameter estimation of the rotating linear rigid target,”2012 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 94–97, 2012, doi: 10.1109/CSAE.2012.6272556

    work page doi:10.1109/csae.2012.6272556 2012

  30. [30]

    Modeling of micro-Doppler signatures from rotor blades,

    B. Wang, W. Li, L. Du, and H. Shi, “Modeling of micro-Doppler signatures from rotor blades,”IET Conference Publications, vol. 2015, 2015, doi: 10.1049/cp.2015.1133

    work page doi:10.1049/cp.2015.1133 2015

  31. [31]

    Radar recognition of multi- propeller drones using micro-doppler linear spectra,

    Y . Cai, O. Krasnov, and A. Yarovoy, “Radar recognition of multi- propeller drones using micro-doppler linear spectra,” inEuRAD 2019 - 2019 16th European Radar Conference, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Validation of Wind Turbine Doppler Signatures in a Passive Bistatic Radar with a Point Scatterer Model,

    M. Ummenhofer, “Validation of Wind Turbine Doppler Signatures in a Passive Bistatic Radar with a Point Scatterer Model,” in2019 Interna- tional Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium in Miami, ACES-Miami 2019, 2019

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Simple modelling of the radar signature of helicopters,

    G. Point and L. Savy, “Simple modelling of the radar signature of helicopters,”IET Conference Publications, vol. 2017, no. CP728, pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: 10.1049/cp.2017.0425

    work page doi:10.1049/cp.2017.0425 2017

  34. [34]

    Application of the singular spec- trum analysis for extraction of micro-Doppler signature of heli- copters,

    C. Clemente and J. J. Soraghan, “Application of the singular spec- trum analysis for extraction of micro-Doppler signature of heli- copters,”IET Conference Proceedings, pp. 93–93(1), January 2012, doi: 10.1049/cp.2012.1662

    work page doi:10.1049/cp.2012.1662 2012

  35. [35]

    Modelling Micro-Doppler Signature of Drone Propellers in Distributed ISAC,

    H. C. A. Costa, S. J. Myint, C. Andrich, S. W. Giehl, C. Schneider, and R. S. Thom ¨a, “Modelling Micro-Doppler Signature of Drone Propellers in Distributed ISAC,” in2024 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf24), 2024, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/RadarConf2458775.2024.10548468

    work page doi:10.1109/radarconf2458775.2024.10548468 2024

  36. [36]

    M. A. Richards,Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2014, ch. 2, ISBN-13: 9780071798334

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    OFDM radar algorithms in mobile communication networks,

    K. M. Braun, “OFDM radar algorithms in mobile communication networks,” Ph.D. dissertation, Karlsruher Institut f ¨ur Technologie (KIT),

    work page

  38. [38]

    Available: https://d-nb.info/104838490X/34

    [Online]. Available: https://d-nb.info/104838490X/34

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Micro-Doppler feature extraction under passive radar based on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing communication signal,

    X. Qu, K. Li, Q. Zhang, and B. Liang, “Micro-Doppler feature extraction under passive radar based on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing communication signal,”The Journal of Engineering, vol. 2019, pp. 6889–6893, 2019, doi: 10.1049/joe.2019.0592

    work page doi:10.1049/joe.2019.0592 2019

  40. [40]

    N. J. Willis,Bistatic radar. SciTech Publishing, 2005, vol. 2, ch. 6, ISBN-13: 9781891121456

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    Feature extraction of rotating target based on bistatic micro-Doppler analysis,

    A. Xiaofeng, Z. Xiaohai, Y . Jianhua, L. Jin, and L. Yongzhen, “Feature extraction of rotating target based on bistatic micro-Doppler analysis,” inProceedings of 2011 IEEE CIE International Conference on Radar , RADAR 2011, vol. 1, 2011, doi: 10.1109/CIE-Radar.2011.6159614

    work page doi:10.1109/cie-radar.2011.6159614 2011

  42. [42]

    Bistatic reflectivity and micro-Doppler signatures of drones for integrated communication and sensing,

    H. C. A. Costa, S. J. Myint, C. Andrich, S. W. Giehl, C. Schneider, and R. S. Thom ¨a, “Bistatic reflectivity and micro-Doppler signatures of drones for integrated communication and sensing,” in2024 International Radar Symposium (IRS), 2024, pp. 194–199

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    V . C. Chen, D. Tahmoush, and W. J. Miceli,Radar micro-Doppler signatures. Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, UK, 2014, ISBN-13: 9781849197168

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Accelerating Innovation in 6G Research: Real-Time Capable SDR System Architecture for Rapid Prototyping,

    M. Engelhardt, S. Giehl, M. Schubert, A. Ihlow, C. Schneider, A. Ebert, M. Landmann, G. Del Galdo, and C. Andrich, “Accelerating Innovation in 6G Research: Real-Time Capable SDR System Architecture for Rapid Prototyping,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 118 718–118 732, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3447884

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3447884 2024

  45. [45]

    Bi-static Reflectivity Measurements of Vulnerable Road Users using Scaled Radar Objects,

    A. Schwind, W. Hofmann, R. Stephan, and M. A. Hein, “Bi-static Reflectivity Measurements of Vulnerable Road Users using Scaled Radar Objects,” in2020 Antenna Measurement Techniques Association Symposium (AMTA), 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Multitone signals with low crest factor,

    S. Boyd, “Multitone signals with low crest factor,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1018–1022, 1986, doi: 10.1109/TCS.1986.1085837. 14 Heraldo Cesar Alves Costareceived a B.Sc. de- gree in Electronic Engineering and a M.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Rio de Janeiro, Bra...

    work page doi:10.1109/tcs.1986.1085837 1986

  47. [47]

    For pioneering the multi-dimensional description of the mobile radio channel by advanced signal- processing methods

    He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering at Technische Universit ¨at Ilmenau, Germany. His research interests include multistic radar, modeling multistatic reflectivity/RCS of objects, and target classification in Integrated Communication and Sensing (ICAS) applications. Sebastian W. Giehlreceived the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in el...

    work page 2020