pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.08726 · v1 · pith:QWMNJL74new · submitted 2025-04-11 · 💻 cs.HC

Interaction-Required Suggestions for Control, Ownership, and Awareness in Human-AI Co-Writing

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords interactioncontrolhuman-aiinterfacesrevisionwritingagencyanalyze
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper explores interaction designs for generative AI interfaces that necessitate human involvement throughout the generation process. We argue that such interfaces can promote cognitive engagement, agency, and thoughtful decision-making. Through a case study in text revision, we present and analyze two interaction techniques: (1) using a predictive-text interaction to type the assistant's response to a revision request, and (2) highlighting potential edit opportunities in a document. Our implementations demonstrate how these approaches reveal the landscape of writing possibilities and enable fine-grained control. We discuss implications for human-AI writing partnerships and future interaction design directions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonslop: A Gamified Experiment in Human-AI Collaborative Writing

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A gamified experiment with 74 participants investigates when humans accept or reject AI-generated word suggestions during writing under conditions designed to discourage AI use.