A possible wave-optical effect in lensed FRBs

Calvin Leung; Goureesankar Sathyanathan; Olaf Wucknitz; Prasenjit Saha

arxiv: 2504.10523 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO

A possible wave-optical effect in lensed FRBs

Goureesankar Sathyanathan , Calvin Leung , Olaf Wucknitz , Prasenjit Saha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO

keywords fast radio burstsgravitational lensingmicrolensingwave opticsplasma scatteringvoltage autocorrelationlensed FRBs

0 comments

The pith

Auto-correlation of voltage in lensed fast radio bursts shows microsecond peaks from wave-optical interference between microlensed images.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores whether wave optics can produce detectable signatures when a fast radio burst is gravitationally lensed by a galaxy that also contains stars acting as microlenses. The authors run a simulation that combines microlensing by those stars with plasma scattering from a turbulent interstellar medium, then compute the auto-correlation of the received voltage rather than the intensity. The simulation produces clear peaks at microsecond time separations that arise from interference between the different micro-images created by the microlenses. These peaks shift with frequency when plasma scattering is included. A sympathetic reader would care because the effect could let observers recognize a strongly lensed FRB even when only one image falls inside the survey window, turning single detections into useful cosmological probes.

Core claim

In this work we explore the FRB analog of quasar microlensing, namely the collective microlensing by stars in the lensing galaxy, now with wave optics included in the eikonal regime. Through a simple simulation of microlensing stars together with plasma scattering by a turbulent interstellar medium, the auto-correlation of the voltage shows peaks at order-microsecond separations that correspond to wave-optical interference between lensed micro-images. The peaks are frequency dependent if plasma-scattering is significant. While qualitative and still in need of more realistic simulations, the results suggest that a strongly-lensed FRB could be identified from a single image.

What carries the argument

The auto-correlation function of the received voltage signal, which isolates interference between wave-optically lensed micro-images produced by stars in the lens galaxy.

If this is right

A single observed FRB image can carry evidence of multiple microlensed paths through its voltage auto-correlation.
The frequency dependence of the peaks can distinguish the microlensing signature from other propagation effects.
Strongly lensed FRBs can be identified without requiring detection of multiple time-delayed bursts.
Microlensing by stars offers an independent route to confirm macro-lensing in FRB samples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the signal is routinely detectable, surveys could search existing single-image FRB catalogs for hidden lensing events.
The same voltage-correlation technique might apply to other compact transients such as pulsars or gamma-ray bursts behind lensing galaxies.
High-resolution observations of known lensed FRB candidates could directly test the predicted microsecond peak separations.

Load-bearing premise

The simple simulation of microlensing stars plus plasma scattering by a turbulent interstellar medium is representative enough to produce a detectable signature in real FRB observations.

What would settle it

High-time-resolution voltage data from a confirmed strongly lensed FRB that shows no microsecond-scale peaks in the auto-correlation function, or peaks whose frequency dependence does not match the plasma-scattering prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.10523 by Calvin Leung, Goureesankar Sathyanathan, Olaf Wucknitz, Prasenjit Saha.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Illustration of time delay due to turbulent ISM, normalized according to Eq. (16). The spatial scale is the same as the microlensing fields in left panels in Figs. 2–4 below. is given an amplitude of q 2 + L −2 0 −11/6 exp − 1 2 l 2 0 q 2 (18) and a random phase. Here l0 and L0 are the grid-size and fieldsize respectively, which act as the small-scale and large-scale cutoffs. Since an integral alo… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Left. Micro-images in the lensing-dominated regime. Black dots mark stellar masses. Gray curves show arrival time contours. Ellipses are micro-images (blue for minima, red for saddle points). Right. Auto-correlation signals: blue for the real part, magenta for the imaginary part. A tanh activation function has been applied to reduce the contrast between the lines. scale of FRB observations, the wave-optica… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Arrival time contours (left) and auto-correlation signals (right) for intermediate-frequency signals at ν/ν0 of 13 (top row), 10 (middle row), 8 (bottom row) Mróz, P., Udalski, A., Szymanski, M. K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, L19 ´ Natarajan, P., Williams, L. L. R., Bradac, M., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, ˇ 19 Ng, C. 2023, A brief review on Fast Radio Bursts Nityananda, R. & Ostriker, J. P. 1984, Journa… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Arrival time contours (left) and auto-correlation signals (right) for low-frequency signals, ν/ν0 being 7 (top row), 6 (middle row), 5 (bottom row). The slight wiggliness of the curves in the bottom left panel are due to small-scale fluctuations from plasma scattering. Article number, page 7 of 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Context: Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are enigmatic extragalactic bursts whose properties are still largely unknown, but based on their extremely small time duration, they are proposed to have a compact structure, making them candidates for wave-optical effects if gravitational lensed. If an FRB is lensed into multiple-images bursts at different times by a galaxy or cluster, a likely scenario is that only one image is detected, because the others fall outside the survey area and time frame. Aims: In this work we explore the FRB analog of quasar microlensing, namely the collective microlensing by stars in the lensing galaxy, now with wave optics included. The eikonal regime is applicable here. Methods. We study the voltage (rather than the intensity) in a simple simulation consisting of (a) microlensing stars, and (b) plasma scattering by a turbulent interstellar medium. Results: The auto-correlation of the voltage shows peaks (at order-microsecond separations) corresponding to wave-optical interference between lensed micro-images. The peaks are frequency dependent if plasma-scattering is significant. While qualitative and still in need of more realistic simulations, the results suggest that a strongly-lensed FRB could be identified from a single image. Conclusions: Microlensing could sniff out macro-lensed FRBs

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches microsecond voltage auto-correlation peaks as a possible signature of wave-optical microlensing in single FRB detections, but the supporting simulation is too minimal for a firm claim.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that a simple simulation of point-mass microlenses plus one turbulent plasma screen produces auto-correlation peaks at microsecond delays from interference between micro-images, with frequency dependence when scattering is included. This is pitched as a way to spot macro-lensed FRBs from a lone detection. The authors are clear that the work is qualitative and needs more realistic runs, which keeps the tone honest. What is actually new is the specific suggestion to use voltage auto-correlation rather than intensity for this FRB microlensing case, pulling together wave optics and ISM scattering in one setup. The simulation illustrates the basic interference idea without overclaiming. The soft spot is the lack of any robustness tests or controls. Only one realization is shown, with no checks on how the peaks change with stellar density, different impact parameters, or when plasma scattering is turned off. A pure ray-optics run would also clarify what is truly wave-optical. Without those, it is hard to judge whether the feature would survive in real data or is tied to the particular choices made. This is for a narrow group of people already working on FRB lensing and radio timing. A reader thinking about follow-up strategies on lensed candidates might pick up the idea, but it will not shift the field until the simulation is expanded. I would send it for peer review. Referees could usefully push on the controls and parameter choices, and the core suggestion is worth that input even in its current form.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that wave-optical microlensing of FRBs by stars in a lensing galaxy produces detectable peaks in the voltage autocorrelation function at microsecond delays due to interference between micro-images. Using a minimal simulation of point-mass microlenses plus a single turbulent plasma scattering screen, the authors report that these peaks are frequency-dependent when scattering is included and suggest the signature could identify macro-lensed FRBs from a single observed image.

Significance. If the reported autocorrelation peaks prove robust, the result would offer a new route to confirm strong lensing of FRBs without requiring multiple detected images, with potential value for cosmology and FRB progenitor studies. The choice to analyze voltage (phase-sensitive) rather than intensity is a conceptual strength, and the inclusion of both microlensing and ISM scattering addresses a realistic complication. The work is explicitly framed as qualitative, limiting its immediate applicability.

major comments (3)

[Methods] Methods (simulation setup): the reported autocorrelation peaks are shown only for a single realization of the microlens population and one turbulent screen; no ensemble of realizations or variations in stellar surface density, mass function, or scattering measure are presented to test whether the ~μs features persist or shift.
[Results] Results: no control runs are shown with plasma scattering turned off or in the pure geometric-optics (ray) limit, leaving open whether the autocorrelation peaks are specifically attributable to wave-optical interference between micro-images rather than other phase effects in the model.
[Discussion] Discussion: the claim that the effect 'could be identified from a single image' is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion, yet no quantitative metrics (e.g., peak significance relative to noise, required bandwidth, or false-alarm probability) are provided to support detectability in real FRB voltage data.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and methods would benefit from explicit statement of the number of microlenses, their mass range, and the precise frequencies or bandwidths used in the voltage simulation.
[Figures] Figure captions should clarify the exact time and frequency ranges plotted and whether the autocorrelation is normalized.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report. Our manuscript is framed as a qualitative exploration of a possible wave-optical signature, and we agree that additional controls and clarifications will strengthen the presentation. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods] Methods (simulation setup): the reported autocorrelation peaks are shown only for a single realization of the microlens population and one turbulent screen; no ensemble of realizations or variations in stellar surface density, mass function, or scattering measure are presented to test whether the ~μs features persist or shift.

Authors: We agree that robustness across realizations is important for even a qualitative study. In the revised manuscript we will add an ensemble of microlens realizations together with variations in scattering measure (while keeping the minimal model) to show that the microsecond-scale autocorrelation peaks persist. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results: no control runs are shown with plasma scattering turned off or in the pure geometric-optics (ray) limit, leaving open whether the autocorrelation peaks are specifically attributable to wave-optical interference between micro-images rather than other phase effects in the model.

Authors: We concur that control simulations are required to isolate the interference effect. The revised version will include runs with plasma scattering disabled and in the pure ray-optics limit to confirm that the reported peaks arise from wave-optical interference between micro-images. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion] Discussion: the claim that the effect 'could be identified from a single image' is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion, yet no quantitative metrics (e.g., peak significance relative to noise, required bandwidth, or false-alarm probability) are provided to support detectability in real FRB voltage data.

Authors: The manuscript is explicitly qualitative (see abstract and conclusions) and does not claim quantitative detectability. We will revise the discussion to stress that full metrics on noise, bandwidth and false-alarm probability lie beyond the present scope and require future, more realistic modeling; we will also highlight the frequency dependence induced by scattering as a potential observational discriminant. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of forward simulation

full rationale

The paper reports auto-correlation peaks obtained by numerically propagating voltage through a model consisting of point-mass microlenses plus a turbulent scattering screen. No parameters are fitted to observations and then reused as predictions; the claimed signature is computed directly from the simulated time series. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or to close a definitional loop. The central result therefore does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the stated applicability of the eikonal regime and on the modeling choices for microlensing stars plus turbulent plasma; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The eikonal regime is applicable here.
Explicitly stated in the methods section of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5773 in / 1290 out tokens · 75649 ms · 2026-05-22T20:09:04.635182+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Evidence for Intermediate-Mass Black Holes From Microlensing Signatures in CHIME/FRB catalog 2
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Two FRBs exhibit microlensing signatures consistent with intermediate-mass black holes of masses approximately 500-600 and 1500-2500 solar masses, interpreted as possible evidence for isolated primordial black holes c...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al

Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 947, 83

work page 2023
[2]

C., Bandura, K

Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K. M., Bhardwaj, M., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 54

work page 2020
[3]

W., Rickett, B

Armstrong, J. W., Rickett, B. J., & Spangler, S. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 209

work page 1995
[4]

J., Petroff, E., Kramer, M., et al

Champion, D. J., Petroff, E., Kramer, M., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 460, L30–L34

work page 2016
[5]

J., Wharton, R

Chatterjee, S., Law, C. J., Wharton, R. S., et al. 2017, Nature, 541, 58–61 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 59 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Bandura, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 48

work page 2017
[6]

2020, Search for Lensed Gravitational Waves Including Morse Phase Information: An In- triguing Candidate in O2

Dai, L., Zackay, B., Venumadhav, T., Roulet, J., & Zaldarriaga, M. 2020, Search for Lensed Gravitational Waves Including Morse Phase Information: An In- triguing Candidate in O2

work page 2020
[7]

2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 159

Eichler, D. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 159

work page 2017
[8]

W., & Sammons, M

Kader, Z., Dobbs, M., Leung, C., Masui, K. W., & Sammons, M. W. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 123027

work page 2024
[9]

2022, Phys

Kader, Z., Leung, C., Dobbs, M., et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 106, 043016

work page 2022
[10]

2020, MNRAS, 496, 564

Katz, A., Kopp, J., Sibiryakov, S., & Xue, W. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 564

work page 2020
[11]

Keane, E. F. & Petroff, E. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447, 2852–2856

work page 2015
[12]

& Beniamini, P

Kumar, P. & Beniamini, P. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 247

work page 2023
[13]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.01202

Leung, C., Jow, D., Saha, P., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.01202

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

W., et al

Leung, C., Kader, Z., Masui, K. W., et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 106, 043017

work page 2022
[15]

Lewis, G. F. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 1583

work page 2020
[16]

R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777

work page 2007
[17]

R., McLaughlin, M

Lorimer, D. R., McLaughlin, M. A., & Bailes, M. 2024, Astrophysics and Space Science, 369

work page 2024
[18]

2022, Introduction to Gravitational Lensing: With Python Ex- amples

Meneghetti, M. 2022, Introduction to Gravitational Lensing: With Python Ex- amples

work page 2022
[19]

K., More, A., Bose, S., & Bagla, J

Mishra, A., Meena, A. K., More, A., Bose, S., & Bagla, J. S. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4869 Article number, page 5 of 7 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda Fig. 3.Arrival time contours (left) and auto-correlation signals (right) for intermediate-frequency signals atν/ν 0 of 13 (top row), 10 (middle row), 8 (bottom row) Mróz, P., Udalski, A., Szyma´nski, M. K., et al....

work page 2021
[20]

Natarajan, P., Williams, L. L. R., Brada ˇc, M., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 19

work page 2024
[21]

2023, A brief review on Fast Radio Bursts

Ng, C. 2023, A brief review on Fast Radio Bursts

work page 2023
[22]

& Ostriker, J

Nityananda, R. & Ostriker, J. P. 1984, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 5, 235

work page 1984
[23]

1986, ApJ, 301, 503

Paczynski, B. 1986, ApJ, 301, 503

work page 1986
[24]

Saha, P., Sluse, D., Wagner, J., & Williams, L. L. R. 2024, Essentials of strong gravitational lensing

work page 2024
[25]

& Williams, L

Saha, P. & Williams, L. L. R. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 1671

work page 2011
[26]

J., Vernardos, G., Collett, T

Shajib, A. J., Vernardos, G., Collett, T. E., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 87

work page 2024
[27]

G., Cordes, J

Spitler, L. G., Cordes, J. M., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 101

work page 2014
[28]

G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J

Spitler, L. G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2016, Nature, 531, 202

work page 2016
[29]

2021, MNRAS, 500, 1114

Sprenger, T., Wucknitz, O., Main, R., Baker, D., & Brisken, W. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1114

work page 2021
[30]

P., Bassa, C

Tendulkar, S. P., Bassa, C. G., Cordes, J. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, L7

work page 2017
[31]

2024, Space Sci

Vernardos, G., Sluse, D., Pooley, D., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 14

work page 2024
[32]

G., & Pen, U.-L

Wucknitz, O., Spitler, L. G., & Pen, U.-L. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 645, A44 Article number, page 6 of 7 Goureesankar Sathyanathan, Calvin Leung , Olaf Wucknitz and Prasenjit Saha,: A possible wave-optical effect in lensed FRBs Fig. 4.Arrival time contours (left) and auto-correlation signals (right) for low-frequency signals,ν/ν 0 being 7 (top row)...

work page 2021

[1] [1]

C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al

Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K., Bhardwaj, M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 947, 83

work page 2023

[2] [2]

C., Bandura, K

Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K. M., Bhardwaj, M., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 54

work page 2020

[3] [3]

W., Rickett, B

Armstrong, J. W., Rickett, B. J., & Spangler, S. R. 1995, ApJ, 443, 209

work page 1995

[4] [4]

J., Petroff, E., Kramer, M., et al

Champion, D. J., Petroff, E., Kramer, M., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 460, L30–L34

work page 2016

[5] [5]

J., Wharton, R

Chatterjee, S., Law, C. J., Wharton, R. S., et al. 2017, Nature, 541, 58–61 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 59 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Bandura, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 48

work page 2017

[6] [6]

2020, Search for Lensed Gravitational Waves Including Morse Phase Information: An In- triguing Candidate in O2

Dai, L., Zackay, B., Venumadhav, T., Roulet, J., & Zaldarriaga, M. 2020, Search for Lensed Gravitational Waves Including Morse Phase Information: An In- triguing Candidate in O2

work page 2020

[7] [7]

2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 159

Eichler, D. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 159

work page 2017

[8] [8]

W., & Sammons, M

Kader, Z., Dobbs, M., Leung, C., Masui, K. W., & Sammons, M. W. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 123027

work page 2024

[9] [9]

2022, Phys

Kader, Z., Leung, C., Dobbs, M., et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 106, 043016

work page 2022

[10] [10]

2020, MNRAS, 496, 564

Katz, A., Kopp, J., Sibiryakov, S., & Xue, W. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 564

work page 2020

[11] [11]

Keane, E. F. & Petroff, E. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447, 2852–2856

work page 2015

[12] [12]

& Beniamini, P

Kumar, P. & Beniamini, P. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 247

work page 2023

[13] [13]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.01202

Leung, C., Jow, D., Saha, P., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.01202

work page arXiv 2023

[14] [14]

W., et al

Leung, C., Kader, Z., Masui, K. W., et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 106, 043017

work page 2022

[15] [15]

Lewis, G. F. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 1583

work page 2020

[16] [16]

R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777

work page 2007

[17] [17]

R., McLaughlin, M

Lorimer, D. R., McLaughlin, M. A., & Bailes, M. 2024, Astrophysics and Space Science, 369

work page 2024

[18] [18]

2022, Introduction to Gravitational Lensing: With Python Ex- amples

Meneghetti, M. 2022, Introduction to Gravitational Lensing: With Python Ex- amples

work page 2022

[19] [19]

K., More, A., Bose, S., & Bagla, J

Mishra, A., Meena, A. K., More, A., Bose, S., & Bagla, J. S. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4869 Article number, page 5 of 7 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda Fig. 3.Arrival time contours (left) and auto-correlation signals (right) for intermediate-frequency signals atν/ν 0 of 13 (top row), 10 (middle row), 8 (bottom row) Mróz, P., Udalski, A., Szyma´nski, M. K., et al....

work page 2021

[20] [20]

Natarajan, P., Williams, L. L. R., Brada ˇc, M., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 19

work page 2024

[21] [21]

2023, A brief review on Fast Radio Bursts

Ng, C. 2023, A brief review on Fast Radio Bursts

work page 2023

[22] [22]

& Ostriker, J

Nityananda, R. & Ostriker, J. P. 1984, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 5, 235

work page 1984

[23] [23]

1986, ApJ, 301, 503

Paczynski, B. 1986, ApJ, 301, 503

work page 1986

[24] [24]

Saha, P., Sluse, D., Wagner, J., & Williams, L. L. R. 2024, Essentials of strong gravitational lensing

work page 2024

[25] [25]

& Williams, L

Saha, P. & Williams, L. L. R. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 1671

work page 2011

[26] [26]

J., Vernardos, G., Collett, T

Shajib, A. J., Vernardos, G., Collett, T. E., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 87

work page 2024

[27] [27]

G., Cordes, J

Spitler, L. G., Cordes, J. M., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 101

work page 2014

[28] [28]

G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J

Spitler, L. G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2016, Nature, 531, 202

work page 2016

[29] [29]

2021, MNRAS, 500, 1114

Sprenger, T., Wucknitz, O., Main, R., Baker, D., & Brisken, W. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1114

work page 2021

[30] [30]

P., Bassa, C

Tendulkar, S. P., Bassa, C. G., Cordes, J. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, L7

work page 2017

[31] [31]

2024, Space Sci

Vernardos, G., Sluse, D., Pooley, D., et al. 2024, Space Sci. Rev., 220, 14

work page 2024

[32] [32]

G., & Pen, U.-L

Wucknitz, O., Spitler, L. G., & Pen, U.-L. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 645, A44 Article number, page 6 of 7 Goureesankar Sathyanathan, Calvin Leung , Olaf Wucknitz and Prasenjit Saha,: A possible wave-optical effect in lensed FRBs Fig. 4.Arrival time contours (left) and auto-correlation signals (right) for low-frequency signals,ν/ν 0 being 7 (top row)...

work page 2021