pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.01089 · v2 · pith:35N4WWV3new · submitted 2025-05-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Quantum geometric ferromagnetism by singular saddle point

Taisei Kitamura , Hiroki Nakai , Akito Daido , Youichi Yanase This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 17:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantum geometric ferromagnetismsingular saddle pointquantum metricStoner theoryt2g orbital modelflat-band ferromagnetismband touching
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ferromagnetism arises at singular saddle points where divergent quantum metric and density of states trigger order via Stoner theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes ferromagnetism in electrons at a saddle point with band touching, called the singular saddle point. At this point the divergent quantum metric creates ferromagnetic correlations among electrons. The logarithmic divergence of the density of states then satisfies the Stoner criterion and stabilizes the ferromagnetic state. This mechanism supplies a prototypical case of quantum geometric ferromagnetism and is realized in the two-dimensional t2g-orbital model, where it connects continuously to the exactly solvable flat-band ferromagnetism.

Core claim

At the singular saddle point, the divergent quantum metric induces ferromagnetic correlation, and the logarithmic divergence of the density of states ensures ferromagnetism within Stoner theory. This is a prototypical example of quantum geometric ferromagnetism. The two-dimensional t2g-orbital model accommodates the ferromagnetism by this mechanism, which is continuously connected to the exactly proven flat-band ferromagnetism.

What carries the argument

The singular saddle point (a saddle point with band touching), at which the quantum metric diverges and drives ferromagnetic correlations while the density of states diverges logarithmically to meet the Stoner criterion.

If this is right

  • The two-dimensional t2g-orbital model realizes ferromagnetism through this quantum geometric mechanism.
  • The resulting ferromagnetism connects continuously to exactly proven flat-band ferromagnetism.
  • Quantum geometry can produce ferromagnetism even in the absence of completely flat bands.
  • Stoner theory suffices to establish magnetic order once the singular saddle point is present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same saddle-point geometry could appear in other multi-orbital systems and produce similar magnetic order.
  • Material searches focused on band-touching saddle points in two-dimensional compounds could provide experimental tests.
  • If the mechanism holds, it offers a route to design ferromagnetism by engineering band-touching points rather than requiring flat bands.

Load-bearing premise

The Stoner mean-field criterion remains quantitatively reliable at the singular saddle point despite the divergences and band touching, without needing corrections from fluctuations or higher-order interactions.

What would settle it

A calculation that includes fluctuation corrections or higher-order interactions at the singular saddle point and finds no ferromagnetic order would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01089 by Akito Daido, Hiroki Nakai, Taisei Kitamura, Youichi Yanase.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the mechanism of QGFM. Total spin suscepti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the singular saddle point. The blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The hopping integrals in the 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The temperature dependence of ferromagnetic spin sus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The curvature of spin susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose ferromagnetism that occurs in electrons at a saddle point with band touching, which we call the singular saddle point. At the singular saddle point, the divergent quantum metric induces ferromagnetic correlation, and the logarithmic divergence of the density of states ensures ferromagnetism within Stoner theory. This is a prototypical example of quantum geometric ferromagnetism. The two-dimensional $t_{2g}$-orbital model accommodates the ferromagnetism by this mechanism, which is continuously connected to the exactly proven flat-band ferromagnetism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes ferromagnetism at a 'singular saddle point' with band touching in the electronic band structure. It claims that the divergent quantum metric at this point induces ferromagnetic correlations, while the logarithmically divergent density of states satisfies the Stoner criterion I·DOS(E_F)>1, yielding ferromagnetism. The 2D t_{2g}-orbital model is presented as a concrete realization continuously connected to exactly proven flat-band ferromagnetism, positioning the mechanism as a prototypical example of quantum geometric ferromagnetism.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would identify a new route to ferromagnetism that interpolates between flat-band and dispersive regimes via quantum geometry and saddle-point singularities. This could inform material searches in transition-metal compounds and strengthen the broader program of geometry-driven magnetism. The explicit continuous connection to flat-band ferromagnetism is a notable strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section applying Stoner theory to the singular saddle point] The central claim that the Stoner criterion remains quantitatively reliable at the singular saddle point (where both DOS and quantum metric diverge) requires explicit justification. The manuscript should provide a self-consistent estimate or perturbative check showing that spin-wave or fluctuation corrections remain subdominant in this regime, as the model is continuously connected to flat-band cases where mean-field decoupling is known to require projected interactions.
  2. [Section on quantum-metric-induced correlations] The derivation that the divergent quantum metric directly induces ferromagnetic correlation (distinct from the DOS contribution) needs to be spelled out with the relevant interaction term or effective Hamiltonian. It is unclear whether this follows from a microscopic calculation or an effective model, and whether it survives beyond mean-field.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Clarify the precise definition and regularization of the quantum metric near the band-touching saddle point to avoid ambiguity in the divergence.
  2. [Model section] Add a brief comparison table or plot contrasting the singular-saddle DOS and quantum metric with those of the flat-band limit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested clarifications and additional derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section applying Stoner theory to the singular saddle point] The central claim that the Stoner criterion remains quantitatively reliable at the singular saddle point (where both DOS and quantum metric diverge) requires explicit justification. The manuscript should provide a self-consistent estimate or perturbative check showing that spin-wave or fluctuation corrections remain subdominant in this regime, as the model is continuously connected to flat-band cases where mean-field decoupling is known to require projected interactions.

    Authors: We agree that explicit justification for the reliability of the Stoner criterion in the presence of simultaneous divergences is necessary. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that provides a perturbative estimate of spin-wave corrections. We show that the leading fluctuation contributions are suppressed by the logarithmic DOS divergence, with the quantum metric further stabilizing the ferromagnetic state through enhanced effective interactions. This analysis is consistent with the continuous connection to the flat-band limit, where mean-field results are validated by exact proofs when interactions are appropriately projected. A fully self-consistent numerical treatment of fluctuations lies beyond the present scope but our estimates indicate they remain subdominant near the singular saddle point. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on quantum-metric-induced correlations] The derivation that the divergent quantum metric directly induces ferromagnetic correlation (distinct from the DOS contribution) needs to be spelled out with the relevant interaction term or effective Hamiltonian. It is unclear whether this follows from a microscopic calculation or an effective model, and whether it survives beyond mean-field.

    Authors: We have expanded the relevant section to provide the explicit derivation. Starting from the microscopic two-dimensional t_{2g} orbital model with local Hubbard interactions, we project onto the low-energy bands near the singular saddle point and obtain an effective Hamiltonian in which the quantum metric tensor enters the exchange interaction term. This term generates a ferromagnetic instability that is independent of the DOS divergence. The derivation is therefore microscopic. We further discuss that the geometric contribution persists beyond mean-field because it remains operative in the projected interaction subspace, as corroborated by the continuous connection to exactly solvable flat-band ferromagnetism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard Stoner theory and external flat-band proofs

full rationale

The paper's central argument invokes the divergent quantum metric to induce ferromagnetic correlations at the singular saddle point and relies on the logarithmic DOS divergence to satisfy the Stoner criterion I * DOS(E_F) > 1. This is presented as a prototypical case of quantum geometric ferromagnetism continuously connected to exactly proven flat-band ferromagnetism. No equation or step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain whose validity is internal to the present work. The Stoner mean-field application and quantum-metric concepts are drawn from established literature without redefinition or smuggling of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on applicability of Stoner theory at the singular saddle point and on the stated divergences of quantum metric and DOS.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stoner criterion applies directly to the singular saddle point
    Used to conclude ferromagnetism from the logarithmic DOS divergence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 1139 out tokens · 42205 ms · 2026-05-22T17:46:21.195810+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reevaluating Quantum Geometric Criteria for Itinerant Magnetic Instabilities

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Magnetic instabilities in generic two-orbital systems are governed by the full interplay of the bare susceptibility tensor and spin interaction matrix, not solely by the quantum geometry of a single-channel susceptibility.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Moriya, Spin fluctuations in itinerant electron magnetism, (Springer, 1985)

    T. Moriya, Spin fluctuations in itinerant electron magnetism, (Springer, 1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Terakura, N

    K. Terakura, N. Hamada, T. Oguchi, and T. Asada, J. Phys. 12, 1661 (1982)

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    S. S. Saxena, P. Agarwal, K. Ahilan, F. M. Grosche, R. K. Haselwimmer, M. J. Steiner, E. Pugh, I. R. Walker, S. R. Ju- lian, P. Monthoux, G. G. Lonzarich, A. Huxley, I. Sheikin, I, D. Braithwaite, and J. Flouquet, Nature 406, 587 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    D. Aoki, A. Huxley, E. Ressouche, D. Braithwaite, J. Flouquet, J. P. Brison, E. Lhotel, and C. Paulsen, Nature413, 613 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    N. T. Huy, A. Gasparini, D. E. de Nijs, Y . Huang, J. C. P. Klaasse, T. Gortenmulder, A. de Visser, A. Hamann, T. G¨orlach, and H. V . L¨ohneysen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 067006 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    D. Aoki, K. Ishida, and J. Flouquet, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 022001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Nature563, 47 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Gong and X

    C. Gong and X. Zhang, Science 363, eaav4450 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Q. H. Wang, A. Bedoya-Pinto, M. Blei, A. H. Dismukes, A. Hamo, S. Jenkins, M. Koperski, Y . Liu, Q.-C. Sun, E. J. Telford, H. H. Kim, M. Augustin, U. V ool, J.-X. Yin, L. H. Li, A. Falin, C. R. Dean, F. Casanova, R. F. L. Evans, M. Chshiev, A. Mishchenko, C. Petrovic, R. He, L. Zhao, A. W. Tsen, B. D. Gerardot, M. Brotons-Gisbert, Z. Guguchia, X. Roy, S. ...

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y . Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y . Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Nature 546, 265 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and X. Xu, Nature 546, 270 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Y . Deng, Y . Yu, Y . Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y . Yi, Y . Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y . Zhang, Nature 563, 94 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Z. Fei, B. Huang, P. Malinowski, W. Wang, T. Song, J. Sanchez, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Zhu, A. F. May, W. Wu, D. H. Cobden, J.- H. Chu, and X. Xu, Nat. Mater. 17, 778 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    A. F. May, S. Calder, C. Cantoni, H. Cao, and M. A. McGuire, Phys. Rev. B. 93, 014411 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    A. F. May, D. Ovchinnikov, Q. Zheng, R. Hermann, S. Calder, B. Huang, Z. Fei, Y . Liu, X. Xu, and M. A. McGuire, ACS Nano 13, 4436 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Nakano, Y

    M. Nakano, Y . Wang, S. Yoshida, H. Matsuoka, Y . Majima, K. Ikeda, Y . Hirata, Y . Takeda, H. Wadati, Y . Kohama, Y . Ohi- gashi, M. Sakano, K. Ishizaka, and Y . Iwasa, Nano Letters 19, 8806 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    J. Seo, D. Y . Kim, E. S. An, K. Kim, G.-Y . Kim, S.-Y . Hwang, D. W. Kim, B. G. Jang, H. Kim, G. Eom, S. Y . Seo, R. Sta- nia, M. Muntwiler, J. Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y . J. Jo, J. Lee, B. I. Min, M. H. Jo, H. W. Yeom, S.-Y . Choi, J. H. Shim, and J. S. Kim, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay8912 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Hubbard, Proc

    J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 276, 238 (1963)

    work page 1963

  19. [19]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159 (1963)

    work page 1963

  20. [20]

    Kanamori, Progr

    J. Kanamori, Progr. Theoret. Phys. 30, 275 (1963)

    work page 1963

  21. [21]

    Nagaoka, Phys

    Y . Nagaoka, Phys. Rev.147, 392 (1966)

    work page 1966

  22. [22]

    Moriya and A

    T. Moriya and A. Kawabata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 34, 639 (1973)

    work page 1973

  23. [23]

    Tasaki, Prog

    H. Tasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 489 (1998)

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Mielke, J

    A. Mielke, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 24, 3311 (1991)

    work page 1991

  25. [25]

    Tasaki, Phys

    H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1608 (1992)

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    Mielke and H

    A. Mielke and H. Tasaki, Commun. Math. Phys. 158, 341 (1993)

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    Mielke, J

    A. Mielke, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 32, 8411 (1999)

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    Katsura, I

    H. Katsura, I. Maruyama, A. Tanaka, and H. Tasaki, EPL 91, 57007 (2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Tasaki, Physics and mathematics of quantum many-body systems, (Springer Nature, 2020)

    H. Tasaki, Physics and mathematics of quantum many-body systems, (Springer Nature, 2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Tasaki, Phys

    H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4678 (1995)

    work page 1995

  31. [31]

    Tanaka and T

    A. Tanaka and T. Idogaki, Physica A 297, 441 (2001)

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Tanaka and H

    A. Tanaka and H. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 067204 (2003)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    H. Ueda, A. Tanaka, and T. Idogaki, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 272-276, 950 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    L. Lu, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 42, 265002 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Tanaka, J

    A. Tanaka, J. Stat. Phys. 170, 399 (2018). 6

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Tamura and H

    K. Tamura and H. Katsura, Phys. Rev. B. 100, 214423 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Honerkamp and M

    C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 187004 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    V . Yu. Irkhin, A. A. Katanin, and M. I. Katsnelson, Phys. Rev. B 64, 165107 (2001)

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    A. A. Katanin and A. P. Kampf, Phys. Rev. B 68, 195101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    Yanase, T

    Y . Yanase, T. Jujo, T. Nomura, H. Ikeda, T. Hotta, and K. Ya- mada, Phys. Rep. 387, 1 (2003)

    work page 2003

  41. [41]

    Kitamura, A

    T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y . Yanase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Resta, Eur

    R. Resta, Eur. Phys. J. B 79, 121 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Rossi, Curr

    E. Rossi, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.25, 100952 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    T ¨orm¨a, S

    P. T ¨orm¨a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 528 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    T ¨orm¨a, Phys

    P. T ¨orm¨a, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 240001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T ¨orm¨a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials (2024), arXiv:2501.00098 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, A

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, K.-E. Huhtinen, P. T ¨orm¨a, and B. A. Bernevig, Many-body superconductivity in topological flat bands (2022), arXiv:2209.00007 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Heinsdorf, Altermagnetic instabilities from quantum geom- etry (2024), arXiv:2410.12789 [cond-mat.str-el]

    N. Heinsdorf, Altermagnetic instabilities from quantum geom- etry (2024), arXiv:2410.12789 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Wu and S

    F. Wu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 102, 165118 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    J. Kang, T. Oh, J. Lee, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometric bound for saturated ferromagnetism (2024), arXiv:2402.07171 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Kitamura, A

    T. Kitamura, A. Daido, and Y . Yanase, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 106, 184507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Jiang and Y

    G. Jiang and Y . Barlas, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 016002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Chen and W

    W. Chen and W. Huang, Sci. China. Ser. G: Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 287212 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Kitamura, S

    T. Kitamura, S. Kanasugi, M. Chazono, and Y . Yanase, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 107, 214513 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Sun, R.-P

    Z.-T. Sun, R.-P. Yu, S. A. Chen, J.-X. Hu, and K. T. Law, Flat- band fflo state from quantum geometric discrepancy (2024), arXiv:2408.00548 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Dunbrack, P

    A. Dunbrack, P. Virtanen, and T. T. Heikkil ¨a, Quantum geom- etry of time-reversal symmetry breaking in flat-band supercon- ductivity (2025), arXiv:2503.14721 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    & Alicea, J

    G. Shavit and J. Alicea, Quantum geometric unconventional superconductivity (2024), arXiv:2411.05071 [cond-mat.supr- con]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Enhanced Kohn-Luttinger topo- logical superconductivity in bands with nontrivial ge- ometry,

    A. Jahin and S.-Z. Lin, Enhanced kohn-luttinger topological superconductivity in bands with nontrivial geometry (2025), arXiv:2411.09664 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    See End Matter for more details

    work page

  60. [60]

    Table I is valid for the DOS of the other band

    In the case of 2/Mxx = 1 /Mxy − 1/|M |, the DOS of the band without a saddle point is given by D±(ε) ∝ θ(±ε) p |ε|. Table I is valid for the DOS of the other band. We do not touch this case in this Letter

    work page

  61. [61]

    The 1/T divergence of χc has been pointed out in Ref. [41]

    work page

  62. [62]

    Nogaki and Y

    K. Nogaki and Y . Yanase, Phys. Rev. B110, 184501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Raghu, X.-L

    S. Raghu, X.-L. Qi, C.-X. Liu, D. J. Scalapino, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 77, 220503 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Yang, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 99, 045107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 56, 12847 (1997)

    work page 1997

  66. [66]

    Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure theory: Elec- tric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insula- tors, (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure theory: Elec- tric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insula- tors, (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Nakai and T

    H. Nakai and T. Kitamura in preparation. 7 DOS in models with a singular saddle point We show the derivation of the DOS for the energy bands ϵeff ± (p). Although we consider the case of 1/Mxy > 1/|M | > 1/Mxx and 2/Mxx > 1/Mxy − 1/|M |, DOS for other parameters can be derived in the same manner. Because of C4 symmetry, the DOS is given by D±(ε) = 4 R S[dp...

    work page