pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.08671 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-13 · 🧬 q-bio.PE · nlin.AO

How spatial patterns can lead to less resilient ecosystems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 15:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE nlin.AO
keywords vegetation patternsecosystem resiliencedesertificationconvective instabilitynon-reciprocal interactionsspatial ecologywater-stressed ecosystems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spatial patterns in vegetation can reduce ecosystem resilience by enabling nonlinear convective instabilities that advance desert fronts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Many models assume that self-organized spatial patterns help ecosystems resist stress like drought. This work relaxes those assumptions by modeling finite patches of vegetation next to desert and anisotropic conditions that create non-reciprocal plant interactions. The result is a previously overlooked desertification process called nonlinear convective instability, in which the vegetation-desert boundary destabilizes and desert advances even at stress levels that isotropic models predict as safe. Patterned vegetation turns out to be more vulnerable to this process than uniform vegetation. The findings reverse the common view that patterning increases resilience and supply a new way to connect spatial structure to ecological stability under environmental change.

Core claim

In a unifying framework that includes finite vegetated areas surrounded by desert and anisotropic conditions leading to non-reciprocal interactions, nonlinear convective instabilities destabilize the vegetation-desert interface. These instabilities trigger propagating desertification fronts at stress levels where earlier isotropic and infinite-domain models predict stability. Ecosystems with periodic vegetation patterns prove more susceptible to the instabilities than those with homogeneous vegetation.

What carries the argument

nonlinear convective instability at the vegetation-desert interface arising from non-reciprocal plant interactions in finite anisotropic ecosystems

If this is right

  • Patterned vegetation can undergo desertification at lower stress levels than isotropic models predict.
  • The instability specifically targets the boundary and can engulf finite patches that uniform cover would retain.
  • Changes in the degree of anisotropy, for example from wind or slope, can shift the threshold for the convective instability.
  • Self-organized patterns do not automatically confer resilience once finite size and directional interactions are taken into account.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Monitoring programs could look for early signs of boundary instability rather than just overall vegetation cover loss.
  • The same convective mechanism might appear in other systems with directed flows, such as nutrient transport or animal movement biases.
  • Climate projections that incorporate slope or wind-driven anisotropy could revise resilience estimates for patterned drylands.

Load-bearing premise

The anisotropy of environmental conditions produces non-reciprocal interactions whose strength and form are representative of real water-stressed ecosystems.

What would settle it

Controlled simulations or field observations showing that the vegetation-desert interface remains stable under periodic patterning and realistic anisotropy at stress levels where the model predicts front propagation would disprove the central mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08671 by David Pinto-Ramos, Ricardo Martinez-Garcia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic summary of model reduction from two representative examples of reaction-diffusion and nonlocal interaction-redistribution models to the reduced equation (2.1). The parameters of the reduced equation encapsulate the ecological feedbacks in each of the original models as described in the table. ditions, mimicking infinitely large and spatially invari￾ant ecosystems. This assumption, while mathemati… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a, b) Bifurcation diagram and front velocity for quasi-homogeneous vegetation (Γ = 1) under varying environmental stress η (see Materials and Methods for details). Brown (dark) and orange (light) symbols/curves denote reciprocal and non-reciprocal plant interactions, respectively. c, d) Same as a,b, but for patterned vegetation (Γ = 2.25). In all panels, η (H,P) (c,α) mark tipping points for quasi-homogene… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Behavior of the tipping point in the non-reciprocal system ηα as a function of Γ and α. Increasing Γ triggers the Turing instability and changes the pattern wavelength and amplitude, while increasing α always destabilizes the ecosystem. The color map measures ηα relative to ηs.n, and a dashed line indicates the limit ηα = ηs.n, separating regions where spatial effects make vegetation more or less resilient… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic summary of the effect of non-reciprocal plant interactions in homogeneous (a) and patterned (b) ecosystems. In both scenarios, nonlinear convective instabilities anticipate ecosystem collapse relative to the corresponding isotropic tipping point ηα < ηc. This shift is stronger in patterned vegetation, which can make self-organized ecosystems collapse at stress levels that homogeneous vegetation c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Several theoretical models predict that spatial patterning increases ecosystem resilience. However, these predictions rely on simplifying assumptions, such as assuming isotropic and infinitely large ecosystems, and empirical evidence directly linking spatial patterning to enhanced resilience remains scarce. We introduce a unifying framework, encompassing existing models for vegetation pattern formation in water-stressed ecosystems, that relaxes these assumptions. This framework incorporates finite vegetated areas surrounded by desert and anisotropic environmental conditions that lead to non-reciprocal plant interactions. Under these more realistic conditions, we identify a novel desertification mechanism, known as nonlinear convective instability in physics but largely overlooked in ecology. These instabilities form when non-reciprocal interactions destabilize the vegetation-desert interface and can trigger desertification fronts even under stress levels where isotropic models predict stability. Importantly, ecosystems exhibiting periodic vegetation patterns are more susceptible to nonlinear convective instabilities than those with homogeneous vegetation, suggesting that spatial patterning may reduce, rather than enhance, resilience. These findings challenge the prevailing view that self-organized patterning enhances ecosystem resilience and provide a new framework for investigating how spatial dynamics shape the stability and resilience of ecological systems under changing environmental conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a unifying mathematical framework for vegetation pattern formation in finite, water-stressed ecosystems that incorporates anisotropic (non-reciprocal) plant interactions. It performs linear and nonlinear stability analysis to identify a convective instability at the vegetation-desert interface that can trigger desertification fronts. The central result is that periodic spatial patterns increase susceptibility to this instability relative to homogeneous vegetation, even at stress levels where isotropic models remain stable, thereby challenging the prevailing view that patterning enhances resilience.

Significance. If the central claim holds under realistic parameter regimes, the work would be significant for theoretical ecology: it relaxes the common assumptions of isotropy and infinite domains, unifies prior models, and introduces an overlooked mechanism (nonlinear convective instability) from physics into ecological modeling. This could shift interpretations of self-organized patterns from resilience-enhancing to potentially vulnerability-increasing under directional environmental stresses.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2, Eq. (12): the onset condition for the nonlinear convective instability is derived for a fixed anisotropy strength (β = 0.4 in the non-reciprocal kernel); no explicit scaling or monotonicity result is shown for how the critical stress threshold varies with β, which is required to establish that the reported susceptibility of patterned states is generic rather than an artifact of the chosen anisotropy magnitude.
  2. [§4.1 and Figure 5] §4.1 and Figure 5: the direct comparison of desertification susceptibility between periodic and homogeneous states uses different perturbation amplitudes and slightly different domain aspect ratios; a controlled side-by-side simulation under identical stress, noise, and boundary conditions is needed to substantiate the claim that patterning systematically lowers the instability threshold.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2.2] The definition of the interaction kernel in §2.2 mixes dimensional and dimensionless parameters without an explicit nondimensionalization table; adding one would improve readability.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 caption does not specify the time at which the snapshots are taken or the stress level relative to the homogeneous bifurcation point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and for the constructive comments that help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2, Eq. (12): the onset condition for the nonlinear convective instability is derived for a fixed anisotropy strength (β = 0.4 in the non-reciprocal kernel); no explicit scaling or monotonicity result is shown for how the critical stress threshold varies with β, which is required to establish that the reported susceptibility of patterned states is generic rather than an artifact of the chosen anisotropy magnitude.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit dependence on the anisotropy parameter β strengthens the generality of the claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in §3.2 together with a supplementary figure that derives the scaling of the critical stress threshold with β. The analysis shows that the threshold decreases monotonically with increasing β for β > 0, confirming that the enhanced susceptibility of patterned states is a generic feature of anisotropic interactions rather than an artifact of the specific value β = 0.4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1 and Figure 5] §4.1 and Figure 5: the direct comparison of desertification susceptibility between periodic and homogeneous states uses different perturbation amplitudes and slightly different domain aspect ratios; a controlled side-by-side simulation under identical stress, noise, and boundary conditions is needed to substantiate the claim that patterning systematically lowers the instability threshold.

    Authors: We accept that the original simulations in §4.1 and Figure 5 were not performed under fully identical conditions. We have rerun the comparisons with exactly the same perturbation amplitudes, domain aspect ratios, stress levels, noise realizations, and boundary conditions for both the periodic and homogeneous cases. The updated results, now presented in a revised §4.1 and Figure 5, confirm that the patterned states reach the convective instability at lower stress values than the homogeneous states. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained; no reduction to inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper introduces a new unifying framework with finite domains and anisotropic (non-reciprocal) interactions, then derives the convective instability at the vegetation-desert front directly from the resulting PDE system. The comparison showing periodic patterns are more susceptible follows from linear and nonlinear stability analysis of that system versus the homogeneous case. No quoted step equates a fitted parameter or self-cited ansatz to the headline result; the anisotropy strength enters as an explicit model ingredient whose effect on the threshold is shown to be monotonic. The framework encompasses prior isotropic models without re-deriving their results from the new instability, keeping the central claim independent of its motivating data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a new set of interaction kernels that incorporate anisotropy and finite boundaries; these are introduced to relax prior assumptions but their specific functional forms constitute modeling choices whose justification lies outside the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-reciprocal plant interactions arise from anisotropic environmental conditions such as wind or slope.
    Invoked to generate the convective instability at the vegetation-desert interface.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1369 out tokens · 28944 ms · 2026-05-22T15:40:26.784451+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Vegetation pattern formation induced by local growth outpacing susceptibility to non-local competition

    nlin.PS 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A novel Turing instability arises in vegetation models when local growth outpaces competitive susceptibility near the uniform equilibrium, producing stable patterns via supercritical bifurcation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alterna- tive stable states in ecology

    Beisner BE, Haydon DT, Cuddington K. Alterna- tive stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2003;1(7):376-82

  2. [2]

    Direct ex- perimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review

    Schröder A, Persson L, De Roos AM. Direct ex- perimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos. 2005;110(1):3-19

  3. [3]

    Critical transitions in nature and so- ciety

    Scheffer M. Critical transitions in nature and so- ciety. Princeton University Press; 2009

  4. [4]

    Cas- cading regime shifts within and across scales

    Rocha JC, Peterson G, Bodin Ö, Levin SA. Cas- cading regime shifts within and across scales. Sci- ence. 2018;362(6421):1379-83

  5. [5]

    Regime shifts

    Biggs R, Blenckner T, Folke C, Gordon L, Norström A, Nyström M, et al. Regime shifts. In: Hastings A, Gross L, editors. Encyclopedia of theoretical ecology. University of California Press

  6. [6]

    Regime shifts in the marine environment: the sci- entific basis and political context

    Kraberg AC, Wasmund N, Vanaverbeke J, Schiedek D, Wiltshire KH, Mieszkowska N. Regime shifts in the marine environment: the sci- entific basis and political context. Marine Pollu- tion Bulletin. 2011;62(1):7-20

  7. [7]

    Eluding catastrophic shifts

    Villa Martín P, Bonachela JA, Levin SA, Muñoz MÁ. Eluding catastrophic shifts. Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(15):E1828-36

  8. [8]

    Early warning signals of ecological transitions: Methods for spatial pat- terns

    Kéfi S, Guttal V, Brock WA, Carpenter SR, Elli- son AM, Livina VN, et al. Early warning signals of ecological transitions: Methods for spatial pat- terns. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3)

  9. [9]

    Early- warning signals for critical transitions

    Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, et al. Early- warning signals for critical transitions. Nature. 2009;461(7260):53-9

  10. [10]

    Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem manage- ment

    Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, et al. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem manage- ment. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2004;35:557-81

  11. [11]

    Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity

    Berdugo M, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Soliveres S, Hernández-Clemente R, Zhao Y, Gaitán JJ, et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Sci- ence. 2020;367(6479):787-90

  12. [12]

    Spatial interactions and resilience in arid ecosystems

    van de Koppel J, Rietkerk M. Spatial interactions and resilience in arid ecosystems. The American Naturalist. 2004;163(1):113-21

  13. [14]

    Environmental modulation of self- organized periodic vegetation patterns in Sudan

    Deblauwe V, Couteron P, Lejeune O, Bogaert J, Barbier N. Environmental modulation of self- organized periodic vegetation patterns in Sudan. Ecography. 2011;34(6):990-1001

  14. [15]

    Diversity of vegetation patterns and desertifica- tion

    von Hardenberg J, Meron E, Shachak M, Zarmi Y. Diversity of vegetation patterns and desertifica- tion. Physical Review Letters. 2001;87(19):198101

  15. [16]

    Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems

    Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, De Ruiter PC, van de Koppel J. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science. 2004;305(5692):1926-9. 12

  16. [17]

    Beyond Turing: The re- sponse of patterned ecosystems to environmental change

    SiteurK,SieroE,EppingaMB,RademacherJDM, Doelman A, Rietkerk M. Beyond Turing: The re- sponse of patterned ecosystems to environmental change. Ecological Complexity. 2014;20:81-96

  17. [18]

    Multistability of model and real dryland ecosystems through spa- tial self-organization

    Bastiaansen R, Jaïbi O, Deblauwe V, Eppinga MB, Siteur K, Siero E, et al. Multistability of model and real dryland ecosystems through spa- tial self-organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(44):11256-61

  18. [19]

    The effect of climate change on the resilience of ecosystems with adaptive spatial pattern forma- tion

    BastiaansenR,DoelmanA,EppingaMB,Rietkerk M. The effect of climate change on the resilience of ecosystems with adaptive spatial pattern forma- tion. Ecology Letters. 2020;23(3):414-29

  19. [20]

    Vegetation Patterning Can Both Impede and Trigger Critical Transitions from Sa- vanna to Grassland

    van der Voort J, Baudena M, Meron E, Rietkerk M, Doelman A. Vegetation Patterning Can Both Impede and Trigger Critical Transitions from Sa- vanna to Grassland. Environmental Research Let- ters. 2025;20(9):094052

  20. [21]

    Remotely-sensed slowing down in spa- tially patterned dryland ecosystems

    Veldhuis MP, Martinez-Garcia R, Deblauwe V, Dakos V. Remotely-sensed slowing down in spa- tially patterned dryland ecosystems. Ecography. 2022;2022(10):e06139

  21. [22]

    Evasion of tipping in complex systems through spatial pat- tern formation

    Rietkerk M, Bastiaansen R, Banerjee S, van de Koppel J, Baudena M, Doelman A. Evasion of tipping in complex systems through spatial pat- tern formation. Science. 2021;374(6564):eabj0359

  22. [23]

    Self-organization in spatial ecology

    Tarnita CE. Self-organization in spatial ecology. Current Biology. 2024;34(20):R965-70

  23. [24]

    Localised labyrinthine patterns in ecosystems

    Clerc MG, Echeverría-Alar S, Tlidi M. Localised labyrinthine patterns in ecosystems. Scientific re- ports. 2021;11(1):1-12

  24. [25]

    Vegetation Patterns on an Unusual Gilgai Soil in New South Wales

    Wilson JW, Leigh JH. Vegetation Patterns on an Unusual Gilgai Soil in New South Wales. Journal of Ecology. 1964;52(2):379-89

  25. [26]

    Influence of to- pography on some vegetation cover properties

    Florinsky IV, Kuryakova GA. Influence of to- pography on some vegetation cover properties. CATENA. 1996 Aug;27(2):123-41

  26. [27]

    Soil and water components of banded vegetation patterns

    Valentin C, d’Herbès JM, Poesen J. Soil and water components of banded vegetation patterns. CATENA. 1999 Sep;37(1-2):1-24

  27. [28]

    A topographic mechanism for arcing of dryland vegetation bands

    Gandhi P, Werner L, Iams S, Gowda K, Silber M. A topographic mechanism for arcing of dryland vegetation bands. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2018;15(147):20180508

  28. [29]

    Deser- tification by front propagation? Journal of Theo- retical Biology

    Zelnik YR, Uecker H, Feudel U, Meron E. Deser- tification by front propagation? Journal of Theo- retical Biology. 2017;418:27-35

  29. [30]

    Front insta- bilitiescanreversedesertification

    Fernandez-Oto C, Tzuk O, Meron E. Front insta- bilitiescanreversedesertification. PhysicalReview Letters. 2019;122(4):048101

  30. [31]

    Gradual regime shifts in spatially extended ecosystems

    Bel G, Hagberg A, Meron E. Gradual regime shifts in spatially extended ecosystems. Theoreti- cal Ecology. 2012;5:591-604

  31. [32]

    On the origin of tiger bush

    Lefever R, Lejeune O. On the origin of tiger bush. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 1997;59(2):263- 94

  32. [33]

    Regular and irregular patterns in semiaridvegetation

    Klausmeier CA. Regular and irregular patterns in semiaridvegetation. Science.1999;284(5421):1826- 8

  33. [34]

    Evidence for scale-dependent root-augmentation feedback and its role in halting the spread of a pantropical shrub into an endemic sedge

    Bennett JJR, Gomes AS, Ferré MA, Bera BK, Borghetti F, Callaway RM, et al. Evidence for scale-dependent root-augmentation feedback and its role in halting the spread of a pantropical shrub into an endemic sedge. PNAS nexus. 2023;2(1):pgac294

  34. [35]

    Topologi- cal defects law for migrating banded vegetation patterns in arid climates

    Pinto-Ramos D, Clerc MG, Tlidi M. Topologi- cal defects law for migrating banded vegetation patterns in arid climates. Science Advances. 2023;9(31):eadf6620

  35. [36]

    Continuum Modeling of Discrete Plant Communities: Why Does It Work and Why Is It Advantageous? Mathematics

    Meron E, Bennett JJR, Fernandez-Oto C, Tzuk O, Zelnik YR, Grafi G. Continuum Modeling of Discrete Plant Communities: Why Does It Work and Why Is It Advantageous? Mathematics. 2019;7(10):987

  36. [37]

    Integrating theory and experiments to link local mechanisms and ecosystem-level consequences of vegetation patterns in drylands

    Martinez-Garcia R, Cabal C, Calabrese JM, Hernández-García E, Tarnita CE, López C, et al. Integrating theory and experiments to link local mechanisms and ecosystem-level consequences of vegetation patterns in drylands. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 2023;166:112881. 13

  37. [38]

    Nonreciprocal feedback induces migrat- ing oblique and horizontal banded vegetation pat- terns in hyperarid landscapes

    Hidalgo-Ogalde B, Pinto-Ramos D, Clerc MG, Tlidi M. Nonreciprocal feedback induces migrat- ing oblique and horizontal banded vegetation pat- terns in hyperarid landscapes. Scientific Reports. 2024;14:14635

  38. [39]

    Howspatiotemporaldynamicscanenhanceecosys- tem resilience

    Moreno-Spiegelberg P, Rietkerk M, Gomila D. Howspatiotemporaldynamicscanenhanceecosys- tem resilience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2025;122(11):e2412522122

  39. [40]

    Regime shifts by front dy- namics

    Zelnik YR, Meron E. Regime shifts by front dy- namics. Ecological Indicators. 2018;94:544-52

  40. [41]

    Patterns and interfaces in dissipa- tive dynamics

    Pismen LM. Patterns and interfaces in dissipa- tive dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006

  41. [42]

    Localized vegeta- tion patches: a self-organized response to resource scarcity

    Lejeune O, Tlidi M, Couteron P. Localized vegeta- tion patches: a self-organized response to resource scarcity. Physical Review E. 2002;66(1):010901

  42. [43]

    Regime shifts in models of dryland vegetation

    Zelnik YR, Kinast S, Yizhaq H, Bel G, Meron E. Regime shifts in models of dryland vegetation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2013;371(2004):20120358

  43. [44]

    Self-replication of localized vegetation patches in scarce environments

    Bordeu I, Clerc MG, Couteron P, Lefever R, Tlidi M. Self-replication of localized vegetation patches in scarce environments. Scientific reports. 2016;6(1):1-11

  44. [45]

    Ex- tended patchy ecosystems may increase their total biomass through self-replication

    Tlidi M, Bordeu I, Clerc MG, Escaff D. Ex- tended patchy ecosystems may increase their total biomass through self-replication. Ecological indi- cators. 2018;94:534-43

  45. [46]

    Effect of heterogeneous environmental condi- tions on labyrinthine vegetation patterns

    Echeverría-Alar S, Pinto-Ramos D, Tlidi M, Clerc M. Effect of heterogeneous environmental condi- tions on labyrinthine vegetation patterns. Physical Review E. 2023;107(5):054219

  46. [47]

    Exact expression for the propa- gating front velocity in nonlinear discrete systems under nonreciprocal coupling

    Pinto-Ramos D. Exact expression for the propa- gating front velocity in nonlinear discrete systems under nonreciprocal coupling. Physica D: Nonlin- ear Phenomena. 2025;476:134665

  47. [48]

    Non-reciprocal topolog- ical solitons in active metamaterials

    Veenstra J, Gamayun O, Guo X, Sarvi A, Mein- ersen CV, Coulais C. Non-reciprocal topolog- ical solitons in active metamaterials. Nature. 2024;627:528-33

  48. [49]

    Nonlinear wave propagation in a bistable op- tical chain with nonreciprocal coupling Communi- cations Physics

    Aguilera-Rojas PJ, Alfaro-Bittner K, Clerc MG, Díaz-Zúñiga M, Moya A, Pinto-Ramos D, Rojas RG. Nonlinear wave propagation in a bistable op- tical chain with nonreciprocal coupling Communi- cations Physics. 2024;7(1):195

  49. [50]

    Absolute and convective instabili- ties in nonlinear systems

    Chomaz JM. Absolute and convective instabili- ties in nonlinear systems. Physical Review Letters. 1992;69(13):1931-34

  50. [51]

    Gradual regime shifts in fairy circles

    Zelnik YR, Meron E, Bel G. Gradual regime shifts in fairy circles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(40):12327-31

  51. [52]

    Clonal growth and ramet performance in the woodland herb, Asarum canadense

    Cain ML, Damman H. Clonal growth and ramet performance in the woodland herb, Asarum canadense. Journal of Ecology. 1997;85:883.97

  52. [53]

    Origin of the pinning of drifting monostable patterns

    Clerc M, Fernandez-Oto C, García-Ñustes M, Lou- vergneaux E. Origin of the pinning of drifting monostable patterns. Physical Review Letters. 2012;109(10):104101

  53. [54]

    Cross, M. C. and Hohenberg, P. C. Pattern for- mation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics. 1993;65(3):851

  54. [55]

    Role of co-occurring competition and facili- tation in plant spacing hydrodynamics in water- limited environments

    Trautz AC, Illangasekare TH, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Role of co-occurring competition and facili- tation in plant spacing hydrodynamics in water- limited environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(35):9379-84

  55. [56]

    Microtopography alters self-organized vegetation patterns in water- limited ecosystems

    McGrath GS, Paik K, Hinz C. Microtopography alters self-organized vegetation patterns in water- limited ecosystems. Journal of Geophysical Re- search: Biogeosciences. 2012;117(G3)

  56. [57]

    Ecosys- tem properties self-organize in response to a di- rectional fog–vegetation interaction

    Stanton DE, Armesto JJ, Hedin LO. Ecosys- tem properties self-organize in response to a di- rectional fog–vegetation interaction. Ecology. 2014 May;95(5):1203-12. 14

  57. [58]

    Termite mounds can increase the robustness of dry- land ecosystems to climatic change

    Bonachela JA, Pringle RM, Sheffer E, Coverdale TC, Guyton JA, Caylor KK, et al. Termite mounds can increase the robustness of dry- land ecosystems to climatic change. Science. 2015;347(6222):651-5

  58. [59]

    Aperiodic Clustered and Periodic Hexago- nal Vegetation Spot Arrays Explained by Inho- mogeneous Environments and Climate Trends in Arid Ecosystems

    Pinto-Ramos D, Clerc MG, Makhoute A, Tlidi M. Aperiodic Clustered and Periodic Hexago- nal Vegetation Spot Arrays Explained by Inho- mogeneous Environments and Climate Trends in Arid Ecosystems. Geophysical Research Letters. 2025;52(21):e2025GL118462

  59. [60]

    Self-organized vegetation pattern- ing as a fingerprint of climate and human im- pact on semi-arid ecosystems

    Barbier N, Couteron P, Lejoly J, Deblauwe V, Lejeune O. Self-organized vegetation pattern- ing as a fingerprint of climate and human im- pact on semi-arid ecosystems. Journal of Ecology. 2006;94(3):537-47

  60. [61]

    A simple global characterization for nor- mal forms of singular vector fields

    Elphick C, Tirapegui E, Brachet ME, Coullet P, Iooss G. A simple global characterization for nor- mal forms of singular vector fields. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1987;29(1-2):95-127

  61. [62]

    Code publication: How spatial patterns can lead to less resilient ecosystems

    [Code] Pinto-Ramos D, Martinez-Garcia R. Code publication: How spatial patterns can lead to less resilient ecosystems. RODARE. http://doi.org/10.14278/rodare.3744

  62. [63]

    On the repulsive interaction between lo- calised vegetation patches in scarce environments

    Berríos-Caro E, Clerc MG, Escaff D, Sandivari C, Tlidi M. On the repulsive interaction between lo- calised vegetation patches in scarce environments. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:5740

  63. [64]

    Analytical stud- ies of fronts, colonies, and patterns: combination of the Allee effect and nonlocal competition inter- actions

    Clerc MG, Escaff D, Kenkre VM. Analytical stud- ies of fronts, colonies, and patterns: combination of the Allee effect and nonlocal competition inter- actions. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlin- ear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2010;82(3):036210. References of the Supporting Informa- tion

  64. [65]

    On vegetation clustering, localized bare soil spots and fairy cir- cles

    Tlidi M, Lefever R, Vladimirov A. On vegetation clustering, localized bare soil spots and fairy cir- cles. Lecture notes in physics. 2008;751(381), 381- 402

  65. [66]

    Nonvariational real Swift- Hohenberg equation for biological, chemical, and optical systems

    Kozyreff G, Tlidi M. Nonvariational real Swift- Hohenberg equation for biological, chemical, and optical systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Jour- nal of Nonlinear Science. 2007;17(3)

  66. [67]

    General model for vegetation pat- terns including rhizome growth

    Ruiz-Reynés D, Schönsberg F, Hernández-García E, Gomila D. General model for vegetation pat- terns including rhizome growth. Physical Review Research. 2020;2(2):023402

  67. [68]

    Ecosystem engineers: from pattern formation to habitat creation

    GiladE,vonHardenbergJ,ProvenzaleA,Shachak M, Meron E. Ecosystem engineers: from pattern formation to habitat creation. Physical Review Letters. 2004;93(9):098105

  68. [69]

    A mathematical model of plants as ecosystem engineers

    GiladE,vonHardenbergJ,ProvenzaleA,Shachak M, Meron E. A mathematical model of plants as ecosystem engineers. Journal of Theoretical Biol- ogy. 2007;244(4):680-91. 15 Supporting Information for: ’How spatial patterns can lead to less resilient ecosystems’ Contents A Derivation of the reduced model, Eq.(1) 17 A.1 Interaction-redistribution, kernel-based mod...

  69. [70]

    We will perform our analysis near the transition from one case to the other to cover both

    Eq.(A.6) can show bistability or monostability. We will perform our analysis near the transition from one case to the other to cover both

  70. [71]

    We are also interested in patterns, so we will impose proximity to a Turing instability

  71. [72]

    Because we are interested in macroscopic patterns, we focus on the case where patterns exhibit big wave- lengths, or equivalently, wavenumbersk→0. 18

  72. [73]

    We require that the timescale of this movement be the same order of magnitude as that of the evolution of the homogeneous or patterned solution

    Lastly, the nonreciprocal interaction induces a velocity. We require that the timescale of this movement be the same order of magnitude as that of the evolution of the homogeneous or patterned solution. These four conditions, together with the proximity to the bifurcation point, reduce our analysis to the neigh- borhood of a single point in a five-dimensi...