Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Parametrised Complexity of Counting Small Sub-Hypergraphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.14081 v3 pith:VTRFISH2 submitted 2025-06-17 cs.CC cs.DS

classification cs.CCcs.DS
keywords mathcalcountingfixed-parametertractablecasescomplexityhypergraphindsub
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Subgraph counting is a fundamental and well-studied problem whose computational complexity is well understood. Quite surprisingly, the hypergraph version of subgraph counting has been almost ignored. In this work, we address this gap by investigating the most basic sub-hypergraph counting problem: given a (small) hypergraph $H$ and a (large) hypergraph $G$, compute the number of sub-hypergraphs of $G$ isomorphic to $H$. Formally, for a family $\mathcal{H}$ of hypergraphs, let #Sub($\mathcal{H}$) be the restriction of the problem to $H \in \mathcal{H}$; the induced variant #IndSub($\mathcal{H}$) is defined analogously. Our main contribution is a complete classification of the complexity of these problems. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, we prove that #Sub($\mathcal{H}$) is fixed-parameter tractable if and only if $\mathcal{H}$ has bounded fractional co-independent edge-cover number, a novel graph parameter we introduce. Moreover, #IndSub($\mathcal{H}$) is fixed-parameter tractable if and only if $\mathcal{H}$ has bounded fractional edge-cover number. Both results subsume pre-existing results for graphs as special cases. We also show that the fixed-parameter tractable cases of #Sub($\mathcal{H}$) and #IndSub($\mathcal{H}$) are unlikely to be in polynomial time, unless respectively #P = P and Graph Isomorphism $\in$ P. This shows a separation with the special case of graphs, where the fixed-parameter tractable cases are known to actually be in polynomial time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Fine-Grained Complexity of Counting Hypergraph Motifs

    cs.CC 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hypergraph motif counting is always FPT-near-quadratic in rank, and FPT-near-linear exactly for the degenerate Venn diagrams, assuming Triangle and Hyperclique Hypotheses.

  2. Counting Patterns in Degenerate Graphs in Constant Space

    cs.DS 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper claims constant-space, DAG-treedepth-based pattern counting in degenerate graphs, but the flagship algorithm's time bound is contradicted by a star-pattern counterexample.

Pith tools