pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.12172 · v1 · pith:XTKEIPFOnew · submitted 2025-07-16 · 🧮 math.AP

Phase-field modelling of cohesive fracture. Part II: Reconstruction of the cohesive law

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords cohesivephase-fieldfracturemodelsexamplesmodellingresponsesresults
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This is the second paper of a three-part work the main aim of which is to provide a unified consistent framework for the phase-field modelling of cohesive fracture. Building on the theoretical foundations of the first paper, where {$\Gamma$-convergence} results have been derived, this second paper presents a systematic procedure for constructing phase-field models that reproduce prescribed cohesive laws. By either selecting the degradation function and determining the damage potential or vice versa, we enable the derivation of multiple phase-field models that exhibit the same cohesive fracture behavior but differ in their localized phase-field evolution. This methodology provides a flexible and rigorous strategy for tailoring phase-field models to specific cohesive responses, as shown by the several examples worked out. The mechanical responses associated with these examples, highlighting their features and validating the theoretical results, are investigated in the third paper from a more engineering-oriented and applied perspective.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quasistatic evolution of cohesive-type fracture

    math.AP 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Existence of globally stable quasistatic evolutions is proved for cohesive fracture with unprescribed paths in any dimension via a new convergence notion for memory variables.