Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Minimal surface entropy and applications of Ricci flow on finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On a finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifold, the hyperbolic metric is the unique metric with minimal surface entropy equal to 2: it uniquely minimizes entropy under sectional curvature at most −1 and uniquely maximizes it under scalar curvatur

desk verdict Solid entropy computation for cusped hyperbolic 3-manifolds, but the upper-bound theorems C/D rest on an unproved interpolation metric and on the unpublished companion [29]; referee it, but expect major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00197 v1 pith:B2MTUR6E submitted 2025-08-29 math.DG math.DSmath.GT

Ruojing Jiang , Franco Vargas Pallete This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.DSmath.GT MSC 53C4453C4253C24
keywords minimalsurfaceentropyhyperbolic3-manifoldsfinite-volumecuspedmanifoldsRicciflowrigidityscalarcurvaturesectionalsurfaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Minimal surface entropy counts, at exponential scale, how many essential minimal surfaces a metric admits up to a given area. This paper extends the rigidity theory of that entropy from closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds to finite-volume ones with cusps. It computes the entropy of the hyperbolic metric as exactly 2, the same value as in the closed case, and proves the hyperbolic metric is the unique optimizer on both sides: among metrics with sectional curvature ≤ −1 it is the unique minimizer, and among weakly cusped metrics with scalar curvature ≥ −6 it is the unique maximizer, under an infinitesimal rigidity or C0-closeness assumption. The point of the paper is that entropy detects the hyperbolic structure sharply even when the manifold is non-compact, and that the maximization half is reached through the quantitative convergence of Ricci flow rather than by comparison geometry alone.

What carries the argument

Minimal surface entropy E(h): the exponential growth rate, in L ln L, of the number of essential surface subgroups whose least-area representatives have h-area at most 4π(L − 1); at the hyperbolic metric the value is 2. The lower-bound side uses the Kahn–Wright construction of nearly Fuchsian essential surfaces in finite-covolume Kleinian groups and their equidistribution toward the Lebesgue measure on the frame bundle. The upper-bound side runs on the normalized Ricci-DeTurck flow: its quantitative exponential convergence to h0 in weighted Hölder norms decaying into the cusps (Theorem 6.2), the convergence of e^t(h(t) − h0) to a −1 eigentensor of the linearized operator (Lemma 7.4), and a m

What would settle it

Look at the companion paper's Theorem 6.2: compute or bound the largest eigenvalue of the linearized operator Ah0 on the weighted little Hölder spaces (it should be exactly −1 with a spectral gap), since the entire δe^{−t} argument depends on that gap. Separately, try to construct, for an arbitrary weakly cusped h with R ≥ −6, the smooth interpolation between h on the thick part and h0 on the thin part required by (7.3); the first concrete h for which no such interpolation exists would break the proof of Theorem C, and a modified construction would be needed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims a two-sided rigidity statement. On a finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifold (M, h0), the minimal surface entropy of the hyperbolic metric is E_{μLeb}(h0) = E(h0) = 2 (Theorem A), exactly as for closed manifolds. In one direction (Theorem B), any metric h with sec(h) ≤ −1 satisfies E(h) ≥ 2, and if h is bilipschitz to h0 with sec(h) ≥ −k², equality holds if and only if h is isometric to h0. In the opposite direction (Theorems C and D), weakly cusped h with R(h) ≥ −6 satisfies E(h) ≤ 2 when the manifold is infinitesimally rigid, and E_{μLeb}(h) ≤ 2 when h is C0-close to h0 and asymptotically cusped, again with equality only for h isometric to h0. The upper-bound half is carried b

Load-bearing premise

The upper-bound theorems rest on the quantitative exponential convergence of the normalized Ricci-DeTurck flow toward the hyperbolic metric, taken from the authors' unpublished companion paper, and on the existence of a smooth interpolation metric with R ≥ −6 and sec ≤ 0 on the cusps; if either fails, Theorems C and D collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theorem A fixes the hyperbolic entropy at exactly 2 for every finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifold, so the exponential counting rate of minimal surfaces is independent of the cusp structure and matches the closed-manifold value.
  • Taken together, Theorems B–D sandwich the entropy of the hyperbolic metric between a sectional-curvature lower bound and a scalar-curvature upper bound, identifying the hyperbolic metric as the unique metric of entropy exactly 2 under either curvature sign condition.
  • Under the assumptions of Theorem C or Theorem D, attaining the value 2 forces the metric to be isometric to h0, so the entropy maximum is attained only at the hyperbolic metric whenever those hypotheses apply.
  • Proposition 2.4 extends the closed-manifold equidistribution of minimal surfaces to finite-volume manifolds, which is why the Lebesgue-measure entropy and the plain entropy coincide at the hyperbolic metric.
  • The proof shows the finite-volume upper bound on entropy can be read off from the exponential convergence rate of the flow, making entropy rigidity a corollary of parabolic stability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The upper-bound theorems are only as solid as the companion paper's quantitative stability estimate: if the exponential decay rate or the spectral gap behind Theorem 6.2 were smaller than claimed, the δe^{−t} gap in (7.6)–(7.10) would not close and Theorems C and D would lose their proof.
  • A natural next step, mirroring the closed case's history, is to remove the infinitesimal rigidity assumption from Theorem C; the paper's use of E_{μLeb} in Theorem D suggests measure-adapted entropy is the right tool for that removal.
  • The modified-metric interpolation in Section 7.1 is asserted without construction: checking whether every weakly cusped h with R ≥ −6 admits a smooth bridge between h and h0 satisfying both R ≥ −6 and sec ≤ 0 would settle the robustness of the upper-bound argument.
  • The exponential L1-decay of −1 eigentensors into the cusps (Lemma 8.3) suggests the obstruction to global flow convergence is confined to the ends, so a quantitative entropy-deficit estimate near h0, controlling how far entropy drops from 2 by the distance to the hyperbolic metric, might be within reach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the recently developed theory of minimal surface entropy from closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds to finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds with cusps. Theorem A computes the entropy of the hyperbolic metric, E(h0)=E_{μLeb}(h0)=2, using Kahn–Wright surface subgroups and a new equidistribution statement for the associated minimal surfaces. Theorem B proves E(h)≥2 when sec(h)≤−1, with rigidity under an additional bilipschitz and lower-curvature assumption. Theorems C and D prove upper bounds E(h)≤2 and E_{μLeb}(h)≤2 under R(h)≥−6 for weakly cusped metrics, with rigidity in the asymptotically cusped case. The upper-bound arguments follow the closed-case strategy of Lowe and Lowe–Neves, replacing compact stability by quantitative exponential convergence of the normalized Ricci–DeTurck flow to the hyperbolic metric in weighted Hölder spaces.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a substantial advance: it establishes entropy rigidity for finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds, a setting where noncompactness creates genuinely new difficulties, and it provides a template for using quantitative Ricci-flow stability in entropy problems. The paper contains several strong ingredients, including a clean spectral estimate (5.6), a detailed adaption of the Kahn–Wright construction to prove equidistribution of minimal surfaces, and a careful treatment of area minimizers in weakly cusped metrics. The entropy comparisons are genuine two-sided squeezes with no fitted parameters. However, the upper-bound theorems C and D depend on two load-bearing external inputs: the quantitative stability theorem 6.2 and the eigentensor-convergence lemma 7.4, both sourced from the unpublished companion paper [29], and on an unproved curvature-controlled interpolation of metrics in §7.1. These gaps currently prevent the paper from being fully self-contained and verifiable.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.1, Eq. (7.3)] The proof of Proposition 7.1, and hence Theorem C, relies on constructing, for each i, a metric h_i equal to h on M(s_i), equal to h0 on M(2s_i)^c, and smoothly interpolating between h and h0 on the annulus M(2s_i)\M(s_i), with the simultaneous bounds R(h_i)≥−6 and sec(h_i)≤0. This existence is asserted without proof or reference. This is not a standard gluing lemma: sectional curvature is not preserved under convex combinations of metrics, and h is only weakly cusped, so it is not close to h0 in any norm. The subsequent applications of Lemma 3.2, the flow starting from h_i, and the containment of area minimizers all depend on this h_i. The same kind of unproved modification is used again before Eq. (7.4) when h_i(t_i) is changed on the thin part to obtain C^2-closeness to h0 while preserving the relevant curvature and minimizer properties. A proof of such an interpolation, or a reformul
  2. [§6.2, Theorem 6.2; §7.3, Lemma 7.4] Theorems C and D rest on quantitative exponential convergence of the normalized Ricci–DeTurck flow to the hyperbolic metric in weighted Hölder spaces (Theorem 6.2) and on the subsequential convergence of e^t(h(t)−h0) to a −1 eigentensor of the linearized operator (Lemma 7.4). Theorem 6.2 is cited from the unpublished companion paper [29] with no proof, and Lemma 7.4's proof invokes equation (7.1), Proposition B.2, and equation (6.16) of [29]. Since these statements carry the main analytic weight of the upper-bound and rigidity arguments, the manuscript is not self-contained. For a journal submission, the relevant companion results should be either incorporated into the paper or replaced by complete proofs, especially because the finite-volume cusp geometry is exactly where the weighted spaces and the L^2 eigentensor classification are needed.
  3. [§7.3, Lemma 7.3(2); §7.5, rigidity] The rigidity part of Proposition 7.1 uses Lemma 7.3(2) to conclude that e^{T_i} l_i(T_i) →0 in C^2(M(s_i)), based on Lemma 7.4 and infinitesimal rigidity. The step 'since (M,h0) is infinitesimally rigid, l_i must be 0' is stated in one sentence and is not proved. In the cusped finite-volume setting one must exclude cusp-localized L^2 eigentensors of A_{h0} with eigenvalue −1, or justify that the infinitesimal rigidity condition H^1(π1(M),Ad)=0 indeed kills all such tensors. This is particularly delicate because nontrivial Einstein variations can be supported near cusps. As written, this is an unproved load-bearing assertion; it may follow from estimates in [29], but that dependence should be made explicit and verifiable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§7.2.2] The metric h_i^+(t_i) is used in Eq. (7.4) before its construction is described. The sentence beginning 'If, on the thin part...' should be expanded and placed before the displayed equation.
  2. [§8, after Eq. (8.17)] The chain 'μLeb(θ(l)) = 1/2 μLeb(l) = 1/6 ∫ tr_{h0}(l) dvol_{h0}' appears to use an averaging identity for frames; the factor 1/2 versus 1/6 should be clarified, though the conclusion tr_{h0}(l)=0 makes the final contradiction independent of the precise constant.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (5.6)] The spectral estimate is clean and well presented. A minor notational issue: the inner product (A_{h0}(l),l) and the subsequent L^2 norms are written without explicit dvol in some displayed equations; adding the volume form would improve readability.
  4. [§2.3.3] In the lower bound for #S_{μLeb}(M,g,ϵ), the text says 'when g is large' after deriving the estimate only along the sequence g_k=k(g0−1)+1. The argument can be completed by comparing arbitrary large g to the preceding element of this sequence, but this should be spelled out.
  5. [References] Reference [29] is listed as 'Manuscript in preparation'. Given how much of Theorems C and D depends on it, the authors should state explicitly which statements from [29] are used and, ideally, make a version of [29] available at submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entropy comparisons are genuine squeezes against the computed baseline E(h0)=2; the main external load is the authors' unpublished companion [29], which is an independent analytic input, not a restatement of the entropy result.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the derivation chain. Theorem A computes E(h0)=E_muLeb(h0)=2 by counting surface subgroups with the Kahn–Wright construction and proving equidistribution of the associated minimal-surface measures to the Lebesgue measure; the lower bound uses degree-k covers and subgroup counting, and the upper bound uses triangulations of pleated surfaces. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Theorem B is a direct Gauss–Bonnet comparison: sec(h) <= -1 forces areah(Sigma) <= 4pi(g-1) (eq. 4.2), giving E(h) >= E(h0)=2, with rigidity obtained from equidistribution and the Cheeger homeomorphism; again no circular reduction. Theorems C and D rely on the quantitative exponential convergence of normalized Ricci-DeTurck flow, Theorem 6.2, imported from the authors' companion paper [29], and Section 7.1 additionally asserts, without proof, the existence of interpolating metrics h_i satisfying R(h_i)>=-6 and sec(h_i)<=0 (eq. 7.3). These are genuine gaps or external analytic inputs, but they are not circular: [29] is a Ricci-flow stability statement whose assumptions do not include the entropy conclusion, and the interpolation, if valid, is a separate geometric construction. The paper itself flags [29] as 'Manuscript in preparation' and leaves the rigidity proof of Theorem D to 'arguments similar to those used in the previous section'; these are correctness/rigor risks, not instances of the derivation being equivalent to its own inputs. No parameter is fitted to make E(h) come out as 2, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked in a way that merely restates the desired rigidity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on three kinds of inputs: (1) massive external machinery (Kahn-Wright surface subgroups, Ratner's classification, Seppi's second fundamental form bound, minimizer existence results, Wise's separability, Perelman's geometrization through BBM surgery, Bamler's stability); (2) stated hypotheses of the theorems (infinitesimal rigidity, weak cusped, asymptotically cusped, C0-closeness); and (3) the authors' own unpublished stability results [29]. No free parameters are fitted to any target entropy value: the constants hCj = 50 ln Rj and hTj = 6 ln Rj are construction choices inherited from Kahn-Wright that only need to make counting bounds decay. The main burden is that the decisive analytic ingredient, Theorem 6.2, is not verifiable from this preprint.

free parameters (2)
  • Cusp cut-off heights hCj, hTj = hCj = 50 ln Rj, hTj = 6 ln Rj (eq. 2.8)
    Hand-chosen in the Kahn-Wright construction so umbrella and hamster-wheel contributions decay (R_j^-97, R_j^-26); not fitted to the entropy value but ad hoc to make counting inequalities work.
  • Kahn-Wright good-curve parameters Rj, delta_j = delta_j = 1/j, Rj chosen with c''_j R_j^-97 -> 0
    Inherited from [33]; adjusted per index j so that removed-feet measures and weight ratios vanish as j -> infinity, which is needed for the vague convergence to muLeb in Proposition 2.4.
assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Kahn-Wright surface subgroup theorem: for every small epsilon there is a closed essential (1+epsilon)-quasigeodesic surface subgroup of Gamma (Theorem 2.3 = [33, Thm 1.1]).
    Foundation for all counting in the cusped setting; the paper sketches but does not reprove it, and the umbrella/hamster-wheel machinery is taken wholesale from [33].
  • standard math Ratner's measure classification and Shah's closure theorem for the PSL2(R)-action on the frame bundle of a finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifold: ergodic invariant measures are muLeb or supported on totally geodesic surfaces ([44], [51], [52]).
    Bridges vague convergence of laminar measures to equality with muLeb in Proposition 2.4, via the decomposition nu = a mu_T + (1-a) muLeb.
  • standard math Exponential mixing of the geodesic flow and equidistribution of good pants feet along good curves in the compact part (Theorems 3.1, 3.3, 5.9 of [33]).
    Used in the proof of Proposition 2.4 (Section 2.3.2) to show the weighted foot measure converges to muLeb on compact sets of bounded height.
  • domain assumption Seppi's estimate |A|^2 = O(epsilon) for minimal surfaces with (1+epsilon)-quasicircle limit sets ([50]), Uhlenbeck-type uniqueness ([57]), and absence of accidental parabolics ([46]).
    Underpins (2.16), the Gauss-Bonnet area identity, and the restriction to parabolic-free surface subgroups in Sections 3 through 8.
  • domain assumption Existence of area-minimizing representatives for essential surface subgroups in the hyperbolic cusped metric and for weakly cusped metrics (Theorem 3.1, using [24], [45], [15], [16], [27], [25], plus Wise's separability [58] and Scott's lifting theorem [49]).
    Without these minimizers the entropy counting has no geometric content; the immersed case needs finite covers, which is why the barrier s depends on the surface subgroup Pi.
  • domain assumption Theorem C assumes infinitesimal rigidity, H^1(pi_1(M), Ad) = 0.
    Explicit hypothesis of Theorem C, inherited from Lowe [36]; needed in Lemma 7.3(2) to force the limit -1 eigentensor l_i of the linearized DeTurck operator to vanish.
  • domain assumption Long-time existence and stability of normalized Ricci flow with bubbling-off for asymptotically cusped metrics of order k >= 2 (Theorem 5.12, generalizing [7, Theorem 2.22]).
    Provides the global flow in the rigidity part of Theorem C and in Theorem D; the proof of Theorem 5.12 in the paper still relies on the BBM book [6], Perelman's geometrization [42], Shi's estimates [53], and Chen-Zhu uniqueness [14].
  • ad hoc to paper Quantitative exponential stability of the normalized Ricci-DeTurck flow near h0 in weighted little Holder spaces (Theorem 6.2, Theorem 5.16) and companion estimates from [29] (Prop B.2, eq. (6.16), eq. (7.1)).
    This is the engine behind Lemmas 7.3, 7.4, and 8.2. It comes from the authors' own unpublished manuscript ('Manuscript in preparation'), so the input cannot be verified from this preprint.
  • standard math The L2-spectral bound (5.6): (A_h0 l, l) <= -||l||^2, with equality characterizing traceless Codazzi divergence-free tensors.
    Derived in Section 5.2 by integration by parts; identifies the -1 eigentensors and gives tr(l) = 0, which is needed for the final contradiction in Theorem D.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Minimal surface entropy and applications of Ricci flow on finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B2MTUR6E

@misc{pith2026250900197,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Minimal surface entropy and applications of Ricci flow on finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B2MTUR6E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00197}
}
abstract

This paper studies minimal surface entropy (the exponential asymptotic growth of the number of minimal surfaces up to a given value of area) for negatively curved metrics on hyperbolic $3$-manifolds of finite volume, particularly its comparison to the hyperbolic minimal surface entropy in terms of sectional and scalar curvature. On one hand, for metrics that are bilipschitz equivalent to the hyperbolic metric and have sectional curvature bounded above by $-1$ and uniformly bounded below, we show that the entropy achieves its minimum if and only if the metric is hyperbolic. On the other hand, by analyzing the convergence rate of the Ricci flow toward the hyperbolic metric, we prove that among all metrics with scalar curvature bounded below by $-6$ and with non-positive sectional curvature on the cusps, the entropy is maximized at the hyperbolic metric, provided that it is infinitesimally rigid. Furthermore, if the metrics are uniformly $C^0$-close to the hyperbolic metric and asymptotically cusped, then the entropy associated with the Lebesgue measure is uniquely maximized at the hyperbolic metric.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Volume comparison on finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds

    math.DG 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The hyperbolic metric minimizes volume among all metrics with scalar curvature at least -6 on finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds, with rigidity when the metric is C^2-close or asymptotically cusped.

  2. Area bounds for constant mean curvature surfaces in hyperbolic 3-manifolds

    math.DG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Closed embedded CMC surfaces with |H|≥1 in finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds have area bounded in terms of H and genus, and Bryant surfaces have area bounded linearly by genus.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [29]

    Jiang and F

    R. Jiang and F. Vargas Pallete. On the stability of Ricci flow on hyperbolic 3-manifolds of finite volume, 2025. Manuscript in preparation

    work page 2025

  2. [8]

    Besson, G

    G. Besson, G. Courtois, and S. Gallot. Volume et entropie minimale des espaces localement symétriques. Invent. Math., 103(2):417–446, 1991

    work page 1991

  3. [1]

    Anderson

    M.T. Anderson. Complete minimal varieties in hyperbolic space.Invent. Math., 69(3):477–494, 1982

    work page 1982

  4. [2]

    Angenent

    S.B. Angenent. Nonlinear analytic semiflows.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 115(1-2):91–107, 1990

    1990

  5. [3]

    Al Assal

    F. Al Assal. Limits of asymptotically Fuchsian surfaces in a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold. arXiv:2309.02164, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [4]

    Bader, D

    U. Bader, D. Fisher, N. Miller, and M. Stover. Arithmeticity, superrigidity, and totally geodesic submanifolds. Ann. of Math., 193(3):837–861, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [5]

    R.H. Bamler. Stability of hyperbolic manifolds with cusps under Ricci flow. Adv. Math., 263:412–467, 2014

    2014

  8. [6]

    Bessières, G

    L. Bessières, G. Besson, M. Boileau, S. Maillot, and J. Porti.Geometrisation of 3-Manifolds, volume 13 of EMS Tracts in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2010

    2010

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    Bessières, G

    L. Bessières, G. Besson, and S. Maillot. Long time behaviour of Ricci flow on open 3-manifolds. Comment. Math., 90(2):377–405, 2015. MINIMAL SURF ACE ENTROPY AND APPLICATIONS OF RICCI FLOW 53

    2015

  2. [9]

    Bowditch

    B. Bowditch. Geometrical finiteness with variable negative curvature.Duke Math. J., 77:229– 274, 1995

    1995

  3. [10]

    H. Bray, S. Brendle, M. Eichmair, and A. Neves. Area-minimizing projective planes in three- manifolds. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 63(9):1237–1247, 2010

    2010

  4. [11]

    Yu. D. Burago and V. A. Zalgaller.Geometric inequalities, volume 285 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1988. Translated from the Russian by A. B. Sosinski˘i, Springer Series in Soviet M...

    1988

  5. [12]

    Calegari.scl, volume 20

    D. Calegari.scl, volume 20. MSJ Memoirs, Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2009

    2009

  6. [13]

    Calegari, F

    D. Calegari, F. Marques, and A. Neves. Counting minimal surfaces in negatively curved 3- manifolds. Duke Math. J., 2022

    2022

  7. [14]

    Chen and X.P

    B.L. Chen and X.P. Zhu. Uniqueness of the Ricci flow on complete noncompact manifolds.J. Differential Geom., 74(1):119–154, 2006

    2006

  8. [15]

    Collin, L

    P. Collin, L. Hauswirth, L. Mazet, and H. Rosenberg. Minimal surfaces in finite volume non compact hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 369, 05 2014

    2014

  9. [16]

    minimal surfaces in finite volume noncompact hyperbolic 3-manifolds

    P. Collin, L. Hauswirth, L. Mazet, and H. Rosenberg. Corrigendum to "minimal surfaces in finite volume noncompact hyperbolic 3-manifolds".Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 2019

    2019

  10. [17]

    C.L.Epstein.ThehyperbolicGaussmapandquasiconformalreflections. J. Reine Angew. Math., 372:96–135, 1986

    1986

  11. [18]

    Gilbarg and N.S

    D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger.Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Classics in Mathematics. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001

    2001

  12. [19]

    M. Gromov. Three remarks on geodesic dynamics and fundamental group.Enseign. Math., 46(2):391–402, 2000

    2000

  13. [20]

    Hamenstädt

    U. Hamenstädt. Entropy-rigidity of locally symmetric spaces of negative curvature.Ann. of Math., 131(1):35–51, 1990

    1990

  14. [21]

    Hamenstädt

    U. Hamenstädt. Incompressible surfaces in rank one locally symmetric spaces.Geom. Funct. Anal., 25:815–859, 2015

    2015

  15. [22]

    Hamenstädt and F

    U. Hamenstädt and F. Jäckel. Stability of Einstein metrics and effective hyperbolization in large Hempel distance.arXiv:2206.10438, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Hamilton

    R.S. Hamilton. A compactness property for solutions of the Ricci flow.Am. J. Math., 117:545, 1995

    1995

  17. [24]

    Hass, J.H

    J. Hass, J.H. Rubinstein, and S. Wang. Boundary slopes of immersed surfaces in 3-manifolds. J. Differential Geom., 52(2):303–325, 1999

    1999

  18. [25]

    Hass and P

    J. Hass and P. Scott. The existence of least area surfaces in 3-manifolds.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 310:87–114, 1988

    1988

  19. [26]

    Hasselblatt and A

    B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok.Chapter 1 Principal structures, volume 1 ofHandbook of Dynam- ical Systems, pages 1–203. Elsevier Science, 2002

    2002

  20. [27]

    Huang and B

    Z. Huang and B. Wang. Closed minimal surfaces in cusped hyperbolic three-manifolds.Geom Dedicata, 189:17–37, 2017

    2017

  21. [28]

    R. Jiang. Counting essential minimal surfaces in closed negatively curved n-manifolds.J. Geom. Anal., 35, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    J. Kahn, F. Labourie, and S. Mozes. Surface groups in uniform lattices of some semi-simple groups. arXiv:1805.10189, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kahn and V

    J. Kahn and V. Markovic. Counting essential surfaces in a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold.Geom. Topol., 16:601–624, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Kahn and V

    J. Kahn and V. Markovic. Immersing almost geodesic surfaces in a closed hyperbolic three manifold. Ann. of Math., 175(3):1127–1190, 2012

    2012

  25. [33]

    Kahn and A

    J. Kahn and A. Wright. Nearly Fuchsian surface subgroups of finite covolume Kleinian groups. Duke Math. J., 170(3):503–573, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Knopf and A

    D. Knopf and A. Young. Asymptotic stability of the cross curvature flow at a hyperbolic metric. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., pages 699–709, 2009. 54 RUOJING JIANG AND FRANCO V ARGAS PALLETE

    2009

  27. [35]

    Labourie

    F. Labourie. Asymptotic counting of minimal surfaces in hyperbolic manifolds [according to Calegari, Marques and Neves].arXiv:2203.09366, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    B. Lowe. Area, Scalar Curvature, and Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds.arXiv:2102.03660, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Lowe and A

    B. Lowe and A. Neves. Minimal surface entropy and average area ratio.J. Differential Geom., 130(2):443–475, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Marques and A

    F. Marques and A. Neves. Conformal currents and the entropy of negatively curved three- manifolds. arXiv:2405.16302, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Morgan and G

    J.W. Morgan and G. Tian.Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, volume 3 ofClay Mathe- matics Monographs. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007

    2007

  32. [40]

    Mozes and N

    S. Mozes and N. Shah. On the space of ergodic invariant measures of unipotent flows.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 15(1):149–159, 1995

    1995

  33. [41]

    Müller and J.-C

    T. Müller and J.-C. Puchta. Character theory of symmetric groups and subgroup growth of surface groups.J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 66(3):623–640, 2002

    2002

  34. [42]

    Perelman

    G. Perelman. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds.arXiv e-prints, 2003

    2003

  35. [43]

    Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, 2:311–393, 1975

    G.DaPratoandP.Grisvard.Equationsd’évolutionabstraitesnonlinéairesdetypeparabolique. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, 2:311–393, 1975

    1975

  36. [44]

    M. Ratner. Raghunathan’s topological conjecture and distributions of unipotent flows.Duke Math. J., 63(1):235–280, 1991

    1991

  37. [45]

    Ruberman

    D. Ruberman. Mutation and volumes of knots inS3. Invent. Math., 90:189–215, 02 1987

    1987

  38. [46]

    Rubinstein

    J.H. Rubinstein. Minimal surfaces in geometric 3-manifolds. InGlobal Theory of Minimal Sur- faces, volume 2 ofClay Math. Proc., pages 725–746. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2005

    2005

  39. [47]

    Sacks and K

    J. Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck. Minimal immersions of closed Riemann surfaces.Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 271(2):639–652, 1982

    1982

  40. [48]

    Schoen and S.T

    R. Schoen and S.T. Yau. Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topology of three dimensional manifolds with non-negative scalar curvature.Ann. of Math., 110(1):127–142, 1979

    1979

  41. [49]

    P. Scott. Subgroups of surface groups are almost geometric. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 17(3):555–565, 1978

    1978

  42. [50]

    A. Seppi. Minimal discs in hyperbolic space bounded by a quasicircle at infinity.Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, 91:807–839, 11 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    N.A. Shah. Closures of totally geodesic immersions in manifolds of constant negative curvature. Singapore: World Scientific, 1991

    1991

  44. [52]

    N.A. Shah. Uniformly distributed orbits of certain flows on homogeneous spaces.Math. Ann, pages 315–334, 1991

    1991

  45. [53]

    W.X. Shi. Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds.J. Differential Geom., 30(1):223–301, 1989

    1989

  46. [54]

    Simonett

    G. Simonett. Center manifolds for quasilinear reaction-diffusion systems.Differential and Inte- gral Equations, 8(4):753–796, 1995

    1995

  47. [55]

    Thurston.Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology, Vol

    W.P. Thurston.Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology, Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997

    1997

  48. [56]

    Topping.Lectures on the Ricci Flow

    P. Topping.Lectures on the Ricci Flow. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  49. [57]

    Uhlenbeck.Closed minimal surfaces in hyperbolic 3-manifolds, pages 147–168

    K. Uhlenbeck.Closed minimal surfaces in hyperbolic 3-manifolds, pages 147–168. Seminar On Minimal Submanifolds. (AM-103). Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983

    1983

  50. [58]

    D.T. Wise. The structure of groups with a quasiconvex hierarchy, volume 209 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2021. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA 02139 Email address: ruojingj@mit.edu ...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.