A Scoping Review of Mixed Initiative Visual Analytics in the Automation Renaissance
read the original abstract
Artificial agents are increasingly integrated into data analysis workflows, carrying out tasks that were primarily done by humans. Our research explores how the introduction of automation recalibrates the dynamic between humans and automating technology. To explore this question, we conducted a scoping review encompassing twenty years of mixed-initiative visual analytic systems. To describe and contrast the relationship between humans and automation, we developed an integrated taxonomy to delineate the objectives of these mixed-initiative visual analytics tools, how much automation they support, and the assumed roles of humans. Here, we describe our qualitative approach of integrating existing theoretical frameworks with new codes we developed. Our analysis shows that the visualization research literature lacks consensus on the definition of mixed-initiative systems and explores a limited potential of the collaborative interaction landscape between people and automation. Our research provides a scaffold to advance the discussion of human-AI collaboration during visual data analysis. Our integrated taxonomy is available in the form of a web application on https://smonadjemi.github.io/miva.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
BONSAI: A Mixed-Initiative Workspace for Human-AI Co-Development of Visual Analytics Applications
BONSAI introduces a four-layer architecture and four-phase workflow for human-AI co-development of visual analytics applications, shown in case studies to enable efficient novel tool creation and reconstruction from p...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.