pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.23231 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Fuzzy dark matter simulations

Hsi-Yu Schive This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 12:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords fuzzy dark matterultralight bosonsnumerical simulationswave dynamicsfluid approximationinitial conditionscode comparisongalactic scales
0
0 comments X

The pith

This review outlines algorithms for wave and fluid simulations of fuzzy dark matter and releases public initial conditions to enable code comparisons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Fuzzy dark matter made of ultralight bosons shows wave effects on galactic scales that require special numerical treatment. The paper describes the governing equations and distinctive wave features before detailing multiple numerical algorithms for both full wave solutions and fluid approximations. It examines the benefits and drawbacks of each method and presents standard test problems. Public initial condition files are made available for isolated halo and cosmological simulations to support consistent comparisons between different codes.

Core claim

The central claim is that providing a survey of numerical algorithms for both wave- and fluid-based FDM simulations, along with their advantages, limitations, representative test problems, and publicly available initial condition files for isolated-halo and cosmological cases, will facilitate code comparison and advance the field.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the collection of wave-based and fluid-based numerical algorithms designed to handle the rapid oscillations of the de Broglie wavelength in fuzzy dark matter.

If this is right

  • Codes can validate their implementations using the same test problems and initial conditions.
  • The advantages and limitations guide selection of appropriate methods for specific FDM problems.
  • Public files reduce setup errors in starting new simulations.
  • Comparisons across wave and fluid approaches become more straightforward.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Consistent use of the benchmarks may improve the accuracy of predictions for FDM's impact on structure formation.
  • The released materials could encourage development of new simulation techniques tailored to ultralight dark matter.
  • Researchers might extend the test problems to include more complex scenarios like mergers or baryonic effects.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the released initial condition files accurately represent the FDM physics and will be used in the same way by all simulation codes.

What would settle it

Observing whether different codes produce the same physical results when started from the provided initial condition files would confirm or refute their usefulness for code comparison.

read the original abstract

Fuzzy dark matter (FDM), composed of ultralight bosons, exhibits intricate wave phenomena on galactic scales. Compared to cold dark matter, FDM simulations are significantly more computationally demanding due to the need to resolve the de Broglie wavelength and its rapid oscillations. In this review, we first outline the governing equations and distinctive features of FDM. We then present a range of numerical algorithms for both wave- and fluid-based simulations, discuss their respective advantages and limitations, and highlight representative test problems. To facilitate code comparison, we also provide publicly available initial condition files for both isolated-halo and cosmological simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review outlines the governing equations and distinctive features of fuzzy dark matter (FDM). It surveys numerical algorithms for both wave- and fluid-based FDM simulations, discusses their respective advantages and limitations, highlights representative test problems, and releases publicly available initial condition files for isolated-halo and cosmological simulations to facilitate code comparisons.

Significance. If the released initial-condition files are generated reproducibly from the governing equations without undocumented choices, the review could help standardize FDM simulation practices and enable direct inter-code comparisons. The compilation of existing algorithms and test problems is a useful service to the community, even though the manuscript introduces no new derivations or simulations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Initial conditions and data release] The section describing the public initial-condition files states that they are supplied to enable code comparisons but provides no explicit verification or documentation of the generation pipeline from the equations in §2 (e.g., smoothing scales, phase conventions, or box-size normalizations). This leaves open the possibility that the files contain hidden setup choices or format ambiguities that would prevent unambiguous interpretation by independent codes.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Test problems] Figure captions for the test-problem results could include the specific resolution and box size used in each run to allow readers to assess numerical convergence directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for highlighting the potential of the public initial-condition files to standardize FDM simulation practices. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Initial conditions and data release] The section describing the public initial-condition files states that they are supplied to enable code comparisons but provides no explicit verification or documentation of the generation pipeline from the equations in §2 (e.g., smoothing scales, phase conventions, or box-size normalizations). This leaves open the possibility that the files contain hidden setup choices or format ambiguities that would prevent unambiguous interpretation by independent codes.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript section on the public initial-condition files would benefit from expanded documentation to ensure full reproducibility and to eliminate any risk of format ambiguities. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated subsection that explicitly describes the generation pipeline, specifying the smoothing scales applied, the phase conventions adopted, the box-size normalizations used, and the precise mapping from the governing equations in §2. We will also include verification diagnostics (e.g., power-spectrum comparisons and direct checks against the Schrödinger-Poisson system) and will augment the public repository with detailed metadata files and validation scripts. These additions will make the files unambiguously usable by independent codes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper supplies algorithms and public IC files with no derivation chain that reduces to self-inputs

full rationale

This is a review article that outlines the governing equations for fuzzy dark matter, surveys wave- and fluid-based numerical algorithms, discusses their advantages and limitations, highlights test problems, and releases public initial-condition files for code comparison. No load-bearing prediction, uniqueness theorem, or fitted result is claimed to be derived from first principles within the paper itself; the central contribution is descriptive and external (public files), so no step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs or self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper relies on standard cosmological assumptions and previously published FDM equations rather than introducing new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Schrödinger-Poisson system governs the evolution of ultralight scalar dark matter on galactic scales.
    Invoked in the opening description of governing equations; treated as established background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5611 in / 1306 out tokens · 33383 ms · 2026-05-18T12:50:48.204164+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraints on Self-Interacting Fuzzy Dark Matter from the Stellar Kinematics of the Dwarf Galaxy Leo II

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Using Jeans analysis of Leo II stellar kinematics, the paper constrains the fuzzy dark matter mass m_a and self-interaction parameter f_a, finding 95% CL lower limits on m_a in the (1-10)×10^{-22} eV range for |f_a^{-...

  2. Constraints on Ultralight Scalar and Dark Photon Dark Matter from PPTA-DR3 and EPTA-DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Bayesian analysis of PPTA-DR3 and EPTA-DR2 finds no statistically significant ULDM signals and sets 95% CL upper limits on scalar and dark photon dark matter, improving prior bounds in most mass ranges.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 170 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7_6

    van Albada GD, van Leer B, Roberts WW (1997) A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 95--103. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7_6 1997

  2. [2]

    230(16):6248--6270

    Albin N, Bruno OP (2011) A spectral FC solver for the compressible Navier--Stokes equations in general domains I : Explicit time-stepping. 230(16):6248--6270. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.04.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.04.023 2011

  3. [3]

    2022(8):014

    Amin MA, Jain M, Karur R et al (2022) Small-scale structure in vector dark matter. 2022(8):014. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/014

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/014 2022

  4. [4]

    7:736--747

    Amruth A, Broadhurst T, Lim J et al (2023) Einstein rings modulated by wavelike dark matter from anomalies in gravitationally lensed images. 7:736--747. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01943-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01943-9 2023

  5. [5]

    Angulo RE, Hahn O (2022) Large-scale dark matter simulations. 8(1):1. doi:10.1007/s41115-021-00013-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41115-021-00013-z 2022

  6. [6]

    434(4):3337--3347

    Angulo RE, Hahn O, Abel T (2013) The warm dark matter halo mass function below the cut-off scale. 434(4):3337--3347. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1246

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1246 2013

  7. [7]

    471(4):4606--4614

    Armengaud E, Palanque-Delabrouille N, Y \`e che C et al (2017) Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman - forest. 471(4):4606--4614. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1870

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1870 2017

  8. [8]

    2021, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2021, 043, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/043

    Banik N, Bovy J, Bertone G et al (2021) Novel constraints on the particle nature of dark matter from stellar streams. 2021(10):043. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/043

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/043 2021

  9. [9]

    ultra-light dark matter: Implications of the soliton -- host halo relation

    Bar N, Blas D, Blum K et al (2018) Galactic rotation curves vs. ultra-light dark matter: Implications of the soliton -- host halo relation. 98(8). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.083027 2018

  10. [10]

    99(10):103020

    Bar N, Blum K, Eby J et al (2019) Ultralight dark matter in disk galaxies. 99(10):103020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.103020 2019

  11. [11]

    Bar N, Blum K, Sun C (2022) Galactic rotation curves versus ultralight dark matter: A systematic comparison with SPARC data. 105(8). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.083015 2022

  12. [12]

    871(1):28

    Bar-Or B, Fouvry JB, Tremaine S (2019) Relaxation in a fuzzy dark matter halo. 871(1):28. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf28c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf28c 2019

  13. [13]

    101(10):103023

    Benito M, Criado JC, H \"u tsi G et al (2020) Implications of Milky Way substructures for the nature of dark matter. 101(10):103023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103023

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.103023 2020

  14. [14]

    475(2):1447--1468

    Bernal T, Fern \'a ndez-Hern \'a ndez LM, Matos T et al (2018) Rotation curves of high-resolution LSB and SPARC galaxies with fuzzy and multistate (ultralight boson) scalar field dark matter. 475(2):1447--1468. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3208

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3208 2018

  15. [15]

    Princeton Univ

    Binney J, Tremaine S (2008) Galactic dynamics. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    118:261,102

    Blas D, Nacir DL, Sibiryakov S (2017) Ultralight dark matter resonates with binary pulsars. 118:261,102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.261102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.261102 2017

  17. [17]

    2025(06):050

    Blum K, Gorghetto M, Hardy E et al (2025) Bracketing the soliton-halo relation of ultralight dark matter. 2025(06):050. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/050

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/050 2025

  18. [18]

    109(10):103526

    Boey R, Wang Y, Kendall E et al (2024) Dynamical friction and black holes in ultralight dark matter solitons. 109(10):103526. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103526

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103526 2024

  19. [19]

    112(2):023510

    Boey R, Kendall E, Wang Y et al (2025) Supermassive binaries in ultralight dark matter solitons. 112(2):023510. doi:10.1103/6kpp-yp75

    work page doi:10.1103/6kpp-yp75 2025

  20. [20]

    450(1):209--222

    Bozek B, Marsh DJE, Silk J et al (2015) Galaxy UV -luminosity function and reionization constraints on axion dark matter. 450(1):209--222. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv624

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv624 2015

  21. [21]

    904(2):161

    Burkert A (2020) Fuzzy dark matter and dark matter halo cores. 904(2):161. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb242

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb242 2020

  22. [22]

    460(4):4397--4402

    Calabrese E, Spergel DN (2016) Ultra-light dark matter in ultra-faint dwarf galaxies. 460(4):4397--4402. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1256

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1256 2016

  23. [23]

    511(1):943--952

    Chan HYJ, Ferreira EGM, May S et al (2022) The diversity of core-halo structure in the fuzzy dark matter model. 511(1):943--952. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac063

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac063 2022

  24. [24]

    540(3):2653--2666

    Chan HYJ, Schive HY, Robles VH et al (2025) Cosmological zoom-in simulation of fuzzy dark matter down to z = 0 : tidal evolution of subhaloes in a Milky Way-sized halo. 540(3):2653--2666. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf828

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf828 2025

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty900

    Chan JHH, Schive HY, Woo TP et al (2018) How do stars affect dm haloes? 478(2):2686--2699. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty900

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty900 2018

  26. [26]

    125(11):111102

    Chan JHH, Schive HY, Wong SK et al (2020) Multiple images and flux ratio anomaly of fuzzy gravitational lenses. 125(11):111102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.111102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.111102 2020

  27. [27]

    2024(1):71

    Chan JHH, Sibiryakov S, Xue W (2024) Condensation and evaporation of boson stars. 2024(1):71. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)071

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)071 2024

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Chavanis PH (1998) On the ‘coarse-grained’ evolution of collisionless stellar systems. 300(4):981--991. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.t01-1-01867.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.t01-1-01867.x 1998

  29. [29]

    100(12):123506

    Chavanis PH (2019) Derivation of the core mass-halo mass relation of fermionic and bosonic dark matter halos from an effective thermodynamical model. 100(12):123506. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.123506 2019

  30. [30]

    European Physical Journal Plus 136(6):703

    Chavanis PH (2021) Landau equation for self-gravitating classical and quantum particles: application to dark matter. European Physical Journal Plus 136(6):703. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01617-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01617-3 2021

  31. [31]

    Chavanis PH (2025) A review of basic results on the Bose–Einstein condensate dark matter model. 12. doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1538434

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1538434 2025

  32. [32]

    104(8):083022

    Chen J, Du X, Lentz EW et al (2021) New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter halos. 104(8):083022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083022

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.083022 2021

  33. [33]

    468(2):1338--1348

    Chen SR, Schive HY, Chiueh T (2017) Jeans analysis for dwarf spheroidal galaxies in wave dark matter. 468(2):1338--1348. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx449

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx449 2017

  34. [34]

    103(10):103019

    Chiang BT, Schive HY, Chiueh T (2021) Soliton oscillations and revised constraints from Eridanus II of fuzzy dark matter. 103(10):103019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103019 2021

  35. [35]

    518(3):4045--4063

    Chiang BT, Ostriker JP, Schive HY (2023) Can ultralight dark matter explain the age-velocity dispersion relation of the Milky Way disc: A revised and improved treatment. 518(3):4045--4063. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3358

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3358 2023

  36. [36]

    134(5):051402

    Chiu HHS, Schive HY, Yang HYK et al (2025) Boosting supermassive black hole growth in the early universe by fuzzy dark matter solitons. 134(5):051402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.051402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.051402 2025

  37. [37]

    107:063,011

    Chiueh T, Hsu YH (2023) Theory and phenomenology of stressed wave-dark-matter soliton. 107:063,011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.063011 2023

  38. [38]

    Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics 44(11):115101

    Chiueh T, Woo TP, Jian HY et al (2011) Vortex turbulence in linear Schr \"o dinger wave mechanics. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics 44(11):115101. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/11/115101

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/11/115101 2011

  39. [39]

    485(2):2861--2876

    Church BV, Mocz P, Ostriker JP (2019) Heating of Milky Way disc stars by dark matter fluctuations in cold dark matter and fuzzy dark matter paradigms. 485(2):2861--2876. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz534

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz534 2019

  40. [40]

    95(8):083512

    Corasaniti PS, Agarwal S, Marsh DJE et al (2017) Constraints on dark matter scenarios from measurements of the galaxy luminosity function at high redshifts. 95(8):083512. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.083512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.083512 2017

  41. [41]

    European Physical Journal C 80(8):735

    Cr a ciun M, Harko T (2020) Testing Bose-Einstein condensate dark matter models with the SPARC galactic rotation curves data. European Physical Journal C 80(8):735. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8272-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8272-4 2020

  42. [42]

    106(6):063517

    Dalal N, Kravtsov A (2022) Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies. 106(6):063517. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063517

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.063517 2022

  43. [43]

    2021(3):076

    Dalal N, Bovy J, Hui L et al (2021) Don't cross the streams: caustics from fuzzy dark matter. 2021(3):076. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/076

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/076 2021

  44. [44]

    119:221103

    De Martino I, Broadhurst T, Tye SHH et al (2017) Recognising axionic dark matter by Compton and de-Broglie scale modulation of pulsar timing. 119:221103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.221103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.221103 2017

  45. [45]

    465(1):941--951

    Du X, Behrens C, Niemeyer JC (2017 a ) Substructure of fuzzy dark matter haloes. 465(1):941--951. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2724

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2724 2017

  46. [46]

    95(4):043519

    Du X, Behrens C, Niemeyer JC et al (2017 b ) Core-halo mass relation of ultralight axion dark matter from merger history. 95(4):043519. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043519

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043519 2017

  47. [47]

    97(6):063,507

    Du X, Schwabe B, Niemeyer JC et al (2018) Tidal disruption of fuzzy dark matter subhalo cores. 97(6):063,507. doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.063507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.063507 2018

  48. [48]

    916(1):27

    Dutta Chowdhury D, van den Bosch FC, Robles VH et al (2021) On the random motion of nuclear objects in a fuzzy dark matter halo. 916(1):27. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac043f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac043f 2021

  49. [49]

    949(2):68

    Dutta Chowdhury D, van den Bosch FC, van Dokkum P et al (2023) On the dynamical heating of dwarf galaxies in a fuzzy dark matter halo. 949(2):68. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc73d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc73d 2023

  50. [50]

    Eberhardt and E

    Eberhardt A, Ferreira EGM (2025) Ultralight fuzzy dark matter review. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2507.00705. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.00705

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.00705 2025

  51. [51]

    2018(10):027--027

    Edwards F, Kendall E, Hotchkiss S et al (2018) PyUltraLight : a pseudo-spectral solver for ultralight dark matter dynamics. 2018(10):027--027. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/027

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/027 2018

  52. [52]

    100(6):063528

    Eggemeier B, Niemeyer JC (2019) Formation and mass growth of axion stars in axion miniclusters. 100(6):063528. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063528

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063528 2019

  53. [53]

    492(1):877--894

    El-Zant AA, Freundlich J, Combes F et al (2020) The effect of fluctuating fuzzy axion haloes on stellar dynamics: a stochastic model. 492(1):877--894. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3478

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3478 2020

  54. [54]

    954(2):163

    Foote HR, Besla G, Mocz P et al (2023) Structure, kinematics, and observability of the Large Magellanic Cloud's dynamical friction wake in cold versus fuzzy dark matter. 954(2):163. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace533

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace533 2023

  55. [55]

    Glennon, N

    Glennon N, Musoke N, Nadler EO et al (2024) Dynamical friction in self-interacting ultralight dark matter. 109(6):063501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063501 2024

  56. [56]

    472(2):1346--1360

    Gonz \'a lez-Morales AX, Marsh DJE, Pe \ n arrubia J et al (2017) Unbiased constraints on ultralight axion mass from dwarf spheroidal galaxies. 472(2):1346--1360. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1941

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1941 2017

  57. [57]

    107(8):083014

    Gosenca M, Eberhardt A, Wang Y et al (2023) Multifield ultralight dark matter. 107(8):083014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.083014 2023

  58. [58]

    69(12):124033

    Guzm \'a n FS, Ure \ n a-L \'o pez LA (2004) Evolution of the Schr \"o dinger-Newton system for a self-gravitating scalar field. 69(12):124033. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.124033

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.124033 2004

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Hahn O, Abel T (2011) Multi-scale initial conditions for cosmological simulations. 415(3):2101--2121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18820.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18820.x 2011

  60. [60]

    912(1):L3

    Hayashi K, Ferreira EGM, Chan HYJ (2021) Narrowing the mass range of fuzzy dark matter with ultrafaint dwarfs. 912(1):L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf501

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf501 2021

  61. [61]

    91(10):103512

    Hlo z ek R, Grin D, Marsh DJE et al (2015) A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data. 91(10):103512. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.103512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.103512 2015

  62. [62]

    476(3):3063--3085

    Hlo z ek R, Marsh DJE, Grin D (2018) Using the full power of the cosmic microwave background to probe axion dark matter. 476(3):3063--3085. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty271

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty271 2018

  63. [63]

    489(2):2367--2376

    Hopkins PF (2019) A stable finite-volume method for scalar field dark matter. 489(2):2367--2376. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1922

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1922 2019

  64. [64]

    106:043,529

    Hotinli SC, Marsh DJE, Kamionkowski M (2022) Probing ultralight axions with the 21-cm signal during cosmic dawn. 106:043,529. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043529

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043529 2022

  65. [65]

    85(6):1158--1161

    Hu W, Barkana R, Gruzinov A (2000) Cold and fuzzy dark matter. 85(6):1158--1161. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1158

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.1158 2000

  66. [66]

    522(1):515--534

    Huang H, Schive HY, Chiueh T (2023) Cosmological simulations of two-component wave dark matter. 522(1):515--534. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad998

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad998 2023

  67. [67]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 59(1):247--289

    Hui L (2021) Wave dark matter. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 59(1):247--289. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120920-010024

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120920-010024 2021

  68. [68]

    Hui L, Ostriker JP, Tremaine S et al (2017) Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter. 95(4). doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043541

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043541 2017

  69. [69]

    2021(1):011

    Hui L, Joyce A, Landry MJ et al (2021) Vortices and waves in light dark matter. 2021(1):011. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/011

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/011 2021

  70. [70]

    2023(4):053

    Jain M, Amin MA (2023) I- SP in: an integrator for multicomponent Schr \"o dinger-Poisson systems with self-interactions. 2023(4):053. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/053

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/04/053 2023

  71. [71]

    110(2):023519

    Kawaii H, Kamada A, Kamada K et al (2024) Modeling the core-halo mass relation in fuzzy dark matter halos. 110(2):023519. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.023519

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.023519 2024

  72. [72]

    523(3):3393--3405

    Khelashvili M, Rudakovskyi A, Hossenfelder S (2023) Dark matter profiles of SPARC galaxies: a challenge to fuzzy dark matter. 523(3):3393--3405. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1595

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1595 2023

  73. [73]

    2014(2):019

    Khmelnitsky A, Rubakov V (2014) Pulsar timing signal from ultralight scalar dark matter. 2014(2):019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/019

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/019 2014

  74. [74]

    96(12):123514

    Kobayashi T, Murgia R, De Simone A et al (2017) Lyman- constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe. 96(12):123514. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123514

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.123514 2017

  75. [75]

    279(2):39

    Kunkel A, Chan HYJ, Schive HY et al (2025) A hybrid scheme for fuzzy dark matter simulations combining the Schr \"o dinger and Hamilton Jacobi Madelung equations. 279(2):39. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/addc59

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/addc59 2025

  76. [76]

    109(4):043507

    Lagu \"e A, Schwabe B, Hlo z ek R et al (2024) Cosmological simulations of mixed ultralight dark matter. 109(4):043507. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043507 2024

  77. [77]

    2020(1):001

    Lancaster L, Giovanetti C, Mocz P et al (2020) Dynamical friction in a fuzzy dark matter universe. 2020(1):001. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/001

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/001 2020

  78. [78]

    517(2):1867--1883

    Laroche A, Gilman D, Li X et al (2022) Quantum fluctuations masquerade as haloes: bounds on ultra-light dark matter from quadruply imaged quasars. 517(2):1867--1883. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2677

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2677 2022

  79. [79]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz271

    Leong KH, Schive HY, Zhang UH et al (2019) Testing extreme-axion wave dark matter using the BOSS Lyman -alpha forest data. 484(3):4273--4286. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz271

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz271 2019

  80. [80]

    121:151,301

    Levkov DG, Panin AG, Tkachev II (2018) Gravitational Bose-Einstein condensation in the kinetic regime. 121:151,301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.151301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.151301 2018

Showing first 80 references.