pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.04845 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Dynamical moment fragmentation in the all-in all-out pyrochlore Nd2Sn2O7

Yi Luo , Matthew S. Powell , Joseph A. M. Paddison , Brenden R. Ortiz , J. Ross Stewart , Joseph W. Kolis , Adam A. Aczel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords dynamical moment fragmentationall-in-all-out orderpyrochloreneutron spectroscopydipolar-octupolar modelNd2Sn2O7spin excitationsfrustrated magnets
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Neutron spectra reveal a flat band with pinch points and half-moon features in the all-in-all-out state of Nd2Sn2O7.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports single-crystal neutron spectroscopy on Nd2Sn2O7 that uncovers dynamical moment fragmentation inside the all-in-all-out magnetic order. The data display a nearly flat excitation band with pinch-point-like momentum dependence together with dispersive branches that produce half-moon patterns across Brillouin zones. These signatures are reproduced in detail by a minimal model containing only dipolar and octupolar spin interactions. The results place the material as a clean platform for studying emergent gauge fields and multipolar spin waves while ruling out photon-like modes that would appear in certain alternative pictures of the low-energy physics.

Core claim

Dynamical moment fragmentation is embedded within the all-in-all-out ordered state of Nd2Sn2O7, appearing as a nearly flat band with pinch-point-like momentum dependence accompanied by dispersive branches that generate half-moon features across multiple Brillouin zones; these signatures are captured quantitatively by a minimal dipolar-octupolar spin Hamiltonian.

What carries the argument

A minimal dipolar-octupolar spin Hamiltonian that reproduces the flat band and half-moon features in the neutron spectra.

If this is right

  • The higher flat-mode energy explains the absence of dynamical interference effects in prior muon spin relaxation measurements.
  • The lack of photon-like excitations imposes constraints on the Coulombic antiferromagnet scenario.
  • Nd2Sn2O7 provides a tractable platform for quantitative exploration of emergent gauge-field physics in frustrated magnets.
  • Multipolar spin-wave dynamics can be studied directly through the observed dispersive branches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar flat bands with pinch-point character may appear in other pyrochlore compounds that realize all-in-all-out order at low temperature.
  • The same minimal Hamiltonian could be used to predict the temperature or field dependence of the fragmentation signatures in future experiments.
  • Varying the rare-earth ion in related stannates might tune the relative strength of dipolar and octupolar terms and reveal crossovers between different fragmentation regimes.

Load-bearing premise

A minimal dipolar-octupolar spin Hamiltonian is sufficient to reproduce the observed neutron spectra without additional interaction terms or higher-order effects.

What would settle it

Detection of extra spectral weight or photon-like modes at low energy in higher-resolution neutron measurements that cannot be accounted for by the minimal Hamiltonian.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.04845 by Adam A. Aczel, Brenden R. Ortiz, Joseph A. M. Paddison, Joseph W. Kolis, J. Ross Stewart, Matthew S. Powell, Yi Luo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) False color map of inelastic scattering intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a–d) Constant- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a,c,e,g,i,k,m) Constant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report single-crystal neutron spectroscopy and bulk characterization on hydrothermally grown Nd2Sn2O7, revealing a dynamical moment fragmentation embedded within the all-in-all-out ordered state. The spectra show a nearly flat band with pinch-point-like momentum dependence, accompanied by dispersive branches that generate half-moon features across multiple Brillouin zones. These defining signatures are captured quantitatively by a minimal dipolar-octupolar spin Hamiltonian, demonstrating excellent agreement between experiment and theory. The higher flat-mode energy helps account for the absence of dynamical interference in prior muon spin relaxation (muSR) studies, while the lack of any photon-like excitation imposes strict constraints on the proposed Coulombic antiferromagnet scenario. Our results extend dynamical moment fragmentation to Nd2Sn2O7 and identify it as a clean, tractable platform for quantitative exploration of emergent gauge-field physics and multipolar spin-wave dynamics in frustrated magnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports single-crystal neutron spectroscopy and bulk measurements on hydrothermally grown Nd2Sn2O7, identifying signatures of dynamical moment fragmentation within the all-in-all-out ordered phase. These include a nearly flat band exhibiting pinch-point-like momentum dependence together with dispersive branches that produce half-moon features in multiple Brillouin zones; the spectra are stated to be captured quantitatively by a minimal dipolar-octupolar spin Hamiltonian.

Significance. If the reported quantitative agreement holds under scrutiny, the work extends dynamical moment fragmentation to a new pyrochlore compound and supplies a clean experimental platform for multipolar spin-wave dynamics and emergent gauge-field physics. The higher flat-mode energy and absence of photon-like excitations also furnish concrete constraints on alternative scenarios such as the Coulombic antiferromagnet.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical modeling section] Theoretical modeling section (around the definition of the minimal Hamiltonian): the two dipolar and octupolar coupling constants are adjusted to reproduce the observed flat band and half-moon intensities. Because the central claim is that the minimal form is sufficient without further-neighbor or higher-order terms, the manuscript must demonstrate that adding such terms does not materially improve the fit (e.g., via explicit comparison of residuals or Bayesian information criterion) or that the parameters are independently constrained by bulk susceptibility or specific-heat data.
  2. [Results section] Results section, comparison of measured and calculated spectra: the claim of 'quantitative agreement' and 'excellent agreement' is load-bearing for the sufficiency of the minimal model, yet no chi-squared values, integrated intensity ratios with uncertainties, or residual maps are provided. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether discrepancies remain within experimental error bars or whether the model systematically under- or over-predicts intensity in the pinch-point or half-moon regions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly label the Brillouin-zone paths and energy integration windows used for the constant-energy slices to facilitate direct comparison with the calculated dynamical structure factor.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the higher flat-mode energy 'helps account for' the absence of dynamical interference in prior muSR work; a brief quantitative estimate of the expected muSR relaxation rate from the measured flat-band energy would strengthen this link.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The comments highlight important points regarding the justification of the minimal model and the quantitative nature of the agreement between data and theory. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical modeling section] Theoretical modeling section (around the definition of the minimal Hamiltonian): the two dipolar and octupolar coupling constants are adjusted to reproduce the observed flat band and half-moon intensities. Because the central claim is that the minimal form is sufficient without further-neighbor or higher-order terms, the manuscript must demonstrate that adding such terms does not materially improve the fit (e.g., via explicit comparison of residuals or Bayesian information criterion) or that the parameters are independently constrained by bulk susceptibility or specific-heat data.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the minimal model's sufficiency strengthens the central claim. The two parameters were primarily constrained by the neutron spectra, but they are also consistent with the temperature dependence of the bulk susceptibility shown in the manuscript. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary comparison in which further-neighbor dipolar and octupolar terms are introduced; we will show that the additional parameters do not materially reduce the residuals and that the Bayesian information criterion favors the minimal model. This analysis will be presented alongside the existing bulk data to provide independent support for the parameter values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section, comparison of measured and calculated spectra: the claim of 'quantitative agreement' and 'excellent agreement' is load-bearing for the sufficiency of the minimal model, yet no chi-squared values, integrated intensity ratios with uncertainties, or residual maps are provided. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether discrepancies remain within experimental error bars or whether the model systematically under- or over-predicts intensity in the pinch-point or half-moon regions.

    Authors: We accept that the absence of explicit quantitative metrics makes it difficult for readers to assess the level of agreement. In the revised manuscript we will include chi-squared values for the spectral fits, integrated intensity ratios with estimated uncertainties for the flat band and half-moon features, and residual maps for representative Brillouin zones. These additions will allow a direct evaluation of whether any systematic deviations exceed experimental uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model-data comparison is independent

full rationale

The paper reports neutron spectra exhibiting a flat band with pinch-point momentum dependence and half-moon features in the all-in-all-out state of Nd2Sn2O7. These are compared to a minimal dipolar-octupolar Hamiltonian that reproduces the signatures with quantitative agreement. No quoted equations or sections demonstrate that the observed features are defined in terms of the model outputs, that parameters are fitted in a manner that forces the specific momentum dependence by construction, or that a self-citation chain supplies the uniqueness of the minimal form. The agreement constitutes a standard test of whether the symmetry-allowed minimal model suffices, rather than a tautological renaming or self-referential prediction. The additional constraint from absence of photon-like modes further stands as an independent check outside the fitted intensities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the dipolar-octupolar Hamiltonian form and the interpretation of spectral features as fragmentation; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • dipolar and octupolar coupling constants
    Parameters in the minimal spin Hamiltonian are chosen or fitted to reproduce the observed flat band energy and momentum dependence.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic interactions in Nd2Sn2O7 are adequately described by a minimal dipolar-octupolar spin Hamiltonian
    Invoked in the abstract to capture the neutron spectra quantitatively.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1327 out tokens · 44571 ms · 2026-05-18T09:17:19.705346+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Frustrated magnetic order in hybrid Kitaev spin-orbital models

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hybrid Kitaev-Yao-Lee models on common lattices produce magnetic order in spins while preserving orbital topological order, and regain exact solvability when Yao-Lee and square-lattice couplings are equal and opposite.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. S. Gardner, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. E. Greedan, Re- views of Modern Physics82, 53 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    E. M. Smith, E. Lhotel, S. Petit, and B. D. Gaulin, An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics16, 387 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Balents, Nature464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Nature464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Quantum Spin Liquids

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 016502 (2017), arXiv:1601.03742 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    S. T. Bramwell, M. J. Harris, B. C. den Hertog, M. J. P. Gingras, J. S. Gardner, D. F. McMorrow, A. R. Wildes, A. L. Cornelius, J. D. M. Champion, R. G. Melko, and T. Fennell, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 047205 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    B. C. den Hertog and M. J. P. Gingras, Physical Review Letters84, 3430 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    A. P. Ramirez, A. Hayashi, R. J. Cava, R. Siddharthan, and B. Shastry, Nature399, 333 (1999). 6

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Fennell, P

    T. Fennell, P. P. Deen, A. R. Wildes, K. Schmalzl, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, R. J. Aldus, D. F. McMorrow, and S. T. Bramwell, Science326, 415 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Physical Review Letters108, 037202 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Gaudet, E

    J. Gaudet, E. M. Smith, J. Dudemaine, J. Beare, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, N. P. Butch, M. B. Stone, D. R. Yahne, K. A. Ross, C. A. Marjerrison, J. D. Garrett, G. M. Luke, A. D. Bianchi, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 187201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Bhardwaj, S

    A. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, H. Yan, R. Moessner, A. H. Nev- idomskyy, and H. J. Changlani, npj Quantum Materials 7, 51 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    B. Gao, T. Chen, D. W. Tam, C. Huang, K. Sasmal, D. T. Adroja, F. Ye, H. Cao, G. Sala, M. B. Stone, C. Baines, J. A. T. Verezhak, H. Hu, J. Chung, X. Xu, S. Cheong, M. Nallaiyan, S. Spagna, M. B. Maple, A. H. Nevidom- skyy, E. Morosan, G. Chen, and P. Dai, Nature Physics 15, 1052 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    E. M. Smith, O. Benton, D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, J. Gaudet, J. Dudemaine, A. Fitterman, J. Beare, A. R. Wildes, S. Bhattacharya, T. DeLazzer, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, N. P. Butch, R. Movshovich, J. D. Garrett, C. A. Marjerrison, J. P. Clancy, E. Kermarrec, G. M. Luke, A. D. Bianchi, K. A. Ross, and B. D. Gaulin, Physical Review X12, 021015 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    E. M. Smith, R. Sch¨ afer, J. Dudemaine, B. Placke, B. Yuan, Z. Morgan, F. Ye, R. Moessner, O. Benton, A. D. Bianchi, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. X15, 021033 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    B. Gao, F. Desrochers, D. W. Tam, D. M. Kirschbaum, P. Steffens, A. Hiess, D. H. Nguyen, Y. Su, S.-W. Cheong, S. Paschen,et al., Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Sibille, N

    R. Sibille, N. Gauthier, E. Lhotel, V. Por´ ee, V. Pom- jakushin, R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, J. Ollivier, A. R. Wildes, C. Ritter, T. C. Hansen, D. A. Keen, G. J. Nilsen, L. Keller, S. Petit, and T. Fennell, Nature Physics16, 546 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Por´ ee, H

    V. Por´ ee, H. Yan, F. Desrochers, S. Petit, E. Lhotel, M. Appel, J. Ollivier, Y. Kim, A. Nevidomskyy, and R. Sibille, Nature Physics21, 83 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, O. Benton, R. Moess- ner, M. Powell, J. W. Kolis, C. M. Pasco, A. F. May, M. D. Frontzek, E. M. Smith, B. D. Gaulin, S. Calder, and K. A. Ross, Phys. Rev. X14, 10.1103/Phys- RevX.14.011005 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2024

  19. [19]

    Por´ee, A

    V. Por´ ee, A. Bhardwaj, E. Lhotel, S. Petit, N. Gau- thier, H. Yan, V. Pomjakushin, J. Ollivier, J. A. Quil- liam, A. H. Nevidomskyy, H. J. Changlani, and R. Sibille, arXiv preprint (2023), arXiv:2305.08261

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    E. M. Smith, A. Fitterman, R. Sch¨ afer, B. Placke, A. Woods, S. Lee, S. H.-Y. Huang, J. Beare, S. Sharma, D. Chatterjee,et al., Physical Review Letters135, 086702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    J. Xu, V. K. Anand, A. K. Bera, M. Frontzek, D. L. Abernathy, N. Casati, K. Siemensmeyer, and B. Lake, Physical Review B92, 224430 (2015), publisher Copy- right:©2015 American Physical Society

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Lhotel, S

    E. Lhotel, S. Petit, S. Guitteny, O. Florea, M. C. Hat- nean, C. Colin, E. Ressouche, M. R. Lees, and G. Bal- akrishnan, Physical Review Letters115, 197202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Petit, E

    S. Petit, E. Lhotel, B. Canals, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, H. Mutka, E. Ressouche, A. R. Wildes, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Nature Physics12, 746 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    J. Xu, C. Balz, C. Baines, H. Luetkens, and B. Lake, Physical Review B94, 064425 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Benton, Physical Review B94, 104430 (2016)

    O. Benton, Physical Review B94, 104430 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Lhotel, S

    ´E. Lhotel, S. Petit, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, H. Mutka, E. Ressouche, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrish- nan, Nature Communications9, 3786 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    J. Xu, A. T. M. N. Islam, I. N. Glavatskyy, M. Reehuis, J.-U. Hoffmann, and B. Lake, Physical Review B98, 060408 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    J. Xu, O. Benton, V. K. Anand, A. T. M. N. Islam, T. Guidi, G. Ehlers, E. Feng, Y. Su, A. Sakai, P. Gegen- wart, and B. Lake, Physical Review B99, 144420 (2019), arXiv:1904.07819

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    J. Xu, O. Benton, A. T. M. N. Islam, T. Guidi, G. Ehlers, and B. Lake, Physical Review Letters124, 097203 (2020), arXiv:1907.11056

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    L´ eger, E

    M. L´ eger, E. Lhotel, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, A. R. Wildes, S. Raymond, E. Ressouche, G. Balakrish- nan, and S. Petit, Physical Review Letters126, 247201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    L´ eger, F

    M. L´ eger, F. Vayer, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, F. Damay, C. Decorse, D. Berardan, B. F˚ ak, J. Zanotti, Q. Berrod, J. Ollivier, J. P. Embs, T. Fennell, D. Sheptyakov, S. Pe- tit, and E. Lhotel, Physical Review B109, 224416 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Anand, A

    V. Anand, A. Bera, J. Xu, T. Herrmannsd¨ orfer, C. Rit- ter, and B. Lake, Physical Review B92, 184418 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    V. K. Anand, D. L. Abernathy, D. T. Adroja, A. D. Hillier, P. K. Biswas, and B. Lake, Physical Review B 95, 224420 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Samartzis, J

    A. Samartzis, J. Xu, V. Anand, A. Islam, J. Ollivier, Y. Su, and B. Lake, Physical Review B106, L100401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Bertin, P

    A. Bertin, P. D. de R´ eotier, B. F˚ ak, C. Marin, A. Yaouanc, A. Forget, D. Sheptyakov, B. Frick, C. Rit- ter, A. Amato, C. Baines, and P. J. C. King, Physical Review B92, 144423 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    P. D. de R´ eotier, A. Yaouanc, A. Maisuradze, A. Bertin, P. J. Baker, A. D. Hillier, and A. Forget, Physical Review B95, 134420 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    A. M. Hallas, A. M. Arevalo-Lopez, A. Z. Sharma, T. Munsie, J. P. Attfield, C. R. Wiebe, and G. M. Luke, Physical Review B91, 104417 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Swarnakar, Y

    D. Swarnakar, Y. Jana, J. Alam, and S. Nandi, Physica B: Condensed Matter521, 93 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    B. Z. Malkin, T. T. A. Lummen, P. H. M. Van Loos- drecht, G. Dhalenne, and A. R. Zakirov, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter22, 276003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Singh, S

    S. Singh, S. Saha, S. K. Dhar, R. Suryanarayanan, A. K. Sood, and A. Revcolevschi, Physical Review B77, 054408 (2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Mauws, A

    C. Mauws, A. M. Hallas, G. Sala, A. A. Aczel, P. M. Sarte, J. Gaudet, D. Ziat, J. A. Quilliam, J. A. Lussier, M. Bieringer,et al., Physical Review B98, 100401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Pe¸ canha-Antonio, E

    V. Pe¸ canha-Antonio, E. Feng, X. Sun, D. Adroja, H. C. Walker, A. S. Gibbs, F. Orlandi, Y. Su, and T. Br¨ uckel, Physical Review B99, 134415 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Huang, G

    Y.-P. Huang, G. Chen, and M. Hermele, Physical review letters112, 167203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    J. G. Rau and M. J. P. Gingras, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics10, 357 (2019), review article, arXiv:1806.09638. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Li and G

    Y.-D. Li and G. Chen, Physical Review B95, 041106 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Yao, Y.-D

    X.-P. Yao, Y.-D. Li, and G. Chen, Physical Review Re- search2, 013334 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Benton, Physical Review B102, 104408 (2020)

    O. Benton, Physical Review B102, 104408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    A. S. Patri, M. Hosoi, and Y. B. Kim, Physical Review Research2, 023253 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    M. E. Brooks-Bartlett, S. T. Banks, L. D. C. Jaubert, A. Harman-Clarke, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Physical Review X4, 011007 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Lhotel, L

    ´E. Lhotel, L. D. C. Jaubert, and P. C. W. Holdsworth, Journal of Low Temperature Physics201, 710 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Mauws, N

    C. Mauws, N. Hiebert, M. L. Rutherford, H. D. Zhou, Q. Huang, M. B. Stone, N. P. Butch, Y. Su, E. S. Choi, Z. Yamani,et al., Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 245802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Scheie, M

    A. Scheie, M. Sanders, X. Gui, Y. Qiu, T. R. Prisk, R. J. Cava, and C. Broholm, Physical Review B104, 134418 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Chen, Phys

    G. Chen, Phys. Rev. Research5, L032027 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Gomez, P

    S. Gomez, P. Sarte, M. Zelensky, A. Hallas, B. Gonzalez, K. Hong, E. Pace, S. Calder, M. Stone, Y. Su,et al., Physical Review B103, 214419 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Bertin,Geometrical Frustration and Quantum Origin of Spin Dynamics, Phd thesis, Universit´ e Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France (2015)

    A. Bertin,Geometrical Frustration and Quantum Origin of Spin Dynamics, Phd thesis, Universit´ e Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Powell, L

    M. Powell, L. D. Sanjeewa, C. D. McMillen, K. A. Ross, C. L. Sarkis, and J. W. Kolis, Crystal Growth & Design 19, 4920 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Fukazawa, R

    H. Fukazawa, R. G. Melko, R. Higashinaka, Y. Maeno, and M. J. P. Gingras, Physical Review B65, 054410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    H. Yan, R. Pohle, and N. Shannon, Phys. Rev. B98, 140402(R) (2018), arXiv:1806.08520 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Bai, S.-S

    X. Bai, S.-S. Zhang, Z. Dun, H. Zhang, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, F. Ye, C. D. Batista,et al., Nature Physics17, 467 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Carretta, P

    S. Carretta, P. Santini, R. Caciuffo, and G. Amoretti, Physical review letters105, 167201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Yi Luo et al., Neutron spectroscopy study of the dipolar– octupolar pyrochlore Nd 2Sn2O7 (2024), dataset released under the CC-BY-4.0 license

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    R. A. Ewings, A. Buts, M. D. Le, J. van Duijn, I. Bustin- duy, and T. G. Perring, Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section A834, 132 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Okamoto, G

    Y. Okamoto, G. J. Nilsen, J. P. Attfield, and Z. Hiroi, Physical Review Letters110, 097203 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Baroudi, B

    K. Baroudi, B. D. Gaulin, S. H. Lapidus, J. Gaudet, and R. J. Cava, Physical Review B92, 024110 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    R. L. Smit, S. Keupert, O. Tsyplyatyev, P. A. Maksimov, A. L. Chernyshev, and P. Kopietz, Physical Review B 101, 054424 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    J. H. P. Colpa, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications93, 327 (1978)

    work page 1978

  67. [67]

    Magnetic Moment Fragmentation in an All-in–All-out Pyrochlore Nd 2Sn2O7

    K. Kang, D. G. Cahill, and A. Schleife, Physical Review B107, 064412 (2023). 8 Supplemental Material for “Magnetic Moment Fragmentation in an All-in–All-out Pyrochlore Nd 2Sn2O7” S1. METHODS AND SAMPLE INFORMATION Single crystals of Nd 2Sn2O7 were grown by sponta- neous nucleation using a high-temperature, high-pressure hydrothermal technique [56]. Stoich...

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    directions, respectively. For comparison, the ex- pected saturated moments in a pyrochlore lattice with local⟨111⟩Ising anisotropy and effective ferromagnetic (FM) nearest-neighbor coupling areg J J/ √ 3 for [100], gJ J/2 for [111], andg J J/ √ 6 for [110] [57]. The observed ordering of induced moments (largest to smallest) and their relative ratios are c...

    work page

  69. [69]

    Substituting these into Eq

    is then ⟨m˜x α(−k,0)m ˜x β(k, t)⟩ = S 2 (gzµB sin(ϑ))2 × X λ (Tα,λ k Tβ,λ+4 −k +T α,λ k Tβ+4,λ+4 −k +Tα+4,λ k Tβ,λ+4 −k +T α+4,λ k Tβ+4,λ+4 −k )⟨bkλb† kλ⟩ (55) Similarly, we could the derive cross section on the energy-gain side (ℏω <0) by the detailed-balance equa- tionS(−k,−ω) = exp(−ℏω/k BT)S(k, ω). Substituting these into Eq. 46 yields the dynamical m...

    work page