pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.11091 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-14 · 🧮 math.CA · math.MG

Effective Brascamp-Lieb inequalities

Timoth\'ee B\'enard , Weikun He This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CA math.MG
keywords Brascamp-Lieb inequalityeffective boundslinear mapsweighted familiesfunctional inequalitiesanalysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Brascamp-Lieb constant for weighted families of linear maps admits an explicit upper bound.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proves an explicit upper bound on the Brascamp-Lieb constant for any weighted family of linear maps that meets the usual conditions making the inequality finite. The bound is effective, meaning it can be written down or estimated directly from the maps, weights, and dimensions rather than merely asserted to exist. Readers care because the Brascamp-Lieb constant governs the best possible constant in a wide range of functional inequalities that appear in analysis, convex geometry, and information theory. Having a concrete number in hand turns qualitative statements into quantitative ones that can be checked or used in applications.

Core claim

We establish an effective upper bound for the Brascamp-Lieb constant associated to a weighted family of linear maps. The construction works under the standard non-degeneracy and dimension conditions that guarantee the inequality is finite, and it supplies an explicit majorant that depends on the given data in a controllable way.

What carries the argument

The effective upper bound on the Brascamp-Lieb constant, which serves as an explicit majorant for the best constant in the inequality determined by the weighted linear maps.

If this is right

  • Applications of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality in analysis and geometry now come with computable control on the constant.
  • The bound depends explicitly on the dimensions and the linear maps, allowing direct estimation from input data.
  • Qualitative finiteness results for the inequality are upgraded to quantitative versions with explicit majorants.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same effective method could be tested on nearby inequalities such as reverse Brascamp-Lieb or multilinear versions to obtain explicit constants there as well.
  • Numerical optimization routines could use the bound as a starting point or verification tool when computing Brascamp-Lieb constants for specific maps.
  • The approach may extend to discrete or finite-field analogues where effective constants are needed for algorithmic applications.

Load-bearing premise

The weighted family of linear maps satisfies the standard non-degeneracy and dimension conditions required for the Brascamp-Lieb inequality to be finite.

What would settle it

A concrete weighted family of linear maps obeying the non-degeneracy and dimension conditions for which the actual Brascamp-Lieb constant exceeds the paper's stated explicit upper bound.

read the original abstract

We establish an effective upper bound for the Brascamp-Lieb constant associated to a weighted family of linear maps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes an effective upper bound for the Brascamp-Lieb constant associated to a weighted family of linear maps, under the standard non-degeneracy and dimension conditions that ensure the classical constant is finite. The contribution replaces the usual existence result with an explicit, computable estimate in terms of the given data.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the result is significant for providing a concrete, usable bound rather than a non-constructive existence statement. This strengthens applicability in harmonic analysis, convex geometry, and related fields where explicit constants facilitate computations or further estimates. The work operates within the standard framework of the field without introducing ad-hoc axioms or free parameters.

minor comments (2)
  1. The introduction could include a brief comparison with prior effective bounds in the literature to better situate the improvement.
  2. Notation for the weighted family of maps and the associated constant should be defined consistently across sections to avoid ambiguity in the statement of the main theorem.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for recommending minor revision. The report accurately captures that the manuscript replaces the classical non-constructive existence result for the Brascamp-Lieb constant with an explicit, computable upper bound under the standard non-degeneracy and dimension hypotheses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation of effective Brascamp-Lieb bound

full rationale

The paper establishes an explicit, computable upper bound for the Brascamp-Lieb constant under the standard non-degeneracy and dimension conditions that already guarantee the classical constant is finite. The contribution replaces a non-effective existence result with a bound expressed directly in terms of the given weighted family of linear maps. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the derivation remains self-contained within the classical Brascamp-Lieb framework and does not rename or smuggle in prior results as new predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are available from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5293 in / 803 out tokens · 37474 ms · 2026-05-17T22:44:01.140795+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI for Mathematics: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects

    math.HO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AI for math combines task-specific architectures and general foundation models to support research and advance AI reasoning capabilities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Semin., GAFA, Isr

    KeithBall.Volumesofsectionsofcubesandrelatedproblems.Geometricaspectsoffunctional analysis, Isr. Semin., GAFA, Isr. 1987-88, Lect. Notes Math. 1376, 251-260 (1989)., 1989

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    On a reverse form of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality.Invent

    Franck Barthe. On a reverse form of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality.Invent. Math., 134(2):335– 361, 1998

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Inequalities in Fourier analysis.Ann

    William Beckner. Inequalities in Fourier analysis.Ann. Math. (2), 102:159–182, 1975

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    Benard and W

    T. Benard and W. He. Effective equidistribution for random walks on simple homogeneous spaces. In preparation

    work page

  5. [5]

    Cowling, and Taryn C

    Jonathan Bennett, Neal Bez, Michael G. Cowling, and Taryn C. Flock. Behaviour of the Brascamp-Lieb constant.Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 49(3):512–518, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Flock, and Sanghyuk Lee

    Jonathan Bennett, Neal Bez, Taryn C. Flock, and Sanghyuk Lee. Stability of the Brascamp- Lieb constant and applications.Am. J. Math., 140(2):543–569, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    The Brascamp-Lieb inequalities: Finiteness, structure and extremals.Geom

    Jonathan Bennett, Anthony Carbery, Michael Christ, and Terence Tao. The Brascamp-Lieb inequalities: Finiteness, structure and extremals.Geom. Funct. Anal., 17(5):1343–1415, 2008

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Finite bounds for Hölder-Brascamp-Lieb multilinear inequalities.Math

    Jonathan Bennett, Anthony Carbery, Michael Christ, and Terence Tao. Finite bounds for Hölder-Brascamp-Lieb multilinear inequalities.Math. Res. Lett., 17(4):647–666, 2010

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    On the multilinear restriction and Kakeya conjectures.Acta Math., 196(2):261–302, 2006

    Jonathan Bennett, Anthony Carbery, and Terence Tao. On the multilinear restriction and Kakeya conjectures.Acta Math., 196(2):261–302, 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Stationary measures and closed invariants on homo- geneous spaces.Ann

    Yves Benoist and Jean-François Quint. Stationary measures and closed invariants on homo- geneous spaces.Ann. Math. (2), 174(2):1111–1162, 2011. EFFECTIVE BRASCAMP-LIEB INEQUALITIES 21

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Herm Jan Brascamp and Elliott H. Lieb. Best constants in Young’s inequality, its converse, and its generalization to more than three functions.Adv. Math., 20:151–173, 1976

    work page 1976

  12. [12]

    E. A. Carlen, E. H. Lieb, and M. Loss. A sharp analog of Young’s inequality onSN and related entropy inequalities.J. Geom. Anal., 14(3):487–520, 2004

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    A generalization of Hölder’s inequality and some probability inequalities

    Helmut Finner. A generalization of Hölder’s inequality and some probability inequalities. Ann. Probab., 20(4):1893–1901, 1992

    work page 1901

  14. [14]

    Exceptional Set Estimate Through Brascamp–Lieb Inequality.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2024(9):7944–7971, 02 2024

    Shengwen Gan. Exceptional Set Estimate Through Brascamp–Lieb Inequality.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2024(9):7944–7971, 02 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Algorithmic and opti- mization aspects of Brascamp-Lieb inequalities, via operator scaling.Geom

    Ankit Garg, Leonid Gurvits, Rafael Oliveira, and Avi Wigderson. Algorithmic and opti- mization aspects of Brascamp-Lieb inequalities, via operator scaling.Geom. Funct. Anal., 28(1):100–145, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    The endpoint case of the Bennett-Carbery-Tao multilinear Kakeya conjecture

    Larry Guth. The endpoint case of the Bennett-Carbery-Tao multilinear Kakeya conjecture. Acta Math., 205(2):263–286, 2010

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Elliott H. Lieb. Gaussian kernels have only Gaussian maximizers.Invent. Math., 102(1):179– 208, 1990

    work page 1990

  18. [18]

    L. H. Loomis and H. Whitney. An inequality related to the isoperimetric inequality.Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 55:961–962, 1949

    work page 1949

  19. [19]

    Regularized Brascamp-Lieb inequalities and an application

    Dominique Maldague. Regularized Brascamp-Lieb inequalities and an application. Q. J. Math., 73(1):311–331, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Geometric Brascamp-Lieb has the optimal best constant.J

    Stefán Ingi Valdimarsson. Geometric Brascamp-Lieb has the optimal best constant.J. Geom. Anal., 21(4):1036–1043, 2011

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    The endpoint perturbed Brascamp-Lieb inequalities with examples.Anal

    Ruixiang Zhang. The endpoint perturbed Brascamp-Lieb inequalities with examples.Anal. PDE, 11(3):555–581, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    The Brascamp-Lieb inequality and its influence on Fourier analysis

    Ruixiang Zhang. The Brascamp-Lieb inequality and its influence on Fourier analysis. InThe physics and mathematics of Elliott Lieb. The 90th anniversary. Volume II, pages 585–628. Berlin: European Mathematical Society (EMS), 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Kakeya-brascamp-lieb inequalities.Collect

    Pavel Zorin-Kranich. Kakeya-brascamp-lieb inequalities.Collect. Math., 71(3):471–492, 2020. CNRS – LAGA, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 99 avenue J.-B. Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse Email address: benard@math.univ-paris13.fr State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and System Science, Chines Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190,...

    work page 2020