RIS-Assisted Physical Layer Security: Artificial Noise-Driven Optimization and Measurements

Ahmet Muaz Aktas; Ali Gorcin; Galymzhan Nauryzbayev; Ibrahim Hokelek; Sefa Kayraklik; Sultangali Arzykulov

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 15 references

RIS-Assisted Physical Layer Security: Artificial Noise-Driven Optimization and Measurements

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A RIS split between signal and artificial-noise beams improves secrecy capacity, and an iterative phase-search method beats a DFT-based sweep.

desk verdict Worth sending to review: an experimental RIS-PLS testbed with a real contribution, but the iterative-vs-DFT comparison rests on an impossible codebook and needs correction before any of its conclusions are used. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.22910 v2 pith:KN34ONWL submitted 2025-11-28 eess.SP

Ahmet Muaz Aktas , Sefa Kayraklik , Sultangali Arzykulov , Galymzhan Nauryzbayev , Ibrahim Hokelek , Ali Gorcin This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SP

keywords reconfigurableintelligentsurfacephysicallayersecurityartificialnoisesecrecycapacityRISpartitioningphaseshiftoptimizationsoftwaredefinedradiopowerallocation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes and experimentally validates a physical-layer security scheme in which a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) is split into two halves: one half is tuned to strengthen the communication signal at the legitimate receiver (Bob), and the other half is tuned to steer artificial noise at the eavesdropper (Eve). The authors derive secrecy capacity from the received-signal expressions, then formulate a power-allocation problem that maximizes secrecy capacity while keeping Eve's capacity below a specified fraction of Bob's. Two practical phase-tuning methods are compared: an iterative element-by-element toggle between 0° and 180°, and a sweep over orthogonal DFT codebooks. Both simulation and software-defined-radio experiments show that the iterative method reaches higher secrecy capacity, and that imposing a 1% leakage limit forces roughly half the transmit power into the artificial-noise beam. The paper concludes that the AN-driven partitioned-RIS approach is feasible and effective for practical deployments.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the partitioned RIS, where N/2 elements are configured to maximize the received communication-signal power at Bob and the other N/2 to maximize the received artificial-noise power at Eve. The phase configurations are restricted to binary shifts {0°, 180°}, and are found either by a sequential iterative algorithm that toggles each element and keeps the phase that raises the target received power, or by a DFT-based algorithm that sweeps N mutually orthogonal codewords. The secrecy-capacity expression Cs = [Cb − Ce]+ and the SINR-ratio constraint η = γ̄e/γ̄b carry the power-allocation trade-off: tightening η from 10% to 1% lowers the optimal data-power fraction α1 from

What would settle it

In the same testbed, remove the obstruction that blocks the direct Alice–Bob and Alice–Eve paths and rerun the experiment with the same α1 values; if Eve's capacity rises above the 1% threshold or the secrecy-capacity gap between iterative and DFT methods shrinks, the claim that the partitioned RIS alone controls Eve's channel is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a single RIS partitioned into two equal segments—one acting as a beamformer for the data signal to Bob, the other as a jammer directing artificial noise at Eve—yields measurable secrecy-capacity gains. The derivation starts from the signal model in which only reflected paths reach the receivers; Bob's and Eve's capacities are expressed in terms of aligned and non-aligned signal components, and secrecy capacity is defined as the non-negative difference Cb − Ce. The optimization problem maximizes secrecy capacity over the power split α1, α2 subject to a minimum capacity for Bob and an explicit cap on Eve's capacity. Using binary phase shifts and onl

Load-bearing premise

The system assumes there is no line-of-sight between the transmitter and receivers, so all received power comes from RIS reflections; if a direct path exists, the eavesdropper's channel is not controlled by the RIS and the reported secrecy-capacity gains and leakage constraints would not transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the claims hold, a practical RIS-based secure link can be built with a fixed 256-element surface and two single-antenna transmitters, requiring only received-power measurements for configuration, no full channel state information.
The iterative phase-search method should be preferred when the configuration budget is limited to a fixed number of trials, since it dominates the DFT sweep in final secrecy capacity in both simulation and measurement.
Deploying the scheme with a strict 1% leakage cap means budgeting roughly half the transmit power to artificial noise, which cuts secrecy capacity compared to the unconstrained optimum near α1 ≈ 0.99.
The measured trade-off between the leakage ratio η and the achievable secrecy capacity provides a concrete calibration point for securing links with heterogeneous eavesdropper threats.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the entire analysis assumes no line-of-sight between Alice and the receivers, the measured gains should be understood as upper bounds for scenarios with a direct path; with a direct component, Eve can bypass the RIS and the 1% leakage calibration would need re-tuning.
The two RIS segments are optimized independently; a joint optimization that coordinates the segments, or adapts the partition ratio, could push secrecy capacity further or handle multiple eavesdroppers, which the paper lists as future work.
The results are tied to a specific free-space geometry and a single 256-element surface; testing in richer multipath environments would show whether the iterative method's advantage persists when the channel is not purely line-of-sight to the RIS.
The capacity expressions treat all non-aligned components as interference, but in a real receiver, some of those components might be exploitable; the measured bit/s/Hz figures therefore depend on the assumption that Eve's decoder treats everything else as noise.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What's actually new: an SDR testbed with a 256-element RIS partitioned to steer CS to Bob and AN to Eve, with capacity measurements for two practical phase-search algorithms. That experimental core is the paper's real value. The setup is thoughtfully described, simulation and measurement curves track each other reasonably, and the power-allocation trade-off, where holding Eve to 1% of Bob's capacity costs α1 dropping from ~0.99 to 0.46–0.58, is a concrete design guide for this niche. The paper earns credit for that.

The soft spot you need to know about is not the lack of error bars or the no-LOS assumption, though those are real limitations. It is the DFT codebook. The text says the DFT-based algorithm uses N=256 mutually orthogonal codewords, each of dimension N/2=128, while all RIS phases are binary {0°,180°}. That is impossible: at most 128 mutually orthogonal binary vectors of length 128 exist. So either the codebook has only 128 orthogonal codewords, making the 256-trial comparison against the iterative method unfair, or it has 256 non-orthogonal patterns and is mislabeled as an orthogonal DFT sweep. Both readings undercut the central "iterative outperforms DFT" result. This is a load-bearing flaw, not a typo. The authors need to specify the exact codebook (rows, columns, orthogonality definition) and rerun the comparison with equal trial counts under a valid codebook, e.g., a 128-codeword Hadamard set.

Other issues are less severe: the α1 values are read off measured curves rather than solved from the stated optimization, so they should be called empirical heuristics, not optimal allocations. The CVX analysis in Fig. 4 lacks a derivation and convexity justification, so it reads as an unexplained black box. The no-LOS assumption is clearly stated, but it means the gains won't transfer to deployments with a direct Alice–receiver path. No code or data is provided, which limits the reproducibility of an experimental study.

For whom: researchers working on measured RIS-PLS or on practical phase-search codebooks. The testbed data and the partitioned-RIS AN concept are useful anchors. I would send it to peer review because the experimental contribution is real and the flaws are fixable, but I would not pass it as-is. Ask for a corrected DFT implementation, a clear derivation for the CVX part, and at least the measurement data. That level of revision would make this a solid reference.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an artificial-noise (AN) driven RIS-assisted physical-layer security system. A 256-element RIS is partitioned into two equal halves: one half is phase-configured to steer the communication signal (CS) to a legitimate receiver (Bob), and the other half is configured to steer AN toward an eavesdropper (Eve). The authors derive capacity expressions, formulate a power-allocation problem between CS and AN subject to a secrecy-capacity / leakage constraint, and propose two practical phase-optimization methods: a sequential iterative method and a DFT-codebook sweep. The system is evaluated both in MATLAB simulations and in an SDR-based testbed. The central claims are that the proposed system achieves notable secrecy-capacity improvements, that the iterative method outperforms the DFT-based method, and that a power-allocation choice can limit Eve's capacity to a small fraction of Bob's capacity.

Significance. If the claims are sustained, the paper would be a useful experimental contribution to RIS-assisted physical-layer security: the 256-element SDR testbed and the measurement campaign are valuable, and the explicit power-vs-secrecy trade-off under a leakage constraint is of practical interest. The paper also ships concrete algorithms for binary-phase RIS optimization and compares them on a real setup, which is uncommon. However, the strength of the claims is currently limited by the ill-defined DFT codebook, the ad hoc determination of the leakage-constrained power-split parameters, and the lack of a clear derivation of the CVX-based optimization. These issues are load-bearing because they concern the main comparison and the claimed optimality of the power allocation.

major comments (5)

[Section III-C.2 and Fig. 2a] The DFT-based routine is described as sweeping N=256 mutually orthogonal codewords, each of dimension N/2=128. Over the binary phase alphabet {0°,180°} specified in Section III-C, the maximum number of mutually orthogonal length-128 vectors is 128 (Hadamard bound). Therefore the described 256-codeword orthogonal sweep cannot exist. If only 128 codewords were used, the comparison in Fig. 2a is not fair (256 iterative trials vs. 128 DFT trials). If 256 non-orthogonal codewords were used, the description is inaccurate. Please provide the exact codebook and either rerun the comparison with equal trial counts or qualify the iterative-vs-DFT conclusion.
[Section IV, Fig. 3] The values α1=0.46 and 0.58 are not obtained by solving the optimization problem P in Eq. (10). The text states they are 'determined' using Fig. 2b so that Eve's capacity is lower than 1% of Bob's capacity. This is a post hoc selection from the same measured curves that are later used to validate the approach. The paper's contribution statement claims the power allocation is optimized to suppress Eve; as written, the experiments only show that a manually chosen α1 can satisfy the 1% constraint. Please either solve P and report the resulting α1 values, or clearly frame the experiment as a feasibility test at manually selected operating points.
[Section II, Eqs. (5)-(8)] The system model assumes no line-of-sight between the transmitter and receivers, so all received energy comes from the RIS. The testbed geometry in Table I shows Alice, Bob, and Eve placed within roughly one to two meters of each other, and the paper does not describe any shielding or antenna orientation that would suppress direct paths. If direct Alice-to-Bob or Alice-to-Eve components exist in the measurements, Eqs. (7)-(8) omit them, which would change the capacity calculations and the validity of the 1% leakage constraint. Please describe how direct paths were eliminated in the experiment, or extend the model to include them.
[Section IV, Fig. 4] The text states that 'the optimum values of α1 are calculated using the Matlab CVX tool,' but no convexity proof or precise formulation is provided. The SINR constraints in Eqs. (11)-(12) and the log-capacity objective in P are not generally convex in α1/α2; a one-dimensional search over α1 would be a different, defensible procedure. Please specify the exact optimization problem given to CVX, or state that an exhaustive or golden-section search was used. Without this, the label 'optimum' for the CVX-based results is unsupported.
[Section III-A, Eq. (7)] In Eq. (7), the numerator contains β1^2+β2^2, where β1 and β2 are the contributions of the same CS symbol from the two RIS partitions. These two components arrive at Bob with a determinate relative phase and should combine coherently, so the instantaneous signal power is |β1 + β2 e^{jφ}|^2, not β1^2+β2^2, unless β1 and β2 are defined as independent random processes and the indicated expression is an expectation. This distinction matters because Eqs. (7)-(8) are used to compute the capacity values in Figs. 2-3. Please specify the exact definitions and assumptions, and either revise the capacity expressions or state the incoherent-combining approximation explicitly.

minor comments (3)

[Eqs. (3)-(4)] The notation for the RIS partitions is inconsistent: the text says Bob's partition has indices n=1,...,N/2, while Eq. (3) assigns i=b to the summation over n=N/2+1,...,N. Please align the notation.
[Section III-C.1 / Fig. 2a] Please clarify what one 'iteration' means for each algorithm: for the iterative method, a single element toggle; for the DFT method, one codebook evaluation. The x-axis in Fig. 2a should be labeled accordingly so that the 256-trial comparison is unambiguous.
[General] The 'zero case' in Fig. 2c is defined only as assigning zero phase to all elements; it would help to state that this is the benchmark mirror-like reflection and whether it corresponds to α1=1 or another operating point.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Experimental power-allocation operating points are read from the same measured capacity curves used to demonstrate the 1% leakage constraint; the power-allocation claim partly reduces to in-sample tuning.

fitted input called prediction [Section IV, Fig. 2b and Fig. 3; cf. Section III-B, Eq. (10)]
"Using Fig. 2b, α1 is determined as 0.46 and 0.58 for the iterative and DFT-based methods, respectively, so that Eve’s capacity is lower than 1% of Bob’s capacity. The results across all SDR transmit gains show that Eve’s capacity is successfully suppressed to provide secure communication when the α1 values are 0.46 and 0.58, respectively."

The α1 values are not obtained by solving the stated optimization problem (10); they are read from the same empirical capacity curves (Fig. 2b) that are then used as evidence of successful suppression. The condition Ce ≤ 0.01 Cb is enforced in-sample by choosing those values, so the subsequent confirmation is a restatement of the selection criterion rather than an independent prediction. The CVX-based analysis in Fig. 4 is a separate model-based optimization, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

full rationale

The main hardware demonstration and the iterative-vs-DFT received-power measurements are self-contained and not circular: phase configurations are selected on measured received power and then evaluated on independent secrecy-capacity metrics. The capacity formulas (7)-(9) are standard definitions applied to the modeled received signals, not results imported from the authors' prior work. Self-citations ([7], [12], [14]) are used descriptively for the algorithm and hardware and are not load-bearing proofs. The partial circularity is confined to the experimental power-allocation claim: the α1 values 0.46/0.58 are calibrated from Fig. 2b to satisfy the 1% leakage target, and the same style of measured data is then used to show that target is met. I do not score the DFT-codebook dimension inconsistency as circularity; it is a mathematical/correctness concern about the iterative-vs-DFT comparison, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The load-bearing assumptions are the no-LOS channel model, independent channels, binary phase quantization, and the fixed equal RIS partition. The power-allocation results are partly empirical: several α1 values and the SINR ratio η are chosen or read off data rather than derived analytically.

free parameters (4)

α1 for 1% Eve capacity constraint = 0.46 (iterative), 0.58 (DFT)
Read off measured capacity curves in Fig. 2b to make Ce = 1% of Cb; not obtained by solving the stated optimization P.
α1 for unconstrained maximum SC = 0.992
Empirically read as the argmax of the SC curve in Fig. 2c; presented as the unconstrained optimum.
SINR ratio η = γ̄e/γ̄b = 1% and 10%
Chosen by hand in Fig. 4 to illustrate the power-secrecy trade-off; not estimated from data.
RIS partition allocation = N/2 for Bob, N/2 for Eve
Fixed a priori; the paper states unequal partitioning is left for future work.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption No line-of-sight between Alice and Bob/Eve; only RIS-reflected signals reach the receivers.
Section II states this explicitly; all capacity expressions (5)-(8) omit direct paths.
domain assumption All channel coefficients are mutually independent.
Section III-A assumes this to drop cross terms in the received-power and capacity expressions.
domain assumption RIS phase shifts are restricted to {0°,180°} and the optimization algorithms observe only received power.
Section III-C restricts the practical design to binary phase quantization and power-only feedback.
ad hoc to paper The RIS is split into two equal halves with a fixed mapping of CS to one half and AN to the other.
The equal split is a design choice; the paper says unequal partitioning is future work.
domain assumption Free-space path loss and cosine antenna-element patterns are used in simulation.
Table I specifies this channel model; it may not hold in richer indoor environments.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RIS-Assisted Physical Layer Security: Artificial Noise-Driven Optimization and Measurements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KN34ONWL

@misc{pith2026251122910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RIS-Assisted Physical Layer Security: Artificial Noise-Driven Optimization and Measurements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KN34ONWL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.22910}
}

read the original abstract

Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) has emerged as a key enabler for providing signal coverage, energy efficiency, reliable communication, and physical layer security (PLS) in next-generation wireless communication networks. This paper investigates an artificial noise (AN)-driven RIS-assisted secure communication system. The RIS is partitioned into two segments, where the first segment is configured to direct the communication signal (CS) toward the legitimate user (Bob), and the other one is configured to steer the AN toward the eavesdropper (Eve). To this end, iterative and discrete Fourier transform-based algorithms are developed for practical RIS phase shift optimization. The power allocation between the CS and the AN signals is optimized in such a way that the secrecy capacity (SC) is maximized while limiting Eve's channel capacity. The proposed PLS framework is evaluated through both simulations and software defined radio based testbed experiments. The results demonstrate promising improvements in the SC, highlighting the potential of AN-driven RIS-assisted PLS for practical deployments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.22910 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** a) Bob’s received power increment through iterations; b) Capacity comparison of Bob and Eve; c) SC comparison. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Experimental results of Eve’s and Bob’s capacities and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface for physical layer security of next-generation wireless communications,

R. Kauret al., “A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface for physical layer security of next-generation wireless communications,” IEEE Open J. of V eh. Technol., vol. 5, pp. 172–199, Jan. 2024

2024
[2]

RIS-assisted physical layer security in emerging RF and optical wireless communication systems: A comprehensive survey,

M. H. Khoshafaet al., “RIS-assisted physical layer security in emerging RF and optical wireless communication systems: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tuts., Aug. 2025

2025
[3]

Secure wireless communication via intelligent reflecting surface,

M. Cui, G. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Secure wireless communication via intelligent reflecting surface,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1410–1414, Oct. 2019

2019
[4]

Secrecy performance analysis of RIS-aided wireless communication systems,

L. Yanget al., “Secrecy performance analysis of RIS-aided wireless communication systems,”IEEE Trans. on V eh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 12 296–12 300, Oct. 2020

2020
[5]

RIS-assisted secure communications: Low-complexity beamforming design,

Z. Chenget al., “RIS-assisted secure communications: Low-complexity beamforming design,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1012–1016, June 2023

2023
[6]

Measurement-based characterization of physical layer security for RIS-assisted wireless systems,

S. Kes ¸iret al., “Measurement-based characterization of physical layer security for RIS-assisted wireless systems,” in2023 IEEE 97th V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2023-Spring), June 2023, pp. 1–6

2023
[7]

Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,

S. Kayrakliket al., “Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 1243–1255, Feb. 2024

2024
[8]

Optimizing indoor RIS-aided physical-layer security: A codebook-generation methodology and measurement-based analysis,

D. Kompostiotiset al., “Optimizing indoor RIS-aided physical-layer security: A codebook-generation methodology and measurement-based analysis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22082, June 2025

arXiv 2025

Show all 15 references

[9]

Intelligent reflecting surface assisted secrecy communication: Is artificial noise helpful or not?

X. Guan, Q. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface assisted secrecy communication: Is artificial noise helpful or not?”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 778–782, June 2020

2020
[10]

Robust and secure wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces,

X. Yuet al., “Robust and secure wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces,”IEEE J. on Sel. Areas in Commun., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2637–2652, Nov. 2020

2020
[11]

Artificial-noise-aided secure MIMO wireless commu- nications via intelligent reflecting surface,

S. Honget al., “Artificial-noise-aided secure MIMO wireless commu- nications via intelligent reflecting surface,”IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 7851–7866, Dec. 2020

2020
[12]

Artificial noise and RIS-aided physical layer security: Optimal RIS partitioning and power control,

S. Arzykulovet al., “Artificial noise and RIS-aided physical layer security: Optimal RIS partitioning and power control,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 992–996, June 2023

2023
[13]

Online DRL-based beam selection for RIS-aided physical layer security: An experimental study,

A. Nasseret al., “Online DRL-based beam selection for RIS-aided physical layer security: An experimental study,” inGLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Commun. Conf., Dec. 2024, pp. 1004–1009

2024
[14]

N78 frequency band modular RIS design and im- plementation,

S. Kayraklıket al., “N78 frequency band modular RIS design and im- plementation,” in2025 55th European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Sep. 2025, pp. 795–798

2025
[15]

B200 RF performance test report,

Ettus Research, “B200 RF performance test report,” Ettus Knowledge Base, Technical Report, 2025, accessed: 2025-10-06, https://kb.ettus.com/images/c/cb/B200 RF Performance.pdf

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface for physical layer security of next-generation wireless communications,

R. Kauret al., “A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface for physical layer security of next-generation wireless communications,” IEEE Open J. of V eh. Technol., vol. 5, pp. 172–199, Jan. 2024

2024

[2] [2]

RIS-assisted physical layer security in emerging RF and optical wireless communication systems: A comprehensive survey,

M. H. Khoshafaet al., “RIS-assisted physical layer security in emerging RF and optical wireless communication systems: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tuts., Aug. 2025

2025

[3] [3]

Secure wireless communication via intelligent reflecting surface,

M. Cui, G. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Secure wireless communication via intelligent reflecting surface,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1410–1414, Oct. 2019

2019

[4] [4]

Secrecy performance analysis of RIS-aided wireless communication systems,

L. Yanget al., “Secrecy performance analysis of RIS-aided wireless communication systems,”IEEE Trans. on V eh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 12 296–12 300, Oct. 2020

2020

[5] [5]

RIS-assisted secure communications: Low-complexity beamforming design,

Z. Chenget al., “RIS-assisted secure communications: Low-complexity beamforming design,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1012–1016, June 2023

2023

[6] [6]

Measurement-based characterization of physical layer security for RIS-assisted wireless systems,

S. Kes ¸iret al., “Measurement-based characterization of physical layer security for RIS-assisted wireless systems,” in2023 IEEE 97th V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2023-Spring), June 2023, pp. 1–6

2023

[7] [7]

Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,

S. Kayrakliket al., “Indoor measurements for RIS-aided communication: Practical phase shift optimization, coverage enhancement, and physical layer security,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 1243–1255, Feb. 2024

2024

[8] [8]

Optimizing indoor RIS-aided physical-layer security: A codebook-generation methodology and measurement-based analysis,

D. Kompostiotiset al., “Optimizing indoor RIS-aided physical-layer security: A codebook-generation methodology and measurement-based analysis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22082, June 2025

arXiv 2025