pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.06505 · v4 · pith:K753XX3Pnew · submitted 2025-12-06 · 💱 q-fin.PR · q-fin.MF

Amortizing Perpetual Options

Zachary Feinstein This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💱 q-fin.PR q-fin.MF
keywords amortizing perpetual optionsperpetual American optionsinstallment optionsoption pricingoptimal stoppingdividend-paying assetsfinancial derivatives
0
0 comments X

The pith

Amortizing perpetual options reduce to equivalent vanilla perpetual American options on dividend-paying assets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces amortizing perpetual options as a fungible variant of continuous-installment options for exchange trading. Explicit installment payments are replaced by decay of the claimable notional, which keeps all units identical over time and avoids lapsing logic. This implicit continuous payment preserves the Markov property and converts the pricing task into a standard optimal-stopping problem. A sympathetic reader cares because the reduction immediately supplies analytical formulas for exercise boundaries, call and put values under the risk-neutral measure, the Greeks, and comparative statics in the amortization rate.

Core claim

We demonstrate that AmPO valuation can be reduced to an equivalent vanilla perpetual American option on a dividend-paying asset. This enables analytical expressions for the exercise boundaries and risk-neutral valuations for calls and puts. These formulas and relations allow us to derive the Greeks and study comparative statics with respect to the amortization rate. Illustrative numerical case studies demonstrate how the amortization rate shapes option behavior and reveal the resulting tradeoffs in the effective volatility sensitivity.

What carries the argument

The reduction that maps an amortizing perpetual option to a vanilla perpetual American option with continuous dividend yield set equal to the amortization rate.

If this is right

  • Closed-form expressions exist for optimal exercise boundaries and risk-neutral valuations of both calls and puts.
  • The Greeks can be obtained by direct differentiation of the reduced-form solutions.
  • Comparative statics with respect to the amortization rate follow immediately from the dividend-yield interpretation.
  • Numerical illustrations show how higher amortization rates alter volatility sensitivity and effective option behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fungibility property may enable standardized exchange-traded perpetual contracts that remain tradable in fixed units without lapsing.
  • Similar implicit-decay constructions could restore Markovian structure to other installment or path-dependent claims.
  • Risk managers could apply the closed-form Greeks directly to delta-hedge books containing amortizing perpetual positions.

Load-bearing premise

The decay of claimable notional functions as an implicit continuous payment that preserves the Markov property and converts the problem into a standard optimal-stopping problem without introducing additional path dependence or state variables.

What would settle it

Simulate the payoff process of an AmPO with decaying notional and compare the resulting price to the closed-form price of the matching perpetual American option with dividend yield equal to the amortization rate; systematic mismatch would disprove the claimed equivalence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.06505 by Zachary Feinstein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example 3.7: Comparison of AmPO and dated at-the-money [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example 3.12: Vega of a $100 position in call, put, and straddle strategies. 4 Discussion and Applications 4.1 Setting the Amortization Rate In Section 3.2, we imposed a fixed qt ≡ q > 0 amortization rate. While the general theory permits endogenous amortization (i.e., dependent on the option value), such a construction can introduce novel manipulations in AmPOs in practice. For instance, consider an AmPO … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we introduce amortizing perpetual options (AmPOs), a fungible variant of continuous-installment options suitable for exchange-based trading. Traditional installment options lapse when holders cease their payments, destroying fungibility across units of notional. AmPOs replace explicit installment payments and the need for lapsing logic with an implicit payment scheme via the decay of the claimable notional. This amortization ensures all units evolve identically, preserving fungibility. We demonstrate that AmPO valuation can be reduced to an equivalent vanilla perpetual American option on a dividend-paying asset. This enables analytical expressions for the exercise boundaries and risk-neutral valuations for calls and puts. These formulas and relations allow us to derive the Greeks and study comparative statics with respect to the amortization rate. Illustrative numerical case studies demonstrate how the amortization rate shapes option behavior and reveal the resulting tradeoffs in the effective volatility sensitivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces amortizing perpetual options (AmPOs) as a fungible variant of continuous-installment options. Traditional installment options lose fungibility when payments cease and units lapse; AmPOs replace explicit payments with decay of the claimable notional so that all units evolve identically. The central claim is that AmPO valuation reduces exactly to the standard perpetual American option problem on a geometric Brownian motion asset paying continuous dividend yield equal to the amortization rate. This reduction is asserted to yield closed-form exercise boundaries and risk-neutral values for calls and puts, from which Greeks and comparative statics with respect to the amortization rate are derived. Numerical case studies illustrate the impact of the amortization parameter on behavior and volatility sensitivity.

Significance. If the reduction is valid and free of hidden path dependence, the work supplies a practical analytical pricing tool by mapping a new instrument class onto well-known perpetual American formulas. The mechanism for achieving fungibility via deterministic notional decay is a clear credit to the paper and could support exchange trading. Derivation of Greeks together with comparative statics on the amortization rate provides concrete risk-management value. The numerical illustrations help quantify the trade-offs introduced by the new parameter.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the claim of an 'exact reduction' to the vanilla perpetual American option on a dividend-paying asset is asserted without derivation steps, boundary conditions, or verification that the notional decay enters the generator precisely as a constant dividend yield q = α. The manuscript must show that the value function factors as N(t) · v(S) and that no residual state variable or path-dependent term arises, as this is load-bearing for all subsequent analytical expressions and the closed-form boundary.
  2. [Model Setup] Model and valuation sections: the assumption that claimable notional decays deterministically at constant rate α and that exercise payoff remains linear in current notional is not explicitly verified to preserve the Markov property in S alone. Without this step-by-step mapping to the standard dividend-adjusted Black-Scholes operator, the applicability of the known perpetual-American solution cannot be confirmed.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the amortization rate α and the notional process should be introduced with an explicit equation in the model section to improve readability.
  2. [Numerical Studies] The numerical case studies would benefit from a table listing all parameter values (initial notional, volatility, risk-free rate, etc.) to support reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying areas where the reduction to the standard perpetual-American framework requires more explicit verification. We agree that additional step-by-step derivations will strengthen the manuscript and will incorporate them in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the claim of an 'exact reduction' to the vanilla perpetual American option on a dividend-paying asset is asserted without derivation steps, boundary conditions, or verification that the notional decay enters the generator precisely as a constant dividend yield q = α. The manuscript must show that the value function factors as N(t) · v(S) and that no residual state variable or path-dependent term arises, as this is load-bearing for all subsequent analytical expressions and the closed-form boundary.

    Authors: We accept that the abstract and introduction state the reduction without spelling out the intermediate steps. In the revised version we will insert a concise derivation immediately after the model definition: we will show that the claimable notional N(t) = N0 exp(−α t) multiplies the payoff linearly, that the infinitesimal generator therefore acquires an extra −α N ∂V/∂N term which, after the ansatz V(t,S,N) = N(t) v(S), cancels exactly against the amortization and leaves the standard dividend-adjusted operator with q = α. We will also state the free-boundary conditions and confirm that the resulting PDE depends on S alone, eliminating any path-dependent residual. These additions will make the applicability of the known perpetual-American formulas fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model Setup] Model and valuation sections: the assumption that claimable notional decays deterministically at constant rate α and that exercise payoff remains linear in current notional is not explicitly verified to preserve the Markov property in S alone. Without this step-by-step mapping to the standard dividend-adjusted Black-Scholes operator, the applicability of the known perpetual-American solution cannot be confirmed.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the Markov property is needed. In the revised model section we will add a short lemma showing that, because the notional decay is deterministic and the payoff is homogeneous of degree one in N, the value function separates as V(t,S,N) = N(t) v(S). Substituting into the generator yields precisely the Black-Scholes operator with continuous dividend yield q = α and no additional state variable. This mapping justifies direct use of the closed-form perpetual-American exercise boundaries and values already available in the literature. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

AmPO valuation reduces to standard perpetual American option on dividend-paying asset with no circularity in derivation

full rationale

The paper's central step is to show that amortizing perpetual options can be valued by treating the notional decay as an exogenous continuous dividend yield q equal to the amortization rate α. This converts the problem into the standard optimal-stopping formulation for a perpetual American option under geometric Brownian motion, whose closed-form exercise boundaries and risk-neutral values are already known from the literature (e.g., Merton 1973 and subsequent works). The derivation relies on the Markov property being preserved under deterministic linear decay of notional and linear payoff structure, which is an assumption stated explicitly rather than fitted or self-defined within the paper. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or an ansatz smuggled from the authors' prior work; the result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model inherits the standard continuous-time risk-neutral framework and introduces the AmPO definition together with the amortization rate as the sole new modeling choice.

free parameters (1)
  • amortization rate
    Rate controlling notional decay; appears as a free parameter whose effect is studied via comparative statics and numerical examples.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Underlying asset follows geometric Brownian motion under the risk-neutral measure.
    Required to obtain closed-form perpetual-American solutions after the reduction.
invented entities (1)
  • Amortizing Perpetual Option (AmPO) no independent evidence
    purpose: Fungible continuous-installment claim whose notional decays implicitly.
    Newly defined contract; no independent empirical or market evidence is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5663 in / 1321 out tokens · 55425 ms · 2026-05-21T18:47:05.149523+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Designing On-Chain Options: Amortizing Perpetual Options

    q-fin.MF 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces amortizing perpetual options as a blockchain-native primitive that supports decentralized risk management including endogenous collateralization and de-peg insurance.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Ackerer, D., Hugonnier, J., and Jermann, U. (2023). Perpetua l futures pricing. Mathematical Finance

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    and Palmowski, Z

    Al-Hadad, J. and Palmowski, Z. (2024). Perpetual american opt ions with asset-dependent discounting. Applied Mathematics & Optimization , 89(1):18

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Angeris, G., Chitra, T., Evans, A., and Lorig, M. (2023). A primer o n perpetuals. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics , 14(1):SC17–SC30

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Ben-Ameur, H., Breton, M., and Fran¸ cois, P. (2006). A dynamic programming approach to price install- ment options. European Journal of Operational Research , 169(2):667–676

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    and Feinstein, Z

    Bichuch, M. and Feinstein, Z. (2025). Axioms for automated mar ket makers: A mathematical framework in fintech and decentralized finance. Operations Research

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Boyarchenko, S. I. and Levendorskii, S. Z. (2002). Perpetua l american options under l´ evy processes. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization , 40(6):1663–1696

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Boyarchenko, S. I. and Levendorski ˇ ı, S. Z. (2000). Option p ricing for truncated l´ evy processes. Interna- tional journal of theoretical and applied finance , 3(03):549–552

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    Ciurlia, P. (2011). An integral representation approach for va luing american-style installment options with continuous payment plan. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications , 74(16):5506–5524. 11

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    and Caperdoni, C

    Ciurlia, P. and Caperdoni, C. (2009). A note on the pricing of perp etual continuous-installment options. Mathematical Methods in Economics and Finance , 4(1):11–26

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    and Roko, I

    Ciurlia, P. and Roko, I. (2005). Valuation of american continuou s-installment options. Computational Economics, 25(1):143–165

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    H., Schachermayer, W., and Tompkins, R

    Davis, M. H., Schachermayer, W., and Tompkins, R. G. (2001). P ricing, no-arbitrage bounds and robusthedging of instalment options. Quantitative Finance , 1(6):597

    work page 2001

  12. [12]

    H., Schachermayer, W., and Tompkins, R

    Davis, M. H., Schachermayer, W., and Tompkins, R. G. (2002). I nstallment options and static hedging. The Journal of Risk Finance , 3(2):46–52

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    L., and Moraux, F

    Detemple, J., Abdou, S. L., and Moraux, F. (2020). American st ep options. European Journal of Operational Research, 282(1):363–385

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    and Singleton, K

    Duffie, D. and Singleton, K. J. (1999). Modeling term structure s of defaultable bonds. The review of financial studies , 12(4):687–720

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Fran¸ cois, P. (2005). Pricing asx installment warrants under g arch h. ben-ameur, m. breton. Les Cahiers du GERAD ISSN , 711:2440

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Hull, J. C. (2018). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives . Pearson, 10th edition

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Kimura, T. (2009). American continuous-installment options: V aluation and premium decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 70(3):803–824

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Kimura, T. (2010). Valuing continuous-installment options. European Journal of Operational Research , 201(1):222–230

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    and Kristensen, J

    Lambert, G. and Kristensen, J. (2023). Panoptic: the perpe tual, oracle-free options protocol. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.14232

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Linetsky, V. (1999). Step options. Mathematical Finance, 9(1):55–96

    work page 1999

  21. [21]

    C., Roughgarden, T., and Zhang, A

    Milionis, J., Moallemi, C. C., Roughgarden, T., and Zhang, A. L. (202 4). Automated market making and loss-versus-rebalancing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06046

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Quah, J. K.-H. and Strulovici, B. (2009). Comparative statics, informativeness, and the interval domi- nance order. Econometrica, 77(6):1949–1992

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Shiller, R. J. (1993). Measuring asset values for cash settleme nt in derivative markets: hedonic repeated measures indices and perpetual futures. The Journal of Finance , 48(3):911–931

    work page 1993

  24. [24]

    F., Li, R

    Singh, S. F., Li, R. K. X., Gaskin, S., Wu, Y., Klinck, J., Michalopoulos, P., Poulos, Z., and Veneris, A. (2025). Modeling loss-versus-rebalancing in automated market ma kers via continuous-installment options. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02971

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    and Bankman-Fried, S

    White, D. and Bankman-Fried, S. (2021). Everlasting options. https://www.paradigm.xyz/2021/05/everlasting-option s

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    and Yi, F

    Yang, Z. and Yi, F. (2009). A variational inequality arising from a merican installment call options pricing. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications , 357(1):54–68. 12

    work page 2009