Low-Mach-number limit for two-phase flows

Cassandre Lebot

arxiv: 2512.16286 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-18 · 🧮 math.AP

Low-Mach-number limit for two-phase flows

Cassandre Lebot This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP

keywords low-Mach-number limittwo-phase flowscompressible Navier-StokesEuler equationspressure closureincompressible limit

0 comments

The pith

The low-Mach-number limit is formally derived for two-phase flows with algebraic or PDE pressure closures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formally studies the low-Mach-number limit for compressible Navier-Stokes and Euler equations in two-phase settings. It reviews single-phase results before deriving the limit for systems with algebraic or PDE pressure closures, one or two velocities, and with or without entropy. If true, this would mean that low-speed two-phase flows can be approximated by simpler incompressible models derived from the compressible ones. A reader cares because these limits provide reduced models that are computationally cheaper while preserving key dynamics.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the low-Mach-number limit can be formally obtained for two-phase flows, leading to incompressible two-phase systems depending on the chosen pressure closure and number of velocities.

What carries the argument

Formal asymptotic analysis as the Mach number tends to zero applied to the compressible two-phase equations.

Load-bearing premise

The solutions possess sufficient regularity or compactness to allow passing to the limit in the equations.

What would settle it

If compressible two-phase simulations at successively smaller Mach numbers fail to approach the predicted incompressible equations, the formal limit would not hold in practice.

read the original abstract

This paper is devoted to the formal study of the low-Mach-number limit for solutions of the compressible Navier-Stokes or Euler equations for different types of fluids.We first review the different results obtained in the case of flows consisting of one phase. Then, we focus on the low-Mach-number limit for two-phase flows, considering different types of systems: with an algebraic closure or a PDE closure for the pressure, with one single or two different velocities, without or with entropy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper lays out formal low-Mach limits for several two-phase configurations but does not close the regularity gap needed to justify the limit in the two-velocity PDE-closure case.

read the letter

The main contribution is a systematic formal expansion of the compressible two-phase Navier-Stokes or Euler system in powers of the Mach number. It first recalls the one-phase results, then works through algebraic versus PDE pressure closures, single versus two velocities, and the presence or absence of entropy. The algebra for the leading-order limit equations is written down cleanly for each variant, which is the new part relative to the one-phase literature it cites. That collection is useful as a reference for anyone who already works with these reduced models in engineering contexts and wants to see the formal justification written out side by side. The derivations follow the usual pattern of collecting O(1) terms after the expansion and identifying the resulting incompressible or low-Mach system with the appropriate interface conditions. Credit is due for keeping the cases distinct and for not claiming more than formal asymptotics. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: passing to the limit still requires enough compactness or regularity at the interface so that the pressure multiplier and velocity jumps survive without extra singular measures. The compressible parent system does not automatically give those bounds when two velocities are present and the closure is a PDE; the paper states the formal steps but does not supply the missing a-priori estimates. For the algebraic-closure single-velocity cases this is less of a problem, but it is load-bearing for the two-velocity PDE version. The work is therefore a clear formal note rather than a fully rigorous limit theorem. It is aimed at specialists in mathematical fluid dynamics who already know the one-phase results and want the two-phase extensions written down. A reader looking for new rigorous theorems or new physical predictions will not find them here. I would still send it to peer review because the formal work is organized and the configurations are stated precisely; referees can ask for the missing estimates or for a clearer statement of what remains open. It is worth the time in this subfield.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper formally derives the low-Mach-number limit for compressible Navier-Stokes and Euler equations, first reviewing known results for single-phase flows and then extending the analysis to two-phase flows. It considers algebraic versus PDE pressure closures, one versus two velocities, and cases with or without entropy, expanding the compressible system in powers of the Mach number and collecting leading-order terms to obtain the corresponding incompressible or low-Mach models.

Significance. If the formal derivations are justified by appropriate regularity, this work would supply a unified asymptotic framework for low-Mach two-phase flows that extends single-phase results and clarifies the role of different closure choices. Such limits are relevant for numerical modeling and analysis of nearly incompressible multiphase systems, provided the interface regularity assumptions can be made rigorous.

major comments (1)

[two-phase PDE-closure section] The formal passage to the limit in the two-velocity PDE-closure case requires sufficient regularity and compactness of the interface to ensure that the pressure Lagrange multiplier and velocity jump conditions survive without additional singular measures. The manuscript states the formal algebra but does not supply or cite a-priori estimates from the compressible parent system that would justify discarding higher-order oscillations at the interface.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the pressure closure and entropy variables should be made uniform across the one-phase review and two-phase sections to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The manuscript is devoted to formal asymptotic derivations, and we address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [two-phase PDE-closure section] The formal passage to the limit in the two-velocity PDE-closure case requires sufficient regularity and compactness of the interface to ensure that the pressure Lagrange multiplier and velocity jump conditions survive without additional singular measures. The manuscript states the formal algebra but does not supply or cite a-priori estimates from the compressible parent system that would justify discarding higher-order oscillations at the interface.

Authors: We agree that a fully rigorous justification of the limit passage would require a priori estimates guaranteeing sufficient regularity and compactness of the interface so that no additional singular measures appear. The present work, however, is strictly formal: we expand the compressible system in powers of the Mach number and collect leading-order terms, exactly as done for the single-phase cases reviewed in the first part of the manuscript. No claim of rigorous convergence is made. To clarify this distinction we will insert a short remark at the beginning of the two-velocity PDE-closure section stating that the derivation is formal and that rigorous analysis would necessitate interface estimates from the parent compressible system, which lie outside the scope of the paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: formal asymptotic expansions rely on external regularity assumptions

full rationale

The paper performs a standard formal low-Mach asymptotic analysis: it reviews known one-phase results, then expands the compressible two-phase system (algebraic or PDE pressure closure, one or two velocities) in powers of Mach number and collects leading-order terms. No derivation step defines the limit equations in terms of parameters fitted from the same data, renames a known result, or reduces the target system to a self-citation chain. The required compactness/regularity hypotheses are stated as external mathematical assumptions needed to pass to the limit, not derived from the limit equations themselves. This matches the pattern of self-contained formal analysis against external benchmarks, yielding score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivations rest on standard existence and regularity results for compressible Navier-Stokes/Euler systems plus specific closure relations for pressure and entropy; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Solutions possess sufficient regularity or compactness to pass to the low-Mach limit
Invoked to justify the formal asymptotic analysis for both single- and two-phase cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5355 in / 1159 out tokens · 25901 ms · 2026-05-16T21:53:03.480158+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Low-Mach-number limit of a compressible two-phase flow system with algebraic closure
math.AP 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

As the Mach number tends to zero under well-prepared data, the bi-fluid compressible system converges to the incompressible non-homogeneous fluid system with transported volume fractions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

3 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

[Alazard, 2005] Alazard, T. (2005). Incompressible limit of the nonisentropic euler equa- tions with the solid wall boundary conditions. [Alazard, 2006] Alazard, T. (2006). Low mach number limit of the full navier-stokes equations.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 180(1):1–73. [Alazard, 2008] Alazard, T. (2008). A minicourse on the low mach num...

work page 2005
[2]

[Desjardins et al., 1999] Desjardins, B., Grenier, E., Lions, P.-L., and Masmoudi, N. (1999). Incompressible limit for solutions of the isentropic navier–stokes equations with dirichlet boundary conditions.Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 78(5):461–471. [Ebin, 1977] Ebin, D. G. (1977). The motion of slightly compressible fluids viewed as ...

work page 1999
[3]

[Lions and Masmoudi, 1998] Lions, P.-L

oxford university press. [Lions and Masmoudi, 1998] Lions, P.-L. and Masmoudi, N. (1998). Incompressible limit for a viscous compressible fluid.Journal de math´ ematiques pures et appliqu´ ees, 77(6):585–627. [M´ etivier and Schochet, 2001a] M´ etivier, G. and Schochet, S. (2001a). The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic euler equations.Archive for...

work page 1998

[1] [1]

[Alazard, 2005] Alazard, T. (2005). Incompressible limit of the nonisentropic euler equa- tions with the solid wall boundary conditions. [Alazard, 2006] Alazard, T. (2006). Low mach number limit of the full navier-stokes equations.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 180(1):1–73. [Alazard, 2008] Alazard, T. (2008). A minicourse on the low mach num...

work page 2005

[2] [2]

[Desjardins et al., 1999] Desjardins, B., Grenier, E., Lions, P.-L., and Masmoudi, N. (1999). Incompressible limit for solutions of the isentropic navier–stokes equations with dirichlet boundary conditions.Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 78(5):461–471. [Ebin, 1977] Ebin, D. G. (1977). The motion of slightly compressible fluids viewed as ...

work page 1999

[3] [3]

[Lions and Masmoudi, 1998] Lions, P.-L

oxford university press. [Lions and Masmoudi, 1998] Lions, P.-L. and Masmoudi, N. (1998). Incompressible limit for a viscous compressible fluid.Journal de math´ ematiques pures et appliqu´ ees, 77(6):585–627. [M´ etivier and Schochet, 2001a] M´ etivier, G. and Schochet, S. (2001a). The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic euler equations.Archive for...

work page 1998