pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.15785 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-22 · 📡 eess.SP

Joint Pilot and Unknown Data-based Localization for OFDM Opportunistic Radar Systems

Mathieu Reniers , Martin Willame , J\'er\^ome Louveaux , Luc Vandendorpe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords OFDMlocalizationopportunistic radarISACpassive radarpositioningFFT estimationdata payloads
0
0 comments X

The pith

Positioning information can be extracted from unknown data payloads in OFDM signals without decoding them for improved localization in passive radar.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes a method to jointly use known pilot signals and unknown random data symbols from communication transmissions for positioning in an opportunistic passive radar setup. Most prior work either discards the data portion of each frame or requires successful decoding first, which limits accuracy to communication performance. The approach processes the data payloads directly and implements the estimation efficiently with Fast Fourier Transforms on signals received by a uniform linear array. Numerical simulations demonstrate better localization than existing pilot-only or decision-directed methods. A sympathetic reader would care because data symbols form the bulk of each transmission frame, so accessing their radar information without extra hardware or decoding could advance integrated sensing in standards like 6G.

Core claim

In an opportunistic passive radar scenario, communication signals from a user are captured by a radar equipped with a uniform linear array; positioning information is extracted from data payloads without decoding them through a joint pilot-and-data method that can be efficiently implemented using Fast Fourier Transforms, resulting in superior localization performance compared to existing approaches.

What carries the argument

Joint pilot and unknown data-based localization method implemented via FFT-based estimation on OFDM signals received by a uniform linear array.

Load-bearing premise

The received signals allow efficient FFT-based estimation in the opportunistic passive radar scenario with a uniform linear array under the assumed channel and signal models.

What would settle it

Numerical simulations in which the proposed joint method shows no accuracy gain or performs worse than pilot-only methods across the tested channel conditions would disprove the performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.15785 by J\'er\^ome Louveaux, Luc Vandendorpe, Martin Willame, Mathieu Reniers.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the considered resource grid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: HitRate and RMSE of sin(θbs) and Rbs as a function of SNR. The HitRate is shown for SNR ∈ [−40 dB, −18 dB] (gray area) and the RMSE for SNR ∈ [−40 dB, 20 dB]. System parameters: P = 1 (BPSK symbols), D = 32, C = {16QAM}, Q = 256, ∆f = 15 kHz, N = 16, ∆d = 0.5 λc. Results are obtained for 10000 Monte-Carlo iterations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: System parameters: P = 1 (BPSK symbols), D = 32, C = {16QAM}, Q = 256 for (a), ∆f = 15 kHz, ∆d = 0.5 λc, N = 16 for (b). Results are obtained for 10000 Monte-Carlo iterations. V. CONCLUSION This paper investigates the joint exploitation of pilots and unknown data payloads for localization. We propose a novel method that does not require data detection, making it robust under poor communication conditions (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrating Sensing and Communications (ISAC) has emerged as a promising paradigm for Sixth Generation (6G) and Wi-Fi 7 networks, with the communication-centric approach being particularly attractive due to its compatibility with current standards. Typical communication signals comprise both deterministic known pilot signals and random unknown data payloads. Most existing approaches either rely solely on pilots for positioning, thereby ignoring the radar information present in the received data symbols that constitute the majority of each frame, or rely on data decisions, which bounds positioning performance to that of the communication system. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel method that extracts positioning information from data payloads without decoding them. We consider an opportunistic scenario in which communication signals from a user are captured by a passive radar equipped with a uniform linear array of antennas. We show that, in this setting, the estimation can be efficiently implemented using Fast Fourier Transforms. Finally, we demonstrate superior localization performance compared to existing methods in the literature through numerical simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a joint pilot and unknown data-based localization technique for OFDM signals in an opportunistic passive radar setting with a uniform linear array. It claims that positioning information can be extracted directly from unknown data payloads without decoding via an FFT-efficient estimator, yielding superior localization performance over pilot-only and decision-directed baselines as shown in numerical simulations.

Significance. If the central claim holds under realistic conditions, the approach would meaningfully advance communication-centric ISAC by exploiting the data payload (the bulk of each frame) for sensing without requiring successful decoding, offering a practical, standards-compatible enhancement for 6G and Wi-Fi 7 opportunistic radar applications. The emphasis on FFT implementation is a notable implementation strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Proposed Estimator): The derivation of the FFT-based joint estimator treats unknown data symbols as deterministic unknowns permitting coherent processing after pilot removal, but provides no explicit robustness analysis or counterexample against residual CFO, Doppler spread, or multipath that would break the assumed separability and collapse the claimed gain.
  2. [§4] §4 (Numerical Results): The reported superior localization performance is demonstrated only via simulations without accompanying theoretical CRLB comparisons, Monte Carlo error statistics, or ablation on channel parameters, leaving the magnitude and conditions of the improvement difficult to evaluate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the received signal model in §2 could be clarified by explicitly distinguishing the pilot and data contributions in the matrix formulation.
  2. [§4] Figure captions in §4 should include the exact SNR range, array size, and number of Monte Carlo trials used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of the estimator derivation and evaluation that we will address to strengthen the paper. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Proposed Estimator): The derivation of the FFT-based joint estimator treats unknown data symbols as deterministic unknowns permitting coherent processing after pilot removal, but provides no explicit robustness analysis or counterexample against residual CFO, Doppler spread, or multipath that would break the assumed separability and collapse the claimed gain.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the derivation in §3 models the unknown data symbols as deterministic unknowns to enable coherent processing after pilot removal under the assumption of ideal synchronization and channel conditions that preserve separability in the FFT domain. The manuscript focuses on this core model and demonstrates gains via simulations, but does not include explicit robustness analysis or counterexamples for residual CFO, Doppler spread, or multipath. We agree this is a limitation. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection discussing the impact of these impairments on separability and include simulation-based counterexamples showing performance degradation when the assumptions are violated. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Numerical Results): The reported superior localization performance is demonstrated only via simulations without accompanying theoretical CRLB comparisons, Monte Carlo error statistics, or ablation on channel parameters, leaving the magnitude and conditions of the improvement difficult to evaluate.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion to strengthen the numerical evaluation. The current §4 presents simulation results comparing the proposed joint estimator against pilot-only and decision-directed baselines, but lacks CRLB derivations, detailed Monte Carlo statistics, and ablation studies. In the revision, we will derive the CRLB for the joint estimator, include it in the performance figures for theoretical benchmarking, report RMSE statistics from Monte Carlo trials, and add ablation results varying key parameters such as multipath count and Doppler spread to clarify the conditions under which the gains hold. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via proposed estimator and simulations

full rationale

The paper derives a novel FFT-efficient estimator for joint pilot and unknown-data localization in an opportunistic passive OFDM radar with ULA. The central claim rests on explicit signal-model assumptions and a new processing step that treats data symbols as deterministic unknowns, followed by numerical validation. No equations reduce by construction to fitted inputs, no self-citation chains carry the uniqueness or ansatz, and no renaming of known results occurs. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper builds on standard domain assumptions about OFDM signal structure and radar processing techniques without introducing new free parameters or entities in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Communication signals comprise deterministic known pilot signals and random unknown data payloads
    Standard assumption in ISAC and OFDM systems
  • domain assumption Estimation can be efficiently implemented using Fast Fourier Transforms in this setting
    Claimed in the abstract for the passive radar with ULA

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5477 in / 1228 out tokens · 59062 ms · 2026-05-16T12:18:41.659620+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Localization in OFDM Passive Distributed Antenna Systems with Pilots and Unknown Data Payloads: A Marginal Maximum Likelihood Approach

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives a marginal maximum likelihood estimator that uses both pilot and unknown data symbols for improved localization in OFDM passive distributed antenna systems without requiring data decoding.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,

    F. Liu et al., “Joint radar and communication design: Applications, state-of-the-art, and the road ahead,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3834–3862, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Joint radar and communication: A survey,

    Z. Feng et al., “Joint radar and communication: A survey,”China Commun., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

    J. A. Zhang et al., “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Lu et al.,Sensing with random communication sig- nals, 2025

    S. Lu et al.,Sensing with random communication sig- nals, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    5g PRS-based sensing: A sensing refer- ence signal approach for joint sensing and communica- tion system,

    Z. Wei et al., “5g PRS-based sensing: A sensing refer- ence signal approach for joint sensing and communica- tion system,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 3250–3263, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Joint sensing and UE positioning in 5g-6g: PRS range estimation with suppressed ambi- guity,

    M. Golzadeh et al., “Joint sensing and UE positioning in 5g-6g: PRS range estimation with suppressed ambi- guity,” in2024 IEEE Radar Conf., IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    5g; NR; physical channels and modulation (3gpp TS 38.211 version 19.1.0 release 19),

    3GPP, “5g; NR; physical channels and modulation (3gpp TS 38.211 version 19.1.0 release 19),” TS 138 211, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    CP-OFDM achieves the lowest aver- age ranging sidelobe under QAM/PSK constellations,

    F. Liu et al., “CP-OFDM achieves the lowest aver- age ranging sidelobe under QAM/PSK constellations,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 6950– 6967, 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Exploiting both pilots and data pay- loads for integrated sensing and communications,

    C. Xu et al., “Exploiting both pilots and data pay- loads for integrated sensing and communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Joint target localization and data detec- tion in bistatic ISAC networks,

    N. Zhao et al., “Joint target localization and data detec- tion in bistatic ISAC networks,”IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    M. F. Keskin et al.,Bridging the gap via data-aided sensing: Can bistatic ISAC converge to genie perfor- mance?2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Enabling MIMO radars in WLAN sensing: From spatial multiplexing to beamsteering,

    H. C. Yildirim et al., “Enabling MIMO radars in WLAN sensing: From spatial multiplexing to beamsteering,” in 21st Eur. Radar Conf. (EuRAD), 2024, pp. 67–70

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Koor et al.,A short tutorial on wirtinger calculus with applications in quantum information, 2023

    K. Koor et al.,A short tutorial on wirtinger calculus with applications in quantum information, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    M. A. Richards et al.,Principles of modern radar. SciTech publishing, 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives,

    M. J. D. Powell, “An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives,”The Computer Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1964

    work page 1964