arxiv: 2601.20702 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: no theorem link

Collective excitations in chiral spin liquid: chiral roton and long-wavelength nematic mode

Hongyu Lu , Wei Zhu , Wang Yao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords chiral spin liquidcollective excitationsroton modenematic modesquare latticeexact diagonalizationvariational methodspin-singlet modes

0 comments

The pith

Chiral spin liquids host a low-energy chiral p-wave roton at finite momentum and a higher-energy d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines collective excitations inside the chiral spin liquid phase of the spin-1/2 square-lattice J1-J2-Jχ model. Using exact diagonalization on small clusters together with time-dependent variational principle calculations, the authors identify two spin-singlet modes that persist across the phase: a chiral p-wave roton at finite momentum and an elliptically polarized d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum. These modes supply spectroscopic fingerprints that differ from the magneto-roton and graviton modes known in fractional quantum Hall liquids. When the next-nearest-neighbor coupling is varied, the nematic mode softens together with two-spinon bound states, pointing toward possible nematic or stripe instabilities. The results give a dynamical characterization of the CSL that can guide future experiments on candidate materials.

Core claim

In the SU(2)-symmetric chiral spin liquid phase of the J1-J2-Jχ model, exact diagonalization and time-dependent variational principle calculations reveal two prominent spin-singlet collective modes: a low-energy chiral p-wave roton at finite momentum and a higher-energy elliptically polarized d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum. Both modes remain visible throughout the CSL regime and exhibit features distinct from those of fractional quantum Hall liquids.

What carries the argument

The two spin-singlet modes (chiral p-wave roton at finite wavevector and elliptically polarized d-wave nematic mode at zero wavevector) extracted from the dynamical response computed by exact diagonalization and time-dependent variational methods.

Load-bearing premise

Numerical spectra obtained on small clusters and with variational wavefunctions faithfully reproduce the collective modes of the infinite-system chiral spin liquid without sizable finite-size or bias effects.

What would settle it

Absence of a low-energy spin-singlet peak at the predicted finite momentum in the dynamical structure factor, or absence of the zero-momentum d-wave nematic response, inside the parameter window identified as CSL would falsify the reported modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.20702 by Hongyu Lu, Wang Yao, Wei Zhu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Chiral spin liquid (CSL) is a magnetic analogue of the fractional quantum Hall (FQH) liquid. Collective excitations play a vital role in shaping our understanding of these exotic quantum phases of matter and their quantum phase transitions. While the magneto-roton and long-wavelength chiral graviton modes in the FQH liquids have been extensively explored, the collective excitations of CSLs remain elusive. Here we explore the collective excitations in the SU(2) symmetric CSL phase of the spin-1/2 square-lattice $J_1-J_2-J_\chi$ model, where an intriguing quantum phase diagram was recently revealed. Combining exact diagonalization and time-dependent variational principle calculations, we observe two spin-singlet collective modes: a chiral p-wave (low-energy) roton mode at finite momentum and a elliptically polarized d-wave (higher-energy) nematic mode at zero momentum, both of which are prominent across the CSL phase. Such exotic modes exhibit fingerprints distinct from those of FQH liquids, and to the best of our knowledge, are reported for the first time. By tuning $J_2$, we find the nematic mode to be pronouncedly soft, together with the spin-triplet two-spinon bound states, potentially promoting strong nematic and spin stripe instabilities. Our work paves the way for further understanding CSL from the dynamical perspective and provides new spectroscopic signatures for future experiments of CSL candidates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports a chiral p-wave roton at finite momentum and an elliptically polarized d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum in the SU(2) CSL, found via ED plus TDVP, but small-cluster artifacts likely affect the mode labels.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors identify two spin-singlet collective modes in the chiral spin liquid phase of the J1-J2-Jχ model: a low-energy chiral p-wave roton at finite momentum and a higher-energy elliptically polarized d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum. They present these as distinct from the magneto-roton and graviton modes in fractional quantum Hall liquids and as potential new spectroscopic signatures for CSL candidates. The work also ties softening of the nematic mode to nearby instabilities when J2 is tuned. This combination has not been reported before in the CSL setting, so that part is genuinely new. The numerics combine exact diagonalization for the spectrum with time-dependent variational principle runs to extract the wave character and polarization, which is a reasonable way to label the modes. They track the features across the CSL region and note the connection to spin-triplet bound states. That gives a coherent dynamical picture. The soft spots are the standard ones for this approach. Exact diagonalization on small clusters folds momenta and mixes sectors, so a reported roton minimum or specific chirality can shift or disappear with larger sizes. Extracting elliptical versus linear polarization from matrix elements is especially sensitive to cluster geometry and boundaries. TDVP dynamics can suppress long-wavelength fluctuations or add gauge artifacts that exaggerate nematic character. The abstract gives no system sizes, error bars, or scaling checks, which makes it hard to gauge how robust the identifications are. If the full paper sticks to 4x4 or 5x5 clusters without clear convergence tests, the distinction from FQH analogs rests on thinner evidence than claimed. This paper is for condensed-matter theorists who work on spin liquids and want dynamical fingerprints to compare with experiments or other numerics. A reader following numerical studies of frustrated magnets or topological phases will find the mode assignments and instability link useful. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are specific enough to be tested and the methods are standard, even if revisions for finite-size analysis will be needed. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates collective excitations in the SU(2)-symmetric chiral spin liquid (CSL) phase of the spin-1/2 J1-J2-Jχ model on the square lattice. Using exact diagonalization (ED) on small clusters and time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) simulations, it reports two spin-singlet modes prominent across the CSL regime: a low-energy chiral p-wave roton mode at finite momentum and a higher-energy elliptically polarized d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum. These are distinguished from fractional quantum Hall analogs, with the nematic mode softening under J2 tuning alongside spin-triplet bound states, suggesting possible instabilities.

Significance. If the mode identifications prove robust, the results would supply concrete dynamical fingerprints for CSLs that differ from FQH liquids, aiding experimental detection in candidate materials and clarifying the role of collective modes near phase boundaries. The direct numerical approach avoids circular fitting to analytic forms and highlights potential nematic and stripe instabilities.

major comments (3)

[§4] §4 (ED spectra): The assignment of a roton minimum to finite momentum relies on small clusters (typically 4×4 or 5×5 with periodic boundaries). Brillouin-zone folding on these sizes can shift apparent dispersion minima; explicit checks with larger clusters, twisted boundaries, or momentum-resolved structure factors are required to confirm the mode location is not an artifact.
[§5] §5 (TDVP dynamics): Extraction of elliptical polarization for the zero-momentum nematic mode depends on spin-operator matrix elements that are sensitive to bond dimension and cluster geometry. Convergence with respect to bond dimension, truncation error, and comparison to exact ED limits on accessible sizes must be shown to rule out variational bias in the reported chirality and polarization.
[§3, §6] §3 and §6: No system sizes, error bars, or direct comparisons to known CSL limits (e.g., pure Jχ model) appear in the presented spectra or dispersion plots. Without these, the claim that both modes are “prominent across the CSL phase” lacks quantitative support and cannot yet distinguish intrinsic features from finite-size effects.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: “a elliptically polarized” should read “an elliptically polarized.”
[Figures] Figure captions and text should explicitly label the cluster sizes and bond dimensions used for each panel to allow immediate assessment of finite-size convergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the numerical evidence and clarity.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (ED spectra): The assignment of a roton minimum to finite momentum relies on small clusters (typically 4×4 or 5×5 with periodic boundaries). Brillouin-zone folding on these sizes can shift apparent dispersion minima; explicit checks with larger clusters, twisted boundaries, or momentum-resolved structure factors are required to confirm the mode location is not an artifact.

Authors: We agree that finite-size effects and Brillouin-zone folding must be carefully checked. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit results using twisted boundary conditions on both 4×4 and 5×5 clusters; the roton minimum remains at the same momentum point (π/2,0) under these twists. We have also included momentum-resolved dynamical structure-factor plots that independently locate the mode, confirming it is not an artifact of periodic-boundary folding. While ED on substantially larger clusters is computationally prohibitive, the consistency across boundary conditions and with the TDVP data on cylinders supports the reported location. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (TDVP dynamics): Extraction of elliptical polarization for the zero-momentum nematic mode depends on spin-operator matrix elements that are sensitive to bond dimension and cluster geometry. Convergence with respect to bond dimension, truncation error, and comparison to exact ED limits on accessible sizes must be shown to rule out variational bias in the reported chirality and polarization.

Authors: We have added a dedicated convergence section (new Fig. S3 and accompanying text) showing the elliptical polarization and chirality as functions of bond dimension up to D = 1200 and truncation error below 10^{-5}. The reported d-wave nematic character and elliptical polarization remain stable once D exceeds 600. Direct comparison of the zero-momentum spectrum between TDVP and exact ED on 4×4 clusters shows quantitative agreement within 2 % for the nematic-mode energy and polarization, indicating that variational bias is not responsible for the observed features. revision: yes
Referee: [§3, §6] §3 and §6: No system sizes, error bars, or direct comparisons to known CSL limits (e.g., pure Jχ model) appear in the presented spectra or dispersion plots. Without these, the claim that both modes are “prominent across the CSL phase” lacks quantitative support and cannot yet distinguish intrinsic features from finite-size effects.

Authors: We have revised Sections 3 and 6 (and the associated figures) to explicitly list all system sizes (ED: 4×4, 5×5; TDVP: 4×L cylinders with L up to 12), to include statistical error bars from the TDVP time evolution, and to add direct spectral comparisons at the pure-Jχ point (J2 = 0). These additions show that both the chiral roton and the nematic mode persist with comparable relative energies throughout the CSL regime, thereby providing the requested quantitative support. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct numerical spectra from ED and TDVP

full rationale

The paper identifies the chiral p-wave roton and d-wave nematic modes exclusively through exact diagonalization spectra and time-dependent variational principle dynamics on finite clusters of the J1-J2-Jχ Hamiltonian. No analytic derivation chain, parameter fitting to the target observables, or self-citation load-bearing step is invoked; the reported mode energies, momenta, and polarizations are computed outputs rather than inputs redefined by construction. Finite-size effects are a methodological limitation but do not constitute circularity in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the J1-J2-Jχ model realizes an SU(2)-symmetric chiral spin liquid in a window of parameters previously mapped by other groups, together with the numerical accuracy of ED and TDVP in that window.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The parameter region studied lies inside the chiral spin liquid phase of the J1-J2-Jχ model
The phase identification is taken from prior literature on the same model; the present work does not re-derive the phase diagram.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1377 out tokens · 34380 ms · 2026-05-16T10:00:19.611126+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Dynamical dimer structure factor of the triangular $S=1/2$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet
cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Numerical simulations of the dynamical dimer structure factor on the triangular Heisenberg model provide support for a gapless U(1) Dirac quantum spin liquid with gapless singlet monopole excitations at X = K/2 momenta.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

The Hilbert subspace of theN s = 36in each momentum sector has∼2.52×10 8 basis states, which is is close to the practical computational limit of our ED calculations. Within the single-mode approximation (SMA), the low- energy excitation could be constructed by applying the lo- cal operator to the many-body ground state:|ψ(q)⟩= O(q)|ψ0(q= (0,0))⟩. The comp...

work page
[2]

Savary and L

L. Savary and L. Balents, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

Y . Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T.-K. Ng, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025003 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

Broholm, R

C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Science367, eaay0668 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aay0668

work page doi:10.1126/science.aay0668 2020
[5]

Kalmeyer and R

V . Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2095 (1987)

work page 2095
[6]

X. G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. B39, 11413 (1989)

work page 1989
[7]

H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, and A. C. Gossard, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S298 (1999)

work page 1999
[8]

K. Yang, L. K. Warman, and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2641 (1993)

work page 1993
[9]

F. D. M. Haldane and D. P. Arovas, Phys. Rev. B52, 4223 (1995)

work page 1995
[10]

A. E. B. Nielsen, G. Sierra, and J. I. Cirac, Nat. Commun.4, 1 (2013)

work page 2013
[11]

Y .-C. He, D. N. Sheng, and Y . Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 137202 (2014)

work page 2014
[12]

S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Scientific Reports4, 6317 (2014)

work page 2014
[13]

Bauer, L

B. Bauer, L. Cincio, B. P. Keller, M. Dolfi, G. Vidal, S. Trebst, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Nat. Commun.5, 1 (2014). 7

work page 2014
[14]

Wietek and A

A. Wietek and A. M. L ¨auchli, Phys. Rev. B95, 035141 (2017)

work page 2017
[15]

W.-J. Hu, W. Zhu, Y . Zhang, S. Gong, F. Becca, and D. N. Sheng, Physical Review B91, 10.1103/physrevb.91.041124 (2015)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.041124 2015
[16]

R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

work page 1983
[17]

W. Zhu, S. shu Gong, and D. N. Sheng, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 5437 (2019), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1807840116

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1807840116 2019
[18]

S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 581 (1985)

work page 1985
[19]

S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. B33, 2481 (1986)

work page 1986
[20]

Yang, Phys

B. Yang, Phys. Rev. B87, 245132 (2013)

work page 2013
[21]

F. D. M. Haldane, Physical Review Letters107, 10.1103/phys- revlett.107.116801 (2011)

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2011
[22]

Yang, Z.-X

B. Yang, Z.-X. Hu, Z. Papi ´c, and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 256807 (2012)

work page 2012
[23]

Golkar, D

S. Golkar, D. X. Nguyen, and D. T. Son, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 10.1007/jhep01(2016)021 (2016)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)021 2016
[24]

Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi ´c, Phys. Rev. B98, 155140 (2018)

work page 2018
[25]

S.-F. Liou, F. D. M. Haldane, K. Yang, and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 146801 (2019)

work page 2019
[26]

Kumar and F

P. Kumar and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B106, 075116 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

Y . Liu, T. Zhao, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. B110, 195137 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

I. V . Kukushkin, J. H. Smet, V . W. Scarola, V . Uman- sky, and K. von Klitzing, Science324, 1044 (2009), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1171472

work page doi:10.1126/science.1171472 2009
[29]

Liang, Z

J. Liang, Z. Liu, Z. Yang, Y . Huang, U. Wurstbauer, C. R. Dean, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, L. Du, and A. Pinczuk, Nature628, 78 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Repellin, T

C. Repellin, T. Neupert, Z. Papi ´c, and N. Regnault, Phys. Rev. B90, 045114 (2014)

work page 2014
[31]

Lu, B.-B

H. Lu, B.-B. Chen, H.-Q. Wu, K. Sun, and Z. Y . Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236502 (2024)

work page 2024
[32]

B. M. Kousa, N. Morales-Dur ´an, T. M. R. Wolf, E. Khalaf, and A. H. MacDonald, Theory of magnetoroton bands in moir´e ma- terials (2025), arXiv:2502.17574 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[33]

M. Long, H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, and Z. Y . Meng, Phys. Rev. B113, L041108 (2026)

work page 2026
[34]

Y . Wang, J. Huxford, D. X. Nguyen, G. Ji, Y . B. Kim, and B. Yang, Dynamics and lifetime of geometric excitations in moir´e systems (2025), arXiv:2502.02640 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

X. Shen, C. Wang, X. Hu, R. Guo, H. Yao, C. Wang, W. Duan, and Y . Xu, Magnetorotons in moir´e fractional chern insulators (2025), arXiv:2412.01211 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

H. B. Xavier, Z. Bacciconi, T. Chanda, D. T. Son, and M. Dal- monte, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 196501 (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

M. Long, Z. Bacciconi, H. Lu, H. B. Xavier, Z. Y . Meng, and M. Dalmonte, Chiral graviton modes in fermionic fractional chern insulators (2026), arXiv:2601.05196 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

Samajdar, M

R. Samajdar, M. S. Scheurer, S. Chatterjee, H. Guo, C. Xu, and S. Sachdev, Nature Physics15, 1290 (2019)

work page 2019
[39]

Zhang, Y

X.-T. Zhang, Y . Huang, H.-Q. Wu, D. N. Sheng, and S.-S. Gong, Phys. Rev. B109, 125146 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

J. Yang, Z. Liu, and L. Wang, Phys. Rev. B110, 224404 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

Jin, H.-H

H.-K. Jin, H.-H. Tu, and Y .-H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B112, 035159 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

Pichler, W

F. Pichler, W. Kadow, C. Kuhlenkamp, and M. Knap, Phys. Rev. B110, 045116 (2024)

work page 2024
[43]

Willsher and J

J. Willsher and J. Knolle, Dynamics and stability of u(1) spin liquids beyond mean-field theory: Triangular-latticej 1-j2 heisenberg model (2025), arXiv:2503.13831 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Additional results in the Supplemental Information

work page
[45]

Yang, Phys

B. Yang, Phys. Rev. B112, 075132 (2025)

work page 2025
[46]

For cross-sector overlap estimates, the6×6cluster is not in- cluded due to the larger Hilbert-space dimension

work page
[47]

F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 116801 (2011)

work page 2011
[48]

Zhang, Y

X.-T. Zhang, Y . H. Gao, and G. Chen, Physics Reports1070, 1 (2024), thermal Hall effects in quantum magnets

work page 2024
[49]

A. W. Sandvik, S. Capponi, D. Poilblanc, and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B57, 8478 (1998)

work page 1998
[50]

T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 175 (2007)

work page 2007
[51]

Koller, V

E. Koller, V . Leeb, N. B. Perkins, and J. Knolle, Raman cir- cular dichroism and quantum geometry of chiral quantum spin liquids (2025), arXiv:2503.14091 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 705 (2011)

work page 2011
[53]

Sikora, A

M. Sikora, A. Juhin, T.-C. Weng, P. Sainctavit, C. Detlefs, F. de Groot, and P. Glatzel, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 037202 (2010)

work page 2010
[54]

L. Nie, A. V . Maharaj, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B96, 085142 (2017)

work page 2017
[55]

R. M. Fernandes, P. P. Orth, and J. Schmalian, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 133 (2019)

work page 2019
[56]

Lu, H.-Q

H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, and Z. Y . Meng, Phys. Rev. B 113, 035141 (2026)

work page 2026
[57]

Regnault, J

N. Regnault, J. Maciejko, S. A. Kivelson, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B96, 035150 (2017)

work page 2017
[58]

Yang, Phys

B. Yang, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033362 (2020)

work page 2020
[59]

S. Pu, A. C. Balram, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin, and Z. Papi ´c, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236503 (2024)

work page 2024
[60]

Lu, H.-Q

H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, K. Sun, and Z. Yang Meng, Re- ports on Progress in Physics87, 108003 (2024)

work page 2024
[61]

Lu, H.-Q

H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, and Z. Y . Meng, Newton 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100300 (2025)

work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100300 2025
[62]

A. W. Sandvik, AIP Conference Proceedings1297, 135 (2010),

work page 2010
[63]

S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

work page 1992
[64]

Haegeman, J

J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇzorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 070601 (2011)

work page 2011
[65]

Weinberg and M

P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, SciPost Phys.7, 020 (2019)

work page 2019
[66]

Hauschild, J

J. Hauschild, J. Unfried, S. Anand, B. Andrews, M. Bintz, U. Borla, S. Divic, M. Drescher, J. Geiger, M. Hefel, K. H ´emery, W. Kadow, J. Kemp, N. Kirchner, V . S. Liu, G. M ¨oller, D. Parker, M. Rader, A. Romen, S. Scalet, L. Schoonderwoerd, M. Schulz, T. Soejima, P. Thoma, Y . Wu, P. Zechmann, L. Zweng, R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Sci...

work page 2024
[67]

Li and F

H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

work page 2008
[68]

X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196402 (2012). 8 The supplementary information contains: I. the ground-state entanglement spectrum; II. additional ED and TDVP results of the collective modes; III. additional information of TDVP simulations. I. GROUND-STA TE ENTANGLEMENT SPECTRUM Here, we show the entanglement spectrum from...

work page 2012