pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.04781 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Magneto-optical transport in type-II Weyl semimetals in the presence of orbital magnetic moment

Panchlal Prabhat , Amit Gupta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords type-II Weyl semimetalsorbital magnetic momentmagneto-optical transportmagnetoconductivityBoltzmann transportlinear and nonlinear responsestilted dispersion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Orbital magnetic moment suppresses magnetoconductivities with distinct features in gapless type-II Weyl semimetals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends prior calculations on type-I Weyl semimetals to gapless type-II cases by incorporating orbital magnetic moment into the semiclassical Boltzmann transport framework. It computes the resulting linear and nonlinear magnetoconductivities and identifies quantitative and qualitative differences driven by the overtilted Weyl cones. A sympathetic reader cares because these transport signatures could serve as experimental markers to confirm the presence of type-II band structure in real materials under combined magnetic and optical probes.

Core claim

In gapless type-II Weyl semimetals, the presence of orbital magnetic moment within the semiclassical Boltzmann approach suppresses the total magnetoconductivities in both linear and nonlinear responses, but the precise manner of this suppression differs from the case of type-I Weyl semimetals owing to the tilted dispersion.

What carries the argument

Orbital magnetic moment inserted into the semiclassical Boltzmann equation for the tilted cones of gapless type-II Weyl fermions.

If this is right

  • Total magnetoconductivity is suppressed in both linear and nonlinear regimes when orbital magnetic moment is included.
  • The suppression pattern differs quantitatively from type-I because of the overtilted cone geometry.
  • Nonlinear response terms acquire additional features traceable to the type-II tilt.
  • These distinctions provide a transport-based route to differentiate type-II from type-I Weyl semimetals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Transport measurements at finite magnetic field could become a practical probe of band tilting in other overtilted Dirac systems.
  • The same framework suggests that optical conductivity tensors in type-II materials may exhibit unique field-induced anisotropies not seen in type-I.
  • Device concepts relying on magneto-optical switching might exploit the distinct type-II suppression to achieve different operating regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical Boltzmann transport formalism remains valid and can be directly extended to incorporate orbital magnetic moment effects in gapless type-II Weyl semimetals without additional corrections from quantum or many-body effects.

What would settle it

A magneto-optical experiment that finds identical suppression patterns of total magnetoconductivity in type-I and type-II samples under matched field and frequency conditions would falsify the predicted differences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.04781 by Amit Gupta, Panchlal Prabhat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The dependence of the optical conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The frequency dependence of optical conductivity at zero B-field for (a) type-I WSM at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The dependence of the optical conductivity at B=1 on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The frequency dependence of optical conductivity at B = 1 T for (a) type-I WSM at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The dependence of the optical conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The dependence of the optical conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The dependence of the optical conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The dependence of the planar Hall conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The dependence of the optical conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The frequency dependence of optical conductivity on the tilt for the case of B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The dependence of Hall conductivity on the tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The frequency dependence of optical conductivity on tilt for the process of second harmonic generation. for (a) type-I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The dependence of the nonlinear optical conductivities for the process of second harmonic generation of on tilt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The nonlinear Hall conductivities for the process of second harmonic generation as a function of the incident photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The angle dependence of the nonlinear Hall conductivity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The magneto-optical transport of gapless type-I tilted single Weyl semimetals(WSMs) exhibits suppression of total magnetoconductivities in the presence of orbital magnetic moment(OMM) in linear and nonlinear responses (Yang Gao et al., Phys. Rev. B {\bf 105}, 165307 (2022)). In this work, we extend our study to investigate magnetoconductivities in gapless type-II Weyl semimetals within the semiclassical Boltzmann approach and show the differences that arise compared to type-I Weyl semimetals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends prior work on magneto-optical transport in gapless type-I tilted Weyl semimetals to the type-II case. It employs the semiclassical Boltzmann transport formalism, incorporates the orbital magnetic moment (OMM), and reports differences in linear and nonlinear magnetoconductivities relative to type-I WSMs arising from the overtilted band structure.

Significance. If the central claim holds after verification, the work would clarify how overtilted cones and the resulting electron-hole pocket topology modify magneto-optical responses in type-II WSMs, aiding material identification. The extension of an existing 2022 calculation is noted, but the absence of explicit checks on the formalism's applicability reduces the immediate significance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methodology / extension from 2022 reference] The extension of the semiclassical Boltzmann equations to gapless type-II WSMs is presented without derivation or estimate showing that inter-pocket scattering channels (arising from intersecting electron-hole pockets at the Weyl node) remain negligible. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed differences, as the type-I equations do not automatically incorporate modified Berry curvature or relaxation times across the overtilted Fermi surface.
  2. [Abstract and results] No explicit conductivity expressions, numerical results, or error analysis are supplied to substantiate the asserted differences in magnetoconductivities. The abstract states that differences arise but supplies neither the modified OMM terms for type-II nor comparison data, preventing assessment of whether the semiclassical approach captures the topology correctly.
minor comments (1)
  1. [References] The citation to Yang Gao et al., Phys. Rev. B 105, 165307 (2022) should be expanded with the full title and arXiv identifier for completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript extending magneto-optical transport calculations to gapless type-II Weyl semimetals. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methodology / extension from 2022 reference] The extension of the semiclassical Boltzmann equations to gapless type-II WSMs is presented without derivation or estimate showing that inter-pocket scattering channels (arising from intersecting electron-hole pockets at the Weyl node) remain negligible. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed differences, as the type-I equations do not automatically incorporate modified Berry curvature or relaxation times across the overtilted Fermi surface.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification for neglecting inter-pocket scattering is necessary given the intersecting electron-hole pockets in type-II WSMs. Our extension of the 2022 Boltzmann formalism incorporates the type-II dispersion, modified Berry curvature, and orbital magnetic moment while retaining the constant relaxation-time approximation. This implicitly assumes intra-pocket dominance, consistent with momentum conservation and the linear-response regime. However, no quantitative estimate was included. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph deriving the relative scattering rates via Fermi's golden rule and showing suppression of inter-pocket processes for the Fermi energies and temperatures considered. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and results] No explicit conductivity expressions, numerical results, or error analysis are supplied to substantiate the asserted differences in magnetoconductivities. The abstract states that differences arise but supplies neither the modified OMM terms for type-II nor comparison data, preventing assessment of whether the semiclassical approach captures the topology correctly.

    Authors: The main text derives the linear and nonlinear magnetoconductivity expressions by extending the type-I formulas with the type-II-specific orbital magnetic moment and overtilted dispersion; numerical results appear in Figures 2–4 demonstrating the additional suppression relative to type-I. The abstract, however, is concise and does not quote the modified OMM terms or include direct comparison data. We will revise the abstract to state the key differences (enhanced suppression arising from electron-hole pocket topology) and add a short comparison table or inset in the results section. A brief validity discussion of the semiclassical approximation will also be included. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; extension relies on external reference

full rationale

The paper frames its contribution as a direct extension of the semiclassical Boltzmann formalism (including OMM) from the cited external 2022 Yang Gao et al. result on type-I WSMs to the type-II case, with the goal of exhibiting differences. No equation, ansatz, or central claim in the provided abstract or description reduces the predicted differences to a self-fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a renaming of inputs by construction. The load-bearing step is the assumption that the formalism extends without additional inter-pocket terms, but this is presented as an independent application rather than a tautological re-derivation of prior author results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the external benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of semiclassical Boltzmann transport to gapless type-II Weyl semimetals including orbital magnetic moment; no free parameters, new entities, or additional axioms are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical Boltzmann transport theory applies to gapless type-II Weyl semimetals in the presence of orbital magnetic moment.
    Invoked as the investigative framework in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5384 in / 1322 out tokens · 44502 ms · 2026-05-16T06:56:39.853900+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semiclassical theory of frequency dependent linear magneto-optical transport in Weyl semimetals

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Semiclassical theory predicts that strong intervalley scattering induces sign reversal of longitudinal magneto-optical conductivity in the weak AC regime for untilted Weyl semimetals with orbital moment, suppressing t...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Weylet al., Electron and gravitation, z

    H. Weylet al., Electron and gravitation, z. Phys56, 330 (1929)

    work page 1929

  2. [2]

    S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, M. Neupane, G. Bian, C. Zhang, R. Sankar, G. Chang, Z. Yuan, C.-C. Lee,et al., Discovery of a weyl fermion semimetal and topological fermi arcs, Science349, 613 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    B. Lv, H. Weng, B. Fu, X. P. Wang, H. Miao, J. Ma, P. Richard, X. Huang, L. Zhao, G. Chen,et al., Experi- mental discovery of weyl semimetal taas, Physical Review X5, 031013 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    L. Lu, Z. Wang, D. Ye, L. Ran, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Experimental observation of weyl points, Science349, 622 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Kim, K.-S

    H.-J. Kim, K.-S. Kim, J.-F. Wang, M. Sasaki, N. Satoh, A. Ohnishi, M. Kitaura, M. Yang, and L. Li, Dirac versus weyl fermions in topological insulators: Adler-bell-jackiw anomaly¡? format?¿ in transport phenomena, Physical review letters111, 246603 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Huang, S.-Y

    S.-M. Huang, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, C.-C. Lee, G. Chang, B. Wang, N. Alidoust, G. Bian, M. Neupane, C. Zhang,et al., A weyl fermion semimetal with sur- face fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide taas class, Nature communications6, 7373 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Murakami, Phase transition between the quantum spin hall and insulator phases in 3d: emergence of a topologi- cal gapless phase, New Journal of Physics9, 356 (2007)

    S. Murakami, Phase transition between the quantum spin hall and insulator phases in 3d: emergence of a topologi- cal gapless phase, New Journal of Physics9, 356 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, Topological semimetal and fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics83, 205101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Yang, Y.-M

    K.-Y. Yang, Y.-M. Lu, and Y. Ran, Quantum hall effects in a weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Ma- terials Physics84, 075129 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Burkov and L

    A. Burkov and L. Balents, Weyl semimetal in a topo- logical insulator multilayer, Physical review letters107, 127205 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    G. Xu, H. Weng, Z. Wang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Chern semimetal and the quantized anomalous hall effect in hgcr 2 se 4, Physical review letters107, 186806 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    B. Lv, N. Xu, H. Weng, J. Ma, P. Richard, X. Huang, L. Zhao, G. Chen, C. Matt, F. Bisti,et al., Observation of weyl nodes in taas, Nature Physics11, 724 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, A no-go theorem for regularizing chiral fermions, Physics Letters B105, 219 (1981)

    work page 1981

  14. [14]

    Borisenko, D

    S. Borisenko, D. Evtushinsky, Q. Gibson, A. Yaresko, K. Koepernik, T. Kim, M. Ali, J. van den Brink, M. Hoesch, A. Fedorov,et al., Time-reversal symmetry breaking type-ii weyl state in ybmnbi2, Nature commu- nications10, 3424 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Huang, L

    X. Huang, L. Zhao, Y. Long, P. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Yang, H. Liang, M. Xue, H. Weng, Z. Fang,et al., Observa- tion of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetore- sistance in 3d weyl semimetal taas, Physical Review X5, 031023 (2015). 21

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    A. C. Potter, I. Kimchi, and A. Vishwanath, Quantum oscillations from surface fermi arcs in weyl and dirac semimetals, Nature communications5, 5161 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    P. J. Moll, N. L. Nair, T. Helm, A. C. Potter, I. Kim- chi, A. Vishwanath, and J. G. Analytis, Transport ev- idence for fermi-arc-mediated chirality transfer in the dirac semimetal cd3as2, Nature535, 266 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    A. A. Burkov, Chiral anomaly and transport in weyl met- als, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter27, 113201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Zyuzin and A

    A. Zyuzin and A. Burkov, Topological response in weyl semimetals and the chiral anomaly, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86, 115133 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    A. A. Zyuzin and R. P. Tiwari, Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in type-ii weyl semimetals, JETP letters103, 717 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Steiner, A

    J. Steiner, A. Andreev, and D. Pesin, Anomalous hall effect in type-i weyl metals, Physical review letters119, 036601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Type-ii weyl semimetals, Nature527, 495 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    P. Li, Y. Wen, X. He, Q. Zhang, C. Xia, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, Z. Zhu, H. N. Alshareef, and X.-X. Zhang, Evi- dence for topological type-ii weyl semimetal wte2, Nature communications8, 2150 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Robust Type-II Weyl Semimetal Phase in Transition Metal Diphosphides XP$_2$ (X = Mo, W)

    G. Autes, D. Gresch, M. Troyer, A. A. Soluyanov, and O. V. Yazyev, Robust type-ii weyl semimetal phase in transition metal diphosphides xp 2(x= mo, w), arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04624 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Jiang, Z

    J. Jiang, Z. Liu, Y. Sun, H. Yang, C. Rajamathi, Y. Qi, L. Yang, C. Chen, H. Peng, C. Hwang,et al., Signature of type-ii weyl semimetal phase in mote2, Nature com- munications8, 13973 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    A. Pal, M. Chinotti, L. Degiorgi, W. J. Ren, and C. Petrovic, Optical properties of ybmnbi2: A type ii weyl semimetal candidate, Physica B: Condensed Matter 536, 64 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Zhang, Z

    M. Zhang, Z. Yang, and G. Wang, Coexistence of type-i and type-ii weyl points in the weyl-semimetal osc2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C122, 3533 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Chang, S.-Y

    T.-R. Chang, S.-Y. Xu, G. Chang, C.-C. Lee, S.-M. Huang, B. Wang, G. Bian, H. Zheng, D. S. Sanchez, I. Be- lopolski,et al., Prediction of an arc-tunable weyl fermion metallic state in mo x w1- x te2, Nature communications 7, 10639 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    S.-Y. Xu, N. Alidoust, G. Chang, H. Lu, B. Singh, I. Be- lopolski, D. S. Sanchez, X. Zhang, G. Bian, H. Zheng, et al., Discovery of lorentz-violating type ii weyl fermions in laalge, Science advances3, e1603266 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Saha and S

    S. Saha and S. Tewari, Anomalous nernst effect in type-ii weyl semimetals, The European Physical Journal B91, 4 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Sharma, P

    G. Sharma, P. Goswami, and S. Tewari, Chiral anomaly and longitudinal magnetotransport in type-ii weyl semimetals, Physical Review B96, 045112 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Mukherjee and J

    S. Mukherjee and J. Carbotte, Anomalous dc hall re- sponse in noncentrosymmetric tilted weyl semimetals, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 115702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    T. M. McCormick, R. C. McKay, and N. Trivedi, Semi- classical theory of anomalous transport in type-ii topo- logical weyl semimetals, Physical Review B96, 235116 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Anomalous Nernst and Thermal Hall Effects in Tilted Weyl Semimetals

    Y. Ferreiros, A. Zyuzin, and J. H. Bardarson, Anomalous nernst and thermal hall effects in tilted weyl semimetals, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01444 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

    work page 1984

  36. [36]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  37. [37]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, The adler-bell-jackiw anomaly and weyl fermions in a crystal, Physics Letters B130, 389 (1983)

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    D. T. Son and N. Yamamoto, Berry curvature, triangle anomalies, and the chiral magnetic effect in fermi liquids, Physical review letters109, 181602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Son and B

    D. Son and B. Spivak, 88j4412s: Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistence of weyl metals. vol. 88, Phys. Rev. B , 104412 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 023201 (2007)

    N. Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 023201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect¡? format?¿ as a topological fermi-liquid property, Physical review letters93, 206602 (2004)

    F. Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect¡? format?¿ as a topological fermi-liquid property, Physical review letters93, 206602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Landsteiner, Anomalous transport of weyl fermions in weyl semimetals, Physical Review B89, 075124 (2014)

    K. Landsteiner, Anomalous transport of weyl fermions in weyl semimetals, Physical Review B89, 075124 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    J. H. KIM, Anomalous transport in a weyl metal (The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, 2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Laurell, R

    P. Laurell, R. Lundgren, and G. Fiete, Thermoelectric properties of weyl and dirac semimetals, Bulletin of the American Physical Society60(2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility, Physical Review B91, 214405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Burkov, Negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in dirac and weyl metals, Physical Review B91, 245157 (2015)

    A. Burkov, Negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in dirac and weyl metals, Physical Review B91, 245157 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Chen and G

    Q. Chen and G. A. Fiete, Thermoelectric transport in double-weyl semimetals (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Intrinsic relative magne- toconductivity of nonmagnetic metals, Physical Review B95, 165135 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Morimoto, S

    T. Morimoto, S. Zhong, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Semiclassical theory of nonlinear magneto-optical re- sponses with applications to topological dirac/weyl semimetals, Physical Review B94, 245121 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Gao, Z.-Q

    Y. Gao, Z.-Q. Zhang, H. Jiang, and K.-H. Ding, Suppres- sion of magneto-optical transport in tilted weyl semimet- als by orbital magnetic moment, Physical Review B105, 165307 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Das and A

    K. Das and A. Agarwal, Linear magnetochiral transport in tilted type-i and type-ii weyl semimetals, Physical Re- view B99, 085405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Ghosh and I

    R. Ghosh and I. Mandal, Direction-dependent conduc- tivity in planar hall set-ups with tilted weyl/multi-weyl semimetals, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 275501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and berry-phase effects, Physical Review B59, 14915 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Nandy, C

    S. Nandy, C. Zeng, and S. Tewari, Chiral anomaly in- duced nonlinear hall effect in semimetals with multiple 22 weyl points, Physical Review B104, 205124 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Physical review letters 95, 137204 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Malic, T

    E. Malic, T. Winzer, E. Bobkin, and A. Knorr, Micro- scopic theory of absorption and ultrafast many-particle kinetics in graphene, Physical Review B84, 205406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    F. M. Pellegrino, M. I. Katsnelson, and M. Polini, Heli- cons in weyl semimetals, Physical Review B92, 201407 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Absence of neutrinos on a lattice:(i). proof by homotopy theory, Nuclear Physics B185, 20 (1981)

    work page 1981

  59. [59]

    Burkov, Giant planar hall effect in topological metals, Physical Review B96, 041110 (2017)

    A. Burkov, Giant planar hall effect in topological metals, Physical Review B96, 041110 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    Nandy, G

    S. Nandy, G. Sharma, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Chi- ral anomaly as the origin of the planar hall effect in weyl semimetals, Physical review letters119, 176804 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    D. Ma, H. Jiang, H. Liu, and X. Xie, Planar hall effect in tilted weyl semimetals, Physical Review B99, 115121 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Kumar, S

    N. Kumar, S. N. Guin, C. Felser, and C. Shekhar, Planar hall effect in the weyl semimetal gdptbi, Physical Review B98, 041103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    J. Yang, W. Zhen, D. Liang, Y. Wang, X. Yan, S. Weng, J. Wang, W. Tong, L. Pi, W. Zhu,et al., Current jet- ting distorted planar hall effect in a weyl semimetal with ultrahigh mobility, Physical Review Materials3, 014201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Gao and B

    Y. Gao and B. Ge, Second harmonic generation in dirac/weyl semimetals with broken tilt inversion symme- try, Optics Express29, 6903 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invari- ant materials, Physical review letters115, 216806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    L. Wu, S. Patankar, T. Morimoto, N. L. Nair, E. Thewalt, A. Little, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, and J. Orenstein, Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide weyl semimetals, Nature Physics13, 350 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Zhang, T

    C.-L. Zhang, T. Liang, Y. Kaneko, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Giant berry curvature dipole density in a fer- roelectric weyl semimetal, npj Quantum Materials7, 103 (2022)

    work page 2022