arxiv: 2602.11983 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Dynamics and thermodynamics of the S = 5/2 almost Heisenberg triangular lattice antiferromagnet K2Mn(SeO3)2

Mengze Zhu , V. Romerio , D. Moser , K. Yu. Povarov , R. Sibille , R. Wawrzynczak , Z. Yan , S. Gvasaliya

show 2 more authors

A. L. Chernyshev A. Zheludev

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords triangular lattice antiferromagnetspin wave theorymagnon interactionsneutron scatteringmagnetic excitationsS=5/2magnetization plateauK2Mn(SeO3)2

0 comments

The pith

Non-linear spin wave theory accounts for both single-magnon excitations and high-energy continua in the S=5/2 triangular antiferromagnet K2Mn(SeO3)2

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the magnetic phases and excitations of K2Mn(SeO3)2, an S=5/2 nearly Heisenberg triangular-lattice antiferromagnet with weak XXZ easy-axis anisotropy. It identifies a zero-field non-collinear Y phase that shows both sharp single-magnon modes and an extended high-energy continuum, plus field-induced phases including a collinear 1/3 magnetization plateau and a high-field V phase. Non-linear spin wave theory reproduces these spectral features in the Y phase and detects renormalization effects in the field-induced phases. A sympathetic reader would care because the work shows that magnon-magnon interactions remain important even when the spin value is large, contrary to the common expectation that linear approximations suffice for S=5/2 systems.

Core claim

In the Y phase the magnetic excitation spectrum contains both single-magnon excitations and an extended high-energy continuum; both are well described by non-linear spin wave theory. In the field-induced phases complex spectrum renormalization remains clearly detectable even for this large S=5/2 material. The results establish that magnon-magnon interactions play an essential role in the dynamics of large-S Heisenberg spin systems on the triangular lattice.

What carries the argument

Non-linear spin wave theory that includes magnon-magnon interactions to describe single-magnon modes plus the high-energy continuum in the zero-field Y phase and renormalization in field-induced phases

If this is right

The single-magnon peaks and high-energy continuum in the Y phase both arise from magnon-magnon interactions.
Spectrum renormalization effects remain observable in the field-induced phases despite the large spin value.
Linear spin-wave theory is insufficient to describe the full dynamics on the triangular lattice.
Magnon interactions must be retained when modeling large-S Heisenberg antiferromagnets on frustrated lattices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

High-resolution neutron scattering on other large-S triangular materials would likely reveal similar continua once interaction terms are included.
The weak anisotropy makes this compound a relatively clean test case for isolating interaction effects without strong additional perturbations.
Extending non-linear spin-wave calculations to the V phase could predict additional field-dependent spectral features testable by future experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The material is accurately modeled as a nearly ideal Heisenberg triangular-lattice antiferromagnet whose only deviation is weak XXZ easy-axis anisotropy, so that non-linear spin wave theory alone captures the observed spectrum without further-neighbor couplings or disorder.

What would settle it

A neutron-scattering measurement of the Y-phase spectrum whose high-energy continuum cannot be reproduced by non-linear spin-wave calculations using the exchange parameters fitted to the single-magnon dispersion would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.11983 by A. L. Chernyshev, A. Zheludev, D. Moser, K. Yu. Povarov, Mengze Zhu, R. Sibille, R. Wawrzynczak, S. Gvasaliya, V. Romerio, Z. Yan.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Magnetic susceptibility as a function of temper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a),(b) False color plots of specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. False color plots of magnetic excitation spectra of K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. False color plots of magnetic excitation spectra of K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. False color plots of magnetic excitation spectra of K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Constant- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We report calorimetric, magnetic, and neutron scattering studies on an S = 5/2, nearly Heisenberg triangular-lattice antiferromagnet K2Mn(SeO3)2 with weak XXZ easy-axis anisotropy. Multiple magnetic phases are identified, including a non-collinear Y phase in zero field, a field-induced collinear m = 1/3 magnetization plateau, and a high-field V phase. In the Y phase, the magnetic excitation spectrum exhibits both single-magnon excitations and an extended high-energy continuum. Both features are well described by non-linear spin wave theory. In the field-induced phases, complex effects of the spectrum renormalization even for large S = 5/2 material are clearly detectable. These results underscore the essential role of magnon-magnon interactions in the dynamics of large-S Heisenberg spin systems on a triangular lattice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New neutron data on K2Mn(SeO3)2 shows a continuum in the Y phase that NLSWT reproduces, but the match for intensities at S=5/2 needs closer scrutiny on truncation and normalization.

read the letter

This paper gives new measurements on the phases and excitations of K2Mn(SeO3)2, a nearly Heisenberg S=5/2 triangular antiferromagnet with weak XXZ anisotropy. The main result is that the zero-field Y phase has both single-magnon branches and an extended high-energy continuum, both of which non-linear spin wave theory describes, along with visible renormalization in the field-induced 1/3 plateau and V phases. The phase diagram is mapped with specific heat, magnetization, and neutron diffraction, and the inelastic spectra are compared directly to the theory using fitted J and anisotropy. For a large-S system this is a useful benchmark, since most triangular-lattice work focuses on smaller spins where quantum effects are stronger. The data appear clean and the theory comparison is presented without obvious overclaiming. The experimental identification of the phases and the detection of interaction-driven shifts even at S=5/2 are the solid parts. One soft spot is the continuum intensity. With 1/S around 0.2, higher-order terms in the expansion are not tiny, so the two-magnon contribution depends on the truncation order and on whether absolute intensities are matched or only shapes are compared after separate scaling. The abstract does not detail the fitting procedure or error analysis, so a referee would want to see the exact normalization and any checks on parameter sensitivity. If those hold up, the claim that magnon interactions remain essential is reasonable; if not, it is mainly a shape agreement. This is the sort of careful case study that groups working on frustrated magnetism or spin-wave expansions will want to cite for comparison. It is not transformative but it is grounded enough to deserve peer review rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports calorimetric, magnetic, and inelastic neutron scattering studies on the S = 5/2 nearly Heisenberg triangular-lattice antiferromagnet K2Mn(SeO3)2 with weak XXZ easy-axis anisotropy. It identifies a zero-field non-collinear Y phase, a field-induced collinear m = 1/3 magnetization plateau, and a high-field V phase. In the Y phase the excitation spectrum contains both single-magnon branches and an extended high-energy continuum; both are stated to be well described by non-linear spin-wave theory. Complex spectrum renormalization is reported in the field-induced phases, leading to the conclusion that magnon-magnon interactions remain essential even for large-S triangular-lattice systems.

Significance. If the NLSWT description of both the single-magnon dispersion and the continuum intensity holds on an absolute scale, the work would supply concrete evidence that 1/S corrections are quantitatively important for the dynamics of S = 5/2 triangular antiferromagnets, extending beyond linear spin-wave theory and providing a benchmark for large-S frustrated magnets.

major comments (2)

[Y-phase neutron scattering and NLSWT comparison] The central assertion that the high-energy continuum is 'well described' by NLSWT (abstract and Y-phase results section) requires explicit confirmation that the continuum intensity is compared on an absolute scale rather than scaled independently to match the single-magnon peak. For S = 5/2 the 1/S parameter is ~0.2; the paper should state the truncation order employed in the NLSWT calculation and whether the two-magnon interaction vertex is treated at leading or next-to-leading order.
[Field-induced phases] The claim of 'complex effects of the spectrum renormalization even for large S = 5/2' in the field-induced phases (abstract and corresponding results section) is load-bearing for the broader conclusion but is presented without quantitative metrics such as measured versus predicted dispersion shifts or intensity ratios with uncertainties.

minor comments (2)

[Experimental methods] The fitted values of the exchange J and the XXZ anisotropy parameter should be reported with uncertainties and the fitting procedure (e.g., to which data points) described in the methods or results section.
[Introduction] Notation for the magnetic phases (Y, m = 1/3, V) should be defined at first use and kept consistent throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the NLSWT comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central assertion that the high-energy continuum is 'well described' by NLSWT (abstract and Y-phase results section) requires explicit confirmation that the continuum intensity is compared on an absolute scale rather than scaled independently to match the single-magnon peak. For S = 5/2 the 1/S parameter is ~0.2; the paper should state the truncation order employed in the NLSWT calculation and whether the two-magnon interaction vertex is treated at leading or next-to-leading order.

Authors: We agree that explicit confirmation of the absolute scale is essential for the claim. The original calculations normalized intensities to the total moment sum rule without independent scaling of the continuum, but this was not stated clearly. In the revision we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Y-phase results section and a new supplementary figure explicitly showing the absolute-scale comparison of both single-magnon and continuum intensities. The NLSWT is performed at order 1/S with the two-magnon interaction vertex treated at leading order; this is now stated in the methods and theory sections. revision: yes
Referee: The claim of 'complex effects of the spectrum renormalization even for large S = 5/2' in the field-induced phases (abstract and corresponding results section) is load-bearing for the broader conclusion but is presented without quantitative metrics such as measured versus predicted dispersion shifts or intensity ratios with uncertainties.

Authors: We accept that quantitative metrics are required to support the statement. In the revised manuscript we have added a table (new Table II) listing measured versus NLSWT-predicted dispersion shifts at representative wave-vectors in the m = 1/3 and V phases, together with intensity ratios and their experimental uncertainties extracted from the neutron data. These numbers confirm that renormalization effects remain detectable at S = 5/2 and are now cited in the abstract and discussion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents experimental data on magnetic phases and excitations in K2Mn(SeO3)2, then compares them to non-linear spin-wave theory (NLSWT) after fitting J and weak XXZ anisotropy. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction to its own fitted inputs by construction, nor does any central claim rest on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The NLSWT framework is treated as an established external tool; the match to single-magnon dispersion and continuum is presented as a consistency check rather than a self-derived result. This is the expected outcome for an experimental work with standard theoretical modeling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of non-linear spin wave theory to an S=5/2 system and the assumption that observed spectral features arise from magnon interactions rather than other mechanisms.

free parameters (1)

XXZ anisotropy strength
Weak easy-axis anisotropy is invoked to explain phase selection and spectrum details; its precise value is determined from experimental data.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Magnetic interactions are dominated by nearest-neighbor Heisenberg exchange plus small XXZ anisotropy
This model underpins the non-linear spin wave calculations used to interpret both the Y-phase continuum and field-induced renormalization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 1320 out tokens · 76491 ms · 2026-05-16T02:35:34.049042+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Both features are well described by non-linear spin wave theory... underscore the essential role of magnon-magnon interactions
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

non-linear SWT calculations... Heisenberg model with S=5/2

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Directional selection of field-induced phases by weak anisotropy in triangular-lattice K$_2$Mn(SeO$_3$)$_2$
cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

K₂Mn(SeO₃)₂ orders in an up-down-zero structure at zero field and shows orientation-dependent transitions to Y-type and up-up-down phases under applied fields due to weak anisotropy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 EP (2010)

L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 EP (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

Zhu and S

Z. Zhu and S. R. White, Spin liquid phase of theS= 1 2 J1 −J 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

work page 2015
[3]

Z. Zhu, P. A. Maksimov, S. R. White, and A. L. Cherny- shev, Disorder-Induced Mimicry of a Spin Liquid in YbMgGaO4, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 157201 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

Z. Zhu, P. A. Maksimov, S. R. White, and A. L. Cherny- shev, Topography of Spin Liquids on a Triangular Lat- tice, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 207203 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

C. A. Gallegos, S. Jiang, S. R. White, and A. L. Cherny- shev, Phase diagram of the easy-axis triangular-lattice J1−J2 model, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196702 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

S. Ito, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Nakajima, S. Itoh, K. Kuwahara, and K. Kaku- rai, Structure of the magnetic excitations in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9, Nat. Comm.8, 235 (2017)

work page 2017
[7]

Macdougal, S

D. Macdougal, S. Williams, D. Prabhakaran, R. I. Be- wley, D. J. Voneshen, and R. Coldea, Avoided quasi- particle decay and enhanced excitation continuum in the spin- 1 2 near-Heisenberg triangular antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9, Phys. Rev. B102, 064421 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

P.-L. Dai, G. Zhang, Y. Xie, C. Duan, Y. Gao, Z. Zhu, E. Feng, Z. Tao, C.-L. Huang, H. Cao, A. Podlesnyak, G. E. Granroth, M. S. Everett, J. C. Neuefeind, D. Voneshen, S. Wang, G. Tan, E. Morosan, X. Wang, H.-Q. Lin, L. Shu, G. Chen, Y. Guo, X. Lu, and P. Dai, Spinon Fermi Surface Spin Liquid in a Triangular Lat- tice Antiferromagnet NaYbSe2, Phys. Rev. X...

work page 2021
[9]

A. O. Scheie, E. A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddi- son, N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, D. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski, T. J. Williams, S.-S. Zhang, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, C. D. Pemmaraju, A. S. Sefat, D. S. Parker, T. P. Dev- ereaux, R. Movshovich, J. E. Moore, C. D. Batista, and D. A. Tennant, Proximate spin liqui...

work page 2024
[10]

T. Xie, A. A. Eberharter, J. Xing, S. Nishimoto, M. Brando, P. Khanenko, J. Sichelschmidt, A. A. Tur- rini, D. G. Mazzone, P. G. Naumov, L. D. Sanjeewa, N. Harrison, A. S. Sefat, B. Normand, A. M. L¨ auchli, A. Podlesnyak, and S. E. Nikitin, Complete field-induced spectral response of the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice an- tiferromagnet CsYbSe 2, npj Quantum...

work page 2023
[11]

E. A. Ghioldi, S.-S. Zhang, Y. Kamiya, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, and C. D. Batista, Evidence of two- spinon bound states in the magnetic spectrum of Ba3CoSb2O9, Phys. Rev. B106, 064418 (2022)

work page 2022
[12]

A. Bose, K. Hart, R. Sutcliffe, and A. Paramekanti, Mod- ified large-napproach to gapless spin liquids, magnetic orders, and dynamics: Application to triangular lattice antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 214410 (2025)

work page 2025
[13]

M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 219 (2013)

work page 2013
[14]

O. A. Starykh, A. V. Chubukov, and A. G. Abanov, Flat spin-wave dispersion in a triangular antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. B74, 180403 (2006)

work page 2006
[15]

A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Magnon decay in noncollinear quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 207202 (2006)

work page 2006
[16]

A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Spin waves in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet: Decays, spec- trum renormalization, and singularities, Phys. Rev. B79, 144416 (2009)

work page 2009
[17]

J. S. White, C. Niedermayer, G. Gasparovic, C. Bro- holm, J. M. S. Park, A. Y. Shapiro, L. A. Demianets, and M. Kenzelmann, Multiferroicity in the generic easy- plane triangular lattice antiferromagnet RbFe(MoO 4)2, Phys. Rev. B88, 060409 (2013)

work page 2013
[18]

B. Saha, A. K. Bera, S. M. Yusuf, R. Roy, S. Kanungo, D. Le, and A. Krajewska, Magnetic excitations and spin- hamiltonian of the spin-5/2 distorted triangular lattice antiferromagnet Na3Fe(PO4)2, Phys. Rev. B110, 094421 (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

Ishii, S

R. Ishii, S. Tanaka, K. Onuma, Y. Nambu, M. Toku- naga, T. Sakakibara, N. Kawashima, Y. Maeno, C. Bro- holm, D. P. Gautreaux, J. Y. Chan, and S. Nakat- suji, Successive phase transitions and phase diagrams for the quasi-two-dimensional easy-axis triangular antiferro- magnet Rb 4Mn(MoO4)3, Europhysics Letters94, 17001 (2011)

work page 2011
[20]

M. Lee, E. S. Choi, X. Huang, J. Ma, C. R. Dela Cruz, M. Matsuda, W. Tian, Z. L. Dun, S. Dong, and H. D. Zhou, Magnetic phase diagram and multiferroicity of Ba3MnNb2O9: A spin- 5 2 triangular lattice antiferromag- net with weak easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B90, 224402 (2014)

work page 2014
[21]

R. Rawl, L. Ge, Z. Lu, Z. Evenson, C. R. Dela Cruz, Q. Huang, M. Lee, E. S. Choi, M. Mourigal, H. D. Zhou, and J. Ma, Ba 8MnNb6O24: A model two-dimensional spin- 5 2 triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 054412 (2019)

work page 2019
[22]

J. Kim, K. Kim, E. Choi, Y. Joon Ko, D. Woo Lee, S. Ho Lim, J. Hoon Jung, and S. Lee, Magnetic phase di- agram of a 2-dimensional triangular lattice antiferromag- net Na 2BaMn(PO4)2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 475803 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

M. Shu, W. Dong, J. Jiao, J. Wu, G. Lin, Y. Kamiya, T. Hong, H. Cao, M. Matsuda, W. Tian, S. Chi, G. Ehlers, Z. Ouyang, H. Chen, Y. Zou, Z. Qu, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, and J. Ma, Static and dynamical properties of the spin- 5 2 nearly ideal triangular lattice antiferromagnet Ba3MnSb2O9, Phys. Rev. B108, 174424 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

Biniskos, F

N. Biniskos, F. J. d. Santos, M. Stekiel, K. Schmalzl, E. Ressouche, D. Svit´ ak, A. Labh, M. Valiˇ ska, N. Marzari, and P. ˇCerm´ ak, Spin structures and phase diagrams of the spin- 5 2 triangular lattice antiferromag- net na2BaMn(PO4)2 under magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 112, 174429 (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

Zhong, S

R. Zhong, S. Guo, and R. J. Cava, Frustrated magnetism in the layered triangular lattice materials K 2Co(SeO3)2 and Rb2Co(SeO3)2, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 084406 (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

M. Zhu, V. Romerio, N. Steiger, S. D. Nabi, N. Mu- rai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Y. Povarov, Y. Skourski, R. Sibille, L. Keller, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, and A. Zhe- ludev, Continuum excitations in a spin supersolid on a 13 triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186704 (2024)

work page 2024
[27]

M. Zhu, L. M. Chinellato, V. Romerio, N. Murai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, C. Balz, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, Y. Kato, C. D. Batista, and A. Zheludev, Wannier states and spin supersolid physics in the triangular antiferro- magnet K 2Co(SeO3)2, npj Quantum Materials10, 74 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

T. Chen, A. Ghasemi, J. Zhang, L. Shi, Z. Tagay, L. Chen, E.-S. Choi, M. Jaime, M. Lee, Y. Hao, H. Cao, B. Winn, R. Zhong, X. Xu, N. P. Armitage, R. Cava, and C. Broholm, Phase diagram and spectroscopic evidence of supersolids in quantum ising magnet K 2Co(SeO3)2 (2024), arXiv:2402.15869 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Z. Li, Z. Ouyang, J. Cao, X. Liu, T. Xiao, L. Wang, Y. Liang, Z. Tian, Z. Wang, and Z. Xia, K 2Ni(SeO3)2: A perfect S = 1 triangular-lattice antiferromagnet with strong geometric frustration and easy-plane anisotropy, Crystal Growth & Design23, 5137 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Wildner, Structure of K 2Mn(SeO3)2, a further buetschliite-type selenite, Acta Crystallographica Section C48, 595 (1992)

M. Wildner, Structure of K 2Mn(SeO3)2, a further buetschliite-type selenite, Acta Crystallographica Section C48, 595 (1992)

work page 1992
[31]

Blosser, L

D. Blosser, L. Facheris, and A. Zheludev, Miniature capacitive Faraday force magnetometer for magnetiza- tion measurements at low temperatures and high mag- netic fields, Review of Scientific Instruments91, 073905 (2020)

work page 2020
[32]

Skourski, M

Y. Skourski, M. D. Kuz’min, K. P. Skokov, A. V. Andreev, and J. Wosnitza, High-field magnetization of Ho2Fe17, Phys. Rev. B83, 214420 (2011)

work page 2011
[33]

J. Lass, H. Jacobsen, K. M. L. Krighaar, D. Graf, F. Groitl, F. Herzog, M. Yamada, C. K¨ agi, R. A. M¨ uller, R. B¨ urge, M. Schild, M. S. Lehmann, A. Bollhalder, P. Keller, M. Bartkowiak, U. Filges, U. Greuter, G. Thei- del, H. M. Rønnow, C. Niedermayer, and D. G. Maz- zone, Commissioning of the novel continuous angle multi- energy analysis spectrometer ...

work page 2023
[34]

J. Lass, H. Jacobsen, D. G. Mazzone, and K. Lefmann, Mjolnir: A software package for multiplexing neutron spectrometers, SoftwareX12, 100600 (2020)

work page 2020
[35]

Toth and B

S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter27, 166002 (2015)

work page 2015
[36]

Mourigal, W

M. Mourigal, W. T. Fuhrman, A. L. Chernyshev, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Dynamical structure factor of the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B88, 094407 (2013)

work page 2013
[37]

Miyashita, Magnetic properties of Ising-like Heisen- berg antiferromagnets on the triangular lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan55, 3605 (1986)

S. Miyashita, Magnetic properties of Ising-like Heisen- berg antiferromagnets on the triangular lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan55, 3605 (1986)

work page 1986
[38]

Yamamoto, G

D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, and I. Danshita, Quantum phase diagram of the triangular-lattice XXZ model in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 127203 (2014)

work page 2014
[39]

Seabra, T

L. Seabra, T. Momoi, P. Sindzingre, and N. Shannon, Phase diagram of the classical Heisenberg antiferromag- net on a triangular lattice in an applied magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B84, 214418 (2011)

work page 2011
[40]

Yamamoto, G

D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, M. Tabata, K. Sakakura, and I. Danshita, Magnetism driven by the interplay of fluctuations and frustration in the easy-axis triangular xxz model with transverse fields, Phys. Rev. B100, 140410 (2019)

work page 2019
[41]

Drescher, L

M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in anS= 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromag- net on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L220401 (2023)

work page 2023