Sharp non-uniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equations in scaling critical spaces

Mikihiro Fujii

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Sharp non-uniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equations in scaling critical spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Uniqueness of mild Navier–Stokes solutions in critical Besov spaces holds exactly for p<n (any q) or p=n with q≤2; for p=n with q>2 or p>n, zero initial data already generates infinitely many global solutions converging to distinct stationa

desk verdict Big claim with a fixable-looking typo in the key bound; worth referee time after the author sorts out the spatial cutoff scale. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.19846 v4 pith:ZXXQVPB5 submitted 2026-02-23 math.AP

Mikihiro Fujii This is my paper

classification math.AP MSC 35Q3035A0276D03

keywords Navier-Stokesequationsnon-uniquenessmildsolutionsscalingcriticalBesovspacesstationaryglobalsharpuniquenessmulti-scaleconstruction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks exactly when uniqueness of mild solutions to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations survives in the smallest natural spaces, the scaling-critical Besov spaces indexed by two parameters (p,q). The author proves a complete dichotomy: uniqueness holds precisely for 1≤p2, or p>n with any q, uniqueness fails. In the failure regime, even zero initial data produces infinitely many small global mild solutions, and each one tends as time goes to infinity toward a distinct nontrivial stationary flow that is itself a non-unique solution of the stationary equations. This proves that the classical uniqueness result in the critical Lebesgue space is sharp: any slightly larger critical space made from the same scale can already contain non-unique flows. If correct, the classification is complete and the constructed solutions are the first examples of non-dissipative, unforced Navier–Stokes flows with critical regularity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the principal profile V = Σ_j V_j^{(p)}, a sum of almost frequency-localized, divergence-free building blocks. Each V_j lives on a tetration-like sequence of frequency scales λ_j (so the frequency gaps grow super-exponentially), and its amplitude is written as a finite superposition of plane waves with directions chosen through a geometric lemma that decomposes the identity matrix into rank-one tensors. The key identity is the cancellation −ΔV_{j-1} + P div(λ^8 ψ_j^2 Id − D V_{j-1}) = 0, which removes the worst low-frequency part of the nonlinear interaction of V_j with itself, leaving a residual forcing F that belongs to a better-regularity Besov space and is much

What would settle it

Directly compute (or numerically estimate) the Besov norm of the first building block V_1^{(p)} at j=1 with the tetration schedule λ_1 = λ^{2^{λ^{4μ}}} and cutoff ψ_1 localized at radius λ_1, and compare it with the claimed bound Cλ^{-α(p)}; if ‖V_1^{(p)}‖_{B^{n/p-1}_{p,q}} ≳ λ^{n/p} λ^{4-2μ} σ_1(n/p-1,q) cannot be reconciled with Cλ^{-α(p)} because of the additional factor coming from the spatial scale of ψ_1, the main theorem fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the boundary of uniqueness for Navier–Stokes mild solutions in the critical Besov scale is exactly the line p<n (any q) together with the point p=n, q≤2; beyond that line — p=n with q>2, or p>n with any q — uniqueness collapses. The mechanism is a new multi-scale construction of stationary building blocks: each block is spread over many frequency shells within a dyadic band, with amplitudes decreasing like 1/√ℓ, and the blocks are arranged so that the low-frequency part of the self-interaction cancels the linear diffusion of the previous block. The remaining forcing is smooth enough and small enough to be absorbed by a contractive fixed point in a better-regular

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the claim that the infinite sum of building blocks V = Σ_j V_j^{(p)} is genuinely small in the critical Besov norm (of order λ^{-α(p)}), and specifically that the first building block, built on the enormous scale λ_1 = λ^{2^{λ^{4μ}}} with the radius-λ_1 cutoff, obeys the same size estimate as the rest of the series; if that exponent bookkeeping fails, the stationary state is not small, the forcing is not small, and the fixed-point argument coll

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the theorem is correct, uniqueness of mild solutions in C([0,T); L^n) cannot be extended to any critical space that is strictly larger but still of the same scaling; in particular, enlarging L^n to the Besov or Triebel–Lizorkin scale with p=n and q>2 already destroys uniqueness.
The result yields a complete yes/no classification of uniqueness in the critical Besov scale for every pair (p,q), leaving no gap.
The constructed stationary solutions are the first examples of non-uniqueness for steady Navier–Stokes flow in scaling-critical spaces, including the three-dimensional case.
Non-dissipative global solutions that do not decay to zero exist in critical spaces where the heat semigroup still decays, so viscous dissipation alone does not force decay for small critical initial data.
For the endpoint case BMO^{-1} (p=∞, q=2), unconditional uniqueness of small mild solutions fails, although well-posedness for small data in that space is known.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mechanism points to a testable numerical check: assemble the first few building blocks on the torus and measure their critical Besov norm and the residual forcing, to see whether the cancellation identity holds at the level of computed magnitudes.
If the classification is right, then any proof of well-posedness in critical Besov spaces for p>n must necessarily exclude some solutions that are mild in the classical sense, or must add an auxiliary dissipative condition; this would explain why existing well-posedness arguments all use a Chemin–Lerner auxiliary norm.
The same multi-scale cancellation may apply to other equations with a quadratic nonlinearity and a diffusion operator, such as the magnetohydrodynamics system or the surface quasi-geostrophic equation, wherever one can find a geometric decomposition of the identity into rank-one tensors that survives the projection to divergence-free fields.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth a serious referee, but the manuscript as printed has a load-bearing typo in Section 4. The headline result is a complete (p,q) classification of uniqueness in critical Besov spaces for mild Navier-Stokes, with non-unique solutions from zero data converging to nontrivial stationary states. If correct, that closes a long-standing problem, and the construction (multi-scale frequency shells, Nash-lemma cancellation) is genuinely novel. The author is also honest about the 2D obstruction and the η=0 cases.

The stress-test note is right: Theorem 4.1(i) does not follow from Lemma 4.9 under the stated definitions. With ψ_j(x)=ψ(|x|-λ_j), the amplitude of the j-th building block has L^p norm about λ_j^{n/p}, and the j=1 block alone is astronomically large under the tetration schedule (4.4). The paper's own lower bound for V_1 uses λ^{n/p}, not λ_1^{n/p}, which is inconsistent. The natural fix is to take the spatial cutoff at scale λ_{j-1}, not λ_j — that makes the L^p normalization λ_{j-1}^{n/p} and the series sums to the advertised λ^{-α(p)}. This is probably a typo rather than broken idea: the rest of the exponent bookkeeping (α(p)<β, the force estimates, the fixed-point steps) is internally coherent, and the cancellation identity requires only ψ_j=1 on supp V_{j-1}, which a cutoff at scale λ_{j-1} can provide.

That said, a typo that changes the magnitude of the principal term by a factor of exp(2^{λ^{4μ}}) is exactly the kind of thing a referee should check. I would not desk-reject this. Send it to a specialist who is comfortable with Besov calculus and convex integration, with specific instructions to verify (4.1), (4.5), and (4.7) after the scale correction. The classification claim, if it holds, is a major contribution; the current manuscript is not yet at the point where I would trust it without that verification.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies uniqueness of mild solutions to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in critical homogeneous Besov spaces \dot B^{n/p-1}_{p,q}(R^n). It claims a complete classification: uniqueness for 1≤p<n with any q and for p=n with q≤2; non-uniqueness for p=n, q>2 and for n<p≤∞, any q. The non-uniqueness construction first produces a small stationary profile V_λ as an infinite sum of frequency-localized building blocks, with residual force F_λ belonging to a better Besov space and much smaller than V_λ; a contraction argument then yields a stationary solution U_λ, and a second fixed point around U_λ produces global non-stationary solutions, including from zero initial data. The paper also claims that these are the first non-dissipative unforced Navier–Stokes flows with critical regularity and that the L^n uniqueness theorem of Lions–Masmoudi and Furioli–Rieusset–Terraneo is sharp.

Significance. If the claims were fully established, the paper would be a major advance: it would give a complete Besov-space classification of uniqueness for mild Navier–Stokes solutions, show sharpness of the L^n endpoint, and provide the first critical-regularity non-dissipative unforced flows. The strategy is explicit and self-contained, combining Besov calculus with a Nash-type geometric lemma and a clear fixed-point architecture; these are genuine strengths. However, the central magnitude estimate for the principal profile is not justified as printed, and the significance of the paper is therefore conditional on a substantial correction.

major comments (2)

[§4.1–4.2, Lemma 4.9 and Theorem 4.1(i), Eqs. (4.7), (4.1), (4.4)] The bound (4.1) is not derivable from Lemma 4.9 with the printed definitions. With λ_1 = λ^{2^{λ^{4μ}}} and ψ_j(x)=ψ(|x|-λ_j), Lemma 4.9 gives at j=1: ‖V_1^{(p)}‖_{B^{n/p-1}_{p,q}} ≥ c λ_1^{n/p} λ^{4-2μ} σ_1(n/p-1,q). Since σ_1(n/p-1,q) ≥ c λ^{(n/p-1)μ} for p>n and σ_1(0,q) ≥ c for p=n, q>2, and λ_1^{n/p} = exp((n/p)2^{λ^{4μ}} log λ), the first block alone is exponentially large, not ≤ Cλ^{-α(p)}. Consequently the series defining V^{(p)} does not converge in the advertised Besov space, and the smallness of F in (4.2) and of w_0 in §5 lose their premise. The likely source is the radius λ_j in the definition of ψ_j; if the intended radius is λ_{j-1}, all subsequent estimates must be redone and the proof re-checked. As printed, Theorem 4.1(i) is not established.
[§5, Step 2 (reduction to p<2n, q<∞)] The reduction at the beginning of Step 2 is not justified as written. The quoted embedding \dot B^{s_1}_{p_1,q_1} ↪ \dot B^{s_2}_{p_2,q_2} for p_1≤p_2, q_1≤q_2 embeds a smaller space into a larger one, whereas the constructed U_λ is only shown to lie in the target space. For endpoint cases p≥2n or q=∞ the theorem only needs the zero initial datum, so a repair may be possible by constructing the solution first in a smaller admissible critical space and then embedding, but this is not what is written and needs to be supplied.

minor comments (4)

[§3, proof of Proposition 3.1] In the estimate of F^{(r)}_{λ,m,L}, the phrase 'the similar strategy as for the estimate of F^{(r)}_{λ,m,L}' appears self-referential; it should refer to the earlier remainder estimate. Several sums also use j where j' or ℓ is intended.
[Theorem 1.2] There is a typo: 'a constant 1 η=η(n,p,q)⩾0' contains a stray '1'.
[§4.2, decomposition of F_1] In the line defining F_{1,2;j}, the sum over ℓ_1,ℓ_2∈Λ_j writes Φ_{j,k_1,ℓ}⊗Φ_{j,k_2,ℓ}; the index ℓ should be ℓ_1,ℓ_2.
[§4.1, notation for h_j] The formula for h_j has an unbalanced parenthesis and is hard to parse; it should be written as h_j ∼ log_2( (log_λ λ_j)/(μ log_λ λ_{j-1}) ), which simplifies to λ_{j-1}^{4μ} up to a logarithmic correction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the construction is explicit, parameter-driven, and checked against independent external results.

full rationale

The paper's main theorem is constructive rather than definitionally circular. Theorem 4.1 builds the principal profile Vλ from explicit building blocks (Nash-lemma amplitudes, mollified modulated plane waves) and then directly estimates its Besov norm and the residual force using Proposition 3.1 and Lemma 4.9; no parameter is fitted to the desired conclusion, and no target quantity is renamed as a prediction. The non-uniqueness in Theorem 1.2 is obtained by producing explicit stationary states Uλ and perturbations wλ for different λ, not by assuming the classification. The uniqueness half, Proposition 1.1, relies on the external Lions–Masmoudi / Furioli–Rieusset–Terraneo L^n uniqueness theorem and standard Besov embeddings, not on the author's construction. The only self-citation, Lemma 2.2 from [23], supplies a standard maximal-regularity/bilinear estimate in Chemin–Lerner spaces; it is used as a tool in the perturbation argument, is not a uniqueness theorem, does not forbid alternatives, and does not define the target result, so it does not constitute load-bearing circularity. The reviewer's flagged discrepancy between the claimed bound (4.1) and the Lemma 4.9 lower bound under the tetration schedule is an apparent arithmetic/consistency issue in the proof, not an equivalence-by-construction; it is a correctness concern to be assessed separately, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof is a constructive PDE argument: no data fitting, no simulations. All adjustable constants (λ, μ, θ, r, p_*, η, exponents) are hand-chosen to close Besov estimates; they are construction knobs, not fitted targets. The main external inputs are standard Littlewood–Paley/Besov calculus, the Nash geometric lemma (cited [50]), and cited maximal-regularity/bilinear estimates ([1], [23]). No invented physical entities. The central risk is the printed exponent bookkeeping around (4.5), (4.7), and (4.1), not circularity.

free parameters (8)

λ (master scale) = λ ∈ 2^N, λ ≥ λ_*; λ → ∞
Central construction parameter; ε_m ~ λ^{−α(p)} → 0 as λ → ∞; all estimates hold only for sufficiently large λ; chosen by hand.
μ = 4n+5 = 4n+5
Shell-growth constant entering the tetration schedule (4.4), the exponents α(p) and β, and the definition of Λ_j; chosen by hand.
β = 12n+12
Exponent in the force bound (4.2); selected so that β > α(p) and the smallness hierarchy (1.5) closes.
α(p) = (3−n/p)μ − 4 − n/p
Exponent in the profile norm bound (4.1); derived from σ_j estimates and drives ε_m → 0; the advertised smallness of V depends on it.
η = η(n,p,q) = 0 for p ≥ 2n or q = ∞; > 0 otherwise
Smallness threshold for admissible initial data in Theorem 1.2; chosen by hand; footnote 1 discloses the η = 0 cases.
θ = 2 < θ < ∞ satisfying (2.2)
Time-integrability exponent in the Chemin–Lerner space used for the non-stationary fixed point (Lemma 2.2); chosen by hand.
r and p_* = n/2 < r < n; n < p_* < 2n
Auxiliary exponents for the stationary perturbation fixed point in Section 5, Step 1; chosen to satisfy Lemma 2.1's conditions.
Amplitude normalization 1/√(h_j ℓ) = h_j = Σ_{ℓ∈Λ_j} 1/ℓ ~ λ^{4μ}_{j−1}
Design choice making the frequency-shell modes quasi-orthogonal in Besov norm; explicitly inspired by [58,62].

assumptions (6)

standard math Littlewood–Paley/Besov calculus; homogeneous spaces modulo polynomials; f = Σ_j Δ_j f for s < n/p or (s,q) = (n/p,1)
Definitions in Section 2; used to form the series V = Σ V_j and to define all norms.
standard math Nash geometric lemma (Lemma 4.3)
Quoted from [50]; supplies the decomposition Id = Σ_k Γ_k(M)^2 k⊗k used for the crucial F1 cancellation in Section 4.2.
standard math Bilinear estimate Lemma 2.1
Cited to [1, Corollary 2.5]; used in the stationary contraction in Section 5, Step 1.
domain assumption Maximal regularity estimate Lemma 2.2
Self-cited from the author's [23]; underpins the non-stationary fixed point in Step 2; no proof is given in this paper.
domain assumption Prior uniqueness theorems underlying Proposition 1.1
The uniqueness half of the classification (U1), (U2) is quoted from [23,26,33,45] and treated as a black box.
domain assumption Stationary well-posedness in \dot{B}^{n/r−1}_{r,1} for small force
Template for the perturbation argument around V_λ; cited to [36] and not reproved.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp non-uniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equations in scaling critical spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXXQVPB5

@misc{pith2026260219846,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp non-uniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equations in scaling critical spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXXQVPB5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.19846}
}

abstract

It is known that uniqueness of mild solutions to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations holds in the critical class $C([0,T);L^n(\mathbb{R}^n))$ for $n \geqslant 3$. In this paper, we prove that this result is sharp in the sense that uniqueness fails if $L^n(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is replaced by some scaling critical spaces that are even slightly larger. We achieve this through a complete classification for every pair $(p,q)$ of whether uniqueness of mild solutions in the critical Besov class $C([0,T);\dot{B}_{p,q}^{n/p-1}(\mathbb{R}^n))$ holds or not. Our non-uniqueness mechanism produces infinitely many global solutions emanating even from zero initial state, whose large-time asymptotics are governed by non-trivial stationary flow. To the best of our knowledge, such non-unique solutions provide the first examples of non-dissipative unforced Navier-Stokes flow with critical regularity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.19846 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Let Xp,q be either B˙ n/p−1 p,q (R n ) or F˙ n/p−1 p,q (R n ). The blue region indicates the range of (1/q, 1/p) for which mild solutions to (1.1) are unique in C([0, T); Xp,q) and small stationary solutions in Xp,q are unique, whereas the red region indicates the range where uniqueness fails for both non-stationary and stationary solutions. Note that the continuous embedding Xp1,q1 ,→ Xp2,q2 for 1 ⩽ p1 ⩽ p2 ⩽ ∞ and… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

On non-uniqueness of mild solutions and stationary singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations
math.AP 2026-03 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

Unconditional uniqueness of mild Navier-Stokes solutions fails in every Besov space with negative regularity index, via non-L^2 stationary singular solutions built by convex integration.
Uniqueness of the dissipative SQG without time-continuity assumption
math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Uniqueness holds for dissipative SQG solutions in critical spaces without time-continuity or smallness via energy method with fractional heat semigroup smoothing and iteration.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Abidi and M

H. Abidi and M. Paicu,Existence globale pour un fluide inhomogène, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)57(2007), 883–917 (French, with English and French summaries)

2007
[2]

Albritton, E

D. Albritton, E. Brué, and M. Colombo,Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations, Ann. of Math. (2)196(2022), 415–455

2022
[3]

Aoki and Y

M. Aoki and Y. Maekawa,Self-similar vorticity around the boundary and non-uniqueness of solutions to the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in the half space(2025), arXiv:2507.02338. Preprint

arXiv 2025
[4]

Bahouri, J.-Y

H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin,Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differen- tial equations, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

2011
[5]

Benameur,Long time decay to the Lei-Lin solution of 3D Navier-Stokes equations, J

J. Benameur,Long time decay to the Lei-Lin solution of 3D Navier-Stokes equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl.422(2015), 424–434

2015
[6]

Bourgain and N

J. Bourgain and N. Pavlović,Ill-posedness of the Navier-Stokes equations in a critical space in 3D, J. Funct. Anal.255(2008), 2233–2247

2008
[7]

Buckmaster, C

T. Buckmaster, C. De Lellis, P. Isett, and L. Székelyhidi Jr.,Anomalous dissipation for 1/5-Hölder Euler flows, Ann. of Math. (2)182(2015), 127–172

2015
[8]

Buckmaster and V

T. Buckmaster and V. Vicol,Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation, Ann. of Math. (2)189(2019), 101–144

2019

Show all 63 references

[9]

Cannone and F

M. Cannone and F. Planchon,Self-similar solutions for Navier-Stokes equations inR 3, Comm. Partial Differential Equations21(1996), 179–193

1996
[10]

Chemin,Remarques sur l’existence globale pour le système de Navier-Stokes incom- pressible, SIAM J

J.-Y. Chemin,Remarques sur l’existence globale pour le système de Navier-Stokes incom- pressible, SIAM J. Math. Anal.23(1992), 20–28 (French, with English summary)

1992
[11]

Chemin and N

J.-Y. Chemin and N. Lerner,Flot de champs de vecteurs non lipschitziens et équations de Navier-Stokes, J. Differential Equations121(1995), 314–328 (French)

1995
[12]

Z. M. Chen,Ln solutions of the stationary and nonstationary Navier-Stokes equations inRn, Pacific J. Math.158(1993), 293–303

1993
[13]

Cheskidov and X

A. Cheskidov and X. Luo,Sharp nonuniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equations, Invent. Math.229(2022), 987–1054

2022
[14]

PDE9(2023), Paper No

,L 2-critical nonuniqueness for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations, Ann. PDE9(2023), Paper No. 13, 56

2023
[15]

Cheskidov, Z

A. Cheskidov, Z. Zeng, and D. Zhang,Global dissipative solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes and MHD equations(2025), arXiv:2503.05692. Preprint

2025 arXiv
[16]

Cheskidov, M

A. Cheskidov, M. Dai, and S. Palasek,Instantaneous Type I blow-up and non-uniqueness of Navier–Stokes flows(2025), arXiv:2511.09556. Preprint

2025
[17]

M. P. Coiculescu and S. Palasek,Non-uniqueness of smooth solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations from critical data, Invent. math. (2025)

2025
[18]

Daneri and L

S. Daneri and L. Székelyhidi Jr.,Non-uniqueness and h-principle for Hölder-continuous weak solutions of the Euler equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.224(2017), 471–514

2017
[19]

De Lellis and L

C. De Lellis and L. Székelyhidi Jr.,The Euler equations as a differential inclusion, Ann. of Math. (2)170(2009), 1417–1436

2009
[20]

Math.193(2013), 377–407

,Dissipative continuous Euler flows, Invent. Math.193(2013), 377–407

2013
[21]

Eskauriaza, G

L. Eskauriaza, G. A. Serëgin, and V. Shverak,L3,∞-solutions of Navier-Stokes equations and backward uniqueness, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk58(2003), 3–44 (Russian, with Russian summary); English transl., Russian Math. Surveys58(2003), 211–250

2003
[22]

Fujii,Ill-Posedness of the Two-Dimensional Stationary Navier–Stokes Equations on the Whole Plane, Ann

M. Fujii,Ill-Posedness of the Two-Dimensional Stationary Navier–Stokes Equations on the Whole Plane, Ann. PDE10(2024), Paper No. 10

2024
[23]

,Time-periodic solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations on the whole space including the two-dimensional case, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire (2025). published online first

2025
[24]

Fujii and H

M. Fujii and H. Tsurumi,Asymptotic instability for the forced Navier–Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces(2025), arXiv:2509.21272v2. Preprint. NON-UNIQUENESS FOR THE NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS IN CRITICAL SPACES 29

2025
[25]

Fujita and T

H. Fujita and T. Kato,On the Navier-Stokes initial value problem. I, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.16(1964), 269–315

1964
[26]

Furioli, P

G. Furioli, P. G. Lemarié-Rieusset, and E. Terraneo,Unicité dansL 3(R3)et d’autres es- paces fonctionnels limites pour Navier-Stokes, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana16(2000), 605–667 (French, with English and French summaries)

2000
[27]

Équations aux Dérivées Partielles

I. Gallagher, D. Iftimie, and F. Planchon,Asymptotics and stability for global solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, Journées “Équations aux Dérivées Partielles” (Forges-les-Eaux, 2002), Univ. Nantes, Nantes, 2002, pp. Exp. No. VI, 9 (English, with English and French summaries)

2002
[28]

Gallagher, D

I. Gallagher, D. Iftimie, and F. Planchon,Asymptotics and stability for global solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)53(2003), 1387–1424 (English, with English and French summaries)

2003
[29]

Giga and T

Y. Giga and T. Miyakawa,Solutions inLr of the Navier-Stokes initial value problem, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.89(1985), 267–281

1985
[30]

T. Hou, Y. Wang, and C. Yang,Nonuniqueness of Leray–Hopf solutions to the unforced incompressible 3D Navier–Stokes equation(2025), arXiv:2509.25116v1. Preprint

2025
[31]

Isett,A proof of Onsager’s conjecture, Ann

P. Isett,A proof of Onsager’s conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2)188(2018), 871–963

2018
[32]

Iwabuchi and M

T. Iwabuchi and M. Nakamura,Small solutions for nonlinear heat equations, the Navier- Stokes equation, and the Keller-Segel system in Besov and Triebel-Lizorkin spaces, Adv. Differential Equations18(2013), 687–736

2013
[33]

Iwabuchi and T

T. Iwabuchi and T. Okazaki,On the uniqueness of the mild solution of the critical quasi- geostrophic equation, Commun. Math. Sci.23(2025)

2025
[34]

Jia and V

H. Jia and V. Šverák,Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self-similar solutions, Invent. Math.196(2014), 233– 265

2014
[35]

Jia and V

H. Jia and V. Sverak,Are the incompressible 3d Navier-Stokes equations locally ill-posed in the natural energy space?, J. Funct. Anal.268(2015), 3734–3766

2015
[36]

Kaneko, H

K. Kaneko, H. Kozono, and S. Shimizu,Stationary solution to the Navier-Stokes equations in the scaling invariant Besov space and its regularity, Indiana Univ. Math. J.68(2019), 857–880

2019
[37]

Kato,StrongL p-solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation inRm, with applications to weak solutions, Math

T. Kato,StrongL p-solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation inRm, with applications to weak solutions, Math. Z.187(1984), 471–480

1984
[38]

Koch and D

H. Koch and D. Tataru,Well-posedness for the Navier-Stokes equations, Adv. Math.157 (2001), 22–35

2001
[39]

Kozono and S

H. Kozono and S. Shimizu,Navier-Stokes equations with external forces in time-weighted Besov spaces, Math. Nachr.291(2018), 1781–1800

2018
[40]

Kozono and H

H. Kozono and H. Sohr,Remark on uniqueness of weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equa- tions, Analysis16(1996), 255–272

1996
[41]

Kozono and M

H. Kozono and M. Yamazaki,Semilinear heat equations and the Navier-Stokes equation with distributions in new function spaces as initial data, Comm. Partial Differential Equations19 (1994), 959–1014

1994
[42]

P. G. Lemarié-Rieusset,Highly singular (frequentially sparse) steady solutions for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations on the torus, J. Funct. Anal.288(2025), Paper No. 110761, 16

2025
[43]

Leray,Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace, Acta Math.63(1934), 193–248 (French)

J. Leray,Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace, Acta Math.63(1934), 193–248 (French)

1934
[44]

J. Li, Y. Yu, and W. Zhu,Ill-posedness for the stationary Navier–Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces, SIAM J. Math. Anal.57(2025), 2363–2383

2025
[45]

Lions and N

P.-L. Lions and N. Masmoudi,Uniqueness of mild solutions of the Navier-Stokes system in LN, Comm. Partial Differential Equations26(2001), 2211–2226

2001
[46]

Luo,Stationary solutions and nonuniqueness of weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equa- tions in high dimensions, Arch

X. Luo,Stationary solutions and nonuniqueness of weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equa- tions in high dimensions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.233(2019), 701–747

2019
[47]

Masuda,Weak solutions of Navier-Stokes equations, Tohoku Math

K. Masuda,Weak solutions of Navier-Stokes equations, Tohoku Math. J. (2)36(1984), 623– 646

1984
[48]

Miura,Remark on uniqueness of mild solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, J

H. Miura,Remark on uniqueness of mild solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Funct. Anal.218(2005), 110–129. 30 MIKIHIRO FUJII

2005
[49]

Nakasato,Analyticity and asymptotic behavior of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in an end-point scaling critical framework, J

R. Nakasato,Analyticity and asymptotic behavior of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in an end-point scaling critical framework, J. Differential Equations453(2026), Paper No. 113851, 29

2026
[50]

Nash,C 1 isometric imbeddings, Ann

J. Nash,C 1 isometric imbeddings, Ann. of Math. (2)60(1954), 383–396

1954
[51]

Palasek,Non-uniqueness in the Leray-Hopf class for a dyadic Navier-Stokes model, Int

S. Palasek,Non-uniqueness in the Leray-Hopf class for a dyadic Navier-Stokes model, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2025), Paper No. rnaf344, 32

2025
[52]

Planchon,Asymptotic behavior of global solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations inR3, Rev

F. Planchon,Asymptotic behavior of global solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations inR3, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana14(1998), 71–93

1998
[53]

Sawano,Theory of Besov spaces, Developments in Mathematics, vol

Y. Sawano,Theory of Besov spaces, Developments in Mathematics, vol. 56, Springer, Singa- pore, 2018

2018
[54]

Serrin,The initial value problem for the Navier-Stokes equations, Nonlinear Problems (Proc

J. Serrin,The initial value problem for the Navier-Stokes equations, Nonlinear Problems (Proc. Sympos., Madison, Wis., 1962), Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1963, pp. 69– 98

1962
[55]

Takeuchi,Decay rates of small global solutions to the Navier–Stokes system in scaling invariant homogeneous Besov spaces, Math

T. Takeuchi,Decay rates of small global solutions to the Navier–Stokes system in scaling invariant homogeneous Besov spaces, Math. Ann. (2025)

2025
[56]

,On the strong solutions to the Navier-Stokes system with excessively singular external forces, SIAM J. Math. Anal.57(2025), 5382–5419

2025
[57]

J. Tan, H. Tsurumi, and X. Zhang,On steady solutions of the Hall-MHD system in Besov spaces, Z. Angew. Math. Phys.76(2025), Paper No. 139, 21

2025
[58]

Tsurumi,Well-posedness and ill-posedness problems of the stationary Navier-Stokes equa- tions in scaling invariant Besov spaces, Arch

H. Tsurumi,Well-posedness and ill-posedness problems of the stationary Navier-Stokes equa- tions in scaling invariant Besov spaces, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.234(2019), 911–923

2019
[59]

Wang,Ill-posedness for the Navier-Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces˙B−1 ∞,q, Adv

B. Wang,Ill-posedness for the Navier-Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces˙B−1 ∞,q, Adv. Math.268(2015), 350–372

2015
[60]

Watanabe,Algebraic decay rates for strong solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in critical spaces(2025)

K. Watanabe,Algebraic decay rates for strong solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in critical spaces(2025). Preprint

2025
[61]

Ann.317(2000), 635–675

M.Yamazaki,The Navier-Stokes equations in the weak-Ln space with time-dependent external force, Math. Ann.317(2000), 635–675

2000
[62]

Yoneda,Ill-posedness of the 3D-Navier-Stokes equations in a generalized Besov space near BMO−1, J

T. Yoneda,Ill-posedness of the 3D-Navier-Stokes equations in a generalized Besov space near BMO−1, J. Funct. Anal.258(2010), 3376–3387

2010
[63]

Zhan,Uniqueness of mild solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in weak-typeLd space (2024), arXiv:2402.01174v2

Z. Zhan,Uniqueness of mild solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in weak-typeLd space (2024), arXiv:2402.01174v2. Preprint. Graduate School of Science, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, 467-8501, Japan Email address:fujii.mikihiro@nsc.nagoya-cu.ac.jp

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Abidi and M

H. Abidi and M. Paicu,Existence globale pour un fluide inhomogène, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)57(2007), 883–917 (French, with English and French summaries)

2007

[2] [2]

Albritton, E

D. Albritton, E. Brué, and M. Colombo,Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations, Ann. of Math. (2)196(2022), 415–455

2022

[3] [3]

Aoki and Y

M. Aoki and Y. Maekawa,Self-similar vorticity around the boundary and non-uniqueness of solutions to the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in the half space(2025), arXiv:2507.02338. Preprint

arXiv 2025

[4] [4]

Bahouri, J.-Y

H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin,Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differen- tial equations, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

2011

[5] [5]

Benameur,Long time decay to the Lei-Lin solution of 3D Navier-Stokes equations, J

J. Benameur,Long time decay to the Lei-Lin solution of 3D Navier-Stokes equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl.422(2015), 424–434

2015

[6] [6]

Bourgain and N

J. Bourgain and N. Pavlović,Ill-posedness of the Navier-Stokes equations in a critical space in 3D, J. Funct. Anal.255(2008), 2233–2247

2008

[7] [7]

Buckmaster, C

T. Buckmaster, C. De Lellis, P. Isett, and L. Székelyhidi Jr.,Anomalous dissipation for 1/5-Hölder Euler flows, Ann. of Math. (2)182(2015), 127–172

2015

[8] [8]

Buckmaster and V

T. Buckmaster and V. Vicol,Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation, Ann. of Math. (2)189(2019), 101–144

2019