pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.00996 · v3 · pith:KX6G3H64new · submitted 2026-03-01 · 💻 cs.HC

Sustainable Care: Designing Technologies That Support Children's Long-Term Engagement with Social Issues

JaeWon Kim , Aayushi Dangol , Rotem Landesman , Alexis Hiniker , McKenna F. Parnes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 10:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords sustainable carechildren's civic engagementsocial issuestechnology designempathic distressburnout preventionchild-computer interactionyouth mental health
0
0 comments X

The pith

The paper introduces 'sustainable care' as a design lens for technologies that support children's sustained engagement with social issues without causing empathic distress or burnout.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Children encounter social problems such as climate change and inequality through digital platforms that emphasize fear and urgency to hold attention. This approach often leaves young people feeling powerless, which contributes to anxiety, withdrawal, and disengagement even among those who care deeply. The authors propose sustainable care as a guiding design lens to create technologies that instead offer pathways to meaningful action and long-term involvement. A sympathetic reader would care because this shift could help convert concern into lasting civic participation rather than burnout. The paper frames this as the starting point for a workshop that brings together researchers in child-computer interaction, games, education, and youth mental health to build a shared research agenda.

Core claim

The central claim is that current digital content, optimized for attention through fear and urgency, drives rising distress and disengagement among children who care about social issues, and that introducing sustainable care as a design lens can guide technologies toward supporting lasting engagement without contributing to empathic distress or burnout.

What carries the argument

Sustainable care, a design lens that asks how technology might support children's sustained engagement with social causes without contributing to empathic distress or burnout.

If this is right

  • Technologies should include clear pathways to meaningful action rather than stopping at alarming information.
  • Design choices must prioritize long-term emotional sustainability to prevent withdrawal from civic engagement.
  • Collaboration across child-computer interaction, games, education, and youth mental health can map effective strategies.
  • A community research agenda can be developed to guide future work on technologies for children's social involvement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers could apply this lens to create apps or platforms that pair awareness with concrete, age-appropriate steps for involvement.
  • Longitudinal studies tracking children's emotional responses and actions over months could test whether sustainable-care features reduce burnout.
  • The approach might extend to questions about how algorithms on youth-focused platforms could balance information with empowerment.
  • Similar principles could inform tools that help young people build resilience when engaging with difficult topics over time.

Load-bearing premise

That digital content optimized for attention through fear and urgency is a primary driver of rising distress and disengagement among children who care about social issues.

What would settle it

A longitudinal observation showing that children who mainly see non-fear-based, action-oriented content about social issues still exhibit high rates of empathic distress and disengagement would undermine the central claim.

read the original abstract

Children today encounter social issues -- climate change, conflict, inequality -- through digital technologies, and the design of that encounter shapes whether young people move toward lasting civic engagement or toward anxiety and withdrawal. Much of the content children see is optimized for attention through fear and urgency, with few pathways toward meaningful action -- contributing to rising distress and disengagement among young people who care deeply but feel powerless to act. This full-day workshop introduces ``sustainable care'' as a design lens, asking how technology might support children's sustained engagement with social causes without contributing to empathic distress or burnout. We invite researchers and practitioners across child-computer interaction, games, education, and youth mental health to map this landscape together and develop a research agenda for the CCI community.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a proposal for a full-day workshop that introduces the concept of 'sustainable care' as a design lens. It describes how children encounter social issues such as climate change, conflict, and inequality via digital technologies, notes that much content is optimized for attention through fear and urgency with few pathways to action, and links this to rising distress and disengagement. The workshop aims to bring together researchers and practitioners from child-computer interaction, games, education, and youth mental health to map the landscape and co-develop a research agenda for the CCI community.

Significance. If the workshop succeeds in fostering collaboration, the 'sustainable care' lens could offer a constructive framework for designing technologies that promote sustained civic engagement among children while mitigating risks of empathic distress. This addresses a socially relevant intersection of HCI, education, and mental health. The proposal's forward-looking, community-oriented approach is a strength, as it positions the work as an invitation to collective agenda-setting rather than a completed empirical study.

minor comments (3)
  1. The motivation section would benefit from one or two concrete examples of existing technologies or design patterns that either exacerbate or mitigate the described distress, to make the problem statement more tangible for readers.
  2. The proposal would be strengthened by outlining a tentative workshop structure, such as planned breakout topics, invited speakers, or deliverables, so that potential participants can better evaluate its value.
  3. Clarify how 'sustainable care' differs from or builds upon related ideas in sustainable HCI or child-computer interaction literature to avoid conceptual overlap.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment of our workshop proposal. We are encouraged by the recognition that the 'sustainable care' lens addresses a relevant intersection of HCI, education, and mental health, and we agree that its community-oriented approach is a strength. The recommendation for minor revision is noted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This is a workshop proposal paper that introduces the concept of 'sustainable care' as a forward-looking design lens and invites community input to develop a research agenda. It contains no mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, empirical results, or formal models. Background statements about digital content and distress function as motivation rather than tested claims or load-bearing premises. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in a way that reduces any central claim to its own inputs by construction. The proposal is self-contained as an agenda-setting exercise.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The contribution rests on the introduction of a new design concept without supporting measurements or formal definitions; the paper adds the term and framing but pulls the motivating observations from general domain knowledge.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Children encounter social issues through digital technologies in ways that shape whether they move toward lasting civic engagement or toward anxiety and withdrawal.
    Opening premise of the abstract that frames the entire motivation.
invented entities (1)
  • sustainable care no independent evidence
    purpose: A design lens for technologies supporting long-term child engagement with social issues without distress or burnout.
    Newly coined term presented as the central contribution of the workshop proposal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5667 in / 1239 out tokens · 42805 ms · 2026-05-22T10:35:11.277894+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Capacity to Care: Designing Social Technology for Sustained Engagement With Societal Challenges

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper proposes a workshop to explore social platform designs that support the full process of caring for large-scale societal issues using Tronto's care ethics framework.

  2. The Capacity to Care: Designing Social Technology for Sustained Engagement With Societal Challenges

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Social media architectures often prevent the full caring process by stopping at awareness, and new designs are needed to support responsibility, competence, and community for sustained engagement with large-scale challenges.

  3. The Capacity to Care: Designing Social Technology for Sustained Engagement With Societal Challenges

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A workshop proposal argues that social media stalls caring at awareness and calls for designs that support sustained engagement using Tronto's care ethics framework.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Shelley Boulianne. 2015. Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-analysis of Current Research.Information, Communication & Society18, 5 (2015), 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542

    work page doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008542 2015

  2. [2]

    Shelley Boulianne and Yannis Theocharis. 2020. Young People, Digital Media, and Engagement: A Meta-Analysis of Research.Social Science Computer Review 38, 2 (2020), 111–127. doi:10.1177/0894439318814190

    work page doi:10.1177/0894439318814190 2020

  3. [3]

    Susan Clayton. 2020. Climate Anxiety: Psychological Responses to Climate Change.Journal of Anxiety Disorders74 (2020), 102263. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis. 2020.102263

    work page doi:10.1016/j.janxdis 2020

  4. [4]

    Aayushi Dangol, Robert Wolfe, Akeiylah Dewitt, Ben Chickadel, Julie Kientz, and Sayamindu Dasgupta. 2025. Reading AI and reading the world: Using an interactive AI system to promote Children’s understanding of AI bias.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction32, 6 (2025), 1–30

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    If anybody finds out you are in BIG TROUBLE

    Aayushi Dangol, Robert Wolfe, Daeun Yoo, Arya Thiruvillakkat, Ben Chickadel, and Julie A. Kientz. 2025. “If anybody finds out you are in BIG TROUBLE”: Understanding Children’s Hopes, Fears, and Evaluations of Generative AI.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction(2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    You Go Through So Many Emotions Scrolling Through Instagram

    Katie Davis, Rotem Landesman, Jina Yoon, JaeWon Kim, Daniela Munoz, Lucia Magis-Weinberg, and Alexis Hiniker. 2025. “You Go Through So Many Emotions Scrolling Through Instagram”: How Teens Use Instagram To Regulate Their Emo- tions. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). ACM, New York, NY, USA

    work page 2025

  7. [8]

    Joseph Kahne, Nam-Jin Lee, and Jessica T. Feezell. 2013. The Civic and Political Significance of Online Participatory Cultures among Youth Transitioning to Adulthood.Journal of Information Technology & Politics10, 1 (2013), 1–20. doi:10. 1080/19331681.2012.701109

    work page arXiv 2013

  8. [9]

    JaeWon Kim, Soobin Cho, Robert Wolfe, Jishnu Hari Nair, and Alexis Hiniker. 2025. Privacy as Social Norm: Systematically Reducing Dysfunctional Privacy Concerns on Social Media.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction9, CSCW2 (2025). doi:10.1145/3711049

    work page doi:10.1145/3711049 2025

  9. [10]

    Kelly, Angela Y

    JaeWon Kim, Lindsay Popowski, Anna Fang, Cassidy Pyle, Guo Freeman, Ryan M. Kelly, Angela Y. Lee, Fannie Liu, Angela D. R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Amy X. Zhang. 2024. Envisioning New Futures of Positive Social Technology: Beyond Paradigms of Fixing, Protecting, and Preventing. InCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperati...

    work page 2024

  10. [11]

    Rotem Landesman, Jenny Radesky, and Alexis Hiniker. 2023. Let Kids Wonder, Question and Make Mistakes: How the Designers of Children’s Technology Think about Child Well-being. InProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC ’23). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 310–321

    work page 2023

  11. [12]

    I Just Don’t Care Enough To Be Interested

    Rotem Landesman, Jina Yoon, JaeWon Kim, Daniela E. Munoz Lopez, Lucia Magis- Weinberg, Alexis Hiniker, and Katie Davis. 2024. “I Just Don’t Care Enough To Be Interested”: Teens’ Moment-By-Moment Experiences on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC ’24). ACM, New York, NY, USA

    work page 2024

  12. [13]

    Lewandowski, Susan D

    Rose E. Lewandowski, Susan D. Clayton, Lena Olbrich, Joseph W. Sakshaug, Britt Wray, Sarah E. O. Schwartz, Jura Augustinavicius, Peter D. Howe, McKenna Parnes, Sabrina Wright, Chelsea Carpenter, Arkadiusz Wiśniowski, David Perez Ruiz, and Lise Van Susteren. 2024. Climate emotions, thoughts, and plans among US adolescents and young adults: a cross-sectiona...

    work page doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00229-8 2024

  13. [14]

    Kientz, and Alexis Hiniker

    Kai Lukoff, Cissy Yu, Julie A. Kientz, and Alexis Hiniker. 2018. What Makes Smart- phone Use Meaningful or Meaningless?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mo- bile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies2, 1 (2018), 1–26. doi:10.1145/3191754

    work page doi:10.1145/3191754 2018

  14. [15]

    Eric Lewandowski, Elouise E

    Elizabeth Marks, Caroline Hickman, Panu Pihkala, Susan Clayton, R. Eric Lewandowski, Elouise E. Mayall, Britt Wray, Catriona Mellor, and Lise van Susteren. 2021. Young People’s Voices on Climate Anxiety, Government Betrayal and Moral Injury: A Global Phenomenon.The Lancet Planetary Health5, 12 (2021), e863–e873. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00278-3 2021

  15. [16]

    2021.Protecting Youth Mental Health: The U.S

    Office of the Surgeon General. 2021.Protecting Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. Technical Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC

    work page 2021

  16. [17]

    Maria Ojala. 2012. Hope and Climate Change: The Importance of Hope for Environmental Engagement among Young People.Environmental Education Research18, 5 (2012), 625–642. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

    work page doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.637157 2012

  17. [18]

    Parnes, Brendan Amort, Cayetana Calderon-Smith, Earle C

    McKenna F. Parnes, Brendan Amort, Cayetana Calderon-Smith, Earle C. Cham- bers, and Regina Musicaro. 2024. Child and Adolescent Engagement with Climate Change on Social Media and Impacts on Mental Health: A Narrative Review. Current Psychiatry Reports26, 11 (2024), 654–665. doi:10.1007/s11920-024-01537-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11920-024-01537-y 2024

  18. [19]

    Parnes and Elliott M

    McKenna F. Parnes and Elliott M. Weiss. 2025. Digital Mental Health Innovations in the Face of Climate Change: Navigating a Sustainable Future.Psychiatric Services(2025). doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20240327

    work page doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20240327 2025

  19. [20]

    Jenny Radesky and Alexis Hiniker. 2022. From Moral Panic to Systemic Change: Making Child-Centered Design the Default.International Journal of Child- Computer Interaction31 (2022), 100351. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100351

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100351 2022

  20. [21]

    Victoria Rideout and Michael B. Robb. 2019.The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens, 2019. Technical Report. Common Sense Media, San Francisco, CA

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    Sarah E. O. Schwartz, Laelia Benoit, Susan Clayton, McKenna F. Parnes, Lance Swenson, and Sarah R. Lowe. 2023. Climate change anxiety and mental health: Environmental activism as buffer.Current Psychology42 (2023), 16708–16721. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6 2023