Study of Low-Frequency Core-Edge Coupling in a Tokamak: I. Experimental Observation in KSTAR

Andreas Bierwage; C. Sung; G.J. Choi; Jaewook Kim; J.G. Bak; K.D. Lee; Seungmin Bong; Wonjun Lee; Y.-c. Ghim

arxiv: 2603.24525 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-25 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Study of Low-Frequency Core-Edge Coupling in a Tokamak: I. Experimental Observation in KSTAR

Wonjun Lee , Andreas Bierwage , Seungmin Bong , Jaewook Kim , K.D. Lee , J.G. Bak , G.J. Choi , C. Sung

show 1 more author

Y.-c. Ghim

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

keywords fishboneKSTARtokamakcore-edge couplingplasma fluctuationselectron temperaturemagnetic fluctuationsinstability

0 comments

The pith

Edge fluctuations precede and correlate more strongly with core fishbone activity in KSTAR as instability strength increases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates double-peaked fishbone events in multiple KSTAR tokamak discharges. It decomposes signals into amplitude and phase parts, finding that edge electron temperature fluctuations correlate more with poloidal magnetic fluctuations and precede core fluctuations as fishbone strength grows with higher beta and lower q95. This suggests the edge is not just reacting but may actively participate in the core-edge coupling. A sympathetic reader would care because this challenges the view of edge activity as passive and could guide better plasma stability models in fusion research.

Core claim

In KSTAR experiments, as normalized beta increases and edge safety factor decreases, fishbone strength increases, leading to stronger amplitude correlations between edge temperature fluctuations and magnetic fluctuations, with the edge phase leading the core phase except in weak cases. This indicates the possibility of an active role for edge activity in low-frequency core-edge coupling.

What carries the argument

Decomposition of fishbone signals into temporal amplitude envelope and phase components, compared between edge and core regions.

If this is right

As fishbone strength increases, edge-core amplitude correlation strengthens.
Edge temperature phase precedes core phase in most cases.
Fishbone strength ties closely to beta_N and q_95 values.
External perturbations influence fishbone appearance conditions but the coupling relation persists.
This points to potential causal influence from edge to core in the instability dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If confirmed, targeting edge conditions could help control core instabilities.
The phase lead suggests possible feedback loops where edge perturbations seed core responses.
Similar analysis might apply to other low-frequency modes like tearing modes.
Independent variation of edge parameters in experiments could test the active role hypothesis.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed increase in edge-core correlation and edge phase precedence with fishbone strength means the edge plays an active causal role instead of both responding to a shared driver.

What would settle it

Finding a discharge where edge fluctuations increase in strength and correlation but core fishbone activity does not intensify, or where phase relations reverse without changing the driver.

read the original abstract

Double-peaked fishbone events across multiple KSTAR discharges are investigated. The normalized beta $\beta_{\mathrm{N}}$ and the edge safety factor $q_{\mathrm{95}}$ under which the fishbones appear vary depending on the presence and form of external magnetic perturbations. The fishbone strength is closely related to $\beta_{\mathrm{N}}$ and $q_{\mathrm{95}}$: as $\beta_{\mathrm{N}}$ increases and $q_{\mathrm{95}}$ decreases, the fishbone strength increases. Measured fishbone-relevant signals are decomposed into amplitude envelope and phase components in the temporal domain, which are analyzed separately. In terms of the amplitude envelope component, the edge electron temperature fluctuation $\tilde T_\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{Edge}}$ becomes more correlated with the poloidal magnetic fluctuation $\dot{B}_\mathrm{\theta}$ compared to the core electron temperature fluctuation $\tilde T_\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{Core}}$ as fishbone strength increases. In terms of the phase component, the phase of $\tilde T_\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{Edge}}$ precedes the phase of $\tilde T_\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{Core}}$ except in the case of very weak fishbones where the phase relations are inconclusive due to weak fishbone activity at the edge plasma, which is comparable to background fluctuations. The investigation suggests the possibility that the edge activity is not a mere side effect of the core activity, but could play an active role.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper quantifies stronger edge correlations and phase leads in KSTAR fishbones with increasing strength, though the active-edge interpretation needs more tests to stand apart from a shared driver.

read the letter

The KSTAR fishbone observations indicate that edge temperature fluctuations correlate more strongly with the poloidal magnetic signal and precede the core temperature phase as the fishbone amplitude grows. This comes from analyzing multiple discharges where beta_N and q_95 set the strength. The paper does a clean job separating the amplitude envelope from the phase in the time domain. That separation reveals how the edge-core link tightens with event strength while the phase relation stays consistent except at the lowest levels. The trends hold across the range of conditions sampled, and the methods are the usual ones for fluctuation analysis in tokamaks. What is new is the multi-shot quantification for these double-peaked events. Earlier work often looked at single peaks or fewer cases, so the statistics here add weight to the reported relations. The soft spot is the move from correlation and timing to an active edge role. The data are compatible with both regions responding to a shared driver that strengthens with higher beta_N and lower q_95, with the edge simply showing tighter or faster coupling. No eigenfunction work, no fixed-core-drive scans, and no check of whether the phase lead survives after removing the global parameter dependence are presented. The suggestion is therefore reasonable but not yet tested against the alternative. Readers working on stability control or core-edge modeling in tokamaks will find the measured relations useful for comparison. It is an experimental note rather than a full mechanism study. I would send this to peer review. The observations are reported clearly enough that referees can evaluate the strength of the active-edge interpretation and suggest the next steps needed to distinguish it.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental observations of double-peaked fishbone instabilities in multiple KSTAR discharges. Fishbone strength is shown to increase with rising normalized beta (beta_N) and falling edge safety factor (q_95). Electron temperature fluctuations in the core and edge are decomposed into amplitude-envelope and phase components and compared against poloidal magnetic fluctuations. The edge temperature envelope exhibits rising correlation with the magnetic signal as fishbone strength grows, while the edge phase leads the core phase except at the weakest fishbone amplitudes where edge signals approach background levels. The authors interpret these trends as suggesting that edge activity may play an active role in the observed core-edge coupling.

Significance. The reported trends in envelope correlation and phase ordering constitute a systematic observational data set on low-frequency core-edge coupling during fishbones. If the measurements are reproducible, they supply concrete constraints for MHD stability models and for the design of active control schemes that exploit or suppress edge-core interactions in ITER-relevant regimes.

major comments (1)

[Discussion / Conclusions] The central interpretive claim (edge activity may play an active rather than passive role) rests on the observed increase in edge-envelope correlation and the reported phase lead. These signatures remain compatible with a common driver whose amplitude is set by beta_N and q_95; the manuscript contains no residual analysis after regressing out these global parameters, no eigenfunction reconstruction, and no controlled edge-parameter scan at fixed core drive. A brief quantitative discussion of this alternative is needed to bound the strength of the causal suggestion.

minor comments (3)

[Results] The abstract states that phase relations are 'inconclusive' for very weak fishbones; the main text should quantify the signal-to-noise threshold used to reach this assessment and report the number of discharges falling into each strength bin.
[Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the time windows and filtering bandwidths applied to the decomposed signals so that the correlation and phase calculations can be reproduced from the published data.
[Introduction] A short paragraph comparing the observed phase-lead magnitudes with linear MHD predictions for fishbone eigenmodes would help place the experimental result in the context of existing theory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment and positive recommendation for minor revision. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate a brief discussion of the alternative interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Discussion / Conclusions] The central interpretive claim (edge activity may play an active rather than passive role) rests on the observed increase in edge-envelope correlation and the reported phase lead. These signatures remain compatible with a common driver whose amplitude is set by beta_N and q_95; the manuscript contains no residual analysis after regressing out these global parameters, no eigenfunction reconstruction, and no controlled edge-parameter scan at fixed core drive. A brief quantitative discussion of this alternative is needed to bound the strength of the causal suggestion.

Authors: We acknowledge that the reported trends in envelope correlation and phase ordering are also compatible with a common driver whose strength is controlled by β_N and q_95. The consistent edge-leading-core phase relation is difficult to reconcile with a purely passive edge response, but we agree that without residual analysis after removing the global-parameter dependence, eigenfunction reconstruction, or a controlled scan, the causal claim cannot be made definitive. In the revised manuscript we have added a short paragraph in the Discussion section that explicitly presents this alternative, notes the absence of the analyses listed by the referee, and states that the present data set therefore provides only suggestive rather than conclusive evidence for an active edge role. This addition bounds the strength of the interpretive claim as requested. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in purely observational analysis

full rationale

The paper reports experimental observations of fishbone events in KSTAR discharges, decomposing measured signals (edge/core Te fluctuations and B_theta) into amplitude envelopes and phases, then correlating these with fishbone strength parameterized by beta_N and q_95. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the provided text; the central interpretive claim (possible active edge role) is a qualitative reading of observed phase precedence and rising correlations, without any reduction to self-definitions, self-citations, or ansatzes. This matches the default case of self-contained observational work with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms introduced; relies on established tokamak diagnostic interpretations and MHD instability classifications.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard MHD and diagnostic interpretations of fishbone instabilities and electron temperature fluctuations
Invoked when linking measured signals to core-edge coupling

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5598 in / 1065 out tokens · 30226 ms · 2026-05-15T00:22:24.375607+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Correlation coefficient C_BθTe ≡ ⟨(Ḃθ(t)−μḂθ)(Tẽ(t)−μTẽ)⟩ / sqrt(...) and conditional averages ⟨AEnv/AEnv_max⟩

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Study of Low-Frequency Core-Edge Coupling in a Tokamak: II. Spatial Channeling & Focusing In Antenna-Driven MHD
physics.plasm-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

MHD simulations demonstrate that edge-localized antenna drive can excite core responses in tokamak plasmas through continuum plateaus and volumetric focusing, without requiring core-localized drive or exact resonance.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

McGuire, R

K. McGuire, R. Goldston, M. Bell, M. Bitter, K. Bol, K. Brau, D. Buchenauer, T. Crowley, S. Davis, F. Dylla, H. Eubank, H. Fishman, R. Fonck, B. Grek, R. Grimm, R. Hawryluk, H. Hsuan, R. Hulse, R. Izzo, R. Kaita, S. Kaye, H. Kugel, D. Johnson, J. Manickam, D. Manos, D. Mansﬁeld, E. Mazzucato, R. McCann, D. McCune, D. Monticello, R. Motley, D. Mueller, K. ...

work page 1983
[2]

Heidbrink and G

W.W. Heidbrink and G. Sager. The ﬁshbone instability in the DIII-D tokamak. Nuclear Fusion , 30(6):1015, jun 1990

work page 1990
[3]

Nave, D.J

M.F.F. Nave, D.J. Campbell, E. Jo ﬀrin, F.B. Marcus, G. Sadler, P . Smeulders, and K. Thomsen. Fishbone ac- tivity in JET. Nuclear Fusion, 31(4):697, apr 1991

work page 1991
[4]

Kass, H.-S

T. Kass, H.-S. Bosch, F. Hoenen, K. Lackner, M. Maraschek, H. Zohm, and ASDEX Upgrade Team. The ﬁshbone instability in ASDEX Upgrade. Nuclear Fusion , 38(6):807, jun 1998

work page 1998
[5]

Fishbone activity in experimental advanced superconducting tokamak neutral beam injection plasma

Liqing Xu, Jizong Zhang, Kaiyun Chen, Liqun Hu, Erzhong Li, Shiyao Lin, Tonghui Shi, Y anmin Duan, and Y ubao Zhu. Fishbone activity in experimental advanced superconducting tokamak neutral beam injection plasma. Physics of Plasmas , 22(12):122510, 12 2015

work page 2015
[6]

R. B. White, R. J. Goldston, K. McGuire, Allen H. Boozer, D. A. Monticello, and W. Park. Theory of modeinduced beam particle loss in tokamaks. The Physics of Fluids , 26(10):2958–2965, 10 1983

work page 1983
[7]

Liu Chen, R. B. White, and M. N. Rosenbluth. Excita- tion of internal kink modes by trapped energetic beam ions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 52:1122–1125, Mar 1984

work page 1984
[8]

Coppi and F

B. Coppi and F. Porcelli. Theoretical model of ﬁshbone oscillations in magnetically conﬁned plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:2272–2275, Nov 1986

work page 1986
[9]

Zhang, H.L

Y .Z. Zhang, H.L. Berk, and S.M. Mahajan. E ﬀect of en- ergetic trapped particles on the ideal internal kink mode. Nuclear Fusion, 29(5):848, may 1989

work page 1989
[10]

Nonlinear dynamics of phase space zonal struc- tures and energetic particle physics in fusion plasmas

F Zonca, L Chen, S Briguglio, G Fogaccia, G Vlad, and X Wang. Nonlinear dynamics of phase space zonal struc- tures and energetic particle physics in fusion plasmas. New Journal of Physics, 17(1):013052, jan 2015

work page 2015
[11]

Physics of Alfvén waves and energetic particles in burning plasmas

Liu Chen and Fulvio Zonca. Physics of Alfvén waves and energetic particles in burning plasmas. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 88:015008, Mar 2016

work page 2016
[12]

Matsunaga, N

G. Matsunaga, N. Aiba, K. Shinohara, Y . Sakamoto, A. Isayama, M. Takechi, T. Suzuki, N. Oyama, N. Asakura, Y . Kamada, and T. Ozeki. Observation of an energetic- particle-driven instability in the wall-stabilized high-β plas- mas in the JT-60U tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:045001, Jul 2009

work page 2009
[13]

Okabayashi, I.N

M. Okabayashi, I.N. Bogatu, M.S. Chance, M.S. Chu, A.M. Garofalo, Y . In, G.L. Jackson, R.J. La Haye, M.J. Lanctot, J. Manickam, L. Marrelli, P . Martin, G.A. Navratil, H. Reimerdes, E.J. Strait, H. Takahashi, A.S. We- lander, T. Bolzonella, R.V . Budny, J.S. Kim, R. Hatcher, Y .Q. Liu, and T.C. Luce. Comprehensive control of re- sistive wall modes in DII...

work page 2009
[14]

Matsunaga, M

G. Matsunaga, M. Okabayashi, N. Aiba, J.A. Boedo, J.R. Ferron, J.M. Hanson, G.Z. Hao, W.W. Heidbrink, C.T. Hol- comb, Y . In, G.L. Jackson, Y .Q. Liu, T.C. Luce, G.R. Mc- Kee, T.H. Osborne, D.C. Pace, K. Shinohara, P .B. Snyder, W.M. Solomon, E.J. Strait, A.D. Turnbull, M.A. V an Zee- land, J.G. Watkins, L. Zeng, the DIII-D Team, and the JT- 60 Team. Dyna...

work page 2013
[15]

Waveform distortion of o ﬀ-axis ﬁshbone instability in the nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic evolu- tion in tokamak plasmas

Hanzheng Li, Y asushi Todo, Hao Wang, Jialei Wang, and Malik Idouakass. Waveform distortion of o ﬀ-axis ﬁshbone instability in the nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic evolu- tion in tokamak plasmas. Nuclear Fusion , 63(8):086012, jun 2023

work page 2023
[16]

Wonjun Lee, Jaewook Kim, Semin Joung, G. J. Choi, 14 J. Kim, M. Woo, T. Rhee, K. D. Lee, J. G. Bak, J. S. Kang, and Y .-C. Ghim. Non-monotonic radial structures of ﬂuc- tuating temperatures and densities associated with ﬁshbone activities in KSTAR. Physics of Plasmas, 30(2):022502, 02 2023

work page 2023
[17]

Kolesnichenko and Y u.V

Y a.I. Kolesnichenko and Y u.V . Y akovenko. Theory of fast ion transport during sawtooth crashes in tokamaks. Nuclear Fusion, 36(2):159, feb 1996

work page 1996
[18]

X. D. Du, R. J. Hong, W. W. Heidbrink, X. Jian, H. Wang, N. W. Eidietis, M. A. V an Zeeland, M. E. Austin, Y . Liu, N. A. Crocker, T. L. Rhodes, K. Särkimäki, A. Snicker, W. Wu, and M. Knolker. Multiscale chirping modes driven by thermal ions in a plasma with reactor-relevant ion tem- perature. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:025001, Jul 2021

work page 2021
[19]

Modeling of thermal-ion-driven internal kink in DIII-D high-Ti plasmas

Y ueqiang Liu, Weichao Xie, and Xiaodi Du. Modeling of thermal-ion-driven internal kink in DIII-D high-Ti plasmas. Nuclear Fusion, 62(8):086050, jul 2022

work page 2022
[20]

Study of Low-Frequency Core-Edge Coupling in a Tokamak: II. Spatial Channeling & Focusing In Antenna-Driven MHD

A. Bierwage et al. Study of low-frequency core-edge cou- pling in a tokamak: II. Spatial channeling & focusing in antenna-driven MHD. Companion paper jointly submit- ted to Fundamental Plasma Physics . Preprint: https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXi3.2603.24463

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxi3.2603.24463
[21]

J. K. Park. Optimizing 3D magnetic perturbations for edge instability control in the KSTAR tokamak. Reviews of Mod- ern Plasma Physics , 8:1, 2024

work page 2024
[22]

Ob- servation of improved conﬁnement by non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁeld in KSTAR

Kimin Kim, Jisung Kang, Hyunseok Kim, Sumin Yi, Jeongwon Y oo, Minjun Choi, Tongnyeol Rhee, Junghee Kim, Myungwon Lee, Won-Ha Ko, and Jaemin Kwon. Ob- servation of improved conﬁnement by non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁeld in KSTAR. Nuclear Fusion, 63(6):066003, apr 2023

work page 2023
[23]

Bae, Y .M

Y .S. Bae, Y .M. Park, J.S. Kim, W.S. Han, S.W. Kwak, Y .B. Chang, H.T. Park, N.H. Song, H.L. Y ang, S.W. Y oon, Y .M. Jeon, S.H. Hahn, S.G. Lee, W.H. Ko, A.C. England, W.C. Kim, Y .K. Oh, J.G. Kwak, M. Kwon, D.H. Chang, S.H. Jeong, T.S. Kim, B.H. Oh, J.T. Jin, S.R. In, K.W. Lee, D.S. Chang, K. Watanabe, M. Dairaku, H. Tobari, M. Kashi- wagi, M. Hanada, T...

work page 2012
[24]

G. S. Y un, W. Lee, M. J. Choi, J. Lee, M. Kim, J. Leem, Y . Nam, G. H. Choe, H. K. Park, H. Park, D. S. Woo, K. W. Kim, C. W. Domier, Jr. Luhmann, N. C., N. Ito, A. Mase, and S. G. Lee. Quasi 3D ECE imaging system for study of MHD instabilities in KSTAR. Review of Scientiﬁc Instru- ments, 85(11):11D820, 07 2014

work page 2014
[25]

S. H. Jeong, K. D. Lee, Y . Kogi, K. Kawahata, Y . Na- gayama, A. Mase, and M. Kwon. Electron cyclotron emis- sion diagnostics on KSTAR tokamaka). Review of Scientiﬁc Instruments, 81(10):10D922, 10 2010

work page 2010
[26]

Prospects and limitations of conditional averaging

D Block, I Teliban, F Greiner, and A Piel. Prospects and limitations of conditional averaging. Physica Scripta, 2006(T122):25, jan 2006

work page 2006
[27]

J. G. Bak, S. G. Lee, the KSTAR Project Team, and DeRac Son. Performance of the magnetic sensor and the integrator for the KSTAR magnetic diagnostics. Review of Scientiﬁc Instruments, 75(10):4305–4307, 10 2004

work page 2004
[28]

X. D. Du, K. Toi, M. Osakabe, S. Ohdachi, T. Ido, K. Tanaka, M. Y okoyama, M. Y oshinuma, K. Ogawa, K. Y . Watanabe, M. Isobe, K. Nagaoka, T. Ozaki, S. Sakakibara, R. Seki, A. Shimizu, Y . Suzuki, and H. Tsuchiya. Resistive interchange modes destabilized by helically trapped ener- getic ions in a helical plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114:155003, Apr 2015

work page 2015
[29]

K. Ida, T. Kobayashi, M. Y oshinuma, T. Akiyama, T. Tokuzawa, H. Tsuchiya, K. Itoh, and S.-I. Itoh. Trigger mechanism for the abrupt loss of energetic ions in magnet- ically conﬁned plasmas. Scientiﬁc Reports, 8:2804, 2018. 15

work page 2018

[1] [1]

McGuire, R

K. McGuire, R. Goldston, M. Bell, M. Bitter, K. Bol, K. Brau, D. Buchenauer, T. Crowley, S. Davis, F. Dylla, H. Eubank, H. Fishman, R. Fonck, B. Grek, R. Grimm, R. Hawryluk, H. Hsuan, R. Hulse, R. Izzo, R. Kaita, S. Kaye, H. Kugel, D. Johnson, J. Manickam, D. Manos, D. Mansﬁeld, E. Mazzucato, R. McCann, D. McCune, D. Monticello, R. Motley, D. Mueller, K. ...

work page 1983

[2] [2]

Heidbrink and G

W.W. Heidbrink and G. Sager. The ﬁshbone instability in the DIII-D tokamak. Nuclear Fusion , 30(6):1015, jun 1990

work page 1990

[3] [3]

Nave, D.J

M.F.F. Nave, D.J. Campbell, E. Jo ﬀrin, F.B. Marcus, G. Sadler, P . Smeulders, and K. Thomsen. Fishbone ac- tivity in JET. Nuclear Fusion, 31(4):697, apr 1991

work page 1991

[4] [4]

Kass, H.-S

T. Kass, H.-S. Bosch, F. Hoenen, K. Lackner, M. Maraschek, H. Zohm, and ASDEX Upgrade Team. The ﬁshbone instability in ASDEX Upgrade. Nuclear Fusion , 38(6):807, jun 1998

work page 1998

[5] [5]

Fishbone activity in experimental advanced superconducting tokamak neutral beam injection plasma

Liqing Xu, Jizong Zhang, Kaiyun Chen, Liqun Hu, Erzhong Li, Shiyao Lin, Tonghui Shi, Y anmin Duan, and Y ubao Zhu. Fishbone activity in experimental advanced superconducting tokamak neutral beam injection plasma. Physics of Plasmas , 22(12):122510, 12 2015

work page 2015

[6] [6]

R. B. White, R. J. Goldston, K. McGuire, Allen H. Boozer, D. A. Monticello, and W. Park. Theory of modeinduced beam particle loss in tokamaks. The Physics of Fluids , 26(10):2958–2965, 10 1983

work page 1983

[7] [7]

Liu Chen, R. B. White, and M. N. Rosenbluth. Excita- tion of internal kink modes by trapped energetic beam ions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 52:1122–1125, Mar 1984

work page 1984

[8] [8]

Coppi and F

B. Coppi and F. Porcelli. Theoretical model of ﬁshbone oscillations in magnetically conﬁned plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett., 57:2272–2275, Nov 1986

work page 1986

[9] [9]

Zhang, H.L

Y .Z. Zhang, H.L. Berk, and S.M. Mahajan. E ﬀect of en- ergetic trapped particles on the ideal internal kink mode. Nuclear Fusion, 29(5):848, may 1989

work page 1989

[10] [10]

Nonlinear dynamics of phase space zonal struc- tures and energetic particle physics in fusion plasmas

F Zonca, L Chen, S Briguglio, G Fogaccia, G Vlad, and X Wang. Nonlinear dynamics of phase space zonal struc- tures and energetic particle physics in fusion plasmas. New Journal of Physics, 17(1):013052, jan 2015

work page 2015

[11] [11]

Physics of Alfvén waves and energetic particles in burning plasmas

Liu Chen and Fulvio Zonca. Physics of Alfvén waves and energetic particles in burning plasmas. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 88:015008, Mar 2016

work page 2016

[12] [12]

Matsunaga, N

G. Matsunaga, N. Aiba, K. Shinohara, Y . Sakamoto, A. Isayama, M. Takechi, T. Suzuki, N. Oyama, N. Asakura, Y . Kamada, and T. Ozeki. Observation of an energetic- particle-driven instability in the wall-stabilized high-β plas- mas in the JT-60U tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:045001, Jul 2009

work page 2009

[13] [13]

Okabayashi, I.N

M. Okabayashi, I.N. Bogatu, M.S. Chance, M.S. Chu, A.M. Garofalo, Y . In, G.L. Jackson, R.J. La Haye, M.J. Lanctot, J. Manickam, L. Marrelli, P . Martin, G.A. Navratil, H. Reimerdes, E.J. Strait, H. Takahashi, A.S. We- lander, T. Bolzonella, R.V . Budny, J.S. Kim, R. Hatcher, Y .Q. Liu, and T.C. Luce. Comprehensive control of re- sistive wall modes in DII...

work page 2009

[14] [14]

Matsunaga, M

G. Matsunaga, M. Okabayashi, N. Aiba, J.A. Boedo, J.R. Ferron, J.M. Hanson, G.Z. Hao, W.W. Heidbrink, C.T. Hol- comb, Y . In, G.L. Jackson, Y .Q. Liu, T.C. Luce, G.R. Mc- Kee, T.H. Osborne, D.C. Pace, K. Shinohara, P .B. Snyder, W.M. Solomon, E.J. Strait, A.D. Turnbull, M.A. V an Zee- land, J.G. Watkins, L. Zeng, the DIII-D Team, and the JT- 60 Team. Dyna...

work page 2013

[15] [15]

Waveform distortion of o ﬀ-axis ﬁshbone instability in the nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic evolu- tion in tokamak plasmas

Hanzheng Li, Y asushi Todo, Hao Wang, Jialei Wang, and Malik Idouakass. Waveform distortion of o ﬀ-axis ﬁshbone instability in the nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic evolu- tion in tokamak plasmas. Nuclear Fusion , 63(8):086012, jun 2023

work page 2023

[16] [16]

Wonjun Lee, Jaewook Kim, Semin Joung, G. J. Choi, 14 J. Kim, M. Woo, T. Rhee, K. D. Lee, J. G. Bak, J. S. Kang, and Y .-C. Ghim. Non-monotonic radial structures of ﬂuc- tuating temperatures and densities associated with ﬁshbone activities in KSTAR. Physics of Plasmas, 30(2):022502, 02 2023

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Kolesnichenko and Y u.V

Y a.I. Kolesnichenko and Y u.V . Y akovenko. Theory of fast ion transport during sawtooth crashes in tokamaks. Nuclear Fusion, 36(2):159, feb 1996

work page 1996

[18] [18]

X. D. Du, R. J. Hong, W. W. Heidbrink, X. Jian, H. Wang, N. W. Eidietis, M. A. V an Zeeland, M. E. Austin, Y . Liu, N. A. Crocker, T. L. Rhodes, K. Särkimäki, A. Snicker, W. Wu, and M. Knolker. Multiscale chirping modes driven by thermal ions in a plasma with reactor-relevant ion tem- perature. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:025001, Jul 2021

work page 2021

[19] [19]

Modeling of thermal-ion-driven internal kink in DIII-D high-Ti plasmas

Y ueqiang Liu, Weichao Xie, and Xiaodi Du. Modeling of thermal-ion-driven internal kink in DIII-D high-Ti plasmas. Nuclear Fusion, 62(8):086050, jul 2022

work page 2022

[20] [20]

Study of Low-Frequency Core-Edge Coupling in a Tokamak: II. Spatial Channeling & Focusing In Antenna-Driven MHD

A. Bierwage et al. Study of low-frequency core-edge cou- pling in a tokamak: II. Spatial channeling & focusing in antenna-driven MHD. Companion paper jointly submit- ted to Fundamental Plasma Physics . Preprint: https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXi3.2603.24463

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxi3.2603.24463

[21] [21]

J. K. Park. Optimizing 3D magnetic perturbations for edge instability control in the KSTAR tokamak. Reviews of Mod- ern Plasma Physics , 8:1, 2024

work page 2024

[22] [22]

Ob- servation of improved conﬁnement by non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁeld in KSTAR

Kimin Kim, Jisung Kang, Hyunseok Kim, Sumin Yi, Jeongwon Y oo, Minjun Choi, Tongnyeol Rhee, Junghee Kim, Myungwon Lee, Won-Ha Ko, and Jaemin Kwon. Ob- servation of improved conﬁnement by non-axisymmetric magnetic ﬁeld in KSTAR. Nuclear Fusion, 63(6):066003, apr 2023

work page 2023

[23] [23]

Bae, Y .M

Y .S. Bae, Y .M. Park, J.S. Kim, W.S. Han, S.W. Kwak, Y .B. Chang, H.T. Park, N.H. Song, H.L. Y ang, S.W. Y oon, Y .M. Jeon, S.H. Hahn, S.G. Lee, W.H. Ko, A.C. England, W.C. Kim, Y .K. Oh, J.G. Kwak, M. Kwon, D.H. Chang, S.H. Jeong, T.S. Kim, B.H. Oh, J.T. Jin, S.R. In, K.W. Lee, D.S. Chang, K. Watanabe, M. Dairaku, H. Tobari, M. Kashi- wagi, M. Hanada, T...

work page 2012

[24] [24]

G. S. Y un, W. Lee, M. J. Choi, J. Lee, M. Kim, J. Leem, Y . Nam, G. H. Choe, H. K. Park, H. Park, D. S. Woo, K. W. Kim, C. W. Domier, Jr. Luhmann, N. C., N. Ito, A. Mase, and S. G. Lee. Quasi 3D ECE imaging system for study of MHD instabilities in KSTAR. Review of Scientiﬁc Instru- ments, 85(11):11D820, 07 2014

work page 2014

[25] [25]

S. H. Jeong, K. D. Lee, Y . Kogi, K. Kawahata, Y . Na- gayama, A. Mase, and M. Kwon. Electron cyclotron emis- sion diagnostics on KSTAR tokamaka). Review of Scientiﬁc Instruments, 81(10):10D922, 10 2010

work page 2010

[26] [26]

Prospects and limitations of conditional averaging

D Block, I Teliban, F Greiner, and A Piel. Prospects and limitations of conditional averaging. Physica Scripta, 2006(T122):25, jan 2006

work page 2006

[27] [27]

J. G. Bak, S. G. Lee, the KSTAR Project Team, and DeRac Son. Performance of the magnetic sensor and the integrator for the KSTAR magnetic diagnostics. Review of Scientiﬁc Instruments, 75(10):4305–4307, 10 2004

work page 2004

[28] [28]

X. D. Du, K. Toi, M. Osakabe, S. Ohdachi, T. Ido, K. Tanaka, M. Y okoyama, M. Y oshinuma, K. Ogawa, K. Y . Watanabe, M. Isobe, K. Nagaoka, T. Ozaki, S. Sakakibara, R. Seki, A. Shimizu, Y . Suzuki, and H. Tsuchiya. Resistive interchange modes destabilized by helically trapped ener- getic ions in a helical plasma. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114:155003, Apr 2015

work page 2015

[29] [29]

K. Ida, T. Kobayashi, M. Y oshinuma, T. Akiyama, T. Tokuzawa, H. Tsuchiya, K. Itoh, and S.-I. Itoh. Trigger mechanism for the abrupt loss of energetic ions in magnet- ically conﬁned plasmas. Scientiﬁc Reports, 8:2804, 2018. 15

work page 2018