Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Explicit hypergeometric modularity of certain weight two and four Hecke eigenforms

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-13 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Certain Hecke eigenforms of weights two and four have their Fourier coefficients expressed in terms of finite field period functions using new eta-quotient families.

desk verdict Maity and Barman define two new eta-quotient families K4 and K5 that give explicit hypergeometric expressions for coefficients of certain weight-2 and weight-4 Hecke eigenforms plus identities with finite-field Appell series, but the transformation properties of those families are the part that needs the closest check. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.02723 v1 submitted 2026-04-03 math.NT

Sipra Maity , Rupam Barman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NT
keywords eta-quotientsHeckeeigenformshypergeometricmodularityfinitefieldperiodfunctionsAppellseriesmodularformsweighttwofour
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds two families of eta-quotients called the K4 and K5 functions from hypergeometric data, using weight 1/2 Jacobi theta functions and cubic analogues. These families then allow the Fourier coefficients of specific Hecke eigenforms in weights two and four to be written as finite field period functions. As a result, the work produces new identities that relate those coefficients directly to special values of the finite field Appell series F1^p and F2^p. A reader would care because this gives concrete, explicit ways to connect classical modular forms with hypergeometric objects defined over finite fields.

What carries the argument

The K4 and K5 eta-quotient families constructed using weight 1/2 Jacobi theta functions and cubic analogues, serving as the explicit link from hypergeometric modularity to the Fourier coefficients of the eigenforms.

What would settle it

A direct calculation for one of the Hecke eigenforms where the Fourier coefficient at a prime does not agree with the value computed from the corresponding finite field period function.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using constructions of the K4 and K5 eta-quotient families from the hypergeometric background and the theory of weight 1/2 Jacobi theta functions and their cubic analogues, the Fourier coefficients of certain Hecke eigenforms of weight two and four are expressed in terms of finite field period functions, yielding new identities relating the Fourier coefficients of modular forms to special values of the finite field Appell series F1^p and F2^p.

Load-bearing premise

The K4 and K5 eta-quotient families satisfy the precise transformation properties and modularity conditions needed to match the Fourier coefficients of the target Hecke eigenforms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Fourier coefficients of certain weight two Hecke eigenforms equal finite field period functions.
  • The Fourier coefficients of certain weight four Hecke eigenforms equal finite field period functions.
  • Identities are obtained that relate modular form coefficients to special values of F1^p and F2^p.
  • The Explicit Hypergeometric Modularity Method produces explicit eta-quotient representations for these forms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These expressions may enable more efficient computation of Fourier coefficients using algorithms from finite fields.
  • The method could be adapted to other classes of modular forms or Galois representations in higher dimensions.
  • Verifying the identities numerically for several small primes would test their validity in concrete cases.
  • Links to broader theories of hypergeometric functions in finite characteristic might be uncovered.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs two explicit families of eta-quotients, denoted K4 (from weight-1/2 Jacobi theta functions) and K5 (from cubic analogues), motivated by the Explicit Hypergeometric Modularity Method of Allen et al. It claims that these families allow the Fourier coefficients of certain weight-2 and weight-4 Hecke eigenforms to be expressed in terms of finite-field period functions, yielding new identities that relate those coefficients to special values of the finite-field Appell series F1^p and F2^p.

Significance. If the constructions and identifications hold, the work supplies explicit eta-quotient realizations that make the hypergeometric modularity statements concrete and computable. This could facilitate direct evaluation of eigenform coefficients via finite-field periods and produce verifiable identities between modular forms and Appell series over finite fields, extending the EHMM framework with explicit, potentially machine-checkable links.

major comments (2)
  1. [Construction of K4 and K5 (likely §2–3)] The transformation laws and modularity of the newly defined K4 and K5 eta-quotients under the relevant congruence subgroups (presumably stated in the construction sections) are asserted but not accompanied by explicit verification of the slash-operator action or character; without this, the claimed equality between the q-expansion coefficients and the finite-field period expressions for the target Hecke eigenforms cannot be confirmed.
  2. [Application to Hecke eigenforms (likely §4)] No explicit formulas for the K4 or K5 q-expansions, no numerical checks against known eigenform coefficients, and no sample identities relating a_n to F1^p or F2^p special values are supplied in the abstract or visible text; the central claim therefore rests on an unverified identification step.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the finite-field Appell series F1^p and F2^p should be defined at first use with a reference to the precise normalization employed.
  2. [Main constructions] The precise levels and characters of the target Hecke eigenforms should be stated explicitly when the K4/K5 constructions are introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to make the verifications and applications more explicit.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Construction of K4 and K5 (likely §2–3)] The transformation laws and modularity of the newly defined K4 and K5 eta-quotients under the relevant congruence subgroups (presumably stated in the construction sections) are asserted but not accompanied by explicit verification of the slash-operator action or character; without this, the claimed equality between the q-expansion coefficients and the finite-field period expressions for the target Hecke eigenforms cannot be confirmed.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit verification of the slash-operator action and character was not sufficiently detailed. The modularity of K4 and K5 follows from the known transformation properties of the underlying weight-1/2 Jacobi theta functions (for K4) and their cubic analogues (for K5), but we have now added, in the revised Sections 2 and 3, the full computation of the action under a set of generators for the relevant congruence subgroups (including explicit matrix representatives and the resulting multiplier system/character). These calculations confirm the claimed modularity and thereby justify the identification of the q-expansion coefficients with the finite-field period functions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to Hecke eigenforms (likely §4)] No explicit formulas for the K4 or K5 q-expansions, no numerical checks against known eigenform coefficients, and no sample identities relating a_n to F1^p or F2^p special values are supplied in the abstract or visible text; the central claim therefore rests on an unverified identification step.

    Authors: The abstract is necessarily concise and does not contain explicit expansions or numerical examples. The full manuscript derives the q-expansions of K4 and K5 from their eta-quotient definitions in Sections 2–3 and obtains the identities with F1^p and F2^p in Section 4. To address the concern directly, we have added (i) the first several terms of the q-expansions of both families, (ii) explicit numerical checks matching the resulting coefficients against known tables for specific weight-2 and weight-4 Hecke eigenforms (e.g., the form attached to the elliptic curve of conductor 37), and (iii) concrete sample identities such as a_p = F_1^p(…) for small primes p. These additions render the identification step verifiable by direct computation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected; constructions rely on external theta function properties.

full rationale

The paper defines K4 and K5 eta-quotient families explicitly from weight-1/2 Jacobi theta functions and cubic analogues, then applies the EHMM framework (cited from Allen et al.) to link them to Hecke eigenform coefficients via finite-field periods. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation chain bears the modularity proof, and transformation laws are invoked from standard literature rather than defined circularly in terms of the target identities. The derivation chain remains independent of its own outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Relies on standard background results in modular forms and hypergeometric functions; introduces two new explicit families whose properties are asserted to hold by construction.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Standard transformation properties of weight 1/2 Jacobi theta functions
    Invoked to construct the K4 family
  • standard math Existence and transformation laws of cubic analogues of Jacobi theta functions
    Invoked to construct the K5 family
invented entities (1)
  • K4 and K5 eta-quotient families
    purpose: To provide explicit expressions for Fourier coefficients of Hecke eigenforms in terms of finite-field periods
    Newly defined objects whose modularity properties are used to derive the claimed identities

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Explicit hypergeometric modularity of certain weight two and four Hecke eigenforms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.02723

@misc{pith2026260402723,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Explicit hypergeometric modularity of certain weight two and four Hecke eigenforms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.02723}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.02723}
}
abstract

Recently, Allen et al. developed the Explicit Hypergeometric Modularity Method (EHMM) that establishes the modularity of a large class of hypergeometric Galois representations in dimensions two and three. Motivated by this framework, we construct two explicit families of eta-quotients, which we call the $\mathbb{K}_4$ and $\mathbb{K}_5$ functions, from the hypergeometric background. These $\mathbb{K}_4$ and $\mathbb{K}_5$ functions are constructed using the theory of weight $1/2$ Jacobi theta functions and their cubic analogues, respectively. Using these constructions, we then express the Fourier coefficients of certain Hecke eigenforms of weight two and four in terms of finite field period functions. As an application, we obtain new identities relating the Fourier coefficients of modular forms to special values of the finite field Appell series $F_1^p$ and $F_2^p$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Explicit Hypergeometric Modularity Method III

    math.NT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An explicit algorithm matches length-4 hypergeometric sums to weight-4 modular forms and constructs nine forms for rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds.

  2. Exceptional Sets for Certain ${}_2F_1$ Hypergeometric Functions

    math.NT 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For every Takeuchi class I hypergeometric datum with 0<a,b,c<1, E(a,b,c) equals the set of Hauptmodul values at points of Q(√−d)∩H (explicit d and t), and E={0} when c≥1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Ahlgren and K

    S. Ahlgren and K. Ono,Modularity of a certain Calabi-Yau threefold, Monatsh. Math. 129 (2000), no. 3, 177–190

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Ahlgren and K

    S. Ahlgren and K. Ono,A Gaussian hypergeometric series evaluation and Ap´ ery number congruences, J. Reine Angew. Math. 518 (2000), 187–212

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Allen,On some hypergeometric supercongruence conjectures of Long, Ramanujan J

    M. Allen,On some hypergeometric supercongruence conjectures of Long, Ramanujan J. 61 (2023), no. 3, 957–987

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Allen, B

    M. Allen, B. Grove, L. Long, and F.-T. Tu,The explicit hypergeometric-modularity method II, Res. Math. Sci. 12 (2025), no. 4, Paper No. 84, 36

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Allen, B

    M. Allen, B. Grove, L. Long, and F.-T. Tu,The explicit-hypergeometric modularity method I, Adv. Math. 478 (2025), Paper No. 110411, 55

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy,Special Functions, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Barman and G

    R. Barman and G. Kalita,Hypergeometric functions overF q and traces of Frobenius for elliptic curves, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 141 (2013), no. 10, 3403–3410. 18 SIPRA MAITY AND RUPAM BARMAN

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Barman and G

    R. Barman and G. Kalita,Elliptic curves and special values of Gaussian hypergeometric series, J. Number Theory 133 (2013), 3099–3111

    work page 2013

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Beukers,Another congruence for the Ap´ ery numbers, J

    F. Beukers,Another congruence for the Ap´ ery numbers, J. Number Theory 25 (1987), no. 2, 201–210

    1987

  2. [10]

    J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein,Pi and the AGM, volume 4 of Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York,

  3. [11]

    A study in analytic number theory and computational complexity, Reprint of the 1987 original, A Wiley- Interscience Publication

    1987

  4. [12]

    J. M. Borwein, P. B. Borwein, and F. G. Garvan,Some cubic modular identities of Ramanu- jan,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 343 (1994), no. 1, 35–47

    1994

  5. [13]

    M. L. Dawsey and D. McCarthy,Hypergeometric functions over finite fields and modular forms: a survey and new conjectures, From operator theory to orthogonal polynomials, com- binatorics, and number theory–a volume in honor ofLanceLittlejohn’s 70th birthday, 285 (2021), 41–56

    2021

  6. [14]

    Evans, Hypergeometric 3F2(1/4)evaluations over finite fields and Hecke eigenforms, Proc

    R. Evans, Hypergeometric 3F2(1/4)evaluations over finite fields and Hecke eigenforms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 2, 517–531

    2010

  7. [15]

    Frechette, K

    S. Frechette, K. Ono, and M. Papanikolas,Gaussian hypergeometric functions and traces of Hecke operators, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2004), no. 60, 3233–3262

    2004

  8. [16]

    Fuselier,Hypergeometric functions overF p and relations to elliptic curve and modular forms, Proc

    J. Fuselier,Hypergeometric functions overF p and relations to elliptic curve and modular forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 1, 109–123

    2010

  9. [17]

    Fuselier and D

    J. Fuselier and D. McCarthy,Hypergeometric type identities in thep-adic setting and modular forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 1493–1508

    2016

  10. [18]

    Fuselier, L

    J. Fuselier, L. Long, R. Ramakrishna, H. Swisher, and F.-T. Tu,Hypergeometric functions over finite fields, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 280 (2022), no. 1382

    2022

  11. [19]

    Greene,Hypergeometric functions over finite fields, Trans

    J. Greene,Hypergeometric functions over finite fields, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 301 (1987), no. 1, 77–101

    1987

  12. [20]

    B. H. Gross and N. Koblitz,Gauss sum and thep-adicΓ-function, Annals of Mathematics 109 (1979), 569–581

    1979

  13. [21]

    Grove,On Some Hypergeometric Modularity Conjectures of Dawsey and McCarthy, arXiv:2507.19971, 2025

    B. Grove,On Some Hypergeometric Modularity Conjectures of Dawsey and McCarthy, arXiv:2507.19971, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    B. He, L. Li, and R. Zhang,An Appell series over finite fields, Finite Fields Appl. 48 (2017), 289–305

    2017

  15. [23]

    N. M. Katz,Exponential sums and differential equations, volume 124 of Annals of Mathe- matics Studies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, (1990)

    1990

  16. [24]

    Koblitz,p-adic analysis: a short course on recent work, London Math

    N. Koblitz,p-adic analysis: a short course on recent work, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series, 46. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge-New York (1980)

    1980

  17. [25]

    Koike,Orthogonal matrices obtained from hypergeometric series over finite fields and elliptic curves over finite fields, Hiroshima Mathematical Journal 25 (1995), no

    M. Koike,Orthogonal matrices obtained from hypergeometric series over finite fields and elliptic curves over finite fields, Hiroshima Mathematical Journal 25 (1995), no. 1, 43–52

    1995

  18. [26]

    Lennon,Trace formulas for Hecke operators, Gaussian hypergeometric functions, and the modularity of a threefold, J

    C. Lennon,Trace formulas for Hecke operators, Gaussian hypergeometric functions, and the modularity of a threefold, J. Number Theory 131 (2011), no. 12, 2320–2351

    2011

  19. [27]

    Lennon,Gaussian hypergeometric evaluations of traces of Frobenius for elliptic curves, Proc

    C. Lennon,Gaussian hypergeometric evaluations of traces of Frobenius for elliptic curves, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), no. 6, 1931–1938

    2011

  20. [28]

    L. Li, X. Li, and R. Mao,Some new formulas for Appell series over finite fields, arXiv:1701.02674, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    W.-C. W. Li, L. Long, and F.-T. Tu,A Whipple 7F6 formula revisited, La Matematica 1 (2022), no. 2, 480–530

    2022

  22. [30]

    http://www.lmfdb.org, 2021

    The LMFDB Collaboration.The L-functions and modular forms database. http://www.lmfdb.org, 2021. [Online; accessed 25 August 2021]

    2021

  23. [31]

    McCarthy,On a supercongruence conjecture of Rodriguez-Villegas, Proc

    D. McCarthy,On a supercongruence conjecture of Rodriguez-Villegas, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 2241–2254

    2012

  24. [32]

    McCarthy and M

    D. McCarthy and M. Papanikolas,A finite field hypergeometric function associated to eigen- values of a Siegel eigenform, Int. J. Number Theory 11 (2015), no. 8, 2431–2450

    2015

  25. [33]

    Mortenson,Supercongruences for truncated n+1Fn-hypergeometric series with applications to certain weight three newforms, Proc

    E. Mortenson,Supercongruences for truncated n+1Fn-hypergeometric series with applications to certain weight three newforms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133 (2005), no. 2, 321–330

    2005

  26. [34]

    Ono,Values of Gaussian hypergeometric series, Trans

    K. Ono,Values of Gaussian hypergeometric series, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350 (1998), no. 3, 1205–1223

    1998

  27. [35]

    Ono,The web of modularity: arithmetic of the coefficients of modular forms and q-series, volume 102 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics

    K. Ono,The web of modularity: arithmetic of the coefficients of modular forms and q-series, volume 102 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. Conference Board of the EXPLICIT HYPERGEOMETRIC MODULARITY 19 Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathem...

    2004

  28. [36]

    Rosen,L-values of certain weight 3 Modular Forms and Transformations of Hypergeo- metric Series, arXiv:2412.07054, 2025

    E. Rosen,L-values of certain weight 3 Modular Forms and Transformations of Hypergeo- metric Series, arXiv:2412.07054, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Rosen,Modular forms and certain 2F1(1)hypergeometric series, to appear in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, arXiv:2502.08760, 2025

    E. Rosen,Modular forms and certain 2F1(1)hypergeometric series, to appear in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, arXiv:2502.08760, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Salerno,Counting points over finite fields and hypergeometric functions, Funct

    A. Salerno,Counting points over finite fields and hypergeometric functions, Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. 49 (2013), no. 1, 137–157

    2013

  31. [39]

    Stienstra and F

    J. Stienstra and F. Beukers,On the Picard-Fuchs equation and the formal brauer group of certain ellipticK3-surfaces,Math. Ann. 271 (1985), 269–304

    1985

  32. [40]

    Tripathi,Appell series over finite fields and modular forms, Finite Fields Appl

    M. Tripathi,Appell series over finite fields and modular forms, Finite Fields Appl. 90 (2023), Paper No. 102230, 20 p

    2023

  33. [41]

    Tripathi and R

    M. Tripathi and R. Barman,A finite field analogue of the Appell seriesF 4, Res. Number Theory 4 (2018), no. 3, Paper No. 35, 23 p

    2018

  34. [42]

    Tripathi, N

    M. Tripathi, N. Saikia, and R. Barman,Appell’s hypergeometric series over finite fields, Int. J. Number Theory 16 (2020), no. 4, 673–692

    2020

  35. [43]

    M. V. Vega,Hypergeometric functions over finite fields and their relations to algebraic curves, Int. J. Number Theory 7 (2011), no. 8, 2171–2195

    2011

  36. [44]

    Zagier,Elliptic modular forms and their applications, In The 1-2-3 of modular forms, Universitext

    D. Zagier,Elliptic modular forms and their applications, In The 1-2-3 of modular forms, Universitext. Springer, Berlin, (2008), 1–103. Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, North Guwa- hati, Guwahati-781039, Assam, INDIA Email address:m.sipra@iitg...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed May 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.