arxiv: 2604.20699 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Forecasts of CMB E-mode anomalies for AliCPT-1

Jiazheng Dou , Wen Zhao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO

keywords alicptanomaliesmodeanomalymodulationpolarizationsimulationsalignment

0 comments

The pith

Forecasts indicate AliCPT combined with Simons Observatory can detect injected E-mode dipole modulation at 99% confidence, while AliCPT alone risks biases in alignment and parity tests due to limited sky coverage.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The standard model of cosmology fits most CMB data well but leaves some large-scale oddities in temperature maps. These could be real signals from the early universe or just chance fluctuations. Polarization data, specifically the E-mode part, offers a separate way to check them because it comes from different physics and avoids some selection biases. The authors run 1000 simulated skies through a component-separation method called NILC to mimic what AliCPT will see. They test four common anomaly statistics on these mocks, including a dipole modulation test where they inject a known signal of strength 0.07. When they combine the AliCPT forecast with data from the Simons Observatory, the modulation signal stands out clearly at high confidence. Alone, AliCPT's partial sky view can distort some of the other statistics, but adding the other telescope brings the results closer to what a perfect full-sky experiment would give.

Core claim

For dipole modulation, we validate the local variance estimator on modulated simulations with an input amplitude A_d = 0.07, and find that the combined AliCPT+SO dataset is likely to detect the injected E-mode modulation at a 99% confidence level.

Load-bearing premise

That the NILC component separation applied to the simulated maps perfectly isolates the E-mode signal without introducing biases that mimic or mask the anomalies, and that the statistical properties of any real E-mode anomalies match those assumed in the unconstrained isotropic simulations.

read the original abstract

The standard $\Lambda$CDM model has been highly successful in describing cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations. Nevertheless, a set of large-scale statistical anomalies persists in temperature anisotropies across WMAP and Planck. CMB $E$-mode polarization offers an independent probe of these anomalies, circumventing the look-elsewhere effect inherent in temperature-only analyses. In this paper, we forecast the capability of the Ali CMB Polarization Telescope (AliCPT), a ground-based CMB experiment in the Northern Hemisphere, to detect such anomalies in large-scale $E$-mode polarization. Using 1000 unconstrained simulations processed with the NILC component separation method, we evaluate four anomaly estimators: dipole modulation, lack of large-angle correlations, quadrupole-octopole alignment, and point-parity asymmetry. Our analysis considers two noise levels for AliCPT, as well as a joint configuration with Simons Observatory (SO) Large Aperture Telescope (LAT). For dipole modulation, we validate the local variance estimator on modulated simulations with an input amplitude $A_d = 0.07$, and find that the combined AliCPT+SO dataset is likely to detect the injected $E$-mode modulation at a 99% confidence level. Tests of the full suite of anomaly statistics on unconstrained isotropic simulations indicate that AliCPT alone, owing to its limited sky coverage, might introduce systematic biases or enlarged uncertainties, especially for quadrupole-octopole alignment and point-parity asymmetry. The combination with SO largely restores the statistical distributions to those expected in an ideal full-sky scenario, thereby establishing a near-cosmic-variance benchmark for upcoming anomaly investigations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

AliCPT E-mode forecasts give concrete numbers on dipole modulation detection but rest on untested NILC behavior under modulation and partial sky.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper runs 1000 NILC-cleaned simulations to forecast how AliCPT-1, alone and combined with SO, can measure four standard E-mode anomaly statistics, with a specific claim that the joint dataset detects an injected dipole modulation of amplitude 0.07 at 99% confidence via the local variance estimator. They also show that AliCPT's northern coverage alone distorts some estimators like quadrupole-octopole alignment and point-parity asymmetry, while adding SO brings the distributions close to full-sky expectations. That is the practical new content: experiment-specific numbers rather than new methods or theory. The validation step on modulated skies for the dipole case is a clear positive, and they are upfront about the sky-coverage limitations. The work applies established estimators and simulation techniques in a straightforward way that could help observers plan follow-up analyses. The softer part is the component-separation step. NILC weights are determined from the data, so a large-scale modulation could shift those weights or add variance shifts that are absent from the isotropic null simulations. The paper validates recovery only for the dipole estimator on modulated runs and does not appear to repeat the exercise for the other three statistics or test whether the partial sky plus modulation creates spurious signals in the cleaned maps. That leaves the 99% claim somewhat dependent on an assumption that NILC behaves identically in modulated and isotropic cases. It is not a fatal gap, but it is the place where extra checks would strengthen the result. This is a paper for people who need quantitative forecasts for upcoming ground-based polarization data or who model anomaly origins. A reader focused on simulation pipelines or experiment planning would find the numbers useful. It is grounded enough in standard techniques and explicit simulations to deserve peer review, even if the validation section needs expansion.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper forecasts the ability of the AliCPT experiment (alone and combined with Simons Observatory) to detect large-scale anomalies in CMB E-mode polarization. Using 1000 unconstrained NILC-processed simulations, it evaluates four estimators (dipole modulation via local variance, lack of large-angle correlations, quadrupole-octopole alignment, and point-parity asymmetry). It validates the dipole-modulation estimator on modulated skies with input amplitude A_d = 0.07 and claims that the AliCPT+SO combination detects this at 99% confidence level, while noting that AliCPT's limited northern-sky coverage can bias some estimators and that adding SO largely restores ideal full-sky statistics.

Significance. If the simulation pipeline is robust, the work supplies concrete, falsifiable forecasts for an important class of anomalies using E-modes (which avoid the look-elsewhere effect of temperature analyses) and demonstrates the value of joint northern+southern data for near-cosmic-variance measurements. The explicit validation on modulated skies and the use of 1000 simulations are strengths that make the forecasts testable once real data arrive.

major comments (2)

[Validation test on modulated skies (abstract and associated section)] The headline 99% CL detection claim for dipole modulation rests on the local-variance estimator recovering A_d = 0.07 in NILC-cleaned modulated simulations for the AliCPT+SO combination. The manuscript does not appear to test whether the blind NILC weights themselves shift when a large-scale E-mode modulation is present (as opposed to the isotropic runs used for the null distribution), which could introduce a spurious variance offset that is not captured by the current validation.
[Results for alignment and parity estimators] For the quadrupole-octopole alignment and point-parity asymmetry estimators, the paper states that AliCPT's partial sky coverage enlarges uncertainties or introduces biases relative to ideal full-sky expectations, but the quantitative size of these effects (e.g., shift in the mean or width of the null distribution) and the precise mechanism by which SO data restores them are not shown with explicit side-by-side histograms or tables.

minor comments (2)

The two noise levels adopted for AliCPT should be stated explicitly (e.g., in a table or methods paragraph) rather than left as “two noise levels.”
Clarify whether the 1000 simulations are sufficient to reliably estimate the 99% tail for the combined dataset, or whether additional runs were used for the modulated validation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive comments that will help improve the robustness and clarity of the forecasts. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Validation test on modulated skies (abstract and associated section)] The headline 99% CL detection claim for dipole modulation rests on the local-variance estimator recovering A_d = 0.07 in NILC-cleaned modulated simulations for the AliCPT+SO combination. The manuscript does not appear to test whether the blind NILC weights themselves shift when a large-scale E-mode modulation is present (as opposed to the isotropic runs used for the null distribution), which could introduce a spurious variance offset that is not captured by the current validation.

Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this potential limitation in our validation. The NILC weights were computed using the standard blind procedure applied to each simulation map, but we did not explicitly recompute and compare weights derived separately from the modulated versus isotropic realizations. This leaves open the possibility of a small systematic offset in the local-variance estimator. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated test that re-derives the NILC weights from the modulated E-mode maps, re-applies the local-variance estimator, and reports any change in the recovered significance for the AliCPT+SO case. The abstract and relevant sections will be updated if the 99% CL claim is affected. revision: yes
Referee: [Results for alignment and parity estimators] For the quadrupole-octopole alignment and point-parity asymmetry estimators, the paper states that AliCPT's partial sky coverage enlarges uncertainties or introduces biases relative to ideal full-sky expectations, but the quantitative size of these effects (e.g., shift in the mean or width of the null distribution) and the precise mechanism by which SO data restores them are not shown with explicit side-by-side histograms or tables.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative comparisons would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add figures containing side-by-side histograms of the null distributions for both the quadrupole-octopole alignment and point-parity asymmetry estimators. Each figure will display results for AliCPT alone, the AliCPT+SO combination, and an ideal full-sky reference, thereby quantifying the shifts in means and widths and illustrating how the addition of SO data restores the distributions toward full-sky expectations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forecasts derived from independent Monte Carlo simulations

full rationale

The paper generates 1000 unconstrained isotropic simulations and separate modulated simulations with injected dipole amplitude A_d=0.07, processes both through NILC, and computes the distribution of four anomaly estimators. The quoted detection claim (99% CL for AliCPT+SO) is the fraction of modulated realizations exceeding the 99% threshold defined from the isotropic ensemble; this is a forward statistical forecast, not a parameter fit to real data nor a self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear in the described chain. The methodology is self-contained against external benchmarks (simulated skies) and does not reduce any central result to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper assumes standard LambdaCDM isotropy for the baseline simulations and that the injected modulation amplitude of 0.07 is representative; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

A_d
Input modulation amplitude of 0.07 used to generate the test simulations for the dipole estimator.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The E-mode polarization anomalies, if present, share the same statistical properties as those observed in temperature maps.
Invoked when applying temperature-derived anomaly estimators directly to forecasted E-mode maps.
domain assumption NILC component separation removes foregrounds without residual contamination that affects large-scale anomaly statistics.
Stated in the description of how the 1000 simulations are processed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1472 out tokens · 36408 ms · 2026-05-09T23:27:47.945912+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Modifications of CMB Temperature and Polarization Quadrupole Signals in Thurston Spacetimes
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Thurston spacetimes generate distinct evolving temperature and polarization patterns in the CMB that can be tracked via Stokes parameters and potentially isolated per geometry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Bennett, A.J

C.L. Bennett, A. Banday, K.M. Gorski, G. Hinshaw, P. Jackson, P. Keegstra et al.,Four year COBE DMR cosmic microwave background observations: Maps and basic results,Astrophys. J. Lett.464(1996) L1 [astro-ph/9601067]. [2]WMAPcollaboration,Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results,Astrophys. J. Suppl.208(2013...

work page arXiv 1996
[2]

Bennett et al.,Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Are There Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies?,Astrophys

C.L. Bennett et al.,Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Are There Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies?,Astrophys. J. Suppl.192 (2011) 17 [1001.4758]. [6]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2013 results. XXIII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB,Astron. Astrophys.571(2014) A23 [1303.5083]. [7]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2015 result...

work page arXiv 2011
[3]

Herold, G.E

L. Herold, G.E. Addison, C.L. Bennett, H.C. Nofi and J.L. Weiland,Nearly full-sky low-multipole CMB temperature anisotropy: III. CMB anomalies,2509.03720

work page arXiv
[4]

Kumar Aluri, P

P. Kumar Aluri, P. Cea, P. Chingangbam, M.-C. Chu, R.G. Clowes, D. Hutsemékers et al.,Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?,Class. Quant. Grav.40 (2023) 094001 [2207.05765]

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

Hinshaw, A.J

G. Hinshaw, A.J. Banday, C.L. Bennett, K.M. Gorski, A. Kogut, C.H. Lineweaver et al., 2-point correlations in the COBE DMR 4-year anisotropy maps,Astrophys. J. Lett.464(1996) L25 [astro-ph/9601061]

work page arXiv 1996
[6]

C.J. Copi, D. Huterer, D.J. Schwarz and G.D. Starkman,No large-angle correlations on the non-Galactic microwave sky,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.399(2009) 295 [0808.3767]

work page arXiv 2009
[7]

C.J. Copi, D. Huterer, D.J. Schwarz and G.D. Starkman,Large-Angle CMB Suppression and Polarization Predictions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.434(2013) 3590 [1303.4786]

work page arXiv 2013
[8]

Tegmark, A

M. Tegmark, A. de Oliveira-Costa and A. Hamilton,A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 123523 [astro-ph/0302496]

work page arXiv 2003
[9]

de Oliveira-Costa, M

A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. Tegmark, M. Zaldarriaga and A. Hamilton,The Significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 063516 [astro-ph/0307282]

work page arXiv 2004
[10]

Schwarz, G.D

D.J. Schwarz, G.D. Starkman, D. Huterer and C.J. Copi,Is the low-l microwave background cosmic?,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 221301 [astro-ph/0403353]

work page arXiv 2004
[11]

Hansen, A.J

F.K. Hansen, A.J. Banday and K.M. Gorski,Testing the cosmological principle of isotropy: Local power spectrum estimates of the WMAP data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.354(2004) 641 [astro-ph/0404206]

work page arXiv 2004
[12]

Eriksen, F.K

H.K. Eriksen, F.K. Hansen, A.J. Banday, K.M. Gorski and P.B. Lilje,Asymmetries in the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropy field,Astrophys. J.605(2004) 14 [astro-ph/0307507]. – 21 –

work page arXiv 2004
[13]

Hoftuft, H.K

J. Hoftuft, H.K. Eriksen, A.J. Banday, K.M. Górski, F.K. Hansen and P.B. Lilje,Increasing Evidence for Hemispherical Power Asymmetry in the Five-Year WMAP Data,Astrophys. J. 699(2009) 985 [0903.1229]

work page arXiv 2009
[14]

Land and J

K. Land and J. Magueijo,Is the Universe odd?,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 101302 [astro-ph/0507289]

work page arXiv 2005
[15]

Kim and P

J. Kim and P. Naselsky,Anomalous parity asymmetry of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe power spectrum data at low multipoles,Astrophys. J. Lett.714(2010) L265 [1001.4613]

work page arXiv 2010
[16]

Gruppuso, F

A. Gruppuso, F. Finelli, P. Natoli, F. Paci, P. Cabella, A. De Rosa et al.,New constraints on Parity Symmetry from a re-analysis of the WMAP-7 low resolution power spectra,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.411(2011) 1445 [1006.1979]

work page arXiv 2011
[17]

Naselsky, W

P. Naselsky, W. Zhao, J. Kim and S. Chen,Is the Cosmic Microwave Background Asymmetry due to the Kinematic Dipole?,Astrophys. J.749(2012) 31

2012
[18]

Zhao,Directional dependence of CMB parity asymmetry,Phys

W. Zhao,Directional dependence of CMB parity asymmetry,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 023010 [1306.0955]

work page arXiv 2014
[19]

Cheng, W

C. Cheng, W. Zhao, Q.-G. Huang and L. Santos,Preferred axis of CMB parity asymmetry in the masked maps,Phys. Lett. B757(2016) 445 [1512.00591]

work page arXiv 2016
[20]

Vielva, E

P. Vielva, E. Martinez-Gonzalez, R.B. Barreiro, J.L. Sanz and L. Cayon,Detection of non-Gaussianity in the WMAP 1 - year data using spherical wavelets,Astrophys. J.609(2004) 22 [astro-ph/0310273]

work page arXiv 2004
[21]

M. Cruz, E. Martinez-Gonzalez, P. Vielva and L. Cayon,Detection of a non-gaussian spot in wmap,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.356(2005) 29 [astro-ph/0405341]

work page arXiv 2005
[22]

Cayon, J

L. Cayon, J. Jin and A. Treaster,Higher criticism statistic: Detecting and identifying non-Gaussianity in the WMAP first year data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.362(2005) 826 [astro-ph/0507246]

work page arXiv 2005
[23]

Zhao,Local properties of Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe cold spot,Mon

W. Zhao,Local properties of Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe cold spot,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.433(2013) 3498 [1209.1174]

work page arXiv 2013
[24]

Zhao,Probing the CMB cold spot through local Minkowski functionals,Res

W. Zhao,Probing the CMB cold spot through local Minkowski functionals,Res. Astron. Astrophys.14(2014) 625 [1209.4021]

work page arXiv 2014
[25]

Inoue and J

K.T. Inoue and J. Silk,Local voids as the origin of large-angle cosmic microwave background anomalies I,Astrophys. J.648(2006) 23 [astro-ph/0602478]

work page arXiv 2006
[26]

Francis and J.A

C.L. Francis and J.A. Peacock,An estimate of the local ISW signal, and its impact on CMB anomalies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.406(2010) 14 [0909.2495]

work page arXiv 2010
[27]

Rassat, J.L

A. Rassat, J.L. Starck and F.X. Dupe,Removal of two large scale Cosmic Microwave Background anomalies after subtraction of the Integrated Sachs Wolfe effect,Astron. Astrophys. 557(2013) A32 [1303.4727]

work page arXiv 2013
[28]

Naidoo, A

K. Naidoo, A. Benoit-Lévy and O. Lahav,The cosmic microwave background Cold Spot anomaly: the impact of sky masking and the expected contribution from the integrated Sachs–Wolfe effect,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.472(2017) L65 [1703.07894]

work page arXiv 2017
[29]

Luparello, E.F

H.E. Luparello, E.F. Boero, M. Lares, A.G. Sánchez and D.G. Lambas,The cosmic shallows – I. Interaction of CMB photons in extended galaxy haloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518 (2022) 5643 [2206.14217]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

Hansen, E.F

F.K. Hansen, E.F. Boero, H.E. Luparello and D.G. Lambas,A possible common explanation for several cosmic microwave background (CMB) anomalies: A strong impact of nearby galaxies on observed large-scale CMB fluctuations,Astron. Astrophys.675(2023) L7 [2305.00268]. – 22 –

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

M. Cruz, E. Martínez-González, C. Gimeno-Amo, B.J. Kavanagh and M. Tucci,Unexplained correlation between the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and the local matter density distribution,JCAP04(2025) 079 [2407.17599]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Hansen, D.G

F.K. Hansen, D.G. Lambas, H.E. Luparello, F. Toscano and L.A. Pereyra,A p<0.0001 detection of cosmic microwave background cooling in galactic halos and its possible relation to dark matter,Astron. Astrophys.696(2025) A184 [2411.15307]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Guth and M.H

A.H. Guth and M.H. Namjoo,Statistical isotropy of the universe and the look-elsewhere effect, 2602.10178

work page arXiv
[34]

Henderson et al.,Advanced ACTPol Cryogenic Detector Arrays and Readout,J

S.W. Henderson et al.,Advanced ACTPol Cryogenic Detector Arrays and Readout,J. Low Temp. Phys.184(2016) 772 [1510.02809]. [41]Atacama Cosmology Telescopecollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 maps,JCAP11(2025) 061 [2503.14451]. [42]Simons Obser v atorycollaboration,The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts, JCAP02(2019) 056 [1808.07445]

work page arXiv 2016
[35]

The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor

K. Harrington et al.,The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor,Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.9914(2016) 99141K [1608.08234]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[36]

Dahal et al.,Four-year Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor (CLASS) Observations: On-sky Receiver Performance at 40, 90, 150, and 220 GHz Frequency Bands,Astrophys

S. Dahal et al.,Four-year Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor (CLASS) Observations: On-sky Receiver Performance at 40, 90, 150, and 220 GHz Frequency Bands,Astrophys. J.926 (2022) 33 [2107.08022]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Li, S.-Y

H. Li, S.-Y. Li, Y. Liu, Y.-P. Li, Y. Cai, M. Li et al.,Probing Primordial Gravitational Waves: Ali CMB Polarization Telescope,Natl. Sci. Rev.6(2019) 145 [1710.03047]

work page arXiv 2019
[38]

Hazumi et al.,LiteBIRD: A Satellite for the Studies of B-Mode Polarization and Inflation from Cosmic Background Radiation Detection,J

M. Hazumi et al.,LiteBIRD: A Satellite for the Studies of B-Mode Polarization and Inflation from Cosmic Background Radiation Detection,J. Low Temp. Phys.194(2019) 443

2019
[39]

Chiocchetta, A

C. Chiocchetta, A. Gruppuso, M. Lattanzi, P. Natoli and L. Pagano,Lack-of-correlation anomaly in CMB large scale polarisation maps,JCAP08(2021) 015 [2012.00024]

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

Shi et al.,Testing Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies in E-mode Polarization with Current and Future Data,Astrophys

R. Shi et al.,Testing Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies in E-mode Polarization with Current and Future Data,Astrophys. J.945(2023) 79 [2206.05920]. [49]LiteBIRDcollaboration,LiteBIRD science goals and forecasts. E-mode anomalies,JCAP01 (2026) 036 [2508.16451]. [50]Simons Obser v atorycollaboration,The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts fo...

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

J. Dou, J. Han, W. Zhao and B. Hu,Forecasts of effects of beam systematics and deprojection on the third-generation ground-based cosmic microwave background experiment,Astron. Astrophys.694(2025) A198 [2412.20415]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

J. Dou, S. Ghosh, L. Santos and W. Zhao,Foreground removal with ILC methods for AliCPT-1,JCAP2024(2024) 006 [2310.19627]

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Zhang, S

J. Zhang, S. Ghosh, J. Dou, Y. Liu, S. Li, J. Chen et al.,Forecast of Foreground Cleaning Strategies for AliCPT-1,Astrophys. J. Suppl.274(2024) 26 [2402.01233]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

J. Dou, S. Ghosh, L. Santos and W. Zhao,Forecast of CMB TB and EB correlations for AliCPT-1,JCAP2024(2024) 046 [2403.19222]. [55]Planckcollaboration,P lanckintermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing,Astron. Astrophys.643(2020) A42 [2007.04997]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

The Python Sky Model: software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky

B. Thorne, J. Dunkley, D. Alonso and S. Naess,The Python Sky Model: Software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.469(2017) 2821 [1608.02841]. – 23 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[46]

Zonca, B

A. Zonca, B. Thorne, N. Krachmalnicoff and J. Borrill,The Python Sky Model 3 Software,J. Open Source Softw.6(2021) 3783 [2108.01444]. [58]Pan-Experiment Galactic Science Groupcollaboration,Full-sky Models of Galactic Microwave Emission and Polarization at Sub-arcminute Scales for the Python Sky Model, 2502.20452

work page arXiv 2021
[47]

HEALPix -- a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere

K.M. Gorski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al., HEALPix – a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere,ApJ622(2005) 759 [astro-ph/0409513]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
[48]

A full sky, low foreground, high resolution CMB map from WMAP

J. Delabrouille, J.-F. Cardoso, M.L. Jeune, M. Betoule, G. Fay and F. Guilloux,A full sky, low foreground, high resolution CMB map from WMAP,A&A493(2009) 835 [0807.0773]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[49]

A needlet ILC analysis of WMAP 7-year data: estimation of CMB temperature map and power spectrum

S. Basak and J. Delabrouille,A needlet ILC analysis of WMAP 7-year data: Estimation of CMB temperature map and power spectrum,MNRAS419(2012) 1163 [1106.5383]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[50]

Basak and J

S. Basak and J. Delabrouille,A needlet ILC analysis of WMAP 9-year polarisation data: CMB polarisation power spectra,MNRAS435(2013) 18 [1204.0292]

work page arXiv 2013
[51]

Vanneste, S

S. Vanneste, S. Henrot-Versillé, T. Louis and M. Tristram,Quadratic estimator for CMB cross-correlation,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 103526 [1807.02484]

work page arXiv 2018
[52]

Tegmark and A

M. Tegmark and A. de Oliveira-Costa,How to measure CMB polarization power spectra without losing information,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 063001 [astro-ph/0012120]

work page arXiv 2001
[53]

J. Chen, S. Ghosh, H. Liu, L. Santos, W. Fang, S. Li et al.,Fast Scalar Quadratic Maximum Likelihood Estimators for the CMB B-mode Power Spectrum,Astrophys. J. Suppl.257(2021) 27 [2104.07408]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

J. Chen, S. Ghosh and W. Zhao,Scalar Quadratic Maximum-likelihood Estimators for the CMB Cross-power Spectrum,Astrophys. J. Suppl.260(2022) 44 [2202.10733]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Gordon, W

C. Gordon, W. Hu, D. Huterer and T.M. Crawford,Spontaneous isotropy breaking: a mechanism for cmb multipole alignments,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 103002 [astro-ph/0509301]

work page arXiv 2005
[56]

Hanson and A

D. Hanson and A. Lewis,Estimators for CMB statistical anisotropy,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 063004 [0908.0963]

work page arXiv 2009
[57]

Akrami, Y

Y. Akrami, Y. Fantaye, A. Shafieloo, H.K. Eriksen, F.K. Hansen, A.J. Banday et al.,Power asymmetry in WMAP and Planck temperature sky maps as measured by a local variance estimator,Astrophys. J. Lett.784(2014) L42 [1402.0870]

work page arXiv 2014
[58]

Ghosh, R

S. Ghosh, R. Kothari, P. Jain and P.K. Rath,Dipole Modulation of Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature and Polarization,JCAP01(2016) 046 [1507.04078]

work page arXiv 2016
[59]

Ghosh and P

S. Ghosh and P. Jain,A Pixel Space Method for Testing Dipole Modulation in the CMB Polarization,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.492(2020) 3994 [1807.02359]

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

C.J. Copi, D. Huterer, D.J. Schwarz and G.D. Starkman,Lack of large-angle TT correlations persists in WMAP and Planck,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.451(2015) 2978 [1310.3831]. [73]WMAPcollaboration,First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters,Astrophys. J. Suppl.148(2003) 175 [astro-ph/0302209]

work page arXiv 2015
[61]

Zaldarriaga and U

M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak,An all sky analysis of polarization in the microwave background, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1830 [astro-ph/9609170]

work page arXiv 1997
[62]

A. Yoho, S. Aiola, C.J. Copi, A. Kosowsky and G.D. Starkman,Microwave Background Polarization as a Probe of Large-Angle Correlations,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 123504 [1503.05928]

work page arXiv 2015
[63]

C.J. Copi, D. Huterer, D.J. Schwarz and G.D. Starkman,Large-scale alignments from WMAP and Planck,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.449(2015) 3458 [1311.4562]. – 24 –

work page arXiv 2015
[64]

Schwarz, C.J

D.J. Schwarz, C.J. Copi, D. Huterer and G.D. Starkman,CMB Anomalies after Planck,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 184001 [1510.07929]

work page arXiv 2016
[65]

C.J. Copi, D. Huterer and G.D. Starkman,Multipole vectors - A New representation of the CMB sky and evidence for statistical anisotropy or non-Gaussianity at 2<= l<= 8,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 043515 [astro-ph/0310511]

work page arXiv 2004
[66]

C.J. Copi, D. Huterer, D.J. Schwarz and G.D. Starkman,On the large-angle anomalies of the microwave sky,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.367(2006) 79 [astro-ph/0508047]

work page arXiv 2006
[67]

Sanyal, S.K

S. Sanyal, S.K. Patel, P.K. Aluri and A. Shafieloo,A reassessment of LVE method and hemispherical power asymmetry in CMB temperature data from Planck PR4,JCAP03(2026) 041 [2411.15786]. [81]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A4 [1807.06208]

work page arXiv 2026
[68]

Zibin and D

J.P. Zibin and D. Contreras,Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry: from temperature to k space to lensing,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 063011 [1512.02618]

work page arXiv 2017
[69]

Contreras, J.P

D. Contreras, J.P. Zibin, D. Scott, A.J. Banday and K.M. Górski,Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry with CMB polarization,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 123522 [1704.03143]. – 25 –

work page arXiv 2017