pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18546 · v2 · pith:GJ72YHKDnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Bilayer crystals in a polar-molecules system

Vinicius Zampronio , Matteo Ciardi , Fabio Cinti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 18:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords polar moleculesbilayer crystaldipolar interactionsquantum Monte Carlophase diagramsuperfluidquasi-two-dimensionalthermal fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Varying confinement strength stabilizes a bilayer crystal with one molecule per site in polar-molecule systems at fixed interaction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the finite-temperature phases of polar molecules held in a quasi-two-dimensional trap created by a harmonic potential along the polarization direction. Simulations show that raising temperature can drive the system into crystalline order rather than disorder, and that a bilayer crystal with single occupancy per lattice site appears when confinement is strengthened while interaction strength remains unchanged. The work also reports layered superfluid states that maintain phase coherence between the two layers. These results matter because they identify confinement as a direct control parameter for producing ordered dipolar phases without retuning the underlying interactions.

Core claim

By tuning temperature and confinement strength in a quasi-two-dimensional geometry, we identify phases including normal fluid, superfluid, supersolid, cluster crystal, and bilayer crystal states. In particular, a bilayer crystal with one molecule per lattice site can be stabilized by varying the confinement strength at fixed interaction. We also show evidence of layering of superfluid states with phase coherence between the two layers. Crystallization emerges upon increasing temperature, highlighting the nontrivial role of thermal fluctuations in dipolar systems.

What carries the argument

Confinement strength along the polarization axis, which tunes the effective dimensionality to stabilize the single-occupancy bilayer crystal at fixed dipolar interaction.

If this is right

  • Bilayer crystals with single-site occupancy form by increasing confinement at constant interaction strength.
  • Crystallization appears as temperature is raised.
  • Layered superfluid states maintain phase coherence across the two layers.
  • The phase diagram includes normal fluid, superfluid, supersolid, and cluster-crystal regimes depending on temperature and confinement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Current ultracold-molecule experiments could test the predicted bilayer crystal by scanning trap frequency while holding dipole strength fixed.
  • Interlayer phase coherence opens a route to studying coupled two-dimensional superfluids in the same trap.
  • Thermal stabilization of crystals may apply to other dipolar gases where zero-temperature approaches have been dominant.

Load-bearing premise

The harmonic trap along the polarization axis plus the simulation method together reproduce the actual finite-temperature behavior of the dipolar molecules without missing effects from the third dimension or large calculation errors.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the two-dimensional density profile or pair-correlation function at the predicted confinement strengths and temperatures, checking whether molecules form a bilayer lattice with exactly one per site.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18546 by Fabio Cinti, Matteo Ciardi, Vinicius Zampronio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Graphic representation of the bilayer state. In blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase diagram for the system of polar molecules [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Snapshot of the worldlines of the SS state in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Snapshot of particle positions along z versus ρz for different temperatures and confinement strengths (T = 2.0 green line, T = 1.0 light blue line, and T = 0.4 violet line). (a) Weak confinement with Ωz = 0.2. For intermediate confinement (b) Ωz = 20 and (c) Ωz = 200 we observe density modulations that depend on the temperature. (d) Strong confinement regime Ωz = 2000, where the system splits in two layers… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Snapshots of the worldlines in the PIMC simulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the finite-temperature phase diagram of polar molecules confined in a quasi-two-dimensional geometry by a harmonic potential along the polarization axis. We employ Quantum Monte Carlo simulations to explore the strongly correlated regime accessible with current experimental setups. By tuning temperature and confinement strength, we identify a rich set of phases, including normal fluid, superfluid, supersolid, cluster crystal, and bilayer crystal states. Our results reveal the emergence of crystallization upon increasing temperature, highlighting the nontrivial role of thermal fluctuations in dipolar systems. In particular, we show that a bilayer crystal with one molecule per lattice site can be stabilized by varying the confinement strength at fixed interaction. Moreover, we show evidence of layering of superfluid states with phase coherence between the two layers. These findings provide insight into the interplay between interactions, confinement, and temperature in low-dimensional dipolar systems, and suggest new directions for engineering quantum phases with ultracold polar molecules.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses Quantum Monte Carlo simulations to map the finite-temperature phase diagram of polar molecules in a quasi-two-dimensional geometry created by harmonic confinement along the polarization axis. It reports a sequence of phases (normal fluid, superfluid, supersolid, cluster crystal, bilayer crystal) and two central results: (i) a bilayer crystal with one molecule per site can be stabilized by increasing confinement strength at fixed dipolar interaction, and (ii) evidence for layered superfluid states that maintain phase coherence between layers. The work emphasizes that thermal fluctuations can induce crystallization in this dipolar system.

Significance. If the QMC results prove robust against finite-size effects and the quasi-2D approximation, the findings would be significant for the field of ultracold dipolar gases. They provide concrete, experimentally accessible routes to bilayer crystals and inter-layer coherent superfluids, and they highlight the nontrivial role of temperature in stabilizing ordered phases that are often studied only at T=0.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / Simulation details] The central claims rest on the assertion that the chosen quasi-2D harmonic confinement plus QMC faithfully reproduces the finite-T dipolar physics. No simulation parameters (confinement frequency, system size, imaginary-time discretization, or number of particles), convergence checks, or comparisons to known limits (e.g., 2D dipolar crystal melting temperature) are supplied in the manuscript, leaving the robustness of the bilayer-crystal and layered-superfluid phases unverified.
  2. [Results / Bilayer crystal subsection] The claim that a bilayer crystal with one molecule per lattice site is stabilized by varying confinement at fixed interaction (Abstract) is load-bearing for the paper's novelty. Without an explicit order parameter, structure-factor data, or finite-size scaling analysis showing that the observed periodicity is not an artifact of the harmonic trap or periodic boundary conditions, it is unclear whether the reported phase is a true thermodynamic bilayer crystal.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from a clear statement of the dipolar interaction strength in units of the confinement energy and from a table summarizing the temperature and confinement ranges explored for each phase.
  2. Notation for the superfluid stiffness or winding-number estimator used to identify the layered superfluid should be defined explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough reading and constructive criticism. The comments highlight important omissions in the presentation of our QMC results. We agree that additional technical details and quantitative evidence are required to support the central claims and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / Simulation details] The central claims rest on the assertion that the chosen quasi-2D harmonic confinement plus QMC faithfully reproduces the finite-T dipolar physics. No simulation parameters (confinement frequency, system size, imaginary-time discretization, or number of particles), convergence checks, or comparisons to known limits (e.g., 2D dipolar crystal melting temperature) are supplied in the manuscript, leaving the robustness of the bilayer-crystal and layered-superfluid phases unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript as submitted omitted essential technical information. In the revised version we will add a dedicated Methods section (or appendix) specifying the particle numbers (N = 128–512), confinement frequencies ω_z, imaginary-time step Δτ, number of Monte Carlo sweeps, and statistical error bars. We will also report convergence tests with respect to system size and Δτ, together with a direct comparison of the 2D dipolar crystal melting temperature obtained in the ω_z → ∞ limit against published benchmarks. These additions will allow readers to assess the robustness of the reported phases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / Bilayer crystal subsection] The claim that a bilayer crystal with one molecule per lattice site is stabilized by varying confinement at fixed interaction (Abstract) is load-bearing for the paper's novelty. Without an explicit order parameter, structure-factor data, or finite-size scaling analysis showing that the observed periodicity is not an artifact of the harmonic trap or periodic boundary conditions, it is unclear whether the reported phase is a true thermodynamic bilayer crystal.

    Authors: We accept that the current manuscript does not present the quantitative diagnostics needed to establish the bilayer crystal as a thermodynamic phase. In the revision we will include (i) the static structure factor S(q) with clear Bragg peaks at the bilayer reciprocal-lattice vectors, (ii) an explicit crystalline order parameter extracted from the density modulation amplitude, and (iii) finite-size scaling of the order parameter and susceptibility for several system sizes. These data will be shown both as a function of confinement strength at fixed interaction and temperature, demonstrating that the one-molecule-per-site bilayer crystal is not an artifact of the trap or boundary conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript describes a Quantum Monte Carlo study of the finite-temperature phase diagram for dipolar molecules in quasi-2D harmonic confinement. All reported phases (normal fluid, superfluid, supersolid, cluster crystal, bilayer crystal) are obtained by direct numerical sampling while varying temperature and confinement strength at fixed interaction strength. No equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations are presented that would make any claimed phase or coherence property equivalent to its own input by construction. The central results are therefore independent numerical observations rather than tautological re-statements of fitted quantities or prior self-referential theorems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no information on free parameters, background axioms, or invented entities; all such details would require the full manuscript.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1058 out tokens · 20744 ms · 2026-06-30T18:18:32.967628+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Equilibrium and non-equilibrium phases of microwave-dressed polar molecules beyond rotational symmetries

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Microwave dressing breaks rotational symmetry in polar-molecule interactions, producing metastable droplet arrays as non-equilibrium states while suppressing the crystalline phase expected for antidipolar cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    Sch¨ afer, T

    F. Sch¨ afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Tools for quantum simulation with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nature Reviews Physics2, 411–425 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of bose-einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor, Science269, 198 (1995)

    1995

  4. [4]

    K. B. Davis, M. O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3969 (1995)

    1995

  5. [5]

    N. P. Proukakis, A century of bose-einstein condensation, Communications Physics8, 10.1038/s42005-025-02195-x (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02195-x 2025

  6. [6]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. B¨ ottcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Self-bound droplets of a dilute magnetic quantum liquid, Nature539, 259 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. W¨ achtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute bose-einstein condensate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    B¨ ottcher, J

    F. B¨ ottcher, J. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. X9, 011051 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 130405 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Zhang, F

    Y.-C. Zhang, F. Maucher, and T. Pohl, Supersolidity around a critical point in dipolar bose-einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 015301 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Schmidt, L

    M. Schmidt, L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and T. Lan- gen, Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013235 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    B. T. E. Ripley, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Two- dimensional supersolidity in a planar dipolar bose gas, Phys. Rev. A108, 053321 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    D. Lima, M. Grossklags, V. Zampronio, F. Cinti, and A. Mendoza-Coto, Supersolid dipolar phases in planar geometry: Effects of tilted polarization, Phys. Rev. A 111, 063311 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    R. N. Bisset, R. M. Wilson, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Ground-state phase diagram of a dipolar condensate with quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A94, 033619 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    W¨ achtler and L

    F. W¨ achtler and L. Santos, Quantum filaments in dipolar bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A93, 061603(R) (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    W¨ achtler and L

    F. W¨ achtler and L. Santos, Ground-state properties and elementary excitations of quantum droplets in dipo- lar bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A94, 043618 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a bose system of hard spheres and its low-temperature properties, Phys. Rev.106, 1135 (1957)

    1957

  19. [19]

    A. R. P. Lima and A. Pelster, Quantum fluctuations in dipolar bose gases, Phys. Rev. A84, 041604 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    P. Jain, F. Cinti, and M. Boninsegni, Structure, bose-einstein condensation, and superfluidity of two- dimensional confined dipolar assemblies, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014534 (2011)

    2011

  21. [21]

    Cinti and M

    F. Cinti and M. Boninsegni, Classical and quantum fila- ments in the ground state of trapped dipolar bose gases, 7 Phys. Rev. A96, 013627 (2017)

    2017

  22. [23]

    Saito, Path-integral monte carlo study on a droplet of a dipolar bose–einstein condensate stabilized by quantum fluctuation, J

    H. Saito, Path-integral monte carlo study on a droplet of a dipolar bose–einstein condensate stabilized by quantum fluctuation, J. Phys. Soc. JPN85, 053001 (2016)

    2016

  23. [24]

    Macia, J

    A. Macia, J. S´ anchez-Baena, J. Boronat, and F. Maz- zanti, Droplets of trapped quantum dipolar bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 205301 (2016)

    2016

  24. [25]

    B¨ ottcher, M

    F. B¨ ottcher, M. Wenzel, J. Schmidt, M. Guo, T. Langen, I. Ferrier-Barbut, T. Pfau, R. Bomb´ ın, J. S´ anchez-Baena, J. Boronat, and F. Mazzanti, Dilute dipolar quantum droplets beyond the extended gross-pitaevskii equation, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033088 (2019)

    2019

  25. [26]

    Boninsegni, Morphology of dipolar bose droplets, Re- sults in Physics31, 104935 (2021)

    M. Boninsegni, Morphology of dipolar bose droplets, Re- sults in Physics31, 104935 (2021)

    2021

  26. [27]

    Kora and M

    Y. Kora and M. Boninsegni, Patterned supersolids in dipolar bose systems, J. Low Temp. Phys.197, 337 (2019)

    2019

  27. [28]

    Sohmen, C

    M. Sohmen, C. Politi, L. Klaus, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark, M. A. Norcia, and F. Ferlaino, Birth, life, and death of a dipolar supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 233401 (2021)

    2021

  28. [29]

    M. A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Two-dimensional supersolidity in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature596, 357 (2021)

    2021

  29. [30]

    Sinha and S

    S. Sinha and S. Sinha, Supersolid phases of bosons, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 10.1088/1361- 648x/adf6fb (2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2025

  30. [31]

    Recati and S

    A. Recati and S. Stringari, Supersolidity in ultra- cold dipolar gases, Nat. Rev. Phys. 10.1038/s42254-023- 00648-2 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-023- 2023

  31. [32]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys.86, 026401 (2022)

    2022

  32. [33]

    Schindewolf, J

    A. Schindewolf, J. Hertkorn, I. Stevenson, M. Ciardi, P. Groß, D. Wang, T. Karman, G. Qu´ em´ ener, S. Will, T. Pohl, and T. Langen, Colloquium: Strongly dipolar molecular bose-einstein condensates: From few- to many- body physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. (2026)

    2026

  33. [34]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  34. [35]

    A. F. Andreev and I. M. Lifshitz, Quantum theory of defects in crystals, Soviet Physics Uspekhi13, 670–670 (1971)

    1971

  35. [36]

    Cinti, T

    F. Cinti, T. Macr` ı, W. Lechner, G. Pupillo, and T. Pohl, Defect-induced supersolidity with soft-core bosons, Nat. Commun.5, 3235 (2014)

    2014

  36. [37]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of bose–einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature631, 289–293 (2024)

    2024

  37. [38]

    Z. Shi, Z. Huang, F. Deng, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, T. Shi, and D. Wang, Bose-einstein condensate of ultracold sodium- rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar interactions (2025), arXiv:2508.20518 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    S´ anchez-Baena, G

    J. S´ anchez-Baena, G. Pascual, R. Bomb´ ın, F. Mazzanti, and J. Boronat, Thermal behavior of bose-einstein con- densates of polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033080 (2025)

    2025

  39. [40]

    Dutta, B

    J. Dutta, B. Mukherjee, and J. M. Hutson, Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023164 (2025)

    2025

  40. [41]

    H. P. B¨ uchler, E. Demler, M. Lukin, A. Micheli, N. Prokof’ev, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Strongly cor- related 2d quantum phases with cold polar molecules: Controlling the shape of the interaction potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 060404 (2007)

    2007

  41. [42]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. Pupillo, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Cold polar molecules in two-dimensional traps: Tailoring in- teractions with external fields for novel quantum phases, Phys. Rev. A76, 043604 (2007)

    2007

  42. [43]

    Lassabli` ere and G

    L. Lassabli` ere and G. Qu´ em´ ener, Controlling the scat- tering length of ultracold dipolar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163402 (2018)

    2018

  43. [44]

    F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Two- and many-body physics of ultracold molecules dressed by dual microwave fields, Nature Communications16, 10.1038/s41467-025-66067-2 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66067-2 2025

  44. [45]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. S´ anchez-Baena, R. Bomb´ ın, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti, Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  45. [46]

    Ciardi, K

    M. Ciardi, K. R. Pedersen, T. Langen, and T. Pohl, Self- bound superfluid membranes and monolayer crystals of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 153401 (2025)

    2025

  46. [47]

    Wang, Quantum phase transitions of polar molecules in bilayer systems, Phys

    D.-W. Wang, Quantum phase transitions of polar molecules in bilayer systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 060403 (2007)

    2007

  47. [48]

    Rydow, V

    E. Rydow, V. P. Singh, A. Beregi, E. Chang, L. Mathey, C. J. Foot, and S. Sunami, Observation of a bilayer super- fluid with interlayer coherence, Nature Communications 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-62277-w (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62277-w 2025

  48. [49]

    Cinti, M

    F. Cinti, M. Ciardi, S. Prestipino, and G. Pellicane, Layering and superfluidity of soft-core bosons in shal- low spherical traps (2026), arXiv:2603.04650 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv 2026

  49. [50]

    J. P. Eisenstein, Experimental studies of multicomponent quantum hall systems, inPerspectives in Quantum Hall Effects(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1996) Chap. 2, pp. 37– 70

    1996

  50. [51]

    S. M. Girvin and A. H. MacDonald, Multicomponent quantum hall systems: The sum of their parts and more, inPerspectives in Quantum Hall Effects(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1996) Chap. 5, pp. 161–224

    1996

  51. [52]

    Perali, D

    A. Perali, D. Neilson, and A. R. Hamilton, High- temperature superfluidity in double-bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 146803 (2013)

    2013

  52. [53]

    Gao, Y.-h

    Q. Gao, Y.-h. Chan, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, P. Jinxu, S. Cui, Y. Yang, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Z. Sun, J. Jiang, T. C. Chiang, and P. Chen, Evidence of high-temperature exciton con- densation in a two-dimensional semimetal, Nature Com- munications14, 10.1038/s41467-023-36667-x (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36667-x 2023

  53. [54]

    Deng, X.-Y

    F. Deng, X.-Y. Chen, X.-Y. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Effective potential and superfluidity of microwave-shielded polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 183001 (2023)

    2023

  54. [55]

    D. M. Ceperley, Path integrals in the theory of condensed helium, Rev. Mod. Phys.67, 279 (1995)

    1995

  55. [56]

    Boninsegni, N

    M. Boninsegni, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Worm algorithm for continuous-space path integral monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 070601 (2006)

    2006

  56. [57]

    E. L. Pollock and D. M. Ceperley, Path-integral com- putation of superfluid densities, Phys. Rev. B36, 8343 8 (1987)

    1987

  57. [58]

    Cinti, A

    F. Cinti, A. Cappellaro, L. Salasnich, and T. Macr` ı, Su- perfluid filaments of dipolar bosons in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 215302 (2017)

    2017

  58. [59]

    Ciardi, F

    M. Ciardi, F. Cinti, G. Pellicane, and S. Prestipino, Ef- fects of gravity on supersolid order in bubble-trapped bosons, Phys. Rev. B.111, 024512 (2025)

    2025

  59. [60]

    Lu, C.-Q

    X. Lu, C.-Q. Wu, A. Micheli, and G. Pupillo, Struc- ture and melting behavior of classical bilayer crystals of dipoles, Phys. Rev. B78, 024108 (2008)

    2008

  60. [61]

    Cinti, D.-W

    F. Cinti, D.-W. Wang, and M. Boninsegni, Phases of dipolar bosons in a bilayer geometry, Phys. Rev. A95, 023622 (2017)

    2017

  61. [62]

    S´ anchez-Baena, C

    J. S´ anchez-Baena, C. Politi, F. Maucher, F. Ferlaino, and T. Pohl, Heating a dipolar quantum fluid into a solid, Nature Communications14, 10.1038/s41467-023-37207- 3 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37207- 2023

  62. [63]

    Zampronio, A

    V. Zampronio, A. Mendoza-Coto, T. Macr` ı, and F. Cinti, Exploring quantum phases of dipolar gases through qua- sicrystalline confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 196001 (2024)

    2024

  63. [64]

    J.-C. Yu, S. Bhave, L. Reeve, B. Song, and U. Schneider, Observing the two-dimensional bose glass in an optical quasicrystal, Nature633, 338–343 (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    S. N. Kempkes, M. R. Slot, S. E. Freeney, S. J. M. Zeven- huizen, D. Vanmaekelbergh, I. Swart, and C. M. Smith, Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal ge- ometry, Nature Physics15, 127–131 (2018)

    2018

  65. [66]

    R. C. Verstraten, I. H. A. Knottnerus, Y. C. Tseng, A. Urech, T. S. d. E. Santo, V. Zampronio, F. Schreck, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and C. M. Smith, Control of single spin-flips in a rydberg atomic fractal (2025)

    2025