pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01714 · v2 · pith:ZGD2IRXZnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 📡 eess.SP

Scalable GNN-Based Power Allocation for Rate-Splitting Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems

Ruomeng Wang , Yin Xu , Aimin Tang , Xiaowu Ou , Jun Zhu , Dazhi He , Lifeng Wang , Wenjun Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 10:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords graph neural networkpower allocationcell-free massive MIMOrate-splittinglarge-scale fadingspectral efficiencyscalable architecture
0
0 comments X

The pith

A scalable graph neural network achieves near-optimal power allocation in rate-splitting cell-free massive MIMO systems using only large-scale fading coefficients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an unsupervised graph neural network framework for downlink power allocation in rate-splitting cell-free massive MIMO systems. It relies solely on large-scale fading coefficients to maximize sum spectral efficiency without instantaneous channel state information. A slice-based adaptive layer projects variable-dimension inputs into a fixed latent space so one model handles different network sizes and topologies. Simulations show the framework reaches performance close to a WMMSE-ADMM upper bound while using fewer parameters and running much faster than deep neural networks or the iterative solver. This approach targets the high computational cost of managing interference in cell-free systems where user and access point counts vary.

Core claim

The paper claims that an unsupervised scalable GNN framework for power allocation in RS-CF-mMIMO systems, relying exclusively on large-scale fading coefficients and a slice-based adaptive layer to resolve dimensionality mismatch, maximizes sum spectral efficiency under per-AP power constraints with maximum-ratio precoding for common streams and regularized zero-forcing for private streams, achieves near-optimal performance, and outperforms unsupervised DNNs while the scalable variant reduces trainable parameters by over 57 percent and inference latency by up to three orders of magnitude relative to WMMSE-ADMM.

What carries the argument

The slice-based adaptive layer that projects variable-dimension features into a fixed latent space, enabling a single model to generalize across diverse network topologies without retraining.

Load-bearing premise

Large-scale fading coefficients alone suffice to optimize power allocation for near-optimal sum spectral efficiency, and the slice-based adaptive layer maps variable-dimension inputs without meaningful loss of optimality across arbitrary topologies.

What would settle it

A set of simulations or real deployments in which the GNN sum spectral efficiency falls substantially below the WMMSE-ADMM bound when small-scale fading realizations differ strongly from the training distribution would falsify the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01714 by Aimin Tang, Dazhi He, Jun Zhu, Lifeng Wang, Ruomeng Wang, Wenjun Zhang, Xiaowu Ou, Yin Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The CF-mMIMO system architecture. satisfying τc = τp + τd. Regarding the uplink pilot training, let Φ = [ϕ1 , . . . , ϕτp ] ∈ C τp×τp denote the set of τp mutually orthogonal pilot sequences satisfying ϕ H t ϕt ′ = τpδt,t′ . In this paper, we consider a dense network scenario characterized by K ≥ τp, which necessitates pilot reuse. Accordingly, let tk ∈ {1, . . . , τp} denote the index of the pilot sequenc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A schematic overview of the proposed GNN framework [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the adaptive node embedding layer mechanism. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CDF of the downlink SE per UE under different network loads: (a) Underloaded ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Training and validation loss curves for the learning-based schemes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CDF of the downlink SE per UE with K = 6 UEs and varying numbers of APs under orthogonal pilot assignment. 0 1 2 3 4 SE per UE [bit/s/Hz] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 CDF RSMA-EP RSMA-WMMSE RSMA-DNN-U RSMA-GNN-U SDMA-GNN-U SDMA-DNN-U [51] SDMA-DNN-S [25] BC (a) K = 6 UEs 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 SE per UE [bit/s/Hz] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 CDF RSMA-EP RSMA-WMMSE RSMA-DNN-U RSMA-GNN-U SDMA-GNN-U SDMA-DNN-… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: CDF of the downlink SE per UE with L = 16 APs and varying numbers of UEs under orthogonal pilot assignment. benchmark with a stable gap of 0.1-0.3 bit/s/Hz, while con￾sistently outperforming its counterpart (SDMA-GNN-U), ver￾ifying the SE gains of rate-splitting. This stability contrasts sharply with the DNN baselines (RSMA-DNN-U and SDMA￾DNN-U). While GNN and DNN schemes perform comparably in the sparse r… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: CDF of the downlink SE per UE under varying Pilot Resource Strains with fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Trainable parameter count across varying number of APs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (CF-mMIMO) systems provide enhanced coverage and capacity for next-generation wireless networks. However, CF-mMIMO systems face significant challenges in downlink power allocation (PA) due to imperfect channel state information (CSI), severe multi-user interference (MUI), and high computational complexity. To address these issues, rate-splitting multiple access (RSMA) is adopted as a robust interference management strategy. Accordingly, this paper proposes an unsupervised and scalable graph neural network (GNN) framework for PA in rate-splitting CF-mMIMO (RS-CF-mMIMO) systems, relying exclusively on large-scale fading (LSF) coefficients without instantaneous CSI. To resolve the dimensionality mismatch in dynamic networks, we introduce a slice-based adaptive layer that projects variable-dimension features into a fixed latent space. This mechanism enables a unified model to generalize across diverse topologies without retraining. Within this architecture, the sum spectral efficiency (SE) is maximized under per-AP power constraints, assuming maximum-ratio precoding for common streams and regularized zero-forcing precoding for private streams. We also derive a weighted minimum mean-square error-alternating direction method of multipliers (WMMSE-ADMM) algorithm as a performance upper bound. Extensive simulations verify that the proposed GNN framework achieves near-optimal SE and outperforms unsupervised deep neural networks (DNNs) across diverse system sizes and pilot assignment schemes. Furthermore, the scalable variant maintains robust performance while reducing the trainable parameter count by over 57% relative to DNNs and decreasing inference latency by up to three orders of magnitude compared with WMMSE-ADMM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an unsupervised scalable GNN framework for downlink power allocation in rate-splitting cell-free massive MIMO systems. It relies exclusively on large-scale fading coefficients (no instantaneous CSI), introduces a slice-based adaptive layer to map variable-dimension inputs to a fixed latent space for generalization across topologies without retraining, maximizes sum spectral efficiency under per-AP power constraints with MR precoding for common streams and RZF for private streams, derives a WMMSE-ADMM algorithm as an upper bound, and reports via simulations that the GNN achieves near-optimal SE while outperforming unsupervised DNNs, with the scalable variant cutting trainable parameters by over 57% and inference latency by up to three orders of magnitude versus WMMSE-ADMM.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a practical, low-complexity, topology-agnostic solution for power allocation in dynamic RS-CF-mMIMO networks. Strengths include the unsupervised GNN formulation that exploits the underlying graph structure, the derivation of an independent WMMSE-ADMM benchmark from first principles, and the emphasis on scalability via the adaptive layer. These elements address key deployment barriers of computational cost and retraining in cell-free systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [slice-based adaptive layer description] The slice-based adaptive layer (introduced to resolve dimensionality mismatch): no analytical bound or approximation-error analysis is supplied for the projection of variable-dimension LSF feature vectors into a fixed latent space. This is load-bearing for the claims of near-optimality and generalization across arbitrary AP/user counts without retraining, as the abstract states the framework 'relies exclusively on LSF coefficients' and the layer enables a 'unified model'.
  2. [simulation results] Simulation results (extensive simulations verifying near-optimal SE): the central performance claims rest on empirical comparisons to WMMSE-ADMM and DNN baselines, yet no details are provided on the number of Monte Carlo trials, statistical significance testing, data exclusion rules, or the precise definition of 'near-optimal' (e.g., SE gap thresholds). This undermines confidence in the assertion that LSF coefficients alone suffice for near-optimal allocation under the stated precoding assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the scalable variant reduces trainable parameters by 'over 57%' relative to DNNs; specify the exact DNN architecture and layer counts used for this comparison to allow direct replication.
  2. [system model] Notation for the common and private stream power variables should be introduced consistently when first appearing in the system model to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the significance of our unsupervised scalable GNN framework for power allocation in RS-CF-mMIMO systems. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [slice-based adaptive layer description] The slice-based adaptive layer (introduced to resolve dimensionality mismatch): no analytical bound or approximation-error analysis is supplied for the projection of variable-dimension LSF feature vectors into a fixed latent space. This is load-bearing for the claims of near-optimality and generalization across arbitrary AP/user counts without retraining, as the abstract states the framework 'relies exclusively on LSF coefficients' and the layer enables a 'unified model'.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript currently lacks an analytical bound or approximation-error analysis for the slice-based adaptive layer. The layer's design and effectiveness are supported by empirical results across varying network sizes, but to better substantiate the generalization claims, we will revise the manuscript to include a detailed characterization of the projection mechanism along with a bound on the approximation error derived from the slicing operation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [simulation results] Simulation results (extensive simulations verifying near-optimal SE): the central performance claims rest on empirical comparisons to WMMSE-ADMM and DNN baselines, yet no details are provided on the number of Monte Carlo trials, statistical significance testing, data exclusion rules, or the precise definition of 'near-optimal' (e.g., SE gap thresholds). This undermines confidence in the assertion that LSF coefficients alone suffice for near-optimal allocation under the stated precoding assumptions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the simulation section would benefit from additional methodological details. In the revised manuscript, we will explicitly report the number of Monte Carlo trials, any statistical significance testing performed, data exclusion rules, and a precise definition of 'near-optimal' (e.g., in terms of the relative gap to the WMMSE-ADMM benchmark). These additions will improve transparency and support the empirical claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent benchmarks and empirical validation

full rationale

The paper's core chain derives WMMSE-ADMM from first principles as an external upper bound, trains the GNN unsupervised on the SE objective using only LSF inputs, and validates via simulation against that bound plus separate DNN baselines. No equation or claim reduces by construction to its own fitted parameters or self-citations; the slice layer is an architectural choice whose losslessness is asserted empirically rather than defined into the result. This matches the default non-circular case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The approach depends on standard MIMO precoding assumptions and introduces one new architectural component whose value is demonstrated empirically.

free parameters (1)
  • GNN trainable weights
    Learned unsupervised by directly optimizing the sum spectral efficiency objective under the stated precoding and power constraints.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Maximum-ratio precoding is used for common streams and regularized zero-forcing precoding for private streams
    Invoked when defining the system model and the optimization objective.
  • domain assumption Sum spectral efficiency is the appropriate objective to maximize under per-AP power constraints
    Stated as the design goal for the power allocation problem.
invented entities (1)
  • slice-based adaptive layer no independent evidence
    purpose: Projects variable-dimension input features into a fixed latent space so a single model generalizes across different network topologies
    Introduced explicitly to resolve the dimensionality mismatch in dynamic networks without requiring retraining.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5854 in / 1571 out tokens · 62066 ms · 2026-06-30T10:57:06.596193+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Low-Complexity Hybrid Precoding for Cell-Free Massive MU-MIMO ISAC Systems

    cs.IT 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The work develops an AO-based hybrid precoding scheme with multi-branch RS MMSE-THP updates that reduces complexity by 87% while meeting ESR and PEB sensing constraints in CF massive MU-MIMO ISAC.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and challenges,

    L. Lu, G. Y . Li, A. L. Swindlehurst, A. Ashikhmin, and R. Zhang, “An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and challenges,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 742–758, 2014

    2014

  2. [2]

    Advancements and challenges in scalable modular antenna arrays for 5G massive MIMO networks,

    A. Ashraf, T. S. Gunawan, M. Kartiwi, L. O. Nur, B. S. Nugroho, and R. P. Astuti, “Advancements and challenges in scalable modular antenna arrays for 5G massive MIMO networks,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 57 895–57 916, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Cell-free massive MIMO for 6G wireless communication networks,

    H. He, X. Yu, J. Zhang, S. Song, and K. B. Letaief, “Cell-free massive MIMO for 6G wireless communication networks,”IEEE J. Commun. Inf. Netw., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 321–335, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Next- generation multiple access with cell-free massive MIMO,

    M. Mohammadi, Z. Mobini, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, “Next- generation multiple access with cell-free massive MIMO,”Proc. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    A survey of NOMA-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    A. Apiyo and J. Izydorczyk, “A survey of NOMA-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems,”Electronics, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 231, Jan. 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Mobile cell-free massive MIMO: Challenges, solutions, and future directions,

    J. Zheng, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, B. Ai, M. Debbah, and K. B. Letaief, “Mobile cell-free massive MIMO: Challenges, solutions, and future directions,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 140– 147, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Ultradense cell-free massive MIMO for 6G: Technical overview and open questions,

    H. Q. Ngo, G. Interdonato, E. G. Larsson, G. Caire, and J. G. Andrews, “Ultradense cell-free massive MIMO for 6G: Technical overview and open questions,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 805–831, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    User-centric cell-free massive MIMO networks: A survey of opportunities, challenges and solutions,

    H. A. Ammar, R. Adve, S. Shahbazpanahi, G. Boudreau, and K. V . Srinivas, “User-centric cell-free massive MIMO networks: A survey of opportunities, challenges and solutions,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 611–652, 2022

    2022

  9. [9]

    Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Bj ¨ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4247–4261, 2020

    2020

  10. [10]

    Making cell-free massive MIMO competitive with MMSE pro- cessing and centralized implementation,

    ——, “Making cell-free massive MIMO competitive with MMSE pro- cessing and centralized implementation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Generalized superimposed training scheme in cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    N. Garg and T. Ratnarajah, “Generalized superimposed training scheme in cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7668–7681, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    Mitigating intra-cell pilot contamination in massive MIMO: A rate- splitting approach,

    A. Mishra, Y . Mao, C. K. Thomas, L. Sanguinetti, and B. Clerckx, “Mitigating intra-cell pilot contamination in massive MIMO: A rate- splitting approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 3472–3487, 2023. 15

    2023

  13. [13]

    Rate-splitting multiple access: Fundamentals, survey, and future research trends,

    Y . Mao, O. Dizdar, B. Clerckx, R. Schober, P. Popovski, and H. V . Poor, “Rate-splitting multiple access: Fundamentals, survey, and future research trends,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2073– 2126, 2022

    2073

  14. [14]

    A primer on rate-splitting multiple access: Tutorial, myths, and frequently asked questions,

    B. Clerckx, Y . Mao, E. A. Jorswieck, J. Yuan, D. J. Love, E. Erkip, and D. Niyato, “A primer on rate-splitting multiple access: Tutorial, myths, and frequently asked questions,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1265–1308, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink communication systems: bridging, generalizing, and outper- forming SDMA and NOMA,

    Y . Mao, B. Clerckx, and V . O. Li, “Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink communication systems: bridging, generalizing, and outper- forming SDMA and NOMA,”EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 133, 2018

    2018

  16. [16]

    Fairness scheduling in user-centric cell-free massive MIMO wireless networks,

    F. G ¨ottsch, N. Osawa, I. Kanno, T. Ohseki, and G. Caire, “Fairness scheduling in user-centric cell-free massive MIMO wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 942–11 957, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    A review of energy efficiency and power control schemes in ultra-dense cell-free massive MIMO systems for sustainable 6G wireless communication,

    A. L. Imoize, H. I. Obakhena, F. I. Anyasi, and S. N. Sur, “A review of energy efficiency and power control schemes in ultra-dense cell-free massive MIMO systems for sustainable 6G wireless communication,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 17, 2022

    2022

  18. [18]

    Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,

    H. Q. Ngo, A. Ashikhmin, H. Yang, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, “Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1834–1850, 2017

    2017

  19. [19]

    Joint user association and power control for cell-free massive MIMO,

    C. Hao, T. T. Vu, H. Q. Ngo, M. N. Dao, X. Dang, C. Wang, and M. Matthaiou, “Joint user association and power control for cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 15 823– 15 841, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Pre- coding and power optimization in cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Nayebi, A. Ashikhmin, T. L. Marzetta, H. Yang, and B. D. Rao, “Pre- coding and power optimization in cell-free massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4445–4459, 2017

    2017

  21. [21]

    Max-min beamforming for large-scale cell-free massive MIMO: A randomized ADMM algorithm,

    B. Wang, J. Fang, Y . Xiao, and M. Haardt, “Max-min beamforming for large-scale cell-free massive MIMO: A randomized ADMM algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 4315–4328, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    A practical max-min fair resource allocation algo- rithm for rate-splitting multiple access,

    F. Luo and Y . Mao, “A practical max-min fair resource allocation algo- rithm for rate-splitting multiple access,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3285–3289, 2023

    2023

  23. [23]

    Clustered cell-free multi-user multiple-antenna systems with rate-splitting: Precoder design and power allocation,

    A. R. Flores, R. C. de Lamare, and K. V . Mishra, “Clustered cell-free multi-user multiple-antenna systems with rate-splitting: Precoder design and power allocation,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 5920– 5934, 2023

    2023

  24. [24]

    Deep learning based power control for cell- free massive MIMO with MRT,

    L. Sala ¨un and H. Yang, “Deep learning based power control for cell- free massive MIMO with MRT,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 2021, pp. 01–07

    2021

  25. [25]

    Learning-based downlink power allocation in cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    M. Zaher, ¨O. T. Demir, E. Bj ¨ornson, and M. Petrova, “Learning-based downlink power allocation in cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 174–188, 2023

    2023

  26. [26]

    Learning optimal fronthauling and decentralized edge computation in fog radio access networks,

    H. Lee, J. Kim, and S.-H. Park, “Learning optimal fronthauling and decentralized edge computation in fog radio access networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 5599–5612, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Deep learning-based power control for cell-free massive MIMO networks,

    N. Rajapaksha, K. S. Manosha, N. Rajatheva, and M. Latva-Aho, “Deep learning-based power control for cell-free massive MIMO networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–7

    2021

  28. [28]

    Joint power control and pilot assignment in cell-free massive MIMO using deep learning,

    M. Usman Khan, E. Testi, M. Chiani, and E. Paolini, “Joint power control and pilot assignment in cell-free massive MIMO using deep learning,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 5260–5275, 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Unsupervised learning-based joint power control and fronthaul capacity allocation in cell-free massive MIMO with hardware impairments,

    N. Rajapaksha, K. S. Manosha, N. Rajatheva, and M. Latva-Aho, “Unsupervised learning-based joint power control and fronthaul capacity allocation in cell-free massive MIMO with hardware impairments,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1159–1163, 2023

    2023

  30. [30]

    Decen- tralized beamforming for cell-free massive mimo with unsupervised learning,

    H. Hojatian, J. Nadal, J.-F. Frigon, and F. Leduc-Primeau, “Decen- tralized beamforming for cell-free massive mimo with unsupervised learning,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1042–1046, 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    Model-based neural collaboration framework for resource-efficient downlink beamforming in cell-free massive mimo systems,

    D. Yu, M. Boloursaz Mashhadi, and R. Tafazolli, “Model-based neural collaboration framework for resource-efficient downlink beamforming in cell-free massive mimo systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 8980–8995, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    A federated deep learning framework for cell-free RSMA networks,

    S. A. Mousavi, M. Monemi, R. Mohseni, and M. Latva-aho, “A federated deep learning framework for cell-free RSMA networks,” arXiv:2501.07126, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Deep reinforcement learn- ing enhanced rate-splitting multiple access for interference mitigation,

    O. N. Irkicatal, E. T. Ceran, and M. Yuksel, “Deep reinforcement learn- ing enhanced rate-splitting multiple access for interference mitigation,” arXiv:2403.05974, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    RNN beamforming optimizer for rate- splitting multiple access and cell-free massive MIMO,

    J. Johnston and X. Wang, “RNN beamforming optimizer for rate- splitting multiple access and cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 3579–3592, 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Deep learning-based power control for uplink cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    Y . Zhang, J. Zhang, Y . Jin, S. Buzzi, and B. Ai, “Deep learning-based power control for uplink cell-free massive MIMO systems,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  36. [36]

    Unsupervised deep learning for power control of cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    Y . Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Buzzi, H. Xiao, and B. Ai, “Unsupervised deep learning for power control of cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 9585–9590, 2023

    2023

  37. [37]

    Power allocation in cell-free massive MIMO: A deep learning method,

    Y . Zhao, I. G. Niemegeers, and S. H. De Groot, “Power allocation in cell-free massive MIMO: A deep learning method,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 87 185–87 200, 2020

    2020

  38. [38]

    Graph representation learning for wireless communications,

    M. Mohsenivatani, S. Ali, V . Ranasinghe, N. Rajatheva, and M. Latva- Aho, “Graph representation learning for wireless communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 2024

    2024

  39. [39]

    Graph neural networks for scalable radio resource management: Architecture design and theoretical analysis,

    Y . Shen, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Graph neural networks for scalable radio resource management: Architecture design and theoretical analysis,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2021

    2021

  40. [40]

    Energy-efficient power allocation in cell-free massive MIMO via graph neural networks,

    R. Raghunath, B. Peng, and E. A. Jorswieck, “Energy-efficient power allocation in cell-free massive MIMO via graph neural networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw. (ICMLCN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 31–37

    2024

  41. [41]

    Dis- tributed graph neural network design for sum ergodic spectral efficiency maximization in cell-free massive MIMO,

    N. X. Tung, T. Van Chien, H. Q. Ngo, and W. J. Hwang, “Dis- tributed graph neural network design for sum ergodic spectral efficiency maximization in cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 5181–5186, 2025

    2025

  42. [42]

    Scalable user rate and energy-efficiency optimization in cell-free massive MIMO,

    H. D. Tuan, A. A. Nasir, H. Q. Ngo, E. Dutkiewicz, and H. V . Poor, “Scalable user rate and energy-efficiency optimization in cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 6050–6065, 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    Learning optimal linear precoding for cell-free massive MIMO with GNN,

    B. Parlier, L. Sala ¨un, and H. Yang, “Learning optimal linear precoding for cell-free massive MIMO with GNN,” inProc. Eur. Conf. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Discov. Databases (ECML PKDD). Brno, Czech Republic: Springer, Sept. 2024, pp. 72–88

    2024

  44. [44]

    GNN-based RSMA for energy efficiency in hardware-impaired cell-free URLLC systems,

    Y . Huang, Y . Jiang, F.-C. Zheng, and P. Zhu, “GNN-based RSMA for energy efficiency in hardware-impaired cell-free URLLC systems,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC). IEEE, 2025, pp. 3551–3556

    2025

  45. [45]

    Graph neural network aided power control in partially connected cell-free massive MIMO,

    S. Mishra, L. Salaun, H. Yang, and C. S. Chen, “Graph neural network aided power control in partially connected cell-free massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 12 412–12 423, 2024

    2024

  46. [46]

    Resource allocation in heterogeneous network with node and edge enhanced graph attention network,

    Q. Sun, Y . He, and O. Petrosian, “Resource allocation in heterogeneous network with node and edge enhanced graph attention network,”Applied Intelligence, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 4865–4877, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    A dynamic power allocation approach for downlink cell-free massive MIMO with graph neural network,

    Y . Zhao, F. Zhang, Z. Zhou, and G. Hu, “A dynamic power allocation approach for downlink cell-free massive MIMO with graph neural network,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 6518–6532, 2025

    2025

  48. [48]

    Heterogeneous graph neural network for power allocation in multicarrier-division duplex cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    B. Li, L.-L. Yang, R. G. Maunder, S. Sun, and P. Xiao, “Heterogeneous graph neural network for power allocation in multicarrier-division duplex cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 962–977, 2024

    2024

  49. [49]

    Heterogeneous resource allocation with multi-task learning for wireless networks,

    N. A. Mitsiou, P. S. Bouzinis, P. G. Sarigiannidis, and G. K. Karagian- nidis, “Heterogeneous resource allocation with multi-task learning for wireless networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 7191– 7205, 2026

    2026

  50. [50]

    On size-oriented long-tailed graph classification of graph neural networks

    Z. Liu, Q. Mao, C. Liu, Y . Fang, and J. Sun, “On size-oriented long-tailed graph classification of graph neural networks.” New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512197

    work page doi:10.1145/3485447.3512197 2022

  51. [51]

    Unsupervised learning-based downlink power allocation for CF-mMIMO networks,

    M. Fabiani, A. Abdallah, A. Celik, and A. M. Eltawil, “Unsupervised learning-based downlink power allocation for CF-mMIMO networks,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 2023, pp. 6309–6314

    2023

  52. [52]

    Unsupervised learning for distributed downlink power allocation in cell-free mMIMO networks,

    M. Fabiani, A. Abdallah, A. Celik, O. Haliloglu, and A. M. Eltawil, “Unsupervised learning for distributed downlink power allocation in cell-free mMIMO networks,”IEEE Trans. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, pp. 644–658, 2025

    2025