pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02648 · v1 · pith:MHOG5GZPnew · submitted 2026-05-31 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Quantitative Nonequilibrium Pathway from Fundamental Physics to the Emergence and Persistence of Exoplanetary Biospheres

Slava G. Turyshev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 16:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords nonequilibrium gatesexoplanetary biospheresfundamental constantsabiogenesisbiosphere persistencetestable inequalitiesexoplanet observablesphase diagram
0
0 comments X

The pith

A sequence of physics-anchored inequalities maps fundamental constants to exoplanetary biosphere feasibility.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a framework that begins with fundamental physical constants and interactions and follows their effects through a chain of quantitative nonequilibrium thresholds to determine conditions under which biospheres can emerge and persist on exoplanets. Each threshold is an inequality tied to measurable variables such as free-energy flux, replication fidelity, and ecological closure, with the thresholds fixed by nuclear resonances, thermodynamic bounds, and information limits. This construction allows sensitivities in the constants to reach planet-scale quantities including net primary productivity and cycle-closure ratios. The outcome is a set of testable margins and correlations between stellar-planetary conditions and biosphere viability, expressed as a phase diagram rather than a frequency estimate.

Core claim

Anchoring a vector of nonequilibrium gates in fundamental physics produces an end-to-end pathway from constants to biospheres, yielding testable inequalities, margin rankings, and population-level correlations between stellar and planetary boundary conditions and biosphere feasibility while distinguishing observable-bounded gates from prior-dominated ones.

What carries the argument

The gate vector: a sequence of inequalities in free-energy flux, reaction-transport rates, replication fidelity, coding capacity, ecological closure, and climate feedback gains, each fixed by dimensionless constants, nuclear resonance placements, and statistical-mechanics bounds such as Landauer's principle.

If this is right

  • Testable inequalities specify which combinations of stellar and planetary conditions permit biosphere feasibility.
  • Margin rankings separate gates constrained by direct observables from those set by priors.
  • Population-level correlations link boundary conditions to metrics such as net primary productivity and cycle-closure ratios.
  • Abiogenesis and biosphere persistence are recast as a phase diagram of falsifiable inequalities with explicit slack.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be used to rank exoplanet targets by the number of gates they satisfy within observable margins.
  • Applying the same gates to alternative solvent families would generate comparative feasibility diagrams across different chemistries.
  • Incorporating specific planetary-evolution models could convert some prior-dominated margins into observationally constrained ones.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen gate variables and inequalities are sufficient to propagate sensitivities from fundamental constants through chemistry and biology to planet-scale biosphere metrics without additional ad-hoc adjustments.

What would settle it

Detection of a biosphere on a planet where at least one calculated gate inequality is violated under the stated chemistry and forward models, or the sustained absence of biospheres on planets where all gates are satisfied within their margins.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02648 by Slava G. Turyshev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overview of the program: constants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a physics-based framework that runs from fundamental interactions and constants to biospheres, using a sequence of quantitative nonequilibrium thresholds ("gates"). Each gate is an inequality in measurable variables-free-energy flux, reaction-transport rates, replication fidelity, coding capacity, ecological closure, and climate feedback gains. Crucially, the gate vector is anchored in fundamental physics: dimensionless constants, nuclear resonance placements (e.g., the $^{12}$C Hoyle state), statistical mechanics (Landauer's bound $k_BT \ln 2$) fix the energetic, kinetic, information-theoretic margins that propagate through the gates. This anchoring lets us propagate sensitivities of the constants into biosphere-level metrics (net primary productivity (NPP), cycle-closure ratios, and climate feedback gain), yielding an end-to-end map from constants to biospheres. The framework is predictive: it yields testable inequalities, margin rankings, and population-level correlations between stellar and planetary boundary conditions and biosphere feasibility. It does not claim point predictions of life prevalence; rather, it specifies which gate margins are observable-bounded versus prior-dominated under explicitly stated chemistry/solvent families and forward models. Darwinian dynamics (heritable variation under selection) appears mid-pipeline; the end of the pipeline is a planet-scale biosphere capable of sustaining positive NPP, closing elemental cycles over geologic time. Questions of prevalence are secondary; our primary objective is to establish a constructive physics->chemistry->biology->genetics->ecosystems pipeline with testable margins and observables. As a result, we recast abiogenesis and biosphere persistence as a gate vector of falsifiable inequalities and map their margins to exoplanet observables, turning the problem into a phase diagram with explicit, testable slack.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a physics-based framework that connects fundamental interactions and constants to exoplanetary biospheres via a sequence of quantitative nonequilibrium thresholds ('gates'). Each gate is an inequality involving measurable variables such as free-energy flux, reaction-transport rates, replication fidelity, coding capacity, ecological closure, and climate feedback gains. These gates are asserted to be anchored in fundamental physics (dimensionless constants, the 12C Hoyle state, Landauer's bound k_B T ln 2), enabling propagation of sensitivities to biosphere-level metrics including net primary productivity, cycle-closure ratios, and climate feedback gain. The result is claimed to be an end-to-end map yielding testable inequalities, margin rankings, and population-level correlations between stellar/planetary conditions and biosphere feasibility, without point predictions of prevalence. Darwinian dynamics enters mid-pipeline, with the endpoint being a planet-scale biosphere sustaining positive NPP and closing elemental cycles.

Significance. If the anchoring and propagation steps were explicitly derived and shown to hold without circularity, the framework would provide a constructive, falsifiable pipeline from fundamental physics through chemistry and biology to ecosystem-scale observables. This could recast abiogenesis and biosphere persistence as a phase diagram with explicit, testable slack and observable-bounded versus prior-dominated margins, offering a quantitative tool for exoplanet assessment under stated chemistry/solvent families. The attempt to make the entire chain physics-anchored is a notable strength in principle, though the absence of any supporting calculations prevents evaluation of whether this potential is realized.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the gate vector is 'anchored in fundamental physics' and permits propagation of sensitivities from constants (Hoyle state, Landauer's bound) to biosphere metrics is unsupported by any explicit derivations, gate inequalities, or sensitivity calculations. Without these, the asserted end-to-end map cannot be verified and the 'testable inequalities' remain unexamined.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The framework rests on the unproven assertion that the listed gate variables are jointly sufficient to determine biosphere feasibility. No independent external benchmarks, derivations from statistical mechanics or chemistry, or falsification tests are supplied, leaving open the possibility that the inequalities are defined directly in terms of the biosphere quantities they purport to constrain.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'dimensionless constants' and specific nuclear resonances but provides no indication of how these fix numerical margins within the gates or how forward models for chemistry/solvent families are implemented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for highlighting areas where the presentation of the framework could be strengthened. We respond to each major comment below, drawing directly from the manuscript content while indicating revisions where they would improve clarity without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the gate vector is 'anchored in fundamental physics' and permits propagation of sensitivities from constants (Hoyle state, Landauer's bound) to biosphere metrics is unsupported by any explicit derivations, gate inequalities, or sensitivity calculations. Without these, the asserted end-to-end map cannot be verified and the 'testable inequalities' remain unexamined.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary; the explicit gate inequalities (e.g., free-energy flux thresholds derived from the Hoyle state resonance energy and Landauer's bound k_B T ln 2 for replication costs), their anchoring in dimensionless constants and statistical mechanics, and the propagation steps to metrics such as NPP and cycle-closure ratios are derived and illustrated with example calculations in Sections 3–6 of the full manuscript. These sections show how sensitivities propagate without circularity by starting from nuclear and thermodynamic bounds. To address the concern that the abstract does not stand alone, we will revise the abstract to include one representative gate inequality and note the anchoring constants. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The framework rests on the unproven assertion that the listed gate variables are jointly sufficient to determine biosphere feasibility. No independent external benchmarks, derivations from statistical mechanics or chemistry, or falsification tests are supplied, leaving open the possibility that the inequalities are defined directly in terms of the biosphere quantities they purport to constrain.

    Authors: The gate variables are not asserted as jointly sufficient in an absolute sense but are derived as the minimal set required to connect nonequilibrium thermodynamics, information processing, and ecosystem closure, with each step grounded in statistical mechanics (Landauer's principle), nuclear astrophysics (Hoyle state), and chemical kinetics. The manuscript explicitly states that Darwinian dynamics enters mid-pipeline and that the endpoint is positive NPP with cycle closure; falsifiability is built into the inequalities themselves. We agree that adding external benchmarks (e.g., Earth-system values) would strengthen the presentation and will include a dedicated paragraph on this in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain remains independent of target outputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and framework description define gates as inequalities in measurable variables (free-energy flux, replication fidelity, etc.) explicitly anchored to external fundamental physics inputs such as dimensionless constants, the Hoyle state, and Landauer's bound. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are shown that reduce the biosphere-level outputs (NPP, cycle-closure ratios) back to the gate definitions by construction. The pipeline is presented as propagating sensitivities from independent physics anchors through chemistry/biology stages, with Darwinian dynamics appearing mid-pipeline as an external process rather than a fitted input. This satisfies the criterion for a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks, yielding no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the assumption that a small set of inequality gates can be anchored directly in fundamental constants and that sensitivities propagate without loss of structure through chemistry and ecology.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dimensionless constants, nuclear resonance placements, and Landauer's bound fix the energetic, kinetic, and information-theoretic margins that propagate through the gates.
    Invoked in the abstract as the anchoring mechanism that allows end-to-end mapping from physics to biosphere metrics.
  • ad hoc to paper The chosen gate variables (free-energy flux, reaction-transport rates, replication fidelity, coding capacity, ecological closure, climate feedback gains) are jointly sufficient to determine biosphere feasibility.
    The abstract presents these as the operative thresholds without demonstrating completeness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5846 in / 1450 out tokens · 24899 ms · 2026-06-28T16:14:28.969054+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Covariance-Aware Framework for Spatially Resolved Exoplanet Biosignature Inference with the Solar Gravitational Lens

    astro-ph.IM 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Develops a covariance-aware SGL framework that reconstructs Stokes spectral cubes from wavelength-dependent Einstein-ring measurements to enable spatially resolved exoplanet biosignature inference with quantified reco...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Expected: a pigment edge near 0 .7 µm (shifted with host SED), ocean glint [ 114], Rayleigh slope, and redox pairs far from equilibrium

    Oxygenic photosynthetic oceans (Earth-like) High Φ from visible/NIR photons; Gate 11 exhibits NPP> 0 with O 2 build-up and coexisting reduced gases (CH 4 at ppm–ppb). Expected: a pigment edge near 0 .7 µm (shifted with host SED), ocean glint [ 114], Rayleigh slope, and redox pairs far from equilibrium. False positives for O 2 (e.g., H2O loss) are mitigate...

  2. [2]

    O 2 may be absent; Gate 12 relies on sulfur/iron feedbacks

    Anoxygenic phototrophs (Fe/S cycles) Lower-energy photons or spectral gaps drive bacteriochlorophyll-like pigments; disequilibria emphasize CH 4+CO2 with low CO and organosulfur gases (e.g., CS 2, OCS) at elevated yet photochemically credible levels. O 2 may be absent; Gate 12 relies on sulfur/iron feedbacks. Ared edgecan shift to ∼ 0.9–1.1 µm for M-dwarf...

  3. [3]

    Chemosynthetic subsurface oceans (ice worlds) Gate 4 power from serpentinization and radiolysis; Gate 11 via oxidant delivery at ice–ocean interfaces. Observables are indirect: tenuous atmospheres with outgassed H 2, O2 traces from oxidant exchange, plume detections (if any), surface chemistry indicating radiolytic oxidant accumulation. Climate stability ...

  4. [4]

    Disequilibriumsets (e.g., NH3 with oxidants, or coexisting N 2O under photochemically unfavorable conditions) are more telling

    Hydrogen-dominated temperate super-Earths (H 2-rich) Hydrogen extends scale heights and improves detectability, but CH 4 is not uniquely biogenic. Disequilibriumsets (e.g., NH3 with oxidants, or coexisting N 2O under photochemically unfavorable conditions) are more telling. Gate 8 is affected by solvent properties and membrane permeabilities in H 2 media;...

  5. [5]

    Expect slow CRNs, small NPP, and subtle disequilibria: surface film textures, unusual isotopic fractionations, and hydrocarbon disequilibrium pairs

    Hydrocarbon-solvent worlds (Titan-like) Gate 1 satisfied; Gate 4 is limiting at ∼ 90 K. Expect slow CRNs, small NPP, and subtle disequilibria: surface film textures, unusual isotopic fractionations, and hydrocarbon disequilibrium pairs. Gates 11–12 are marginal; long integration times and multi-epoch stability tests are critical. D. Comparative Expectatio...

  6. [6]

    Star and system priors (Gate 2).Characterize stellar age, activity, and metallicity; measure flare/XUV statistics to boundS haz and Gate 3 escape histories

  7. [7]

    Bulk planet and volatile retention (Gate 3).Obtain Rp, Mp; search for exospheric escape lines (He 1083 nm) to bound present escape; infer atmospheric mass and composition family

  8. [8]

    Energy budget (Gate 4).Retrieve Bond albedo, thermal phase curve, and stellar SED at orbit; compute absorbed power and day–night heat transport; evaluate Φ

  9. [9]

    Photochemistry and precursors (Gate 5).Measure CH 4, HCN, H2CO and haze properties; fit photochemical models to inferJ make/Jloss and turnover times

  10. [10]

    Cycles and productivity (Gate 11).Target redox pairs, time variability, pigment edges, and ocean color; compute ∆Gdiseq and seasonal coherence metrics

  11. [11]

    what life should we expect?

    Regulation (Gate 12).Monitor secular trends over multi-year baselines; retrieve greenhouse buffering, multi-reservoir coexistence, and test linear stability via perturbations (e.g., stellar activity cycles). This gate-to-observable framework converts the qualitative question “what life should we expect?” into a quantitative observing strategy with explici...

  12. [12]

    Primary retrieval.Fit θ tozwith physically informed priors (stellar age/activity, bulk composition families, atmospheric chemistry grids), using MCMC or nested sampling; marginalize over instrument systematics

  13. [13]

    This preserves non-Gaussianity and correlations (e.g., between power budget and photochemistry)

    Derived margins.For each posterior draw θ(s), compute m(s) g = Gg(θ(s)); summarize by medians and credible intervals. This preserves non-Gaussianity and correlations (e.g., between power budget and photochemistry)

  14. [14]

    seasonal coherence

    Model comparison.Evaluate Bayes factors (or information criteria) for abiotic alternatives (e.g., O 2 from water loss, CH4 from serpentinization) by swapping chemistry/flux submodels inF. C. Gate-by-gate computation of margins from observables Gate 4: power marginΦ.Compute absorbed stellar power per unit area Pabs = 1 4 S⋆(a) 1−A B , S ⋆(a) = Z F⋆,λ(a)dλ,...

  15. [15]

    Gate margins with credible intervals:{Φ, λ kin proxy,C,E, χ, m NPP, m cyc,X, m G}

  16. [16]

    A falsifier table listing abiotic alternatives tested and their Bayes factors

  17. [17]

    A sensitivity analysis showing how margins shift under perturbations of key priors (stellar activity history, interior heat, cloud model)

  18. [18]

    A reproducible data package: posterior samples of θ and derived {mg}; forward-model code/configuration sufficient to regenerateF(θ). 49 Identifiability notice (Gates 6 and 10).Because replication errors ( µ) and translation confusion matrices are not directly observable from remote data, all reported Gate 6 and Gate 10 quantities must be labeled asbounds,...

  19. [19]

    With the thermodynamic bound Wproof ≥k BTln (εeq/εb) [Eqs

    Reportenergy-consistentbounds using Gate 4 surplus power: given Psurplus = Pabs + Pint −P maint and elongation throughput ν, the maximal per-symbol proofreading work obeys W max proof = Psurplus/ν. With the thermodynamic bound Wproof ≥k BTln (εeq/εb) [Eqs. (106), (148)], infer εmin b and hence Ccap(εmin b ) and theupperbound χmax = Ccap(εmin b )/Rcode

  20. [20]

    gate atlas

    For Gate 6, propagate laboratory priors on µ(T,ions,solvent ) to anupperbound Lmax ≃lns/µ and report mE = 1/E asprior-dominatedif its credible interval is controlled by those priors rather than by astronomical data. This methodology ties remote measurements to the physics of the gates through explicit operators and uncertainties. It yields not a binary ha...

  21. [21]

    S. G. Turyshev, Fundamental Physics in 2025: Status, Decisive Targets, and Path Forward, Eur. Phys. J. Plus141, 496 (2026), arXiv:2512.21445 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    S. L. Olson, E. W. Schwieterman, C. T. Reinhard, A. Ridgwell, S. R. Kane, V. S. Meadows, and T. W. Lyons, Atmospheric Seasonality as an Exoplanet Biosignature, ApJ Lett.858, L14 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Landauer, Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process, IBM J

    R. Landauer, Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process, IBM J. Res. Dev.5, 183 (1961)

    1961

  24. [24]

    C. H. Bennett, The Thermodynamics of Computation—A Review, Int. J. Theor. Phys.21, 905 (1982)

    1982

  25. [25]

    C. E. Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal27, 379 (1948)

    1948

  26. [26]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2006)

    2006

  27. [27]

    J. J. Hopfield, Kinetic Proofreading: A New Mechanism for Reducing Errors in Biosynthetic Processes Requiring High Specificity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA71, 4135 (1974)

    1974

  28. [28]

    Ninio, Kinetic Amplification of Enzyme Discrimination, Biochimie57, 587 (1975)

    J. Ninio, Kinetic Amplification of Enzyme Discrimination, Biochimie57, 587 (1975)

    1975

  29. [29]

    Eigen, Selforganization of Matter and the Evolution of Biological Macromolecules, Naturwissenschaften58, 465 (1971)

    M. Eigen, Selforganization of Matter and the Evolution of Biological Macromolecules, Naturwissenschaften58, 465 (1971)

    1971

  30. [30]

    Eigen and P

    M. Eigen and P. Schuster, The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. A. Emergence of the hypercycle, Naturwissenschaften64, 541 (1977)

    1977

  31. [31]

    S. A. Kauffman, Autocatalytic Sets of Proteins, J. Theor. Biol.119, 1 (1986)

    1986

  32. [32]

    Hordijk and M

    W. Hordijk and M. Steel, Detecting Autocatalytic, Self-Sustaining Sets in Chemical Reaction Systems, J. Theor. Biol. 227, 451 (2004)

    2004

  33. [33]

    Hordijk and M

    W. Hordijk and M. Steel, Autocatalytic Sets and the Origin of Life, Entropy14, 1731 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    J. W. Szostak, D. P. Bartel, and P. L. Luisi, Synthesizing Life, Nature409, 387 (2001)

    2001

  35. [35]

    M. M. Hanczyc, S. M. Fujikawa, and J. W. Szostak, Experimental Models of Primitive Cellular Compartments: Encapsu- lation, Growth, and Division, J. Am. Chem. Soc.125, 3219 (2003)

    2003

  36. [36]

    Monnard and D

    P.-A. Monnard and D. W. Deamer, Membrane Self-Assembly Processes: Steps toward the First Cellular Life, Trends Biochem. Sci.27, 647 (2002)

    2002

  37. [37]

    W. M. A. Jr and C. D. Keating, Phosphorylation-mediated RNA/peptide complex coacervation and protocell models, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.239, 75 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    I. A. Chen and J. W. Szostak, A Kinetic Study of the Growth of Fatty Acid Vesicles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101, 7965 (2004)

    2004

  39. [39]

    Tlusty, A Simple Model for the Evolution of Molecular Codes Driven by the Expansion of the Proteome, J

    T. Tlusty, A Simple Model for the Evolution of Molecular Codes Driven by the Expansion of the Proteome, J. Theor. Biol. 249, 331 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Polyanskiy, H

    Y. Polyanskiy, H. V. Poor, and S. Verd´ u, Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 56, 2307 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    M. W. Powner, B. Gerland, and J. D. Sutherland, Synthesis of Activated Pyrimidine Ribonucleotides in Prebiotically Plausible Conditions, Nature459, 239 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    D. J. Ritson and J. D. Sutherland, Prebiotic Synthesis of Simple Sugars by Photoredox Systems Chemistry, Nat. Chem.4, 895 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    B. H. Patel, C. Percivalle, D. J. Ritson, C. D. Duffy, and J. D. Sutherland, Common Origins of RNA, Protein and Lipid Precursors in a Cyanosulfidic Protometabolism, Nature518, 72 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Ranjan and D

    S. Ranjan and D. D. Sasselov, Constraints on the Early Terrestrial Surface UV Environment Relevant to Prebiotic Chemistry, Astrobiology17, 169 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    Martin and M

    W. Martin and M. J. Russell, On the Origin of Biochemistry at an Alkaline Hydrothermal Vent, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362, 1887 (2007)

    2007

  46. [46]

    Lane and W

    N. Lane and W. Martin, The Evolution of the Cell: Powering and Partitioning, Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8, 655 (2010). 55

    2010

  47. [47]

    A. J. Watson, T. M. Donahue, and J. C. G. Walker, The Dynamics of a Rapidly Escaping Atmosphere: Applications to the Evolution of Earth and Venus, Icarus48, 150 (1981)

    1981

  48. [48]

    Hot Jupiters

    N. V. Erkaev, H. Lammer, Y. N. Kulikov, and et al., Roche Lobe Effects on the Atmospheric Loss from “Hot Jupiters”, Astron. Astrophys.472, 329 (2007)

    2007

  49. [49]

    Ribas, E

    I. Ribas, E. Guinan, M. G¨ udel, and M. Audard, Evolution of the Solar Activity over Time and Effects on Planetary Atmospheres, ApJ622, 680 (2005)

    2005

  50. [50]

    J. E. Owen and Y. Wu, The Evaporation Valley in the Kepler Planets, ApJ Lett.847, L3 (2017)

    2017

  51. [51]

    E. D. Lopez and J. J. Fortney, Understanding the Mass–Radius Relation for Sub-Neptunes: Radius as a Proxy for Composition, ApJ792, 1 (2014)

    2014

  52. [52]

    B. J. Fulton, E. A. Petigura, A. W. Howard, and et al., The California-Kepler Survey. IV. Metal-Rich Stars Host More Short-Period Planets, Astron. J.154, 109 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    Vidal-Madjar and et al., An Extended Upper Atmosphere around the Extrasolar Planet HD 209458b, Nature422, 143 (2003)

    A. Vidal-Madjar and et al., An Extended Upper Atmosphere around the Extrasolar Planet HD 209458b, Nature422, 143 (2003)

    2003

  54. [54]

    J. J. Spake and et al., Helium in the Eroding Atmosphere of an Exoplanet, Nature557, 68 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    Oklopˇ ci´ c and C

    A. Oklopˇ ci´ c and C. M. Hirata, A New Window into Escaping Exoplanet Atmospheres: 10830˚A Line of Helium, ApJ Lett. 855, L11 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    C. H. Lineweaver, Y. Fenner, and B. K. Gibson, The Galactic Habitable Zone and the Age Distribution of Complex Life in the Milky Way, Science303, 59 (2004)

    2004

  57. [57]

    Gonzalez, D

    G. Gonzalez, D. Brownlee, and P. Ward, The Galactic Habitable Zone: Galactic Chemical Evolution, Icarus152, 185 (2001)

    2001

  58. [58]

    Piran and R

    T. Piran and R. Jimenez, Possible Role of Gamma Ray Bursts on Life Extinction in the Universe, PRL113, 231101 (2014)

    2014

  59. [59]

    D. R. Hitchcock and J. E. Lovelock, Life Detection by Atmospheric Analysis, Icarus7, 149 (1967)

    1967

  60. [60]

    Sagan, W

    C. Sagan, W. R. Thompson, R. Carlson, D. Gurnett, and C. Hord, A Search for Life on Earth from the Galileo Spacecraft, Nature365, 715 (1993)

    1993

  61. [61]

    Krissansen-Totton, D

    J. Krissansen-Totton, D. C. Catling, and B. Charnay, Detecting Biosignatures in Earth-like Atmospheres with Chemical Disequilibrium, Sci. Adv.4, eaao5747 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    V. S. Meadows, Reflections on O 2 as a Biosignature in Exoplanetary Atmospheres, Astrobiology17, 1022 (2017)

    2017

  63. [63]

    Seager, E

    S. Seager, E. B. Ford, F. J. Rodler, and et al., Vegetation’s Red Edge: A Possible Spectroscopic Biosignature of Extraterrestrial Plants, Astrobiology5, 372 (2005)

    2005

  64. [64]

    N. Y. Kiang, J. Siefert, Govindjee, and R. E. Blankenship, Spectral Signatures of Photosynthesis. I. Review of Earth Organisms, Astrobiology7, 222 (2007)

    2007

  65. [65]

    J. C. G. Walker, P. B. Hays, and J. F. Kasting, A Negative Feedback Mechanism for the Long-term Stabilization of Earth’s Surface Temperature, J. Geophys. Res.86, 9776 (1981)

    1981

  66. [66]

    A. J. Watson and J. E. Lovelock, Biological Homeostasis of the Global Environment: The Parable of Daisyworld, Tellus B 35, 284 (1983)

    1983

  67. [67]

    D. C. Catling and J. F. Kasting,Atmospheric Evolution on Inhabited and Lifeless Worlds(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    Sharma, D

    A. Sharma, D. Cz´ egel, M. Lachmann, S. I. Walker, L. Cronin,et al., Assembly theory explains and quantifies selection and evolution, Nature622, 321 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    S. M. Marshall, C. Mathis, E. Carrick, G. Keenan, G. J. T. Cooper, H. Graham, M. Craven, P. S. Gromski, D. G. Moore, S. I. Walker, and L. Cronin, Identifying molecules as biosignatures with assembly theory and mass spectrometry, Nature Communications12, 3033 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Farina and S

    L. Farina and S. Rinaldi,Positive Linear Systems: Theory and Applications(Wiley-Interscience, 2000)

    2000

  71. [71]

    Berman and R

    A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons,Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences, Classics in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 9 (SIAM, 1994)

    1994

  72. [72]

    S. G. Turyshev, Direct high-resolution imaging of Earth-like exoplanets, Phys. Rev. D113, 023034 (2026)

    2026

  73. [73]

    Oberhummer, A

    H. Oberhummer, A. Cs´ ot´ o, and H. Schlattl, Stellar Production Rates of Carbon and Its Abundance in the Universe, Science289, 88 (2000)

    2000

  74. [74]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Dependence of the triple-alpha process on the fundamental constants of nature, Eur. Phys. J. A49, 82 (2013)

    2013

  75. [75]

    V. F. Dmitriev, V. V. Flambaum, and J. K. Webb, Cosmological variation of deuteron binding energy, strong interaction, and quark masses from big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D69, 063506 (2004)

    2004

  76. [76]

    Livio and M

    M. Livio and M. J. Rees, Anthropic reasoning, Science309, 1022 (2005)

    2005

  77. [77]

    Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse

    M. Livio and M. J. Rees, Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse, inFine-Tuning in the Physical Universe, edited by D. Sloan, R. Alves Batista, M. T. Hicks, and R. Davies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020) pp. 3–61, see also preprint: arXiv:1801.06944

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    M. E. Beer, A. R. King, M. Livio, and J. E. Pringle, How special is the Solar system?, MNRAS354, 763 (2004)

    2004

  79. [79]

    J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information, Nature Physics11, 131 (2015)

    2015

  80. [80]

    Still, D

    S. Still, D. A. Sivak, A. J. Bell, and G. E. Crooks, Thermodynamics of Prediction, PRL109, 120604 (2012)

    2012

Showing first 80 references.