pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02720 · v1 · pith:B7N3PQTRnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

A Cosmic Archipelago of lensed metal-poor galaxies at zsim6

A. Bolamperti , M. Messa , A. Zanella , E. Vanzella , P. Bergamini , F. Loiacono , A. M. Koekemoer , J. Vernet
show 16 more authors
R. A. Windhorst A. Adamo F. Annibali F. Calura M. Castellano J. M. Diego C. Grillo M. Gronke E. Iani M. Meneghetti A. Mercurio K. Nakajima S. Ravindranath M. Ricotti P. Rosati H. Yan
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords metal-poor galaxiescosmic reionizationstrong gravitational lensinghigh-redshift galaxiesLyα escape fractionLyman-continuum escapedwarf galaxiesepoch of reionization
0
0 comments X

The pith

UV-faint metal-poor galaxies at z~6 show high Lyman-continuum escape fractions and may drive reionization.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies the Cosmic Archipelago as a group of strongly lensed galaxies at redshift 6.14 behind the cluster MACSJ0416. Focus falls on CA4, a compact UV-faint system with stellar mass around 4 million solar masses, metallicity near 0.02 solar, and star-formation rate of 0.46 solar masses per year. Spectrophotometric data yield an ionizing-photon production efficiency of log xi_ion ~25.5 along with Lyα and Lyman-continuum escape fractions of 43% and 47%. These traits locate CA4 at the boundary between massive star clusters and dwarf galaxies. Five additional young, metal-poor members produce a measured galaxy overdensity of 12.3 in a narrow redshift slice, implying such faint systems could supply a sizable share of the ionizing photons needed for cosmic reionization.

Core claim

The Cosmic Archipelago is an ensemble of galaxies strongly lensed by MACSJ0416 at z~6.14. CA4 is a young, low-mass (4.3e6 solar masses), metal-poor (Z~0.02 Z_sun) star-forming galaxy with high ionizing-photon output and escape fractions f_esc^Lyα~43% and f_esc~47%, consistent with its blue UV slope and small Lyα velocity offset. Five more systems at the same redshift are all young (<11 Myr) and metal-poor (<0.05 Z_sun), yielding a significant overdensity delta_gal=12.3 in the small volume.

What carries the argument

The Cosmic Archipelago ensemble of lensed galaxies at z~6.14, characterized through joint spectrophotometric fitting across far-UV to red-optical wavelengths using lensing magnification factors.

If this is right

  • UV-faint metal-poor galaxies can supply a large fraction of the ionizing photons required for reionization.
  • The Cosmic Archipelago produces a galaxy overdensity of 12.3 at z~6 within delta z~0.08.
  • All members are young bursty systems with mass-weighted ages under 11 Myr and metallicities below 0.05 solar.
  • These galaxies occupy the interface between stellar clusters and dwarf galaxies and efficiently produce ionizing radiation.
  • The combination of high escape fractions, blue UV slopes, and small velocity offsets enables significant Lyman-continuum leakage.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the overdensity holds, models of reionization must assign greater weight to the faint end of the luminosity function at z>6.
  • Similar archipelagos may appear behind other massive lensing clusters, allowing statistical samples of early low-mass galaxies.
  • The link between extremely blue UV slopes and high escape fractions could be tested in larger JWST surveys of unlensed fields.
  • The placement at the cluster-dwarf boundary suggests that feedback and gas-clearing processes in low-mass systems differ from those in more massive galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The lensing magnification values and the stellar masses, metallicities, star-formation rates, and escape fractions derived from the spectrophotometric models are accurate and unbiased.

What would settle it

A measurement of the Lyman-continuum escape fraction in an unlensed galaxy at z~6 with comparable UV luminosity and metallicity that returns a value well below 20%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02720 by A. Adamo, A. Bolamperti, A. Mercurio, A. M. Koekemoer, A. Zanella, C. Grillo, E. Iani, E. Vanzella, F. Annibali, F. Calura, F. Loiacono, H. Yan, J. M. Diego, J. Vernet, K. Nakajima, M. Castellano, M. Gronke, M. Meneghetti, M. Messa, M. Ricotti, P. Bergamini, P. Rosati, R. A. Windhorst, S. Ravindranath.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Combined HST and JWST color image (2023-146 release), showing an overview of the Cosmic Archipelago. We plot in yellow the Lyα contours from MUSE, at z ∼ 6.14, and in green the four NIRSpec￾IFU pointings of the GO program 1908 (PI: E. Vanzella). The CA1 and CA2 pointings have been analyzed by Messa et al. (2025) and Vanzella et al. (2024), respectively. The cyan square, representing the fifth point￾ing of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Summary of the JWST photometric and spectroscopic data of CA4. Top left: cutout around CA4 of an image obtained by stacking the NIRCam SW filters (i.e., F090W, F115W, F150W, F200W) with the 0.02′′/pix reduction. Top center: CA4 in the stacked NIRCam LW filters (i.e., F277W, F356W, F410M, F444W) with the 0.04′′/pix reduction. The blue circle, with a radius of 0.2′′, represents the adopted aperture to derive… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Photometry and joint broadband+spectroscopy SED fitting results for CA4. Left panel: black points show the CA4 magnitudes obtained through aperture photometry (see Sect. 3.2 and Appendix A), superimposed to the three solutions obtained with SED fitting, shown in red and blue (fesc = 0), and green (free fesc). While they robustly predict similar ages, M⋆, log U, and SFR, they have different metallicities. F… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 1D (top) and 2D (bottom) X-Shooter spectra centered on the Lyα, NVλ1240, CIVλλ1548, 1550, HeIIλ1640, OIII]λ1666, and CIII]λ1908 lines (from left to right). The green colors denote spectra lying in the VIS arm, while red colors in the NIR arm. Only the Lyα is detected, for the other lines we are able to put stringent upper limits on their EW0. The aperture adopted to extract the 1D spectrum, of 1.4′′, is sh… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lyα spectrum (green line) of CA4 and best-fit model (red line), obtained with zELDA. The values of the best-fit parameters are vexp = 50 km s−1 , NHI = 1018.7 cm−2 , τ = 0.003, and EWLyα i = 21.1 Å. Orange lines show 105 realizations of the best-fit model, obtained by randomly extracting the values of each parameter from a normal distri￾bution parametrized by the best-fit value and its uncertainty. The x-a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Summary of the JWST photometric and spectroscopic data and analysis of the additional systems at z ∼ 6.14, namely CA5, CA6, CA7, CA8, CA9, shown in the different rows. Left panels: cutouts from the stacked SW filters (0.02′′/pix reduction). The blue regions highlight the apertures adopted for measuring the photometry, while the rectangles highlight the NIRSpec MSA positions (from the DJA archive). Center p… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Metallicity of the islands of the Cosmic Archipelago with spa￾tially resolved spectroscopy (namely, CA1-i1, CA1-i2, CA1-i4 (Messa et al. 2025) CA2, CA2-i3 (Vanzella et al. 2024), CA4, CA6, CA8, CA9). We put them in the context, comparing with low metallicity sources at z > 3 from the literature (Vanzella et al. 2026; Morishita et al. 2025a; Cai et al. 2025; Vanzella et al. 2023b; Nakajima et al. 2026; Maio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Cosmic Archipelago is an ensemble of galaxies, strongly lensed by the cluster MACSJ0416, showing extreme physical properties at $z\sim6.14$. We combine JWST/NIRCam with deep VLT/X-Shooter and JWST/NIRSpec IFU to perform a joint spectrophotometric analysis from the far ultraviolet to red optical rest-frame. We focus on CA4, a UV-faint ($M_{UV}=-17.7$), compact ($r_e=81\pm11$ pc) galaxy at $z=6.1446$, magnified by a factor $\mu=3.73$. CA4 is a young, low-mass ($M_\star =4.3\times10^6$ M$\odot$), star-forming (${\rm SFR}=0.46$ M$\odot$/yr), and metal-poor ($Z\sim0.02$ Z$\odot$) galaxy, and an efficient producer of ionizing photons ($\log(\xi_{ion}/{\rm erg^{-1} Hz})\sim25.5$). Its properties place CA4 at the poorly explored interface between massive stellar clusters and dwarf galaxies during the epoch of reionization. Moreover, CA4 shows large Ly$\alpha$ ($f_{esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}\sim43\%$) and Lyman-continuum ($f_{esc}\sim47\%$) escape fractions, consistent with its small Ly$\alpha$ velocity offset ($\Delta v\sim100$ km/s) and extremely blue UV-continuum slope ($\beta=-3.10$). These characteristics suggest that such UV-faint, metal-poor galaxies may contribute significantly to cosmic reionization. We also confirm five additional systems at the redshift of the Cosmic Archipelago, magnified by factors up to 12.5. They are all young (mass-weighted ages $<11$ Myr) and metal-poor ($Z<0.05$ Z$_\odot$), spanning a wide range of stellar masses and SFRs. Given the large number of these bursty star-forming galaxies in a small cosmic volume, we estimate that the currently known members of the Cosmic Archipelago result in a significant overdensity at $z\sim6$ ($\Delta z\sim0.08$), with $\delta_{gal}=12.3^{+6.6}_{-4.6}$. These results highlight the Cosmic Archipelago as an unprecedented laboratory for studying the earliest groups of low-mass, low-metallicity galaxies during the epoch of reionization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery via JWST/NIRCam, VLT/X-Shooter and JWST/NIRSpec of a strongly lensed ensemble (the 'Cosmic Archipelago') at z≈6.14 behind MACSJ0416. It focuses on CA4 (M_UV=-17.7, μ=3.73, r_e≈81 pc, M_*≈4.3×10^6 M_⊙, SFR≈0.46 M_⊙ yr^{-1}, Z≈0.02 Z_⊙, log ξ_ion≈25.5) and five additional members, all young and metal-poor. CA4 exhibits high Lyα (f_esc^Lyα≈43%) and Lyman-continuum (f_esc≈47%) escape fractions together with a blue UV slope (β=-3.10) and small velocity offset (Δv≈100 km s^{-1}). The authors argue these UV-faint systems may contribute substantially to reionization and report a galaxy overdensity δ_gal=12.3^{+6.6}_{-4.6} within Δz≈0.08.

Significance. If the reported escape fractions and intrinsic properties survive scrutiny of the lens model and SED assumptions, the work would strengthen the case that low-mass, low-metallicity galaxies at the cluster-dwarf interface are important reionization sources, providing rare, magnified examples at z∼6 that are otherwise inaccessible.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (lens modeling): Only a single fiducial magnification (μ=3.73 for CA4, up to 12.5 for others) is presented; no alternative lens models, systematic error budgets, or robustness tests are shown. Because all intrinsic quantities (M_UV, M_*, SFR, ξ_ion) and the derived escape fractions scale directly with 1/μ, this is load-bearing for the reionization claim.
  2. [§4] §4 (spectrophotometric fitting): The values f_esc^Lyα∼43% and f_esc∼47% are obtained from a single set of SED assumptions (SFH, IMF, dust law, metallicity grid). No alternative template libraries or parameter variations are reported, leaving open the possibility that the high escape fractions are partly driven by model choice rather than data.
  3. [Abstract & §5] Abstract & §5: The statement that CA4 'may contribute significantly to cosmic reionization' rests on the combination of the above two quantities; without quantified uncertainties from lens and SED choices, the quantitative support for this central implication remains incomplete.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1: the reported velocity offset Δv∼100 km s^{-1} for CA4 should be accompanied by its measurement uncertainty and the precise definition (e.g., peak-to-peak or centroid).
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the UV slope β=-3.10 is quoted without the fitting wavelength range or covariance with the escape-fraction derivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below, agreeing where the manuscript can be strengthened through additional analysis and revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (lens modeling): Only a single fiducial magnification (μ=3.73 for CA4, up to 12.5 for others) is presented; no alternative lens models, systematic error budgets, or robustness tests are shown. Because all intrinsic quantities (M_UV, M_*, SFR, ξ_ion) and the derived escape fractions scale directly with 1/μ, this is load-bearing for the reionization claim.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation of only the fiducial magnification limits the assessment of robustness. The adopted lens model is the most recent detailed reconstruction available for MACSJ0416. In the revised manuscript we will add comparisons to alternative published lens models for this cluster, derive a systematic uncertainty budget on μ, and propagate these to the intrinsic quantities and escape fractions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (spectrophotometric fitting): The values f_esc^Lyα∼43% and f_esc∼47% are obtained from a single set of SED assumptions (SFH, IMF, dust law, metallicity grid). No alternative template libraries or parameter variations are reported, leaving open the possibility that the high escape fractions are partly driven by model choice rather than data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the escape fractions are derived under a single set of SED assumptions. In the revision we will repeat the spectrophotometric fits using alternative SFHs (including bursty histories), IMF choices, and dust attenuation laws, and report the resulting range in f_esc values to demonstrate that the high escape fractions are robust to reasonable model variations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract & §5] Abstract & §5: The statement that CA4 'may contribute significantly to cosmic reionization' rests on the combination of the above two quantities; without quantified uncertainties from lens and SED choices, the quantitative support for this central implication remains incomplete.

    Authors: We agree that the reionization implication requires quantified uncertainties. After incorporating the lens-model and SED-variation analyses described above, we will revise the abstract and §5 to include the propagated uncertainties on the key quantities and adjust the strength of the claim accordingly while retaining the physical motivation based on the observed properties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; observational derivations from spectra and photometry

full rationale

The paper reports galaxy properties (magnification, M_UV, M_*, SFR, Z, ξ_ion, f_esc^Lyα, f_esc) extracted via standard lens modeling and joint NIRCam/X-Shooter/NIRSpec spectrophotometric fitting. No equations or steps reduce a claimed prediction to its own fitted inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to justify core results. The derivation chain is self-contained against external data and standard methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced; the work relies on standard lensing and stellar-population synthesis assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard flat Lambda-CDM cosmology for redshift-to-distance conversion and lensing geometry
    Invoked implicitly for deriving physical sizes, masses, and magnifications from observed quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6118 in / 1175 out tokens · 30803 ms · 2026-06-28T13:26:51.961917+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Possible chemical signatures of first-star enrichment in a very metal-poor galaxy overdensity near the end of reionization

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Discovery of a very metal-poor galaxy overdensity of 17 members near a possible Pop III-enriched absorber at z=5.945, with estimated minimum halo mass of log(M_h,min/M_⊙)=10.68.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L., Coe, D., et al

    Abdurro’uf, Larson, R. L., Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 47

    2024

  2. [2]

    D., Vanzella, E., et al

    Adamo, A., Bradley, L. D., Vanzella, E., et al. 2024, Nature, 632, 513

    2024

  3. [3]

    Adams, T. F. 1972, ApJ, 174, 439

    1972

  4. [4]

    Ahn, S.-H., Lee, H.-W., & Lee, H. M. 2000, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 33, 29 Almada Monter, S. & Gronke, M. 2024, MNRAS, 534, L7 Almada Monter, S., Gronke, M., & Chang, S.-J. 2026, MNRAS, 547, stag330

    2000

  5. [5]

    & Tosi, M

    Annibali, F. & Tosi, M. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 48

    2022

  6. [6]

    2024, A&A, 688, A146

    Arribas, S., Perna, M., Rodríguez Del Pino, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A146

    2024

  7. [7]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy-Specutils Development Team. 2019, Specutils: Spectroscopic analysis and reduction, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1902.012

    2009

  8. [8]

    J., et al

    Atek, H., Shuntov, M., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1201

    2023

  9. [9]

    J., Adams, N

    Austin, D., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 43

    2025

  10. [10]

    2016, ApJS, 224, 33

    Balestra, I., Mercurio, A., Sartoris, B., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 33

    2016

  11. [11]

    P., Goudfrooij, P., et al

    Bastian, N., Saglia, R. P., Goudfrooij, P., et al. 2006, A&A, 448, 881

    2006

  12. [12]

    2023, A&A, 674, A79

    Bergamini, P., Grillo, C., Rosati, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A79

    2023

  13. [13]

    2021, A&A, 645, A140

    Bergamini, P., Rosati, P., Vanzella, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A140

    2021

  14. [14]

    & Arnouts, S

    Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    1996

  15. [15]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 5263

    Bolamperti, A., Zanella, A., Meštri´c, U., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 5263

    2023

  16. [16]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 98

    Bonamigo, M., Grillo, C., Ettori, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 98

    2018

  17. [17]

    J., Aravena, M., Decarli, R., et al

    Bouwens, R. J., Aravena, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 72

    2016

  18. [18]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 83

    2012

  19. [19]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34

    2015

  20. [20]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, L69

    2010

  21. [21]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 81

    2022

  22. [22]

    J., Oesch, P

    Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 47

    2021

  23. [23]

    J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al

    Boyett, K., Bunker, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 1796

    2024

  24. [24]

    2025, astropy/photutils: 2.2.0

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2025, astropy/photutils: 2.2.0

    2025

  25. [25]

    1971, MNRAS, 153, 471

    Brocklehurst, M. 1971, MNRAS, 153, 471

    1971

  26. [26]

    & Gnedin, O

    Brown, G. & Gnedin, O. Y . 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5935

    2021

  27. [27]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88

    2023

  28. [28]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    2023

  29. [29]

    2025, ApJ, 993, L52

    Cai, S., Li, M., Cai, Z., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, L52

    2025

  30. [30]

    Cai, S. & Yu, Z. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.17498

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 5914

    Calura, F., Lupi, A., Rosdahl, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 5914

    2022

  32. [32]

    2021, MNRAS, 500, 3083

    Calura, F., Vanzella, E., Carniani, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 3083

    2021

  33. [33]

    L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T

    Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582

    1994

  34. [34]

    B., Grillo, C., Rosati, P., et al

    Caminha, G. B., Grillo, C., Rosati, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A90

    2017

  35. [35]

    B., Grillo, C., Rosati, P., et al

    Caminha, G. B., Grillo, C., Rosati, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A3

    2023

  36. [36]

    I., Cooper, R

    Caputi, K. I., Cooper, R. A., Rinaldi, P., Navarro-Carrera, R., & Iani, E. 2026, submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2601.11466

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245

    1989

  38. [38]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 417

    2019

  39. [39]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

    2018

  40. [40]

    J., Wilkins, S

    Caruana, J., Bunker, A. J., Wilkins, S. M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2831

    2014

  41. [41]

    2016, A&A, 590, A31

    Castellano, M., Amorín, R., Merlin, E., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A31

    2016

  42. [42]

    2023, A&A, 675, A121

    Castellano, M., Belfiori, D., Pentericci, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A121

    2023

  43. [43]

    2022, ApJ, 938, L15

    Castellano, M., Fontana, A., Treu, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, L15

    2022

  44. [44]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 76

    Cava, A., Schaerer, D., Richard, J., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 76

    2018

  45. [45]

    2024, ApJ, 976, L15

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, L15

    2024

  46. [46]

    P., Mason, C., et al

    Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 7052

    2024

  47. [47]

    2013, ApJ, 779, 127

    Chiang, Y .-K., Overzier, R., & Gebhardt, K. 2013, ApJ, 779, 127

    2013

  48. [48]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104 Article number, page 15 of 22 A&A proofs:manuscript no

    Chisholm, J., Saldana-Lopez, A., Flury, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104 Article number, page 15 of 22 A&A proofs:manuscript no. main_v2_FINAL

    2022

  49. [49]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463

    Choustikov, N., Katz, H., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463

    2024

  50. [50]

    2026, submitted to A&A, arXiv:2601.16281

    Claeyssens, A., Adamo, A., Kokorev, V ., et al. 2026, submitted to A&A, arXiv:2601.16281

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 2535

    Claeyssens, A., Adamo, A., Messa, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2535

    2025

  52. [52]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 2180

    Claeyssens, A., Adamo, A., Richard, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2180

    2023

  53. [53]

    C., Scholte, D., et al

    Cullen, F., Carnall, A. C., Scholte, D., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 2176

    2025

  54. [54]

    J., McLure, R

    Cullen, F., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 997

    2024

  55. [55]

    J., McLeod, D

    Cullen, F., McLure, R. J., McLeod, D. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 14

    2023

  56. [56]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425

    2023

  57. [57]

    2024, A&A, 684, A75

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75

    2024

  58. [58]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 944

    Curti, M., Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., & Maiolino, R. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 944

    2020

  59. [59]

    2025, A&A, 697, A89

    Curti, M., Witstok, J., Jakobsen, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A89

    2025

  60. [60]

    & Ferrara, A

    Dayal, P. & Ferrara, A. 2018, Phys. Rep., 780, 1 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A189 de Vaucouleurs, G. 1948, Annales d’Astrophysique, 11, 247

    2018

  61. [61]

    2014, PASA, 31, e040

    Dijkstra, M. 2014, PASA, 31, e040

    2014

  62. [62]

    2016, ApJ, 828, 71

    Dijkstra, M., Gronke, M., & Venkatesan, A. 2016, ApJ, 828, 71

    2016

  63. [63]

    T., Dickinson, M., Taylor, A

    Donnan, C. T., Dickinson, M., Taylor, A. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 224

    2025

  64. [64]

    Dopita, M. A. & Sutherland, R. S. 2003, Astrophysics of the diffuse universe

    2003

  65. [65]

    2025, A&A, 698, A234

    Dottorini, D., Calabrò, A., Pentericci, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A234

    2025

  66. [66]

    J., Stanway, E

    Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e058

    2017

  67. [67]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 116

    Emami, N., Siana, B., Alavi, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 116

    2020

  68. [68]

    K., Pettini, M., Shapley, A

    Erb, D. K., Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1168 ESO CPL Development Team. 2015, EsoRex: ESO Recipe Execution Tool, As- trophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1504.003

    2010

  69. [69]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3831

    Feldmann, R., Quataert, E., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3831

    2023

  70. [70]

    2026, submitted to A&A, arXiv:2602.17499

    Felicioni, G., Brada ˇc, M., Asada, Y ., et al. 2026, submitted to A&A, arXiv:2602.17499

    arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    & Bournaud, F

    Fensch, J. & Bournaud, F. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 3579

    2021

  72. [72]

    J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al

    Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al. 2017, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 53, 385

    2017

  73. [73]

    P., Cameron, E., & Pettitt, A

    Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., Cameron, E., & Pettitt, A. N. 2019, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 2, 10

    2019

  74. [74]

    L., Bagley, M., Song, M., et al

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M., Song, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 52

    2022

  75. [75]

    L., Ryan, Jr., R

    Finkelstein, S. L., Ryan, Jr., R. E., Papovich, C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 71

    2015

  76. [76]

    M., Lin, X., et al

    Fudamoto, Y ., Helton, J. M., Lin, X., et al. 2025, submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2503.15597

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    J., Secunda, A

    Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227

    2025

  78. [78]

    A., Weibel, A., et al

    Giovinazzo, E., Oesch, P. A., Weibel, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A352

    2026

  79. [79]

    2015, ApJ, 812, 123

    Gronke, M., Bull, P., & Dijkstra, M. 2015, ApJ, 812, 123

    2015

  80. [80]

    Gronke, M., Dijkstra, M., McCourt, M., & Oh, S. P. 2016, ApJ, 833, L26

    2016

Showing first 80 references.