Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Galaxy groups within voids

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Galaxy groups in voids are typically small and loose, pointing to an early stage of evolution.

desk verdict This paper catalogs 1367 groups in voids from the CAVITY sample and shows most void galaxies are singlets, but the FoF groups lack validation against projections in low-density space. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.17676 v1 pith:RA3BLNCA submitted 2026-06-16 astro-ph.GA

M. Argudo-Fernández , G. Torres-Ríos , P. Vásquez-Bustos , S. Verley , I. Pérez , S. Duarte Puertas , A. Jiménez , R. García-Benito
show 13 more authors
A. Zurita M. Alcázar-Laynez B. Bidaran A. Conrado D. Espada E. Florido R. González Delgado M. Hernández-Sánchez I. del Moral-Castro J. Román L. Sánchez-Menguiano S. Subramanian P. Villalba-González
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxygroupscosmicvoidslarge-scalestructureevolutionfriends-of-friendsalgorithmlocaluniversevoidgalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper applies a friends-of-friends algorithm to a sample of local void galaxies drawn from the CAVITY survey parent sample. It constructs a catalogue of 1367 groups containing 3040 galaxies and shows that 59 percent of void galaxies are isolated singlets, in contrast to a control sample where 60 percent of galaxies reside in groups. The identified void groups reach a maximum richness of six galaxies, and their measured harmonic radii, velocity dispersions, crossing times, and virial masses indicate loose, dynamically young systems. Group richness shows no dependence on void density. These results describe how galaxy assembly proceeds in the lowest-density regions of the local universe.

What carries the argument

Friends-of-friends group finder algorithm applied to void galaxies, together with the dynamical indicators harmonic radius, radial velocity dispersion, dimensionless crossing time, virial mass, and mass-to-light ratio used to assess evolutionary stage.

What would settle it

Finding even one group with seven or more galaxies inside a void, or measuring crossing times for the identified groups that match those of virialized groups in denser regions, would falsify the claim that void groups are characteristically small and dynamically young.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Galaxy groups within voids are typically loose groups in an early stage of their evolution. The groups are identified with a friends-of-friends algorithm that enforces gravitational binding, and the densest such groups contain only six galaxies. Parameters such as harmonic radius, radial velocity dispersion, dimensionless crossing time, virial mass, and mass-to-light ratio are used to establish that the systems have not yet reached virial equilibrium, unlike groups found in denser environments.

Load-bearing premise

The friends-of-friends linking criteria, calibrated on the void sample, correctly identify physically bound groups rather than chance projections in these low-density regions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Galaxy groups exist inside voids of every density, with no correlation between group richness and void density.
  • The great majority of galaxies inside voids remain isolated singlets rather than members of groups.
  • The richest groups found in voids contain only six galaxies, far smaller than groups in filaments, walls, or clusters.
  • Void groups display larger harmonic radii and longer crossing times than groups outside voids, consistent with an early evolutionary stage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scarcity of groups and their loose character may indicate that gravitational collapse and merging proceed more slowly inside voids than in the rest of the cosmic web.
  • Void groups could provide clean observational targets for studying the initial phases of group assembly with minimal subsequent environmental processing.
  • The same selection method could be applied to higher-redshift void samples to test whether the preference for small, young groups persists across cosmic time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper applies a friends-of-friends (FoF) algorithm to a sample of void galaxies drawn from the CAVITY survey parent catalog at z<0.08 to identify 1367 galaxy groups containing 3040 galaxies (plus 14672 singlets). It constructs a control sample of NCNV groups and uses dynamical parameters (harmonic radius R_H, radial velocity dispersion σ_vr, dimensionless crossing time H0 t_c, virial mass M_vir) together with r-band luminosity to derive mass-to-light ratios. The main results are that most void galaxies are singlets (59%), void groups are small (maximum richness 6), show no richness dependence on void density, and are typically loose with short crossing times, indicating an early evolutionary stage.

Significance. If the group catalog is robust, the work supplies a statistically useful sample of groups in underdense environments and a direct contrast with the NCNV control sample, which could constrain models of group assembly and galaxy evolution as a function of large-scale density.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on FoF application): the claim that the 1367 groups are 'physically bound' and that the reported trends in R_H, σ_vr, H0 t_c, M_vir and M/L demonstrate an 'early stage of evolution' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no validation that the FoF linking lengths (tuned on the void sample) recover bound systems rather than projections in the low-density void regime; no mock-catalog tests, no comparison to independent mass estimators, and no assessment of interloper fraction are described.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (counts and trends paragraph): no uncertainties or error bars are attached to the reported fractions (59% singlets, 60% grouped in NCNV), the richness distribution, or the dynamical-parameter trends with richness; without these the statistical significance of the void-versus-NCNV contrast cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'fiends-of-friends' is a typographical error for 'friends-of-friends'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: 'The catalogue of groups consists on 1367' should read 'consists of 1367'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on FoF application): the claim that the 1367 groups are 'physically bound' and that the reported trends in R_H, σ_vr, H0 t_c, M_vir and M/L demonstrate an 'early stage of evolution' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no validation that the FoF linking lengths (tuned on the void sample) recover bound systems rather than projections in the low-density void regime; no mock-catalog tests, no comparison to independent mass estimators, and no assessment of interloper fraction are described.

    Authors: We agree the manuscript does not contain mock-catalog tests or explicit interloper assessments. The FoF implementation uses standard linking lengths in both projected separation and velocity difference, selected to identify systems with a degree of gravitational association as stated in the methods. The early-evolution inference rests on the observed short crossing times and loose configurations. In revision we will add an expanded methods discussion of the linking-length choice, note the lack of mock validation as a limitation, and moderate the abstract wording from 'physically bound groups' to 'identified groups'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (counts and trends paragraph): no uncertainties or error bars are attached to the reported fractions (59% singlets, 60% grouped in NCNV), the richness distribution, or the dynamical-parameter trends with richness; without these the statistical significance of the void-versus-NCNV contrast cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that uncertainties are required to evaluate significance. The revised manuscript will attach Poisson or bootstrap uncertainties to the singlet/group fractions, the richness distribution, and the trends of dynamical parameters with richness. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Performing dedicated mock-catalog tests to validate the FoF groups in void environments and assess interloper fractions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; results are direct empirical counts and measurements from algorithm application

full rationale

The paper applies a friends-of-friends algorithm to the input void galaxy catalog to identify 1367 groups, then computes dynamical parameters (R_H, sigma_vr, H0 t_c, M_vir, M/L) directly from those groups and reports trends with richness. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-referential definitions are presented that would make any claim equivalent to its inputs by construction. The derivation chain consists of catalog processing followed by straightforward measurement; conclusions do not reduce to prior fits or self-citations. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular observational study.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the selected void sample is representative and that the FoF algorithm returns physically bound groups; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Galaxy groups within voids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RA3BLNCA

@misc{pith2026260617676,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Galaxy groups within voids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RA3BLNCA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.17676}
}
abstract

In this work, we aim to identify and characterise a sample of galaxy groups within voids in the local Universe (z\,<\,0.08), taking into account the peculiarities of these vast and empty structures. The void galaxies used in this study are selected from a well-defined void galaxy sample, from which the parent sample of the Calar Alto Void Integral-field Treasury surveY (CAVITY) legacy project was drawn. To identify galaxy groups, we applied a fiends-of-friends (FoF) like group finder algorithm to the selected sample, ensuring a certain degree of gravitational binding among group members. The same algorithm has been applied to identify a control sample of groups not in clusters nor voids, referred as NCNV groups. The catalogue of groups consists on 1367 physically bound groups, with a total of 3040 galaxies, plus 14672 galaxy singlets. Most of the galaxies in voids are singlets (59\%), in contrast, most of the NCNV galaxies in the control sample are in groups (60\%). To consider the dynamical stage of the groups we used the parameters harmonic radius ($\rm R_H$), radial velocity dispersion ($\rm \sigma_{v_r}^2$), dimensionless crossing time ($\rm H_0 t_c$), and group virial mass ($\rm M_{vir}$). We also used the total optical ($r$-band) luminosity, L$_r$, to estimate the mass-to-light ratio ($\rm M/L$) of the groups. We studied the relations of void properties and these parameters with the group richness. Galaxy groups can be found in any void in the local Universe, with no dependency of group richness on the density of voids. The densest groups in the studied sample of voids are composed of six galaxies, therefore, voids generally contain small groups, in comparison to denser structures such as filaments, walls, and galaxy clusters. Galaxy groups within voids are typically loose groups, in an early stage of their evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17676 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: Redshift distribution of the groups, as blue dashed and cyan dotted open histograms, for the full (14672 singlets and 1367 groups) and limited (1013 singlets and 395 groups) sample, respectively, in comparison to the distribution of the redshift of the voids (gray filled histogram). Right panel: redshift of the group as a function of the group richness. The redshift distribution for groups with same grou… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. ). The right panel of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of the projected distance (upper panel), in kpc, and line-of sight velocity difference (lower panel), in km s−1 , of group mem￾bers with respect to the central galaxy of the group (full sample), for groups with Ngal ≥ 2. The vertical black dashed lines indicate the limit values used to define the physically bound groups in the first iteration, following Argudo-Fernández et al. (2015). to identify galaxy… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Properties of the voids as a function of the group richness: number of galaxies in the voids (void richness, top left panel); size of the voids (Rvoid, top right panel); the number density of galaxies in each void (ρN, bottom left panel); and the over-density-corrected…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of the dynamical parameters for the 1397 galaxy groups in the full sample. From left to right: effective radius of the groups, as log RH; observed velocity dispersion, as logσ; dimensionless crossing time, as log (H0tc); and group virial mass, as log Mvir …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dynamical parameters of the galaxy groups with more than one member as a function of the group richness. The effective radius of the groups, as log RH is shown in the left panel, while the dimensionless crossing time, as log (H0tc) is shown in the right panel. The obse…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the mass-to-light ratio of the groups in the full sample with Ngal ≥ 2. Only groups with log (Mvir/M⊙) > 9 are con￾sidered in the analysis. The distribution for the control sample of NCNV groups is presented as green dotted open histogram. within the gr…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Group mass-to-light ratio (top panel), mass-richness ratio (mid￾dle panel), and luminosity-richness ratio (bottom panel) as functions of group richness. The distribution of these parameters for groups with same group richness is represented by violin plots (grey dashed…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: 3D visualisation of the spatial distribution of galaxies within two voids in the CAVITY sample (Void 941 and Void 622, in the left and right panels, respectively) as an example of the distribution of groups within voids of similar size (Rvoid ∼ 13 h−1 Mpc) but differe…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-tracer mass bias in matched cosmic voids from SDSS DR7 and the ELUCID constrained simulation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxy and subhalo mass fractions relative to dark matter decrease towards the centres of matched cosmic voids, with galaxy-to-subhalo ratios limited by the scarcity of massive subhaloes.

  2. ALMA CO-CAVITY II. Resolved Scaling Relations in Void Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In void galaxies, the resolved relation between molecular gas and stellar mass is the tightest of the three star-formation scaling relations, with 0.16 dex scatter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., & Agüeros. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543

    2009

  2. [2]

    O., Corwin, Jr., H

    Abell, G. O., Corwin, Jr., H. G., & Olowin, R. P. 1989, ApJS, 70, 1

    1989

  3. [3]

    D., Allende Prieto, C., et al

    Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 12

    2015

  4. [4]

    G., Montero-Dorta, A

    Alfaro, I. G., Montero-Dorta, A. D., Bustillos, J. F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.05117

    work page arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    G., Rodriguez, F., Ruiz, A

    Alfaro, I. G., Rodriguez, F., Ruiz, A. N., & Lambas, D. G. 2020, A&A, 638, A60

    2020

  6. [6]

    G., Rodriguez, F., Ruiz, A

    Alfaro, I. G., Rodriguez, F., Ruiz, A. N., Luparello, H. E., & Lambas, D. G. 2022, A&A, 665, A44

    2022

  7. [7]

    Szalay, A. S. 2010, MNRAS, 404, L89 Argudo-Fernández, M., Gómez Hernández, C., Verley, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A258 Argudo-Fernández, M., Verley, S., Bergond, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A110 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156...

    2010

  8. [8]

    J., Hoyle, F., Torres, F., & V ogeley, M

    Benson, A. J., Hoyle, F., Torres, F., & V ogeley, M. S. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 160

    2003

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Blanton, M. R. & Roweis, S. 2007, AJ, 133, 734

    2007

  2. [10]

    R., Kofman, L., & Pogosyan, D

    Bond, J. R., Kofman, L., & Pogosyan, D. 1996, Nature, 380, 603

    1996

  3. [11]

    Cautun, M., van de Weygaert, R., Jones, B. J. T., & Frenk, C. S. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2923

    2014

  4. [12]

    Ceccarelli, L., Padilla, N., & Lambas, D. G. 2008, MNRAS, 390, L9

    2008

  5. [13]

    Ceccarelli, L., Paz, D., Lares, M., Padilla, N., & Lambas, D. G. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 1435

    2013

  6. [14]

    L., Alonso, S., & Garcia Lambas, D

    Ceccarelli, M. L., Alonso, S., & Garcia Lambas, D. 2025, A&A, 700, A196

    2025

  7. [15]

    M., González Delgado, R

    Conrado, A. M., González Delgado, R. M., García-Benito, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A98

    2024

  8. [16]

    J., Farrar, G

    Croton, D. J., Farrar, G. R., Norberg, P., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1155

    2005

  9. [17]

    Curtis, O., McDonough, B., & Brainerd, T. G. 2024, ApJ, 962, 58

    2024

  10. [18]

    2007, A&A, 474, 783

    Deng, X.-F., He, J.-Z., Jiang, P., Luo, C.-H., & Wu, P. 2007, A&A, 474, 783

    2007

  11. [19]

    J., & Ferrari, A

    Diaferio, A., Ramella, M., Geller, M. J., & Ferrari, A. 1993, AJ, 105, 2035 Domínguez-Gómez, J., Pérez, I., Ruiz-Lara, T., et al. 2023a, A&A, 680, A111 Domínguez-Gómez, J., Pérez, I., Ruiz-Lara, T., et al. 2023b, Nature, 619, 269

    1993

  12. [20]

    P., Hill, D

    Driver, S. P., Hill, D. T., Kelvin, L. S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 971

    2011

  13. [21]

    P., Norberg, P., Baldry, I

    Driver, S. P., Norberg, P., Baldry, I. K., et al. 2009, Astronomy and Geophysics, 50, 5.12

    2009

  14. [22]

    Einasto, M., Einasto, J., Müller, V ., Heinämäki, P., & Tucker, D. L. 2003, A&A, 401, 851

    2003

  15. [23]

    2024, A&A, 681, A91

    Einasto, M., Einasto, J., Tenjes, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A91

    2024

  16. [24]

    J., Weinberg, D

    Eisenstein, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Agol, E., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 72

    2011

  17. [25]

    El-Ad, H., Piran, T., & Dacosta, L. N. 1997, MNRAS, 287, 790

    1997

  18. [26]

    & Thomas, D

    Etherington, J. & Thomas, D. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 660

    2015

  19. [27]

    2016, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 16, 72

    Feng, S., Shao, Z.-Y ., Shen, S.-Y ., et al. 2016, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 16, 72

    2016

  20. [28]

    A., Kannappan, S

    Florez, J., Berlind, A. A., Kannappan, S. J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 906, 97 Galárraga-Espinosa, D., Garaldi, E., & Kauffmann, G. 2023, A&A, 671, A160 Galárraga-Espinosa, D., Kauffmann, G., Bonoli, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.15345

    2021

  21. [29]

    2011, ApJ, 728, 74 García-Benito, R., Jiménez, A., Sánchez-Menguiano, L., et al

    Galaz, G., Herrera-Camus, R., Garcia-Lambas, D., & Padilla, N. 2011, ApJ, 728, 74 García-Benito, R., Jiménez, A., Sánchez-Menguiano, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A161

    2011

  22. [30]

    Grogin, N. A. & Geller, M. J. 1999, AJ, 118, 2561

    1999

  23. [31]

    Grogin, N. A. & Geller, M. J. 2000, AJ, 119, 32

    2000

  24. [32]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 899

    Habouzit, M., Pisani, A., Goulding, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 899

    2020

  25. [33]

    M., Porciani, C., & Dekel, A

    Hahn, O., Carollo, C. M., Porciani, C., & Dekel, A. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 41

    2007

  26. [34]

    1982, ApJ, 255, 382

    Hickson, P. 1982, ApJ, 255, 382

    1982

  27. [35]

    P., & Palumbo, G

    Hickson, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Huchra, J. P., & Palumbo, G. G. 1992, ApJ, 399, 353

    1992

  28. [36]

    & V ogeley, M

    Hoyle, F. & V ogeley, M. S. 2002, ApJ, 566, 641

    2002

  29. [37]

    S., & Pan, D

    Hoyle, F., V ogeley, M. S., & Pan, D. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3041

    2012

  30. [38]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  31. [39]

    A., Aragón-Calvo, M

    Jaber, M., Peper, M., Hellwing, W. A., Aragón-Calvo, M. A., & Valenzuela, O. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 4087

    2024

  32. [40]

    2020, A&A, 639, A71

    Kuutma, T., Poudel, A., Einasto, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 639, A71

    2020

  33. [41]

    E., Maldonado, V ., et al

    Lares, M., Luparello, H. E., Maldonado, V ., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 85

    2017

  34. [42]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 2663

    Li, G., Ma, Y .-Z., Tramonte, D., & Li, G.-L. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2663

    2024

  35. [43]

    2012, A&A, 545, A104

    Lietzen, H., Tempel, E., Heinämäki, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A104

    2012

  36. [44]

    C., Hao, L., et al

    Liu, C.-X., Pan, D. C., Hao, L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 165

    2015

  37. [45]

    Mamon, G. A. 1987, ApJ, 321, 622

    1987

  38. [46]

    A., Scherrer, R

    Mao, Q., Berlind, A. A., Scherrer, R. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 161

    2017

  39. [47]

    & Hudson, M

    Marinoni, C. & Hudson, M. J. 2002, ApJ, 569, 101

    2002

  40. [48]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 5747 Merchán, M

    Martizzi, D., V ogelsberger, M., Torrey, P., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5747 Merchán, M. & Zandivarez, A. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 216

    2020

  41. [49]

    G., & González, R

    Padilla, N., Lambas, D. G., & González, R. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 936

    2010

  42. [50]

    C., V ogeley, M

    Pan, D. C., V ogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., Choi, Y .-Y ., & Park, C. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 926 pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas

    2012

  43. [51]

    & Lee, J

    Park, D. & Lee, J. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1105

    2009

  44. [52]

    S., Gupta, P., & Kumar, H

    Paul, S., John, R. S., Gupta, P., & Kumar, H. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 2 Pérez, F. & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21 Pérez, I., Gil, L., Ferré-Mateu, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 695, A84 Pérez, I., Verley, S., Sánchez-Menguiano, L., et al. 2025b, in Highli...

    2017

  45. [53]

    Yepes, C

    Miguel, G. Yepes, C. Rodríguez-López, A. Gómez-García, & C. Dafonte, 93 Pérez, I., Verley, S., Sánchez-Menguiano, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A213

    2024

  46. [54]

    Pisani, A., Ramella, M., & Geller, M. J. 2003, AJ, 126, 1677

    2003

  47. [55]

    2007, A&A, 464, 451

    Popesso, P., Biviano, A., Böhringer, H., & Romaniello, M. 2007, A&A, 464, 451

    2007

  48. [56]

    E., Holwerda, B

    Porter, L. E., Holwerda, B. W., Kruk, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 5768

    2023

  49. [57]

    A., Martin, J

    Pustilnik, S. A., Martin, J. M., Huchtmeier, W. K., et al. 2002, A&A, 389, 405

    2002

  50. [58]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 4045

    Ricciardelli, E., Cava, A., Varela, J., & Quilis, V . 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4045

    2014

  51. [59]

    2013, MNRAS, 435, 222 Rodríguez-Medrano, A

    Rieder, S., van de Weygaert, R., Cautun, M., Beygu, B., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 222 Rodríguez-Medrano, A. M., Paz, D. J., Stasyszyn, F. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 916 Rodríguez-Medrano, A. M., Springel, V ., Stasyszyn, F. A., & Paz, D. J. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2822

    2013

  52. [60]

    R., V ogeley, M

    Rojas, R. R., V ogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., & Brinkmann, J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 50

    2004

  53. [61]

    Rosas-Guevara, Y ., Tissera, P., Lagos, C. d. P., Paillas, E., & Padilla, N. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 712 Sánchez-Alarcón, P. M., Román, J., Knapen, J. H., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A117

    2022

  54. [62]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525

    1998

  55. [63]

    P., Giovanelli, R., et al

    Stierwalt, S., Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 338

    2009

  56. [64]

    2008, A&A, 479, 927

    Tago, E., Einasto, J., Saar, E., et al. 2008, A&A, 479, 927

    2008

  57. [65]

    M., Daza-Perilla, I

    Taverna, A., Salerno, J. M., Daza-Perilla, I. V ., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 6367

    2023

  58. [66]

    Tempel, E., Tuvikene, T., Kipper, R., & Libeskind, N. I. 2017, A&A, 602, A100

    2017

  59. [67]

    Tikhonov, A. V . & Klypin, A. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1915 Torres-Ríos, G., Pérez, I., Verley, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A341 Torres-Ríos, G., Verley, S., Pérez, I., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.00982 van de Weygaert, R. & Platen, E. 2011, in International Journal of Mod...

    2009 arXiv

  60. [68]

    2005, A&A, 436, 443

    Verdes-Montenegro, L., Sulentic, J., Lisenfeld, U., et al. 2005, A&A, 436, 443

    2005

  61. [69]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  62. [70]

    J., Aguilar, J

    Wang, H., Eisenstein, D. J., Aguilar, J. N., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2069

    2026

  63. [71]

    L., Han, J

    Wen, Z. L., Han, J. L., & Liu, F. S. 2009, ApJS, 183, 197 Wes McKinney. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. Stéfan van der Walt & Jarrod Millman, 56 – 61

    2009

  64. [72]

    2001, ApJ, 550, L129

    White, M., Hernquist, L., & Springel, V . 2001, ApJ, 550, L129

    2001

  65. [73]

    J., van den Bosch, F

    Yang, X., Mo, H. J., van den Bosch, F. C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 153

    2007

  66. [74]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.29706 Article number, page 13 of 13

    Zhang, Y ., Yang, X., Guo, H., Wang, P., & Shi, F. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.29706 Article number, page 13 of 13

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.