Geometric Rigidity via Almost-Harmonic Twisted Spinors

Francesco Bei; Simone Cecchini

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Geometric Rigidity via Almost-Harmonic Twisted Spinors

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On a closed even-dimensional spin manifold carrying a closed two-form whose lift to the universal cover is exact and whose powers pair nontrivially with the A-hat class, the infimum of scalar curvature is at most -4n/(n-1) times the bottom

desk verdict Solid, carefully written paper that upgrades Gromov's exact-lift obstruction to a sharp rigidity theorem; the main real risk is the unstated L2-index black box in Proposition 2.2. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.19567 v2 pith:RBQRLUV6 submitted 2026-06-17 math.DG math.GT

Francesco Bei , Simone Cecchini This is my paper

classification math.DGmath.GT MSC 53C2753C2158J2058J50

keywords scalarcurvaturespingeometrytwistedDiracoperatorsL2-indexbottomofspectrumuniversalcoverA-hatgenusrigidity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a sharp spectral ceiling on scalar curvature: under the exact-lift two-form hypothesis, inf_M scal ≤ -4n/(n-1) λ0(X,g). The constant is the best possible, and the equality case is rigid: the metric must be Einstein, and the universal cover must be real hyperbolic (when the spectrum bottom is positive) or Euclidean (when it is zero and the two-form is top-degree non-singular). The proof manufactures harmonic spinors twisted by arbitrarily small connections built from the two-form; an index count shows these spinors exist, and a conformal reinterpretation of the refined Kato inequality turns their asymptotic equality into a parallel spinor for a conformally related metric. For a broad class of manifolds—products of hyperbolic surfaces, symplectic manifolds with exact lifted form, and certain four-manifolds—this gives an obstruction to positive scalar curvature and identifies exactly which metrics realize the sharp bound.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the family of twisted Dirac operators D_s on the universal cover, coupled to the trivial line bundle with connection d+isη, where dη = π*ω. An index theorem for the associated central extension of the deck group computes the L2-index as a polynomial in s; a nonzero coefficient produces harmonic twisted spinors ψ_j with s_j→0. The refined Kato inequality's defect tensor—the Kato defect—measures exactly how far a spinor is from being parallel after a conformal change; equality in the scalar bound makes this defect vanish asymptotically. A recentering by deck transformations prevents the spinor mass from escaping to infinity, so a limit yields a parallel spinor for a conformall

What would settle it

Look for a counterexample among the manifolds the paper itself lists: for the symmetric-product examples whose fundamental group is amenable (so λ0=0 for every metric), try to construct a Riemannian metric with inf scalar ≥ 0. Theorem A predicts inf scalar < 0 for every metric on such a manifold, so any metric with nonnegative inf scalar would overturn the bound. Alternatively, on a product of hyperbolic surfaces, attempt to realize equality; the theorem says equality would force a real-hyperbolic universal cover, which the topology excludes, so an equality metric would disprove the rigidity s

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem A is the central claim: a purely topological-cohomological condition—the existence of a closed two-form whose lift to the universal cover is exact and whose wedge powers detect the A-hat class—quantitatively controls scalar curvature. The sharp inequality inf scal ≤ -4n/(n-1) λ0 follows from the Lichnerowicz formula, the refined Kato inequality, and Rayleigh's characterization of the bottom of the spectrum. Equality forces Ric = -4λ0/(n-1) g; if λ0>0, the universal cover has constant sectional curvature -4λ0/(n-1)^2 and is real hyperbolic; if λ0=0 and ∫ω^m ≠ 0, the cover is Euclidean. The analytic heart is Theorem B: given a sequence of harmonic twisted spinors with parameters tendin

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain rests on the assumption that the L2-index theorem for the twisted Dirac operator holds for the non-discrete central extension of the deck group and gives exactly the polynomial formula (2.7), with no hidden correction terms; if that formula fails, no harmonic twisted spinors are produced and both the bound and all rigidity conclusions collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Under the cohomological hypotheses, no metric of positive scalar curvature can exist on M.
For products of hyperbolic surfaces, for products of a simply connected A-hat-manifold with surface products, and for symplectic manifolds with exact lifted symplectic form, every Riemannian metric obeys the sharp negative ceiling; in the surface-product case the inequality is always strict.
Equality metrics are Einstein with Ricci tensor -4λ0/(n-1) g; when λ0>0 the universal cover is real hyperbolic, and when λ0=0 and ω^m ≠ 0 the cover is Euclidean.
The A-hat refinement detects rigidity in cases that the usual top-power condition cannot, such as products Y×B where Y is simply connected with nonzero A-hat class.
The same machinery yields untwisted rigidity when zero lies in the spectrum of the Dirac operator on the cover, with applications to nonvanishing A-hat genus and enlargeability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference — The recentering-and-conformal-limit step is a reusable template: any sequence of almost-kernel sections with Kato defect O(s_j) should yield a parallel spinor for a conformally changed metric, so the same Einstein rigidity could follow in other settings where such sequences arise from index theory.
Inference — The proof suggests a quantitative stability statement: if the scalar-curvature ceiling is nearly attained, the Kato-defect estimates provide explicit small quantities that should force the metric to be close, in a measured sense, to the Einstein/hyperbolic models; making this precise could extend the theorem from exact equality to near-equality.
Inference — The paper's remarks indicate the spin hypothesis can be relaxed to virtually spin by passing to finite covers; if carried out for general non-spin manifolds, the method would give the same sharp bound for a much wider class of manifolds with exact-lift two-forms.
Inference — When λ0=0, the flatness conclusion comes by combining Einstein rigidity with the structure theorem for compact Ricci-flat manifolds; a spinorial proof of flatness avoiding that decomposition might generalize to noncompact or non-closed settings where the structure theorem is unavailable.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: if you care about scalar-curvature comparison and rigidity, read this. The paper proves a sharp inf-scal bound under an exact-lift, A-hat-non-singular two-form, with equality forcing Einstein, hyperbolic, or flat geometry. The sharp inequality itself goes back to Davaux, and Wang–Zhu announced scalar rigidity, so the genuinely new pieces are the A-hat-refined setting and the conformal-recentering proof of Einstein rigidity (Theorem B). The authors are upfront about the overlap with [34]; the two methods look genuinely independent.

What the paper does well: the proof is unusually complete for something this long. The Kato-defect computation in Proposition 3.3 checks out, the ground-state transform in Lemma 3.8 is clean, and the recentering Lemma 4.5 plus conformal limit Proposition 4.11 is a nice way to turn an almost-kernel sequence into a parallel spinor. I found no sign errors in the conformal Einstein computation, and the examples in Remarks 1.7–1.8 are useful, especially the A-hat case that the top-power condition misses.

Soft spots, in proportion. Proposition 2.2 is load-bearing and under-specified. It invokes Ballmann's L2-index theorem for compact extensions and applies it to the non-discrete U(1)-central extension Γ_s, but it never states the theorem's hypotheses or verifies them. The one-form η is only assumed exact, not bounded, and it is not obvious whether that matters. A referee should check this first; if the index formula fails, the spinor sequence disappears and both the bound and rigidity collapse. Second, Lemma 4.12 leans on Ledrappier–Wang [25, Theorem 6] as another black box; standard, but still a dependency. Third, the overlap with Wang–Zhu [34] is real, though handled honestly.

The stress-test concern about the L2-index theorem is fair as a confidence limitation, but I do not think it is fatal. There is no internal inconsistency or concrete counterexample here. This paper deserves a serious referee; the right outcome is probably acceptance after the index-theoretic hypotheses are stated and checked carefully.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper establishes a sharp scalar-curvature upper bound for closed even-dimensional spin manifolds, Theorem A: if M carries a closed homologically A-hat-non-singular two-form whose lift to the universal cover X is exact, then inf_M scal <= -4n/(n-1) lambda_0(X). Equality forces the metric to be Einstein; for lambda_0>0 the universal cover is real hyperbolic, and for lambda_0=0 with nonvanishing top power of the two-form it is Euclidean. The proof combines Gromov's U(1)-central extension and an L2-index theorem (Proposition 2.2) to produce harmonic twisted spinors, a Rayleigh-Kato-Lichnerowicz mechanism for the bound and scalar rigidity, and a recentered conformal-limit argument yielding a parallel spinor for a conformally related metric. A conformal Einstein criterion then upgrades to Einstein rigidity, and Ledrappier-Wang rigidity gives sectional rigidity. The paper also isolates Theorem B, which converts a sequence of harmonic twisted spinors into Einstein rigidity under the sharp scalar-curvature identity.

Significance. If the main theorem holds, it is a strong contribution to scalar-curvature comparison: a sharp, parameter-free bottom-spectrum bound with a complete equality analysis under purely topological hypotheses. The analytic execution is careful: the Kato defect is interpreted conformally, the recentering argument is well organized, and the scalar rigidity uses a clean proof of a Wang-Zhu-type positivity principle. The paper also supplies useful examples of the hypotheses. No fitted parameters or machine-checked code are involved; the main external input is the cited L2-index theorem. That input is currently a black box in the manuscript, which is the principal reason I cannot recommend acceptance without revision.

major comments (2)

[§2.4, Proposition 2.2] Proposition 2.2 is the sole source of the harmonic twisted spinors psi_j, and both Theorem 3.1 and Theorem A collapse without it. The proof invokes [1, Thm 8.27] without stating its hypotheses. Gamma_s is not the discrete deck group but a U(1)-central extension; the cited theorem must be shown to apply to this non-discrete locally compact group, and the exact version used should be stated. In addition, pi^*omega=deta only gives exactness; eta is not shown to be bounded or to satisfy any growth condition. Many L2-index theorems for twisted Dirac operators require bounded geometry of the twisting connection, i.e. local boundedness of eta or at least a growth bound on parallel transport. The authors should either verify that exact-lift suffices for the cited theorem or add the necessary condition to the hypotheses of Theorem A. As written, Eq. (2.7) and the choice of s_j with I(s_j)!=0 are
[§2.2 and §3.2, Eq. (2.6)] The integrated Lichnerowicz formula (2.6) and its use in Proposition 3.5 and Proposition 4.3 assume that from D_s psi in L2 one may conclude nabla^s psi in L2 and integrate the formula. This is standard for operators of bounded geometry. If eta is unbounded, d+is eta may not be a bounded-geometry connection, so this step needs an explicit justification or a boundedness hypothesis on eta. In particular, the proof of the sharp scalar bound (3.1) uses (2.6) directly, so this is a load-bearing analytic point rather than a regularity footnote.

minor comments (4)

[§1, Remarks 1.2-1.3 and References] Several references are listed as preprints or 'to appear' ([33], [34], [15], [2]). If final versions are available, they should be updated.
[§4.4, Lemma 4.5] The notation B_N(gamma), Q_N, M_{j,N}, E_{j,N} is used before being fully explained in words; a short sentence defining the word-metric ball and the local masses would improve readability.
[§4.6, Lemma 4.13] In the Kunneth step, spell out that H^1(N)=0 because N is simply connected; this makes the displayed isomorphism H^2(T^q x N;R) = H^2(T^q;R) oplus H^2(N;R) transparent.
[§2.4] The phrase 'compact extensions of the deck group' is ambiguous; the paper means a U(1)-central extension. Using the latter term consistently would avoid confusion with other compact-group extensions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation; proof chain is self-contained, with only contextual self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation runs from the topological A-hat-non-singularity input through Ballmann's L2-index theorem (Proposition 2.2) to harmonic twisted spinors, then through the Lichnerowicz/Kato/Rayleigh estimates to the scalar bound, and through conformal spinor compactness and the conformal Einstein criterion to Einstein and sectional rigidity. None of these steps is defined in terms of the conclusion. lambda0 and omega are inputs, not fitted parameters, and the harmonic spinors are produced by an external index theorem rather than by assuming the desired scalar-curvature bound. The equality cases invoke standard external rigidity theorems (Ledrappier-Wang, Fischer-Wolf) only after proving the required harmonic and parallel objects. The only self-citations ([2], [3], [4]) are contextual and not load-bearing; Remark 1.4's use of [2, Lemma 2.9] is a stated corollary about positive scalar curvature, not the source of Theorem A. The main external dependency is Proposition 2.2's application of [1, Theorem 8.27] to the non-discrete U(1)-central extension Gamma_s; the paper does not restate the theorem's hypotheses, but this is a confidence or correctness concern rather than circularity, since no equation or fitted value is reused as its own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new constants, particles, or entities are introduced. The proof depends on external theorems listed above; λ0 and ω are inputs from the hypotheses.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Ballmann's Γ_s-L2-index theorem (Thm 8.27 in [1]) applies to the U(1)-central extension Γ_s of the deck group and yields formula (2.7) for the twisted Dirac index.
Invoked in Proposition 2.2 to produce the harmonic twisted spinors; if this black box fails, Theorem A has no analytic input.
standard math Existence of a positive generalized ground state f solving Δf = λ0 f on every complete manifold (Fischer-Colbrie–Schoen Theorem 1).
Used in Proposition 3.7 and throughout the Einstein rigidity section; standard but unproved in the paper.
standard math Ledrappier–Wang Theorem 6: a complete simply connected manifold with Ric ≥ -(n-1) and a positive harmonic function with |∇log u| = (n-1) is hyperbolic.
Used in Lemma 4.12 to upgrade Einstein to constant sectional curvature.
standard math Fischer–Wolf structure theorem for compact Ricci-flat manifolds.
Used in Lemma 4.13 to conclude flatness from λ0 = 0 and ∫ω^m ≠ 0.
standard math Conformal spinor transformation formula (Bourguignon–Hijazi–Milhorat–Moroianu–Moroianu, Prop 2.33) and conformal scalar/Ricci transformation formulas (Besse 1.159).
Used in Lemma 4.4 and Proposition 4.2; standard but central to the equality analysis.
standard math Harnack and Schauder estimates for positive solutions of (Δ-λ0)u = 0 with uniform constants on compact sets.
Used in Lemma 4.6 to extract the limit ground state f∞.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Rigidity via Almost-Harmonic Twisted Spinors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RBQRLUV6

@misc{pith2026260619567,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Rigidity via Almost-Harmonic Twisted Spinors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RBQRLUV6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.19567}
}

read the original abstract

We establish sharp scalar-curvature bounds and rigidity consequences of Gromov's exact-lift two-form method. Let ((M^n,g)), (n\geq 4) even, be a closed spin Riemannian manifold carrying a homologically (\widehat A)-non-singular closed two-form (\omega) whose lift to the universal cover (X) is exact. Then[\inf_M \operatorname{scal}_g \leq -\frac{4n}{n-1}\lambda_0(X).]Equality forces (g) to be Einstein; if (\lambda_0(X)>0), then (X) is real hyperbolic, while if (\lambda_0(X)=0) and (\int_M\omega^{n/2}\neq 0), then (g) is flat. The proof combines Gromov's twisted (L^2)-index with a conformal interpretation of the refined Kato equality and a recentering argument. The same method yields untwisted rigidity results when zero belongs to the spectrum of the Dirac operator on the universal cover, with applications to nonvanishing (\widehat A)-genus and enlargeability.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Bottom spectrum and parabolicity of 3-manifolds with scalar curvature lower bound
math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

Complete 3-manifolds with scalar curvature lower bound, finitely many ends, and finite first Betti number satisfy a sharp bottom spectrum upper bound and are parabolic under positive scalar curvature.
The positive mass theorem under a spectral scalar curvature bound on spin manifolds
math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

On spin manifolds, Brendle–Wang spectral positivity of scalar curvature implies (n−1)α+2β>0 (resp. ≥0) via a weighted Dirac operator and refined Kato estimates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

[34]

Jinmin Wang and Bo Zhu,Scalar curvature, sharp bottom spectrum and geometric rigidity, 2026

2026
[1]

MR 2243012

Werner Ballmann,Lectures on Kähler manifolds, ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2006. MR 2243012

2006
[2]

Francesco Bei, Benoît Claudon, Simone Diverio, and Stefano Trapani,Weak Kähler hyperbolicity is birational, Algebraic Geometry (2024), To appear

2024
[3]

Reine Angew

Francesco Bei, Simone Diverio, Philippe Eyssidieux, and Stefano Trapani,Weakly Kähler hyperbolic man- ifolds and the Green-Griffiths-Lang conjecture, J. Reine Angew. Math.807(2024), 257–297. MR 4698497

2024
[4]

Francesco Bei, Simone Diverio, and Stefano Trapani,Geometric effects of hyperbolic cohomology classes on Kähler manifolds (with an appendix by Benoît Claudon), https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09907 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[5]

Besse,Einstein manifolds, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3

Arthur L. Besse,Einstein manifolds, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge, vol. 10, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987

1987
[6]

Jean-Pierre Bourguignon, Oussama Hijazi, Jean-Louis Milhorat, Andrei Moroianu, and Sergiu Moroianu, A spinorial approach to Riemannian and conformal geometry, EMS Monographs in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2015

2015
[7]

4, 581–598

Robert Brooks,The fundamental group and the spectrum of the laplacian, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici56(1981), no. 4, 581–598

1981

Show all 35 references

[8]

David M. J. Calderbank, Paul Gauduchon, and Marc Herzlich,Refined Kato inequalities and conformal weights in Riemannian geometry, Journal of Functional Analysis173(2000), no. 1, 214–255

2000
[9]

Ann.319(2001), no

Jianguo Cao and Frederico Xavier,Kähler parabolicity and the Euler number of compact manifolds of non-positive sectional curvature, Math. Ann.319(2001), no. 3, 483–491. MR 1819879

2001
[10]

115, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984, Including a chapter by Burton Randol; with an appendix by Jozef Dodziuk

Isaac Chavel,Eigenvalues in riemannian geometry, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 115, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1984, Including a chapter by Burton Randol; with an appendix by Jozef Dodziuk

1984
[11]

3, 289–297

Shiu Yuen Cheng,Eigenvalue comparison theorems and its geometric applications, Mathematische Zeitschrift143(1975), no. 3, 289–297. MR 0378001

1975
[12]

Chernoff,Essential self-adjointness of powers of generators of hyperbolic equations, Journal of Functional Analysis12(1973), no

Paul R. Chernoff,Essential self-adjointness of powers of generators of hyperbolic equations, Journal of Functional Analysis12(1973), no. 4, 401–414

1973
[13]

Alain Connes, Mikhaïl Gromov, and Henri Moscovici,Group cohomology with Lipschitz control and higher signatures, Geometric and Functional Analysis3(1993), no. 1, 1–78

1993
[14]

Ann.327(2003), no

Hélène Davaux,An optimal inequality between scalar curvature and spectrum of the Laplacian, Math. Ann.327(2003), no. 2, 271–292. MR 2015070

2003
[15]

Di Cerbo, Alexander Dranishnikov, and Ekansh Jauhari,Curvature, macroscopic dimensions, and symmetric products of surfaces, arXiv preprint (2026)

Luca F. Di Cerbo, Alexander Dranishnikov, and Ekansh Jauhari,Curvature, macroscopic dimensions, and symmetric products of surfaces, arXiv preprint (2026)

2026
[16]

do Carmo,Riemannian geometry, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, 1992

Manfredo P. do Carmo,Riemannian geometry, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, 1992. 30 FRANCESCO BEI AND SIMONE CECCHINI

1992
[17]

Fischer and Joseph A

Arthur E. Fischer and Joseph A. Wolf,The structure of compact Ricci-flat Riemannian manifolds, Journal of Differential Geometry10(1975), no. 2, 277–288

1975
[18]

2, 199–211

Doris Fischer-Colbrie and Richard Schoen,The structure of complete stable minimal surfaces in 3- manifolds of non-negative scalar curvature, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics33 (1980), no. 2, 199–211

1980
[19]

Trudinger,Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, 2 ed., Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2001, Reprint of the 1983 second edition

David Gilbarg and Neil S. Trudinger,Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, 2 ed., Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2001, Reprint of the 1983 second edition

2001
[20]

1, 263–292

Mikhail Gromov,Kähler hyperbolicity and L2-Hodge theory, Journal of Differential Geometry33(1991), no. 1, 263–292

1991
[21]

Misha Gromov,Four lectures on scalar curvature, Perspectives in scalar curvature. Vol. 1, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, [2023]©2023, pp. 1–514. MR 4577903

2023
[22]

Dedicata135(2008), 119–127

Bernhard Hanke and Thomas Schick,The strong Novikov conjecture for low degree cohomology, Geom. Dedicata135(2008), 119–127. MR 2413333

2008
[23]

Jürgen Jost and Kang Zuo,Vanishing theorems forL2-cohomology on infinite coverings of compact Kähler manifolds and applications in algebraic geometry, Comm. Anal. Geom.8(2000), no. 1, 1–30. MR 1730897

2000
[24]

Blaine Lawson and Marie-Louise Michelsohn,Spin geometry, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol

H. Blaine Lawson and Marie-Louise Michelsohn,Spin geometry, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 38, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989

1989
[25]

Differential Geom.85(2010), no

François Ledrappier and Xiaodong Wang,An integral formula for the volume entropy with applications to rigidity, J. Differential Geom.85(2010), no. 3, 461–477. MR 2739810

2010
[26]

1, 143–162

Peter Li and Jiaping Wang,Complete manifolds with positive spectrum, II, Journal of Differential Geometry62(2002), no. 1, 143–162

2002
[27]

Daoqiang Liu,Bottom spectrum, verticalˆA-cowaist and scalar curvature rigidity, 2026

2026
[28]

Varghese Mathai,The Novikov conjecture for low degree cohomology classes, Geometriae Dedicata99 (2003), 1–15

2003
[29]

2, Paper No

Ovidiu Munteanu and Jiaping Wang,Bottom spectrum of three-dimensional manifolds with scalar curvature lower bound, Journal of Functional Analysis287(2024), no. 2, Paper No. 110457. MR 4736650

2024
[30]

Ann.281 (1988), no

Kaoru Ono,The scalar curvature and the spectrum of the Laplacian of spin manifolds, Math. Ann.281 (1988), no. 1, 163–168. MR 944610

1988
[31]

Jonathan Rosenberg,C∗-algebras, positive scalar curvature, and the Novikov conjecture, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS58(1983), 197–212

1983
[32]

Strichartz,Analysis of the laplacian on the complete riemannian manifold, Journal of Functional Analysis52(1983), no

Robert S. Strichartz,Analysis of the laplacian on the complete riemannian manifold, Journal of Functional Analysis52(1983), no. 1, 48–79

1983
[33]

Jinmin Wang and Bo Zhu,Sharp bottom spectrum and scalar curvature rigidity, 2025

2025
[35]

1, 272–284

Xiaodong Wang,Harmonic functions, entropy, and a characterization of the hyperbolic space, The Journal of Geometric Analysis18(2008), no. 1, 272–284

2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [34]

Jinmin Wang and Bo Zhu,Scalar curvature, sharp bottom spectrum and geometric rigidity, 2026

2026

[2] [1]

MR 2243012

Werner Ballmann,Lectures on Kähler manifolds, ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2006. MR 2243012

2006

[3] [2]

Francesco Bei, Benoît Claudon, Simone Diverio, and Stefano Trapani,Weak Kähler hyperbolicity is birational, Algebraic Geometry (2024), To appear

2024

[4] [3]

Reine Angew

Francesco Bei, Simone Diverio, Philippe Eyssidieux, and Stefano Trapani,Weakly Kähler hyperbolic man- ifolds and the Green-Griffiths-Lang conjecture, J. Reine Angew. Math.807(2024), 257–297. MR 4698497

2024

[5] [4]

Francesco Bei, Simone Diverio, and Stefano Trapani,Geometric effects of hyperbolic cohomology classes on Kähler manifolds (with an appendix by Benoît Claudon), https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09907 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[6] [5]

Besse,Einstein manifolds, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3

Arthur L. Besse,Einstein manifolds, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge, vol. 10, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987

1987

[7] [6]

Jean-Pierre Bourguignon, Oussama Hijazi, Jean-Louis Milhorat, Andrei Moroianu, and Sergiu Moroianu, A spinorial approach to Riemannian and conformal geometry, EMS Monographs in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2015

2015

[8] [7]

4, 581–598

Robert Brooks,The fundamental group and the spectrum of the laplacian, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici56(1981), no. 4, 581–598

1981