Finite-Window Recursive Audit Chains for Navier-Stokes Generated Packages

Runlong Yu

arxiv: 2606.20899 · v1 · pith:IOVNFJSGnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🧮 math.AP

Finite-Window Recursive Audit Chains for Navier-Stokes Generated Packages

Runlong Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP

keywords Navier-Stokes equationsaudit chainsfinite-windowanti-phantom boundsone-step admissibilityerror recursionpressure projectiondefect extraction

0 comments

The pith

Finite-window recursive audit chains yield anti-phantom lower bounds for Navier-Stokes generated packages once one-step admissibility and scale-wise certificates hold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a finite-window recursive audit framework for packages generated by the Navier-Stokes equations. It first supplies a one-step admissibility criterion for pressure-admissible finite-energy packages under an explicit ledger of synchronization, localization, projection, harmonic-tail, chart, clean-gap, gate/slack, and detector mismatches. It then proves a finite-chain propagation theorem: given a finite renormalized chain of such admissible packages together with a static finite-window audit certificate at each scale, variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation produce a recursive finite-window anti-phantom lower bound. A sympathetic reader would care because the framework supplies explicit, checkable conditions under which localized Navier-Stokes behavior can be certified against residual or phantom contributions without requiring global control.

Core claim

The central claim is that once one-step admissibility supplies a finite renormalized chain of packages and a static finite-window audit certificate is available at each scale, variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation yield a recursive finite-window anti-phantom lower bound. The framework is completed by compact pressure projection criteria, reduced quotient chart visibility, clean detector gaps, a pressure-flux-energy matrix kernel condition, a smooth reduced NS-generated verification class, and a conditional Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg compatible defect-extraction criterion.

What carries the argument

The finite-chain propagation theorem, which converts one-step admissible packages and static scale-wise audit certificates into a recursive anti-phantom lower bound via variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation.

If this is right

The anti-phantom lower bound propagates recursively across the finite window for any admissible chain.
Compact pressure projection criteria and reduced chart visibility become available as verification tools inside the framework.
A pressure-flux-energy matrix kernel condition and smooth reduced verification class can be used to certify individual packages.
A conditional defect-extraction criterion compatible with Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg estimates follows from the audit structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same recursion structure might be applied to other evolution equations that admit localized energy packages and scale-wise certificates.
Numerical checks on explicit Navier-Stokes solutions inside a finite window could test whether the derived lower bound is attained or exceeded.
The explicit mismatch ledger offers a template for constructing similar audit certificates in related regularity or blow-up analyses.

Load-bearing premise

A static finite-window audit certificate must be available at each scale along with the one-step admissibility criterion under the listed ledger of mismatches.

What would settle it

Exhibit a pressure-admissible finite-energy Navier-Stokes generated package that meets the one-step admissibility ledger and possesses the required static finite-window audit certificates at each scale, yet after performing the variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation the resulting quantity falls below the claimed anti-phantom lower bound.

read the original abstract

We develop a finite-window recursive audit framework for Navier--Stokes-generated packages. On a fixed window, the underlying anti-phantom certificate asserts that a baseline-visible package is either detected locally or charged to an explicit residual ledger. The first component of the framework is a broad one-step admissibility criterion for pressure-admissible finite-energy Navier--Stokes-generated audit packages under an explicit ledger of synchronization, localization, projection, harmonic-tail, chart, clean-gap, gate/slack, and detector mismatches. The second component is a finite-chain propagation theorem: once one-step admissibility supplies a finite renormalized chain of packages and a static finite-window audit certificate is available at each scale, variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation yield a recursive finite-window anti-phantom lower bound. We also give compact/effective pressure projection criteria, reduced quotient chart visibility, clean detector gaps, a pressure--flux--energy matrix kernel condition, a smooth reduced NS-generated verification class, and a conditional Caffarelli--Kohn--Nirenberg compatible defect-extraction criterion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a conditional propagation theorem for error bounds on NS packages but assumes the audit certificates exist rather than showing how to build them.

read the letter

The core claim is a finite-chain propagation theorem: if one-step admissibility holds and static finite-window audit certificates are already on hand at each scale, then variable-coefficient error recursion plus weighted summation produces a recursive anti-phantom lower bound. That is the new piece. The paper also supplies an explicit one-step admissibility list covering synchronization, localization, projection, harmonic-tail, chart, clean-gap, gate/slack, and detector mismatches, plus several supporting criteria such as compact pressure projection, reduced quotient chart visibility, clean detector gaps, a pressure-flux-energy matrix kernel condition, and a conditional Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg compatible defect-extraction rule.

Those criteria are laid out clearly and the ledger structure is organized, which is useful if someone already works inside a custom verification setup for approximate NS solutions. The framework stays within finite windows and renormalized chains, so it avoids some infinite-scale issues that appear in other regularity arguments.

The limitation is the one flagged in the stress test. The theorem is explicitly conditional on the certificates being available; the text enumerates what the certificates must check but does not construct them from the Navier-Stokes equations, prove a base case, or run an inductive step that produces them for actual NS-generated packages. Without that step the recursion cannot be applied to concrete solutions. The new terminology (anti-phantom certificate, residual ledger, audit package) is self-contained and does not obviously reduce to standard objects in the NS literature, which makes it harder to judge how much is genuinely new versus re-labeled.

This is for readers already working on formal or computational verification frameworks for PDEs who might want a template for recursive error tracking. It is coherent enough on its own terms to go to referees, who can check whether the full proofs close the existence gap. I would not bring it to a reading group or cite it myself.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a finite-window recursive audit framework for Navier-Stokes-generated packages. It introduces a one-step admissibility criterion for pressure-admissible finite-energy NS-generated audit packages under an explicit ledger of synchronization, localization, projection, harmonic-tail, chart, clean-gap, gate/slack, and detector mismatches. A finite-chain propagation theorem states that, once one-step admissibility supplies a finite renormalized chain and static finite-window audit certificates are available at each scale, variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation produce a recursive finite-window anti-phantom lower bound. The paper also supplies compact pressure projection criteria, reduced quotient chart visibility, clean detector gaps, a pressure-flux-energy matrix kernel condition, a smooth reduced NS-generated verification class, and a conditional Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg compatible defect-extraction criterion.

Significance. If the results hold, the framework would supply a structured recursive method for producing anti-phantom lower bounds on NS-generated packages via explicit mismatch ledgers and error recursion. The enumeration of concrete admissibility criteria and the conditional propagation theorem constitute a systematic approach to auditing, which could be useful for verification or regularity questions if the base certificates can be constructed. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present.

major comments (1)

[Finite-chain propagation theorem (abstract and theorem statement)] The finite-chain propagation theorem (abstract and the section stating the theorem) is explicitly conditional on the existence of a static finite-window audit certificate at each scale, yet the manuscript supplies no base-case construction, existence argument, or inductive step demonstrating that the listed one-step admissibility criteria actually produce such certificates for NS-generated packages. This assumption is load-bearing for invoking the variable-coefficient recursion and obtaining the anti-phantom lower bound.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the residual ledger, anti-phantom certificate, and audit package should be introduced with explicit definitions and symbols in the first section where they appear, rather than relying on the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript. The single major comment is addressed point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Finite-chain propagation theorem (abstract and theorem statement)] The finite-chain propagation theorem (abstract and the section stating the theorem) is explicitly conditional on the existence of a static finite-window audit certificate at each scale, yet the manuscript supplies no base-case construction, existence argument, or inductive step demonstrating that the listed one-step admissibility criteria actually produce such certificates for NS-generated packages. This assumption is load-bearing for invoking the variable-coefficient recursion and obtaining the anti-phantom lower bound.

Authors: We agree that the finite-chain propagation theorem is stated conditionally on the availability of static finite-window audit certificates at each scale, and that the manuscript does not supply an explicit base-case construction or inductive argument showing that the one-step admissibility criteria produce such certificates. The contribution of the paper is the derivation of the variable-coefficient error recursion and the resulting anti-phantom lower bound once those certificates are granted; the one-step admissibility criteria are presented as a separate tool for generating the renormalized chain. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated remark immediately following the theorem statement that (i) explicitly flags the conditional nature of the result, (ii) notes that constructing or verifying the base certificates via the listed mismatch ledger remains an open direction, and (iii) indicates how the compact pressure-projection criteria and pressure-flux-energy matrix kernel condition supplied later in the paper could serve as starting points for such constructions in concrete cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central result is explicitly conditional

full rationale

The paper's finite-chain propagation theorem is stated as conditional on the explicit assumption that 'a static finite-window audit certificate is available at each scale' together with one-step admissibility. Variable-coefficient error recursion and weighted summation are then applied to produce the anti-phantom lower bound. This is a standard implication from stated premises rather than any reduction of the output to the inputs by construction, self-definition, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation load-bearing. No equations or claims in the provided text equate the derived bound to the certificate assumption itself, and no self-citations or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are referenced. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained under its own hypotheses.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about Navier-Stokes packages and introduces multiple invented entities without independent evidence in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Pressure-admissible finite-energy Navier-Stokes-generated audit packages under explicit ledger of synchronization, localization, projection, harmonic-tail, chart, clean-gap, gate/slack, and detector mismatches.
Invoked as the basis for the one-step admissibility criterion in the abstract.

invented entities (3)

anti-phantom certificate no independent evidence
purpose: Asserts that a baseline-visible package is either detected locally or charged to an explicit residual ledger.
New concept introduced to support the audit framework.
residual ledger no independent evidence
purpose: To charge undetected packages in the audit process.
Invented entity forming part of the certificate mechanism.
audit package no independent evidence
purpose: Navier-Stokes generated entity subject to the recursive audit chains.
New entity defined within the framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5702 in / 1501 out tokens · 49655 ms · 2026-06-26T15:58:44.044032+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Structural Audit of Navier-Stokes Obstruction Calculus
math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Audit of Navier-Stokes obstruction calculus shows existing decompositions locate CKN badness transport but lack coercive estimates, proving a resolution lemma and identifying the need for a filtered stretching-diffusi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace,Acta Mathematica63(1934), 193–248

J. Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace,Acta Mathematica 63(1934), 193–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547354

work page doi:10.1007/bf02547354 1934
[2]

Hopf, ¨Uber die Anfangswertaufgabe f¨ ur die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen,Mathema- tische Nachrichten4(1951), 213–231

E. Hopf, Über die Anfangswertaufgabe für die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen. Erhard Schmidt zu seinem 75. Geburtstag gewidmet,Mathematische Nachrichten4 (1950/51), no. 1–6, 213–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.3210040121

work page doi:10.1002/mana.3210040121 1950
[3]

Scheffer, Partial regularity of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations,Pacific Journal of Mathematics66(1976), no

V. Scheffer, Partial regularity of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations,Pacific Journal of Mathematics66(1976), no. 2, 535–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1976. 66.535

work page doi:10.2140/pjm.1976 1976
[4]

Scheffer, Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathematical Physics55(1977), no

V. Scheffer, Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathematical Physics55(1977), no. 2, 97–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01626512

1977
[5]

Caffarelli, R

L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, and L. Nirenberg, Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics35 (1982), no. 6, 771–831. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160350604

work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160350604 1982
[6]

Sohr and W

H. Sohr and W. von Wahl, On the regularity of the pressure of weak solutions of Navier–Stokes equations,Archiv der Mathematik46(1986), 428–439. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01210782

work page doi:10.1007/bf01210782 1986
[7]

Lin, A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics51(1998), no

F.-H. Lin, A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics51(1998), no. 3, 241–257. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199803)51:3<241::AID-CPA2>3.0.CO;2-A

1998
[8]

Constantin, W

P. Constantin, W. E, and E. S. Titi, Onsager’s conjecture on the energy conservation for solutions of Euler’s equation,Communications in Mathematical Physics165(1994), no. 1, 207–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099744

work page doi:10.1007/bf02099744 1994
[9]

G. L. Eyink, Energy dissipation without viscosity in ideal hydrodynamics. I. Fourier analysis and local energy transfer,Physica D78(1994), no. 3–4, 222–240. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(94)90117-1

work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(94)90117-1 1994
[10]

Duchon and R

J. Duchon and R. Robert, Inertial energy dissipation for weak solutions of incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations,Nonlinearity13(2000), no. 1, 249–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/13/1/312

work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/13/1/312 2000
[11]

G. A. Seregin and V. Šverák, Navier–Stokes equations with lower bounds on the pressure, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis163(2002), no. 1, 65–86. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s002050200199. 52

work page doi:10.1007/s002050200199 2002
[12]

Escauriaza, G

L. Escauriaza, G. Seregin, and V. Šverák,L3,∞-solutions of Navier–Stokes equations and backward uniqueness,Russian Mathematical Surveys58(2003), no. 2, 211–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1070/RM2003v058n02ABEH000609

work page doi:10.1070/rm2003v058n02abeh000609 2003
[13]

Kukavica and M

I. Kukavica and M. Ziane, One component regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations, Nonlinearity19(2006), no. 2, 453–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/ 19/2/012

work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/ 2006
[14]

Cao and E

C. Cao and E. S. Titi, Global regularity criterion for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations involv- ing one entry of the velocity gradient tensor,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 202(2011), no. 3, 919–932. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6

work page doi:10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6 2011
[15]

G. A. Seregin,Lecture Notes on Regularity Theory for the Navier–Stokes Equations, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2015, x+258 pp. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1142/9314

work page doi:10.1142/9314 2015
[16]

Chemin and P

J.-Y. Chemin and P. Zhang, On the critical one component regularity for 3-D Navier– Stokes system,Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Série 449(2016), no. 1, 131–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.2278

work page doi:10.24033/asens.2278 2016
[17]

Chemin, P

J.-Y. Chemin, P. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, On the critical one component regularity for 3-D Navier–Stokes system: general case,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis224 (2017), no. 3, 871–905. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-017-1089-0

work page doi:10.1007/s00205-017-1089-0 2017
[18]

B. Han, Z. Lei, D. Li, and N. Zhao, Sharp one component regularity for Navier–Stokes, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis231(2019), no. 2, 939–970. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00205-018-1292-7

work page doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1292-7 2019
[19]

Barker and C

T. Barker and C. Prange, Quantitative regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via spatial concentration,Communications in Mathematical Physics385(2021), no. 2, 717–792. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04122-x

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04122-x 2021
[20]

Kang and D

K. Kang and D. D. Nguyen, Local regularity criteria in terms of one velocity component for the Navier–Stokes equations,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics25(2023), no. 1, article no. 10, 15 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-022-00754-8

work page doi:10.1007/s00021-022-00754-8 2023
[21]

Albritton, T

D. Albritton, T. Barker, and C. Prange, Epsilon regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via weak–strong uniqueness,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics25(2023), no. 3, article no. 49, 12 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-023-00780-0

work page doi:10.1007/s00021-023-00780-0 2023
[22]

Finite-Scale One-Component Regularity via Harmonic Pressure for the 3D Navier-Stokes Equations

R. Yu, Finite-Scale One-Component Regularity via Harmonic Pressure for the 3D Navier– Stokes Equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.08352 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08352

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.08352 2026
[23]

Strict 2.5D Shadows for One-Component Navier-Stokes Regularity

R. Yu, Strict 2.5D Shadows for One-Component Navier–Stokes Regularity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.11720 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2606.11720

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026
[24]

Schur Visibility and Anti-Phantom Reduction in One-Component Navier-Stokes Degeneration

R. Yu, Schur Visibility and Anti-Phantom Reduction in One-Component Navier–Stokes Degeneration, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.12267 [math.AP], 2026. DOI: https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12267

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12267 2026
[26]

Yu, Critical Ledgers and Scale-Defect Cascades for Navier–Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13887 [math.AP], 2026

R. Yu, Critical Ledgers and Scale-Defect Cascades for Navier–Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13887 [math.AP], 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606. 13887

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606 2026
[27]

Yu, Finite-Window Singularity Audits and Local-to-Clean Defect Transfer for Navier– Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15086 [math.AP], 2026

R. Yu, Finite-Window Singularity Audits and Local-to-Clean Defect Transfer for Navier– Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15086 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2606.15086

arXiv 2026
[28]

Yu, Finite-Window Computational Anti-Phantom Theorems for Scale-Critical Navier– Stokes Defects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15456 [math.AP], 2026

R. Yu, Finite-Window Computational Anti-Phantom Theorems for Scale-Critical Navier– Stokes Defects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15456 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15456. 54

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15456 2026

[1] [1]

Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace,Acta Mathematica63(1934), 193–248

J. Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace,Acta Mathematica 63(1934), 193–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547354

work page doi:10.1007/bf02547354 1934

[2] [2]

Hopf, ¨Uber die Anfangswertaufgabe f¨ ur die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen,Mathema- tische Nachrichten4(1951), 213–231

E. Hopf, Über die Anfangswertaufgabe für die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen. Erhard Schmidt zu seinem 75. Geburtstag gewidmet,Mathematische Nachrichten4 (1950/51), no. 1–6, 213–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.3210040121

work page doi:10.1002/mana.3210040121 1950

[3] [3]

Scheffer, Partial regularity of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations,Pacific Journal of Mathematics66(1976), no

V. Scheffer, Partial regularity of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations,Pacific Journal of Mathematics66(1976), no. 2, 535–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1976. 66.535

work page doi:10.2140/pjm.1976 1976

[4] [4]

Scheffer, Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathematical Physics55(1977), no

V. Scheffer, Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathematical Physics55(1977), no. 2, 97–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01626512

1977

[5] [5]

Caffarelli, R

L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, and L. Nirenberg, Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics35 (1982), no. 6, 771–831. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160350604

work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160350604 1982

[6] [6]

Sohr and W

H. Sohr and W. von Wahl, On the regularity of the pressure of weak solutions of Navier–Stokes equations,Archiv der Mathematik46(1986), 428–439. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01210782

work page doi:10.1007/bf01210782 1986

[7] [7]

Lin, A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics51(1998), no

F.-H. Lin, A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics51(1998), no. 3, 241–257. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199803)51:3<241::AID-CPA2>3.0.CO;2-A

1998

[8] [8]

Constantin, W

P. Constantin, W. E, and E. S. Titi, Onsager’s conjecture on the energy conservation for solutions of Euler’s equation,Communications in Mathematical Physics165(1994), no. 1, 207–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099744

work page doi:10.1007/bf02099744 1994

[9] [9]

G. L. Eyink, Energy dissipation without viscosity in ideal hydrodynamics. I. Fourier analysis and local energy transfer,Physica D78(1994), no. 3–4, 222–240. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(94)90117-1

work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(94)90117-1 1994

[10] [10]

Duchon and R

J. Duchon and R. Robert, Inertial energy dissipation for weak solutions of incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations,Nonlinearity13(2000), no. 1, 249–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/13/1/312

work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/13/1/312 2000

[11] [11]

G. A. Seregin and V. Šverák, Navier–Stokes equations with lower bounds on the pressure, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis163(2002), no. 1, 65–86. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s002050200199. 52

work page doi:10.1007/s002050200199 2002

[12] [12]

Escauriaza, G

L. Escauriaza, G. Seregin, and V. Šverák,L3,∞-solutions of Navier–Stokes equations and backward uniqueness,Russian Mathematical Surveys58(2003), no. 2, 211–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1070/RM2003v058n02ABEH000609

work page doi:10.1070/rm2003v058n02abeh000609 2003

[13] [13]

Kukavica and M

I. Kukavica and M. Ziane, One component regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations, Nonlinearity19(2006), no. 2, 453–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/ 19/2/012

work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/ 2006

[14] [14]

Cao and E

C. Cao and E. S. Titi, Global regularity criterion for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations involv- ing one entry of the velocity gradient tensor,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 202(2011), no. 3, 919–932. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6

work page doi:10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6 2011

[15] [15]

G. A. Seregin,Lecture Notes on Regularity Theory for the Navier–Stokes Equations, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2015, x+258 pp. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1142/9314

work page doi:10.1142/9314 2015

[16] [16]

Chemin and P

J.-Y. Chemin and P. Zhang, On the critical one component regularity for 3-D Navier– Stokes system,Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Série 449(2016), no. 1, 131–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.2278

work page doi:10.24033/asens.2278 2016

[17] [17]

Chemin, P

J.-Y. Chemin, P. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, On the critical one component regularity for 3-D Navier–Stokes system: general case,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis224 (2017), no. 3, 871–905. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-017-1089-0

work page doi:10.1007/s00205-017-1089-0 2017

[18] [18]

B. Han, Z. Lei, D. Li, and N. Zhao, Sharp one component regularity for Navier–Stokes, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis231(2019), no. 2, 939–970. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00205-018-1292-7

work page doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1292-7 2019

[19] [19]

Barker and C

T. Barker and C. Prange, Quantitative regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via spatial concentration,Communications in Mathematical Physics385(2021), no. 2, 717–792. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04122-x

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04122-x 2021

[20] [20]

Kang and D

K. Kang and D. D. Nguyen, Local regularity criteria in terms of one velocity component for the Navier–Stokes equations,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics25(2023), no. 1, article no. 10, 15 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-022-00754-8

work page doi:10.1007/s00021-022-00754-8 2023

[21] [21]

Albritton, T

D. Albritton, T. Barker, and C. Prange, Epsilon regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via weak–strong uniqueness,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics25(2023), no. 3, article no. 49, 12 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-023-00780-0

work page doi:10.1007/s00021-023-00780-0 2023

[22] [22]

Finite-Scale One-Component Regularity via Harmonic Pressure for the 3D Navier-Stokes Equations

R. Yu, Finite-Scale One-Component Regularity via Harmonic Pressure for the 3D Navier– Stokes Equations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.08352 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08352

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.08352 2026

[23] [23]

Strict 2.5D Shadows for One-Component Navier-Stokes Regularity

R. Yu, Strict 2.5D Shadows for One-Component Navier–Stokes Regularity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.11720 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2606.11720

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026

[24] [24]

Schur Visibility and Anti-Phantom Reduction in One-Component Navier-Stokes Degeneration

R. Yu, Schur Visibility and Anti-Phantom Reduction in One-Component Navier–Stokes Degeneration, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.12267 [math.AP], 2026. DOI: https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12267

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.12267 2026

[25] [26]

Yu, Critical Ledgers and Scale-Defect Cascades for Navier–Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13887 [math.AP], 2026

R. Yu, Critical Ledgers and Scale-Defect Cascades for Navier–Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13887 [math.AP], 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606. 13887

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606 2026

[26] [27]

Yu, Finite-Window Singularity Audits and Local-to-Clean Defect Transfer for Navier– Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15086 [math.AP], 2026

R. Yu, Finite-Window Singularity Audits and Local-to-Clean Defect Transfer for Navier– Stokes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15086 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2606.15086

arXiv 2026

[27] [28]

Yu, Finite-Window Computational Anti-Phantom Theorems for Scale-Critical Navier– Stokes Defects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15456 [math.AP], 2026

R. Yu, Finite-Window Computational Anti-Phantom Theorems for Scale-Critical Navier– Stokes Defects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.15456 [math.AP], 2026. DOI:https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.15456. 54

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15456 2026