Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 1 cited by

Audio Editing in the Era of Foundation Models: A Survey

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Audio editing tasks can be organized into a unified taxonomy supported by foundation models in both training-based and training-free ways.

desk verdict This is a standard organizing survey on audio editing with foundation models that adds no new technical results. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.23139 v1 pith:76LJN3FW submitted 2026-06-22 eess.AS

Changhao Pan , Yifei Fan , Fan Zhuo , Yifu Chen , Wenxiang Guo , Yu Zhang , Ruiqi Li , Zhiyuan Zhu
show 8 more authors
Rui Yang Shengpeng Ji Chenyuhao Wen Jiayang Xu Ke Lei Xiaoda Yang Jingyu Lu Zhou Zhao
This is my paper
classification eess.AS
keywords audioeditingfoundationmodelssurveytaxonomygenerativeAIGCtraining-freemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey reviews audio editing methods that use foundation models to modify audio signals according to user needs. It establishes a taxonomy that groups existing editing tasks together. It then contrasts two main ways foundation models are used: those that require training and those that do not. The review also covers datasets, evaluation methods, and remaining problems in the area. Organizing the field this way helps researchers see the current state and plan next steps as generative audio advances quickly.

What carries the argument

The unified taxonomy of audio editing tasks, which groups methods by how they modify audio using foundation models, along with the split into training-based and training-free paradigms for implementing those edits.

What would settle it

Identification of a widely used audio editing technique based on foundation models that cannot be placed into any category of the proposed taxonomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a comprehensive review of audio editing in the foundation model era can be achieved by first defining a unified taxonomy of editing tasks and then summarizing representative foundation-model approaches from training-based and training-free perspectives, while also addressing resources and open challenges.

Load-bearing premise

The papers and approaches selected for the review represent the field without significant omissions or biases in coverage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Methods in the field can now be systematically compared using the taxonomy.
  • Datasets and evaluation protocols are collected in one place for easier access.
  • Identified challenges suggest specific areas for new research efforts.
  • Both training and training-free approaches are shown to support different editing needs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future work might extend the taxonomy to include emerging tasks not yet common.
  • Training-free methods could allow faster experimentation without large compute resources.
  • The survey's structure might serve as a template for similar reviews in other generative media fields like image or video editing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey on audio editing using foundation models. It claims to deliver a unified taxonomy of audio editing tasks, summarize representative foundation-model approaches from both training-based and training-free perspectives, review associated resources (datasets, evaluation protocols, data construction tools), and outline open challenges and future directions.

Significance. If the taxonomy accurately organizes the cited literature without major omissions and the paradigm summaries are faithful, the work provides a useful organizing framework for a rapidly developing subfield at the intersection of audio signal processing and generative AI. The explicit discussion of resources and challenges adds practical value for researchers entering the area.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (Taxonomy): The distinction between training-based and training-free paradigms is introduced early but would benefit from an explicit decision tree or decision criteria table showing how a given method is assigned to one category versus the other, to reduce potential reader ambiguity when new papers appear.
  2. [§4] §4 (Resources): The datasets subsection lists several corpora but does not indicate which editing tasks each corpus primarily supports; adding a task-coverage matrix would strengthen the utility of this section.
  3. Throughout: A small number of citations appear only in the text and not in the reference list (e.g., the first mention of a diffusion-based editing method in §3.2); ensure all in-text citations are present in the bibliography.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and positive assessment of our survey. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no individual points to address. We will prepare a revised manuscript incorporating any minor editorial improvements as needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; survey of external literature

full rationale

The paper is a literature survey whose central claim is a unified taxonomy and summary of paradigms drawn from reviewed external works. No equations, fitted parameters, derivations, or self-referential steps exist that could reduce to the paper's own inputs. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any technical result since the work contains no technical derivations. The completeness assumption is inherent to surveys and does not create circularity in the argument structure.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a survey paper; it introduces no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities. The work rests on the existence and representativeness of the reviewed audio-editing literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Audio Editing in the Era of Foundation Models: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/76LJN3FW

@misc{pith2026260623139,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Audio Editing in the Era of Foundation Models: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/76LJN3FW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23139}
}
read the original abstract

Audio editing aims to modify a given synthetic or real-world audio signal to satisfy specific user needs. As a promising yet challenging direction in AIGC, it has attracted increasing attention. Recent advances in audio generation have made powerful generative models central to modern audio editing systems. This rapid progress has created a growing need to organize emerging tasks, methods, and resources into a coherent view. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of audio editing in the era of foundation models. We first present a unified taxonomy of existing editing tasks and then summarize the major foundation-model paradigms that support modern audio editing, covering representative approaches from both training-based and training-free perspectives. We further discuss related resources, including datasets, evaluation protocols, and data construction tools. Finally, we identify open challenges in this field and outline promising directions for future research. The project page is released at https://github.com/DaViD-Pigeon/AudioEditSurvey.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23139 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Taxonomy of audio editing tasks. fine-grained editing tasks. It highlights how di￾verse editing goals impose distinct requirements on controllability, temporal localization, and con￾tent preservation. Second, we examine the main￾stream foundation-model architectures adopted for audio editing, and analyze their suitability for dif￾ferent editing scenarios in Section 3. Then, we or￾ganize existing methods according to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of training-based audio editing methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of training-free audio editing methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SwanTale: Unified Multi-Speaker Speech and Audio Generation for Instruct and Zero-Shot Tasks

    eess.AS 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SwanTale unifies instruction-driven and zero-shot speech and audio generation in one 48 kHz model, with a large captioning pipeline, and reports leading scores on several expressiveness and instruction-following benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Paul Boersma and David Weenink

    Beyond voice identity conversion: manipulat- ing voice attributes by adversarial learning of struc- tured disentangled representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12346. Paul Boersma and David Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (6.1. 16)[computer software]. Dmitry Bogdanov, Minz Won, Philip Tovstogan, Alas- tair Porter, and Xavier Serra. 2019...

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    CosyEdit: Unlocking End-to-End Speech Editing Capability from Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech Models

    A comparative analysis of automatic speech recognition errors in small group classroom discourse. InProceedings of the 31st ACM conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, pages 250– 262. Edresson Casanova, Julian Weber, Christopher D Shulby, Arnaldo Candido Junior, Eren Gölge, and Moacir A Ponti. 2022. Yourtts: Towards zero-shot multi-sp...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with ad- vanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261. Jade Copet, Felix Kreuk, Itai Gat, Tal Remez, David Kant, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, and Alexandre Défossez. 2023. Simple and controllable music gen- eration.Advances in neural information pro...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    InForty-first interna- tional conference on machine learning

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high- resolution image synthesis. InForty-first interna- tional conference on machine learning. Zach Evans, CJ Carr, Josiah Taylor, Scott H Hawley, and Jordi Pons. 2024. Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion. InForty-first International Confer- ence on Machine Learning. Eduardo Fonseca, Xavier Favory, Jordi...

    2024

  5. [5]

    Youquan Fu, Ruiyang Si, Hongfa Wang, Dongzhan Zhou, Jiacheng Sun, Ping Luo, Di Hu, Hongyuan Zhang, and Xuelong Li

    Metricgan+: An improved version of met- ricgan for speech enhancement.arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03538. Youquan Fu, Ruiyang Si, Hongfa Wang, Dongzhan Zhou, Jiacheng Sun, Ping Luo, Di Hu, Hongyuan Zhang, and Xuelong Li. 2025. Object-avedit: An object-level audio-visual editing model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.00050. Liting Gao, Yi Yuan, Yaru Chen, Yuelan Che...

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    FunASR: A Fundamental End-to-End Speech Recognition Toolkit

    Rfm-editing: Rectified flow matching for text- guided audio editing. InICASSP 2026-2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 15467–15471. IEEE. Zhifu Gao, Zerui Li, Jiaming Wang, Haoneng Luo, Xian Shi, Mengzhe Chen, Yabin Li, Lingyun Zuo, Zhihao Du, Zhangyu Xiao, et al. 2023. Funasr: A funda- mental end-...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    V oicenong: Robust high-quality speech editing model without hallucinations. InProc. Interspeech 2025, pages 3469–3473. Yannick Jadoul, Bill Thompson, and Bart De Boer. 2018. Introducing parselmouth: A python interface to praat. Journal of Phonetics, 71:1–15. Shengpeng Ji, Yifu Chen, Minghui Fang, Jialong Zuo, Jingyu Lu, Hanting Wang, Ziyue Jiang, Long Zh...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Keon Lee, Kyumin Park, and Daeyoung Kim

    Dgmo: Training-free audio source separation through diffusion-guided mask optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02858. Keon Lee, Kyumin Park, and Daeyoung Kim. 2023. Dailytalk: Spoken dialogue dataset for conversational text-to-speech. InICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1–5. IEEE....

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 21 references
  1. [9]

    Jinhua Liang, Yuanzhe Chen, Yi Yuan, Dongya Jia, Xiaobin Zhuang, Zhuo Chen, Yuping Wang, and Yux- uan Wang

    Styletts: A style-based generative model for natural and diverse text-to-speech synthesis.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 19(1):283–296. Jinhua Liang, Yuanzhe Chen, Yi Yuan, Dongya Jia, Xiaobin Zhuang, Zhuo Chen, Yuping Wang, and Yux- uan Wang. 2025. Audi...

    2025

  2. [10]

    Chen-Chou Lo, Szu-Wei Fu, Wen-Chin Huang, Xin Wang, Junichi Yamagishi, Yu Tsao, and Hsin-Min Wang

    Stylestream: Real-time zero-shot voice style conversion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20113. Chen-Chou Lo, Szu-Wei Fu, Wen-Chin Huang, Xin Wang, Junichi Yamagishi, Yu Tsao, and Hsin-Min Wang. 2019. Mosnet: Deep learning based objec- tive assessment for voice conversion.arXiv prepr...

    2019

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12858

    Audio editing with non-rigid text prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12858. William Peebles and Saining Xie. 2023. Scalable diffu- sion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195–4205. Puyuan Peng, Po-Yao Hua...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Alessandro Ragano, Jan Skoglund, and Andrew Hines

    The musdb18 corpus for music separation. Alessandro Ragano, Jan Skoglund, and Andrew Hines

  5. [13]

    InICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1011–1015

    Nomad: Unsupervised learning of per- ceptual embeddings for speech enhancement and non-matching reference audio quality assessment. InICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1011–1015. IEEE. ITUT Rec. 2006. P....

    2024

  6. [14]

    InICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 6493–6497

    Dnsmos: A non-intrusive perceptual objective speech quality metric to evaluate noise suppressors. InICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Confer- ence on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 6493–6497. IEEE. Antony W Rix, John G Beerends, Michael P Hollier, an...

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Jaesung Tae, Hyeongju Kim, and Taesu Kim

    IEEE. Jaesung Tae, Hyeongju Kim, and Taesu Kim. 2021. Editts: Score-based editing for controllable text-to- speech.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02584. Daxin Tan, Liqun Deng, Yu Ting Yeung, Xin Jiang, Xiao Chen, and Tan Lee. 2021. Editspeech: A text based speech editing system usi...

    2021

  8. [16]

    IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and lan- guage processing, 28:1778–1787

    Complex spectral mapping for single-and multi-channel speech enhancement and robust asr. IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and lan- guage processing, 28:1778–1787. Haojie Wei, Xueke Cao, Tangpeng Dan, and Yueguo Chen. 2023. Rmvpe: A robust model for vocal pitch estimatio...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Shih-Lun Wu, Chris Donahue, Shinji Watanabe, and Nicholas J Bryan

    Analysis of forced aligner performance on l2 english speech.Speech Communication, 158:103042. Shih-Lun Wu, Chris Donahue, Shinji Watanabe, and Nicholas J Bryan. 2024. Music controlnet: Mul- tiple time-varying controls for music generation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speec...

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    remove the background crowd noise from the speech

    Editsinger: Zero-shot text-based singing voice editing system with diverse prosody modeling. In IJCAI, pages 4503–4509. Yixiao Zhang, Yukara Ikemiya, Woosung Choi, Naoki Murata, Marco A Martínez-Ramírez, Liwei Lin, Gus Xia, Wei-Hsiang Liao, Yuki Mitsufuji, and Simon Dixon. 202...

    2023

  11. [19]

    When the editable unit is defined by speaker activity rather than text, pyannote (Bredin,

    generates word-level timestamps for long- form speech. When the editable unit is defined by speaker activity rather than text, pyannote (Bredin,

  12. [20]

    For general au- dio, sound event detection models (Kong et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023) produce event-level activity boundaries

    and V AD tools (Karan et al., 2024) can provide speaker-active segments. For general au- dio, sound event detection models (Kong et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023) produce event-level activity boundaries. In music editing, temporal localization often relies on pitch or note-level ...

    2024

  13. [21]

    How- ever, their effectiveness depends heavily on stable text-acoustic alignment and high-quality tokeniza- tion

    and SpeechX (Wang et al., 2024b). How- ever, their effectiveness depends heavily on stable text-acoustic alignment and high-quality tokeniza- tion. When applied to music or general audio, weak semantic boundaries, dense source mixtures, and long-term structural constraints may...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.