Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Sloshing Motions in Abell 3571 Revealed by XRISM/Resolve Velocity Mapping

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read XRISM velocity maps show Abell 3571 has large-scale gas sloshing from an off-axis minor merger.

desk verdict New XRISM Resolve velocity maps of Abell 3571 show ~60 km/s blueshift in the north and ~170 km/s redshift in the south that track the thermodynamic asymmetry, but the sloshing attribution rests on a qualitative simulation match. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.30413 v1 pith:WJ5CYMJM submitted 2026-06-29 astro-ph.HE

Itsuki Aihara , Congyao Zhang , Sora Nakajima , Kyoko Matsushita , Hannah McCall , Irina Zhuravleva , Shogo B. Kobayashi , Kotaro Fukushima
show 7 more authors
William R. Forman Christine Jones Annie Heinrich Daniele Rogantini Kosuke Sato Kazunori Suda Ildar Khabibullin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords galaxyclustersintraclustermediumsloshingminormergersX-rayspectroscopyvelocitymappingcoolcoresAbell3571
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper maps line-of-sight velocities across the central 300 kpc of Abell 3571 using four XRISM Resolve pointings. It reports subsonic dispersions of 100-150 km/s, with the northern cooler surface-brightness excess blueshifted by up to 60 km/s and the southern/eastern hotter deficits redshifted by up to 170 km/s relative to the brightest cluster galaxy. These kinematic patterns together with the thermodynamic asymmetry match the early phase of sloshing in numerical simulations of an off-axis minor merger. The results point to Abell 3572, 1.6 Mpc to the south, as a candidate perturber and suggest that such sloshing can redistribute gas and slow the return to a strong cool core even when AGN feedback is weak.

What carries the argument

Line-of-sight velocity field from X-ray line spectroscopy combined with surface-brightness and temperature maps, tested against hydrodynamic simulations of minor-merger sloshing.

What would settle it

A tailored simulation with the observed mass ratio and impact parameter that fails to reproduce the measured north-south velocity gradient of ~230 km/s, or deeper observations that reveal a different line-of-sight velocity pattern.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The large-scale thermodynamic and kinematic asymmetry is broadly consistent with early-phase sloshing induced by an off-axis minor merger. Velocity dispersions remain subsonic across most regions. The cooler northern excess is blueshifted relative to the BCG while the hotter southern and eastern regions are redshifted. Numerical simulations reproduce this configuration for an early-stage off-axis encounter, and the lack of strong AGN signatures implies sloshing-driven redistribution contributes to delaying cool-core re-establishment.

Load-bearing premise

The velocity shifts and thermodynamic asymmetries are produced by sloshing from a minor merger rather than projection effects, AGN motions, or other processes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sloshing signatures can appear in clusters that look relaxed in X-ray images.
  • Minor mergers can redistribute gas and affect cool-core evolution on Gyr timescales.
  • Abell 3572 is a viable perturber whose orbit and mass can be tested with further data.
  • Clusters without prominent AGN feedback may still experience delayed cool-core recovery due to sloshing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Velocity mapping with XRISM could be applied to other apparently relaxed clusters to search for hidden sloshing.
  • The observed velocity amplitudes set a lower limit on the time since the merger pericenter passage.
  • If sloshing is common, models of cool-core fraction evolution must include minor-merger effects alongside AGN heating.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents XRISM/Resolve spectroscopic observations of the central ~300 kpc of Abell 3571, reporting subsonic velocity dispersions of ~100-150 km/s and line-of-sight velocity shifts with the northern cool surface-brightness excess blueshifted by up to -60 km/s and the southern/eastern hot deficit redshifted by up to 170 km/s relative to the BCG. The thermodynamic and kinematic asymmetry is interpreted as broadly consistent with early-phase sloshing induced by an off-axis minor merger, with Abell 3572 suggested as the perturber, in the absence of strong AGN feedback signatures.

Significance. If the sloshing attribution holds, the work supplies direct kinematic constraints from microcalorimeter spectroscopy on merger-driven gas motions in a cluster core. It illustrates how velocity mapping can distinguish dynamical processes in apparently relaxed systems and informs models of cool-core evolution via sloshing-driven redistribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported velocity shifts (~-60 km/s and ~170 km/s) are given without uncertainties or error budgets. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim of a significant large-scale asymmetry and its consistency with simulations cannot be quantitatively assessed without them.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion of numerical simulations: the statement that the observations are 'broadly consistent with early-phase sloshing' supplies no quantitative metrics (velocity amplitude match, spatial pattern after projection, or comparison at the inferred mass ratio and impact parameter with Abell 3572). This leaves the attribution to sloshing as an untested qualitative interpretation rather than a verified match.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Methods: provide explicit details on how the line-of-sight velocities and dispersions were extracted from the Resolve spectra, including any assumptions on the emission-line modeling or background subtraction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported velocity shifts (~-60 km/s and ~170 km/s) are given without uncertainties or error budgets. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim of a significant large-scale asymmetry and its consistency with simulations cannot be quantitatively assessed without them.

    Authors: We agree that uncertainties are necessary for quantitative assessment. The reported shifts are extracted from the spectral fits in Section 3.2, where the 1σ uncertainties on the line centroids are approximately ±30 km/s for the northern blueshift and ±40 km/s for the southern redshift. We will revise the abstract to include these uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion of numerical simulations: the statement that the observations are 'broadly consistent with early-phase sloshing' supplies no quantitative metrics (velocity amplitude match, spatial pattern after projection, or comparison at the inferred mass ratio and impact parameter with Abell 3572). This leaves the attribution to sloshing as an untested qualitative interpretation rather than a verified match.

    Authors: We agree that the current wording presents a qualitative rather than quantitative comparison. The consistency statement draws from general features in published sloshing simulations (velocity amplitudes of order 100 km/s and the expected north-south thermodynamic/kinematic pattern for early-phase off-axis mergers). A rigorous quantitative match, including projection and specific mass ratio/impact parameter for Abell 3572, would require new tailored hydrodynamic simulations, which lie outside the scope of this observational study. We have revised the discussion to emphasize the qualitative basis and to note this limitation explicitly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: purely observational velocity mapping with interpretive claim independent of data reduction

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct spectroscopic measurements of line-of-sight velocities, dispersions, temperatures, and surface-brightness features from XRISM Resolve pointings. These quantities are extracted from the data without any model fitting that feeds back into the reported values. The statement that the observed asymmetry is 'broadly consistent with early-phase sloshing' is a qualitative comparison to external numerical simulations and does not constitute a derivation, prediction, or self-referential step. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to generate the primary results; the central kinematic and thermodynamic maps stand as independent observations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Observational paper; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract. The claim rests on the assumption that the instrument calibration and line-of-sight velocity extraction are accurate, which is treated as standard domain practice rather than a paper-specific axiom.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sloshing Motions in Abell 3571 Revealed by XRISM/Resolve Velocity Mapping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WJ5CYMJM

@misc{pith2026260630413,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sloshing Motions in Abell 3571 Revealed by XRISM/Resolve Velocity Mapping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WJ5CYMJM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.30413}
}
abstract

Minor mergers can induce sloshing motions in the intracluster medium, leaving characteristic signatures in the thermodynamic structure and gas kinematics of cluster cores. Abell 3571 is an X-ray-bright, apparently relaxed cluster at $z \sim 0.04$. We observed the central $\sim 300$ kpc region of Abell 3571 with four partially overlapping XRISM Resolve pointings, covering three contiguous Resolve fields to the north, south and east with a total exposure time of approximately 575 ks. The velocity dispersions are subsonic and are at the level of $\sim 100$--$150 \, \mathrm{km~ \, s^{-1}}$ across most regions. The cooler region associated with the northern surface-brightness excess is blueshifted by up to $\sim -60 \, \mathrm{km \, s^{-1}}$ relative to the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG), while the hotter region in the southern and eastern surface-brightness deficit regions is redshifted by up to $\sim 170 \, \mathrm{km \, s^{-1}}$. Numerical simulations suggest that this large-scale thermodynamic and kinematic asymmetry is broadly consistent with early-phase sloshing induced by an off-axis minor merger. Abell 3572, an X-ray-faint gas-poor cluster located 1.6 Mpc to the south, is a promising candidate for the perturber. Given the lack of clear signatures of prominent AGN feedback in Abell 3571, these results suggest that sloshing-driven gas redistribution may contribute to delaying the re-establishment of a strong cool core in Abell 3571.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30413 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Exposure-corrected X-ray image of A3571 obtained with XMM-Newton/MOS1 in the 0.5–2.0 keV band. No background was subtracted, and the image was smoothed with a 2-dimensional Gaussian of σ = 5.0 pixels = 5.5 ′′. Black regions represent the Resolve FOV. (b) The residual image obtained by subtracting the best-fit elliptical β-model form the XMM/MOS1 image shown in the panel (a). Blue regions correspond to positive r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative spectrum and best-fit SSM model for region 5, which includes the BCG of A3571. The spectrum has been rebinned for display purposes only. The red model component represents the contribution from region 5 itself, while the other colored lines show the contributions of photons originating in the neighboring regions. The black model component represents the NXB, and the thick green line represents the sum… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Upper panels: Color maps of values of three spectral parameters: (a) temperature, (b) bulk velocity, and (c) velocity dispersion. The gray contours represent the residuals from the elliptical β-model: thin solid lines indicate positive values, thick solid lines correspond to zero, and dotted lines denote negative values. The green diamond marks the position of the BCG, and the solid gray line indicates the projected… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: Simulated dark matter (DM) surface mass density distribution, which resembles the relative positions of A3571 (the main cluster) and A3572 (the subcluster). The purple line indicates the subcluster’s infalling trajectory. Right panels: Simulated X-ray surfa…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diagnosing the Fe line complex of the intracluster medium by XRISM high-resolution spectroscopy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sample-wide XRISM analysis finds Fe Lyα2/Lyα1 = 0.55 ± 0.02, consistent with an unresolved M1 transition, and a tentative excess in hotter systems.

  2. XRISM Reveals a Kinematically Coherent Core System of the Nearby Cool-Core Cluster Abell 2199

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    XRISM observations show the core of Abell 2199 is kinematically coherent with low turbulence, where turbulent heating may offset ~20% of radiative cooling losses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    doi:10.1086/191333 , keywords =

    Abell, G. O., Corwin, Jr., H. G., & Olowin, R. P. 1989, ApJS, 70, 1, doi: 10.1086/191333

    work page doi:10.1086/191333 1989

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1086/506508 , keywords =

    Ascasibar, Y., & Markevitch, M. 2006, ApJ, 650, 102, doi: 10.1086/506508

    work page doi:10.1086/506508 2006

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556957 , keywords =

    Baier-Soto, R., Jaff´ e, Y., Finoguenov, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A228, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556957

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556957 2025

  5. [5]

    2005, ApJ, 627, 647, doi: 10.1086/430397

    Bailin, J., & Steinmetz, M. 2005, ApJ, 627, 647, doi: 10.1086/430397 9

    work page doi:10.1086/430397 2005

  6. [6]

    A., Truong, N., et al

    Bellomi, E., ZuHone, J. A., Truong, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.12754, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.12754

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.12754 2025

  7. [7]

    MNRAS , author =

    Binggeli, B. 1982, A&A, 107, 338 Bˆ ırzan, L., Rafferty, D. A., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 3468, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22083.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22083.x 1982

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Cash, W. 1979, ApJ, 228, 939, doi: 10.1086/156922

    work page doi:10.1086/156922 1979

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    2003, ApJ, 590, 225, doi: 10.1086/374923

    Churazov, E., Forman, W., Jones, C., & B¨ ohringer, H. 2003, ApJ, 590, 225, doi: 10.1086/374923

    2003 doi

  2. [10]

    2025, PASJ, 77, S270, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf089

    Kondo, M. 2025, PASJ, 77, S270, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf089

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    P., Busarello, G., Merluzzi, P., et al

    Haines, C. P., Busarello, G., Merluzzi, P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1055, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2338

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    2025, ApJL, 995, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2609

    Heinrich, A., Zhang, C., Zhuravleva, I., et al. 2025, ApJL, 995, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2609

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.27161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.27161

    Heinrich, A., Zhuravleva, I., Churazov, E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.27161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.27161

    2026 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    W., et al

    Herbonnet, R., von der Linden, A., Allen, S. W., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4889, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2913 HI4PI Collaboration, Bekhti, N. B., Fl¨ oer, L., Keller, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    S., Mittal, R., Reiprich, T

    Hudson, D. S., Mittal, R., Reiprich, T. H., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912377

    2010 doi

  8. [16]

    N., & Meaburn, J

    Kemp, S. N., & Meaburn, J. 1991, MNRAS, 251, 10P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/251.1.10P

    1991 doi

  9. [17]

    R., Postman, M., Strauss, M

    Lauer, T. R., Postman, M., Strauss, M. A., Graves, G. J., & Chisari, N. E. 2014, ApJ, 797, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/82

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    2025, A&A, 702, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554374

    Lehle, K., Nelson, D., & Pillepich, A. 2025, A&A, 702, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554374

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Lodders, K., Palme, H., & Gail, H. P. 2009, Landolt B¨ ornstein, 4B, 712, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-88055-434

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    Lopes, P. A. A., Trevisan, M., Lagan´ a, T. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5473, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1374

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    Markevitch, M., Vikhlinin, A., & Forman, W. R. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 301, Matter and Energy in Clusters of Galaxies, ed. S. Bowyer & C.-Y. Hwang, 37, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0208208

    2003 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    2011, A&A, 527, A134, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913432

    Matsushita, K. 2011, A&A, 527, A134, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913432

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    R., & Nulsen, P

    McNamara, B. R., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 117, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625

    2007 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    2015, ApJ, 800, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/60

    Miniati, F. 2015, ApJ, 800, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/60

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    N., et al

    Nevalainen, J., Kaastra, J., Parmar, A. N., et al. 2001, A&A, 369, 459, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010119

    2001 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, ApJ, 954, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace359

    Olivares, V., Su, Y., Forman, W., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace359

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2026a, PASJ, 78, 719, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psag013

    Omiya, Y., Okabe, N., Nakazawa, K., et al. 2026a, PASJ, 78, 719, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psag013

    doi

  20. [28]

    2026b, ApJL, 996, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2a28

    Omiya, Y., Ichinohe, Y., Nakazawa, K., et al. 2026b, ApJL, 996, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2a28

    doi

  21. [29]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.21580, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.21580

    Ota, N., Veronica, A., Dietl, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.21580, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.21580

    2026 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    R., Meunier, J., et al

    Rose, T., McNamara, B. R., Meunier, J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf32d

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    2010, A&A, 510, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913156

    Rossetti, M., & Molendi, S. 2010, A&A, 510, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913156

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    S., Dennerl, K., Russell, H

    Sanders, J. S., Dennerl, K., Russell, H. R., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936468

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    M., Roediger, E., et al

    Sheardown, A., Fish, T. M., Roediger, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0c06

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 182, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/182

    Simionescu, A., Werner, N., Urban, O., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 182, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/182

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Lucey, J

    Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., Hudson, M. J., Schlegel, D. J., & Davies, R. L. 2000, MNRAS, 313, 469, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03251.x

    2000 doi

  28. [36]

    Raymond, J. C. 2001, ApJL, 556, L91, doi: 10.1086/322992

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    Springel, V. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 791, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    Springel, V., & Farrar, G. R. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 911, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12159.x

    2007 doi

  31. [39]

    2026, PASJ, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psag028

    Tanaka, K., Eckart, M., Fukushima, K., et al. 2026, PASJ, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psag028

    2026 doi

  32. [40]

    2025, PASJ, 77, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf023

    Tashiro, M., Kelley, R., Watanabe, S., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf023

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    2009, A&A, 504, 33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912535

    Vazza, F., Brunetti, G., Kritsuk, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912535

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    2002, A&A, 385, 39, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020117

    Morganti, R. 2002, A&A, 385, 39, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020117

    2002 doi

  35. [43]

    2008, A&A, 484, 327, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809622

    Venturi, T., Giacintucci, S., Dallacasa, D., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, 327, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809622

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    2020, ApJS, 248, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., & Pakmor, R. 2020, ApJS, 248, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2025a, Nature, 638, 365, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08561-z XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2025b, PASJ, 77, 1278, d...

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.05803, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.05803

    Zhang, C., Churazov, E., Khabibullin, I., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.05803, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.05803

    doi

  38. [46]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/138

    Zhang, C., Yu, Q., & Lu, Y. 2014, ApJ, 796, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/138

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    2026b, A&A, 707, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557660

    Zhang, C., Zhuravleva, I., Heinrich, A., et al. 2026b, A&A, 707, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557660

    doi

  40. [48]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.04619, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.04619

    Zheng, X., Yu, H., Jia, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.04619, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.04619

    2026 doi

  41. [49]

    A., Markevitch, M., & Johnson, R

    ZuHone, J. A., Markevitch, M., & Johnson, R. E. 2010, ApJ, 717, 908, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/908

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    A., Miller, E

    ZuHone, J. A., Miller, E. D., Simionescu, A., & Bautz, M. W. 2016, ApJ, 821, 6, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/6

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.