Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Fourier restriction norm method adapted to controlled paths: stochastic wave equations

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read First pathwise solution theory for stochastic wave equations with white-in-time noise

desk verdict First pathwise well-posedness for SNLW with multiplicative white-in-time noise, via a genuine unification of Fourier restriction norms and rough path integration. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07618 v1 pith:GMZNLW6H submitted 2026-07-08 math.AP math.PR

Andreia Chapouto , Jiawei Li , Tadahiro Oh This is my paper
classification math.APmath.PR
keywords noisepathspathwisestochastictheorywell-posednessadaptedcase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper resolves a forty-year-old open problem: how to construct solutions to the stochastic nonlinear wave equation with multiplicative white-in-time noise in a pathwise (deterministic, sample-by-sample) sense, rather than only in the Ito (probabilistic average) sense. The obstacle is that the stochastic forcing term is too temporally irregular to define the integral it requires using classical tools. The authors build a single framework that combines three ingredients: (1) the Fourier restriction norm method adapted to U^p/V^p function spaces, which captures both dispersive decay and temporal regularity at the scaling-critical threshold; (2) the sewing lemma and controlled-path theory from rough integration, which defines integrals against irregular signals; and (3) a random tensor estimate for multiple stochastic integrals, which proves the random operator encoding the noise has the temporal Holder regularity needed. In the white-in-time case (Hurst parameter beta = 1/2), the first-order driver has temporal regularity alpha < 1/2, so the classical Young integral fails; the authors construct a second-order driver and impose a controlled-path structure, then split the unknown into a temporally rough but spatially smooth part and a temporally smooth but spatially rough part to close the estimates. The result achieves essentially sharp spatial regularity, matching the deterministic well-posedness threshold.

What carries the argument

Sewing lemma; U^p/V^p function spaces (Koch-Tataru); controlled paths (Gubinelli); random tensor estimate for multiple stochastic integrals with respect to fractional Brownian motions; interaction representation; Strichartz estimates; RDE-PDE system decomposition

What would settle it

If one could exhibit a spatially inhomogeneous noise operator for which the random tensor estimates fail to produce the required Holder regularity of the driver, the restriction to Fourier multipliers would be essential rather than merely convenient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central object is the interaction representation u_tilde = S(-t)u(t), which removes the linear wave propagator from the stochastic convolution and exposes the temporal regularity of the noise. At this level, the stochastic term becomes a Young integral (for fractional-in-time noise with beta > 1/2) or a rough integral (for white-in-time noise with beta = 1/2) against an operator-valued random driver X whose Holder regularity is established via the random tensor estimate. The key structural innovation for the rough case at high dimension and critical regularity is the decomposition u = v + w, where v is rougher in time but gains spatial regularity from the driver's spatial smoothing, andw

Load-bearing premise

The noise operator Phi is assumed to be spatially homogeneous (a Fourier multiplier), and the extension to general Hilbert-Schmidt operators, while expected, is not proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pathwise well-posedness enables almost-sure convergence of approximation schemes (mollification, piecewise linear) for stochastic wave equations, which Ito theory alone does not provide.
  • The unified framework extends to other stochastic dispersive PDEs with multiplicative noise, including stochastic NLS and stochastic KdV, where temporal roughness induces spatial regularity loss.
  • The one-dimensional result covers almost space-time white noise, which is optimal for one-parameter rough paths; full space-time white noise requires bi-parameter analysis beyond the current framework.
  • The agreement with Ito solutions (Appendix A) bridges the pathwise and probabilistic theories, ensuring consistency with the established random-field solution theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The spatial smoothing of the wave propagator (absent for Schrodinger) is what makes the driver regularity bounds close without spatial loss; extending to stochastic NLS will require a different mechanism to compensate.
  • The restriction to spatially homogeneous noise (Fourier multiplier operators) may be removable for the Young case but could be essential in the rough case where the second-order driver's tensor structure depends on the multiplier factorization.
  • The framework should extend to Hurst parameters beta > 1/3 using higher-order rough paths, at the cost of requiring higher spatial regularity to control the nonlinear term.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper establishes pathwise local well-posedness of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation (SNLW) with multiplicative noise on the torus T^d, in both the fractional-in-time (Young) and white-in-time (rough) cases. The main results (Theorems 1.4 and 1.5) achieve essentially sharp spatial regularity, matching the deterministic critical Sobolev index s_crit. The approach combines the Fourier restriction norm method adapted to U^p/V^p spaces (Koch-Tataru) with Young/rough integration via the sewing lemma and controlled paths (Gubinelli). A key technical tool is a random tensor estimate (Lemma 2.12) for multiple stochastic integrals with respect to fractional Brownian motions, used to establish almost sure operator-norm bounds on the random drivers (Propositions 4.1, 4.2). The white-in-time result (Theorem 1.5) resolves a long-standing open problem. Appendix A verifies agreement with Ito solutions.

Significance. This is a substantial and important contribution. Theorem 1.5 gives the first pathwise well-posedness result for SNLW with multiplicative white-in-time noise, resolving a forty-year-old open problem. The regularity thresholds are essentially sharp, and in d=1 the result covers almost space-time white noise, which is optimal for one-parameter rough paths. The paper provides complete, detailed proofs of all main components: the random tensor estimate (Lemma 2.12), driver regularity (Propositions 4.1, 4.2), deterministic nonlinear estimates (Section 5), contraction arguments (Sections 6, 7), and Ito agreement (Appendix A). The unified framework combining U^p/V^p spaces with sewing-based rough integration is a methodological contribution likely to influence subsequent work on stochastic dispersive PDEs. The v-w decomposition (Section 7) for handling the endpoint case (d>=6, k=2, s=s_crit>=1) is a notable technical innovation.

major comments (2)
  1. Proposition 4.2(ii), Eq. (4.34): The bound on the second-order driver X requires summing over dyadic blocks under conditions (4.32)-(4.33), verified through a case-by-case analysis (cases (a.i)-(c.ii), pp. 50-51). The convergence in each case reduces to conditions (4.51)-(4.56), which collectively yield (4.32) and (4.33). While the individual cases appear correctly handled, the presentation is dense and the reader must verify six separate frequency interaction regimes. A brief summary table or a more explicit statement of which condition from (4.51)-(4.56) corresponds to which regime would strengthen the verification. This is not an error but a load-bearing argument where clarity directly affects verifiability.
  2. Lemma 2.12 (random tensor estimate): The proof proceeds by induction on TT* powers (Eq. (2.40)-(2.48)), and the inductive step (Eq. (2.45)) relies on the factorization property of the H^beta norm (stated after (2.45): '||f1(t_B1) f2(t_B2)||_{H^beta_{tB}} = prod ||fj||_{H^beta_{tBj}}'). This factorization is correct for the tensor-product structure of H^beta(R^k_+) as defined in (2.23), but it is used implicitly in a context where the time variables have been identified through the contraction (2.43). A one-sentence justification that the factorization survives the relabelling (2.44) would close a gap that a careful reader would flag.
minor comments (5)
  1. p. 50, Eq. (4.45): The expression appears to list (4.45) twice in the text ('putting (4.45), (4.45), (4.46), and (4.47) together'). One reference should likely be to (4.38) or the L^2 bound on eg.
  2. The notation F^(k) in (4.15) uses k as an integer index for sin/cos, which conflicts with k>=2 denoting the nonlinearity power throughout the paper. Consider using a different symbol (e.g., F^(ell)).
  3. Remark 1.22 (p. 8): The spatial homogeneity assumption Phi = Fourier multiplier is stated as a simplification ('We leave the general case to interested readers'). While the random tensor estimate (Lemma 2.12) is stated in general tensor form, the driver regularity proofs (Propositions 4.1, 4.2) use the multiplier structure in (4.14) and (4.41). A brief remark on where the general Hilbert-Schmidt case would require modification would be helpful.
  4. p. 87, proof of Lemma A.6: The notation fM_{s,sigma} (after (A.38)) and tilde-M_{s,sigma} (after (A.42)) are introduced without explicit definition of the tilde variant; the reader can infer it but a definition would be cleaner.
  5. The paper is long (93 pages). While the level of detail is largely justified, some material in Section 3 (Young/rough integration review) and Appendix C (sewing lemma proof) is standard. The authors could consider condensing these sections in a final version, though this does not affect correctness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the positive assessment. Both comments are well-taken and concern clarity of presentation in load-bearing technical arguments. We address each below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Proposition 4.2(ii), Eq. (4.34): The bound on the second-order driver X requires summing over dyadic blocks under conditions (4.32)-(4.33), verified through a case-by-case analysis (cases (a.i)-(c.ii), pp. 50-51). The convergence in each case reduces to conditions (4.51)-(4.56), which collectively yield (4.32) and (4.33). While the individual cases appear correctly handled, the presentation is dense and the reader must verify six separate frequency interaction regimes. A brief summary table or a more explicit statement of which condition from (4.51)-(4.56) corresponds to which regime would strengthen the verification.

    Authors: We agree that the case-by-case analysis on pp. 50–51 is dense and that a summary table mapping each frequency interaction regime to the corresponding condition would significantly aid verifiability. In the revised manuscript, we will add a table (or an equivalent explicit summary) listing, for each of the six cases (a.i)–(c.ii), the frequency regime (in terms of the relative sizes of N, N1, N2, N3, N23), the condition from (4.51)–(4.56) that governs convergence in that regime, and how each condition contributes to the unified conditions (4.32)–(4.33). This is purely a clarification; no mathematical change is needed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Lemma 2.12 (random tensor estimate): The proof proceeds by induction on TT* powers (Eq. (2.40)-(2.48)), and the inductive step (Eq. (2.45)) relies on the factorization property of the H^beta norm (stated after (2.45): '||f1(t_B1) f2(t_B2)||_{H^beta_{tB}} = prod ||fj||_{H^beta_{tBj}}'). This factorization is correct for the tensor-product structure of H^beta(R^k_+) as defined in (2.23), but it is used implicitly in a context where the time variables have been identified through the contraction (2.43). A one-sentence justification that the factorization survives the relabelling (2.44) would close a gap that a careful reader would flag.

    Authors: We agree that a brief justification is warranted. The factorization property follows from the definition (2.23) of H^beta(R^k_+) as a tensor-product Hilbert space: the norm factorizes across any partition of the time variables. After the relabelling (2.44), the sets B1 and C (whose union is D) and B2 and C (whose union is A) are disjoint collections of time variables, so the H^beta-norm on the combined variable set t_B = t_{B1} ⊔ t_{B2} still factorizes as a product of the H^beta-norms on t_{B1} ⊔ t_C and t_{B2} ⊔ t_C. The relabelling merely reindexes which variables belong to which factor; it does not alter the tensor-product structure. We will add one sentence to this effect after (2.45) in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The central random tensor estimate (Lemma 2.12) is proved in full via an induction on TT* powers using the Wiener chaos estimate (Lemma 2.8, attributed to Nelson's hypercontractivity — an external, standard result). The driver bounds (Propositions 4.1, 4.2) are derived from Lemma 2.12 through explicit case-by-case frequency analysis. The well-posedness results (Theorems 1.4, 1.5) follow from deterministic contraction arguments (Sections 6, 7) using the driver bounds and standard Strichartz/Sobolev estimates as input. The sewing lemma (Lemma 3.4) is proved in Appendix C. The self-citation to [144] for the β=1/2 case of Lemma 2.12 is not load-bearing because the paper provides a complete proof. No parameter is fitted to data and then presented as a prediction. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. The conditions on σ and s emerge from the frequency interaction analysis, not from circular reasoning. The agreement with Itô solutions (Proposition A.5) is proved by direct computation. The derivation is genuinely self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper introduces minimal new entities, all of which serve clear structural purposes and are supported by independent estimates. The free parameters (alpha, gamma, epsilon) are not fitted to data but are chosen to satisfy regularity constraints. The spatial homogeneity assumption on Phi is the main simplifying axiom that is not fully justified in the general case.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (temporal regularity exponent) = 1/2 < alpha < beta (Young case); 1/3 < alpha < 1/2 (rough case)
    Chosen close to beta to maximize temporal regularity. Not fitted to data but selected to satisfy the constraint alpha + gamma > 1 (or min(alpha+gamma, 3alpha) > 1 in the rough case).
  • gamma (remainder temporal regularity) = 1/2 < gamma < 1, close to 1/2
    Selected in the rough case to satisfy alpha + gamma > 1 with alpha close to 1/2. Not fitted but chosen to close the contraction argument.
  • epsilon (spatial regularity gain) = small positive
    Small spatial smoothing parameter used in the rough case to handle the d>=6, k=2 case via the v-w decomposition. Its existence is guaranteed by the improved nonlinear estimates (Proposition 5.11).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The noise operator Phi is spatially homogeneous: Phi(e_n) = phi_n e_n with phi_{-n} = phi_n (equation 1.22).
    Stated in Section 1.3 to simplify presentation. The authors claim the general case is a straightforward extension but do not prove it.
  • standard math The deterministic NLW is locally well-posed in H^s for s satisfying condition (1.21) (Proposition 1.2).
    Follows from standard contraction arguments using Sobolev embedding (d=1) and Strichartz estimates (d>=2). The paper provides the nonlinear estimates in Section 5.
  • standard math The sewing lemma (Lemma 3.4) holds for functions of bounded p-variation.
    Adapted from Holder setting. Proof included in Appendix C.
  • domain assumption The random tensor estimate (Lemma 2.12) extends to fractional Brownian motions with Hurst parameter 1/2 <= beta < 1.
    Stated as a 'straightforward modification' of the beta=1/2 case from [144]. Full proof provided in Subsection 2.5.
  • standard math The Strichartz estimates on T^d follow from those on R^d via finite speed of propagation (Lemma 5.5).
    Cited from [166]. Standard in the dispersive PDE literature.
invented entities (3)
  • Interaction representation u-hat = S(-t)u(t) independent evidence
    purpose: Removes the linear wave propagator from the stochastic convolution term, enabling pathwise construction via Young/rough integration.
    Standard in Fourier restriction norm method. The X^{s,b}-norm is expressed in terms of this representation (equation 1.28).
  • Operator-valued driver X-hat (equation 1.32) and second-order driver X-double-hat (equation 1.37) independent evidence
    purpose: Two-parameter stochastic processes that serve as the Young/rough drivers for the pathwise construction of the stochastic convolution.
    Their regularity is established in Propositions 4.1 and 4.2 using the random tensor estimate, providing falsifiable bounds on operator norms.
  • v-w decomposition (equation 1.42) independent evidence
    purpose: Splits the unknown into a spatially-smoother temporally-rougher part v and a temporally-smoother spatially-rougher part w, to handle the d>=6, k=2 case.
    The decomposition is justified by the spatial smoothing of the rough driver (Proposition 4.2) and the improved nonlinear estimates (Proposition 5.11).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fourier restriction norm method adapted to controlled paths: stochastic wave equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GMZNLW6H

@misc{pith2026260707618,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fourier restriction norm method adapted to controlled paths: stochastic wave equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GMZNLW6H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07618}
}
abstract

We investigate the pathwise well-posedness issue of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation (SNLW) with a multiplicative noise. While the Ito solution theory (= random field solution theory) was established in the '80s, its pathwise well-posedness has remained a challenging open problem for over forty years. By building a unified framework for the Fourier restriction norm method adapted to the $U^p$- and $V^p$-spaces, due to Koch and Tataru (2007), and the Young/rough integration theory via the sewing lemma and controlled paths due to Gubinelli (2004) along with the random tensor estimate for multiple stochastic integrals with respect to (fractional) Brownian motions, we establish pathwise local well-posedness of SNLW in optimal regularity ranges. In particular, in the one-dimensional case with a white-in-time noise, our result covers the case of an almost space-time white noise, which is optimal within the framework of one-parameter rough paths.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlinear PDEs with modulated dispersion III: multiplicative noises

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Irregular modulation of dispersion yields pathwise regularization-by-noise for multiplicative Young noise on stochastic KdV, giving local well-posedness in every Hs.

  2. Refined global well-posedness for the periodic modulated Korteweg-de Vries equation

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    With a sufficiently irregular modulation, the periodic modulated KdV is globally well-posed in H^s(T) for every real s, via a non-classical scaling that bypasses the s = -3/2 barrier.

  3. A remark on pathwise well-posedness of the 1-$d$ stochastic heat equation

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pathwise global well-posedness of the 1-d SHE holds for σ > −2β+1 (Young) and σ > −1/2 (rough/white-in-time), via random-tensor estimates on convolution drivers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 172 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Arthur, G

    T. Arthur, G. Li, O. Pocovnicu, T. Zhao,Global well-posedness of the energy-critical defocusing stochastic nonlinear wave equations with multiplicative noises, in preparation

    work page

  2. [2]

    Babin, A.A

    A.V. Babin, A.A. Ilyin, E.S. Titi,On the regularization mechanism for the periodic Korteweg-de Vries equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 5, 591–648

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Balan,The stochastic wave equation with multiplicative fractional noise: a Malliavin calculus approach, Potential Anal

    R.M. Balan,The stochastic wave equation with multiplicative fractional noise: a Malliavin calculus approach, Potential Anal. 36 (2012), no. 1, 1–34

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Balan, M

    R.M. Balan, M. Jolis, L. Quer-Sardanyons,SPDEs with affine multiplicative fractional noise in space with index 1 4 < H < 1 2, Electron. J. Probab. 20 (2015), no. 54, 36 pp

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Barbu, M

    V. Barbu, M. R¨ ockner,The finite speed of propagation for solutions to nonlinear stochastic wave equations driven by multiplicative noise,J. Differential Equations 255 (2013), no. 3, 560–571

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    B´ enyi, T

    ´A. B´ enyi, T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu,On the probabilistic Cauchy theory of the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation onR d,d≥3, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B 2 (2015), 1–50

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    B´ enyi, T

    ´A. B´ enyi, T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu,On the probabilistic Cauchy theory for nonlinear dispersive PDEs, Landscapes of Time-Frequency Analysis. 1–32, Appl. Numer. Harmon. Anal., Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    B´ enyi, T

    ´A. B´ enyi, T. Oh, T. Zhao,Fractional Leibniz rule on the torus, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 153 (2025), no. 1, 207–221

    work page 2025

Show all 172 references
  1. [9]

    Biagini, Y

    F. Biagini, Y. Hu, B. Øksendal, T. Zhang,Stochastic calculus for fractional Brownian motion and applications, Probability and its Applications (New York). Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2008. xii+329 pp. 94 A. CHAPOUTO, J. LI, AND T. OH

    2008

  2. [10]

    Bourgain,Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear evolution equations

    J. Bourgain,Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear evolution equations. I. Schr¨ odinger equations, Geom. Funct. Anal. 3 (1993), no. 2, 107–156

    1993

  3. [11]

    Bourgain,Periodic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures, Comm

    J. Bourgain,Periodic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures, Comm. Math. Phys. 166 (1994), no. 1, 1–26

    1994

  4. [12]

    Bourgain,Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm

    J. Bourgain,Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 176 (1996), no. 2, 421–445

    1996

  5. [13]

    Bringmann,Almost sure local well-posedness for a derivative nonlinear wave equation, Int

    B. Bringmann,Almost sure local well-posedness for a derivative nonlinear wave equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021, no. 11, 8657–8697

    2021

  6. [14]

    Bringmann,Introduction to deterministic and random dispersive equation, lecture notes from Summer School on PDEs and Randomness (2023), Max Planck Institute Leipzig

    B. Bringmann,Introduction to deterministic and random dispersive equation, lecture notes from Summer School on PDEs and Randomness (2023), Max Planck Institute Leipzig. https://files-www.mis.mpg.de/mpi-typo3/events-files/slides 764.pdf

    2023

  7. [15]

    Bringmann,Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlin- earity II: dynamics, J

    B. Bringmann,Invariant Gibbs measures for the three-dimensional wave equation with a Hartree nonlin- earity II: dynamics, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 26 (2024), no. 6, 1933–2089

    2024

  8. [16]

    Bringmann, Y

    B. Bringmann, Y. Deng, A.R. Nahmod, H. Yue,Invariant Gibbs measures for the three dimensional cubic nonlinear wave equation, Invent. Math. 236 (2024), no. 3, 1133–1411

    2024

  9. [17]

    Bringmann, J

    B. Bringmann, J. L¨ uhrmann, G. Staffilani,The wave maps equation and Brownian paths, Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), no. 3, Paper No. 60, 115 pp

    2024

  10. [18]

    E. Brun, G. Li, R. Liu,Global well-posedness of the energy-critical stochastic nonlinear wave equations, J. Differential Equations 397 (2024), 316–348

    2024

  11. [19]

    Brze´ zniak,On stochastic convolution in Banach spaces and applications, Stochastics Stochastics Rep

    Z. Brze´ zniak,On stochastic convolution in Banach spaces and applications, Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 61 (1997), no. 3-4, 245–295

    1997

  12. [20]

    Brze´ zniak, M

    Z. Brze´ zniak, M. Ondrej´ at,Strong solutions to stochastic wave equations with values in Riemannian manifolds, J. Funct. Anal. 253 (2007), no. 2, 449–481

    2007

  13. [21]

    Brze´ zniak, M

    Z. Brze´ zniak, M. Ondrej´ at,Stochastic geometric wave equations with values in compact Riemannian homogeneous spaces, Ann. Probab. 41 (2013), no. 3B, 1938–1977

    2013

  14. [22]

    Brze´ zniak, S

    Z. Brze´ zniak, S. Peszat,Space-time continuous solutions to SPDE’s driven by a homogeneous Wiener process, Studia Math. 137 (1999), no. 3, 261–299

    1999

  15. [23]

    Brze´ zniak, N

    Z. Brze´ zniak, N. Rana,Local solution to an energy critical 2-D stochastic wave equation with exponential nonlinearity in a bounded domain, J. Differential Equations 340 (2022), 386–462

    2022

  16. [24]

    N. Burq, N. Tzvetkov,Random data Cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations. I. Local theory, Invent. Math. 173 (2008), no. 3, 449–475

    2008

  17. [25]

    N. Burq, N. Tzvetkov,Probabilistic well-posedness for the cubic wave equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 16 (2014), no. 1, 1–30

    2014

  18. [26]

    Cairoli,Sur une ´ equation diff´ erentielle stochastique, C

    R. Cairoli,Sur une ´ equation diff´ erentielle stochastique, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. A-B 274 (1972), A1739–A1742

    1972

  19. [27]

    Cairoli, J

    R. Cairoli, J. Walsh,Stochastic integrals in the plane, Acta Math. 134 (1975), 111–183

    1975

  20. [28]

    Cairoli, J

    R. Cairoli, J. Walsh,Martingale representations and holomorphic processes, Ann. Probability 5 (1977), no. 4, 511–521

    1977

  21. [29]

    Carmona, D

    R. Carmona, D. Nualart,Random nonlinear wave equations: propagation of singularities, Ann. Probab. 16 (1988), no. 2, 730–751

    1988

  22. [30]

    Carmona, D

    R. Carmona, D. Nualart,Random nonlinear wave equations: smoothness of the solutions, Probab. Theory Related Fields 79 (1988), no. 4, 469–508

    1988

  23. [31]

    Caruana, P

    M. Caruana, P. K. Friz,Partial differential equations driven by rough paths, J. Differential Equations 247 (2009), no. 1, 140–173

    2009

  24. [32]

    Caruana, P

    M. Caruana, P. K. Friz, H. Oberhauser,A (rough) pathwise approach to a class of non-linear stochastic partial differential equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 28 (2011), no. 1, 27–46

    2011

  25. [33]

    Catellier, K

    R. Catellier, K. Chouk,Paracontrolled distributions and the 3-dimensional stochastic quantization equation, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 5, 2621–2679

    2018

  26. [34]

    Chapouto,A refined well-posedness result for the modified KdV equation in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces

    A. Chapouto,A refined well-posedness result for the modified KdV equation in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces. J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 35 (2023), no. 3, 2537–2578

    2023

  27. [35]

    Chapouto, M

    A. Chapouto, M. Gubinelli, G. Li, J. Li, T. Oh,Nonlinear PDEs with modulated dispersion III: multiplicative noises, preprint

  28. [36]

    Chapouto, J

    A. Chapouto, J. Li, F.G. Longmou-Moffo, T. Oh, M. Okamoto,Pathwise local well-posedness of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with a multiplicative Young noise, preprint

  29. [37]

    Chapouto, J

    A. Chapouto, J. Li, T. Oh,Fourier restriction norm method adapted to controlled paths II: stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations on the Euclidean space, in progress. FOURIER RESTRICTION NORM METHOD ADAPTED TO CONTROLLED PATHS 95

  30. [38]

    Chapouto, J

    A. Chapouto, J. Li, T. Oh, G. Zheng,Pathwise well-posedness of the stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with multiplicative noises, in preparation

  31. [39]

    X. Chen, A. Deya, J. Song, S. Tindel,Hyperbolic Anderson model 2: Strichartz estimates and Stratonovich setting, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2023, no. 21, 18575–18628

    2023

  32. [40]

    X. Chen, A. Deya, J. Song, S. Tindel,Solving the hyperbolic Anderson model 1: Skorohod setting, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 61 (2025), no. 3, 1794–1814

    2025

  33. [41]

    Cheung, G

    K. Cheung, G. Li, T. Oh,Almost conservation laws for stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Evol. Equ. 21 (2021), 1865–1894

    2021

  34. [42]

    Chouk, M

    K. Chouk, M. Gubinelli,Nonlinear PDEs with modulated dispersion I: Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 40 (2015), no. 11, 2047–2081

    2015

  35. [43]

    Chouk, M

    K. Chouk, M. Gubinelli,Rough sheets, arXiv:1406.7748 [math.PR]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Chouk, M

    C. Chouk, M. Gubinelli, G. Li, J. Li, T. Oh,Nonlinear PDEs with modulated dispersion II: Korteweg-de Vries equation, arXiv:1406.7675 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Christ, J

    M. Christ, J. Colliander, T. Tao,Ill-posedness for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations, arXiv:math/0311048 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Colliander, T

    J. Colliander, T. Oh,Almost sure well-posedness of the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below L2(T), Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), no. 3, 367–414

    2012

  39. [47]

    Da Prato, A

    G. Da Prato, A. Debussche,Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations, Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 4, 1900–1916

    2003

  40. [48]

    Da Prato, J

    G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk,Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, Second edition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 152. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. xviii+493 pp

    2014

  41. [49]

    Dalang,Extending the martingale measure stochastic integral with applications to spatially homoge- neous s.p.d.e.’s, Electron

    R.C. Dalang,Extending the martingale measure stochastic integral with applications to spatially homoge- neous s.p.d.e.’s, Electron. J. Probab. 4 (1999), no. 6, 29 pp; Corrections, Electron. J. Probab. 6 (2001), no. 6, 5 pp

    1999

  42. [50]

    Dalang,The stochastic wave equation

    R.C. Dalang,The stochastic wave equation. A minicourse on stochastic partial differential equations, 39–71, Lecture Notes in Math., 1962, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009

    1962

  43. [51]

    Dalang, N.E

    R.C. Dalang, N.E. Frangos,The stochastic wave equation in two spatial dimensions, Ann. Probab. 26 (1998), no. 1, 187–212

    1998

  44. [52]

    Dalang, M

    R.C. Dalang, M. Sanz-Sol´ e,H¨ older-Sobolev regularity of the solution to the stochastic wave equation in dimension three, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 199 (2009), no. 931, vi+70 pp

    2009

  45. [53]

    Dalang, M

    R.C. Dalang, M. Sanz-Sol´ e,Stochastic partial differential equations, space-time white noise and random fields, Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2026. xix+634 pp

    2026

  46. [54]

    de Bouard, A

    A. de Bouard, A. Debussche,A stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with multiplicative noise, Comm. Math. Phys. 205 (1999), no. 1, 161–181

    1999

  47. [55]

    de Bouard, A

    A. de Bouard, A. Debussche,The stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in H 1, Stochastic Anal. Appl. 21 (2003), no. 1, 97–126

    2003

  48. [56]

    Delgado-Vences, D

    F.J. Delgado-Vences, D. Nualart, G. Zheng,A central limit theorem for the stochastic wave equation with fractional noise, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 56 (2020), no. 4, 3020–3042

    2020

  49. [57]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, H. Yue,Optimal local well-posedness for the periodic derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 384 (2021), no. 2, 1061–1107

    2021

  50. [58]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, H. Yue,Invariant Gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two, Ann. of Math. 200 (2024), no. 2, 399–486

    2024

  51. [59]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, H. Yue,Random tensors, propagation of randomness, and nonlinear dispersive equations, Invent. Math. 228 (2022), no. 2, 539–686

    2022

  52. [60]

    Deya,A nonlinear wave equation with fractional perturbation, Ann

    A. Deya,A nonlinear wave equation with fractional perturbation, Ann. Probab. 47 (2019), no. 3, 1775–1810

    2019

  53. [61]

    Deya,On a non-linear 2D fractional wave equation, Ann

    A. Deya,On a non-linear 2D fractional wave equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 56 (2020), no. 1, 477–501

    2020

  54. [62]

    Deya,On ill-posedness of nonlinear stochastic wave equations driven by rough noise, Stochastic Process

    A. Deya,On ill-posedness of nonlinear stochastic wave equations driven by rough noise, Stochastic Process. Appl. 150 (2022), 215–249

    2022

  55. [63]

    A. Deya, M. Gubinelli, M. Hofmanov´ a, S. Tindel,A priori estimates for rough PDEs with application to rough conservation laws, J. Funct. Anal. 276 (2019), no. 12, 3577–3645

    2019

  56. [64]

    A. Deya, M. Gubinelli, S. Tindel,Non-linear rough heat equations, Probab. Theory Related Fields 153 (2012), no. 1-2, 97–147

    2012

  57. [65]

    Farr´ e, D

    M. Farr´ e, D. Nualart,Nonlinear stochastic integral equations in the plane, Stochastic Process. Appl. 46 (1993), no. 2, 219–239. 96 A. CHAPOUTO, J. LI, AND T. OH

    1993

  58. [66]

    Feyel, A

    D. Feyel, A. de La Pradelle,Curvilinear integrals along enriched paths, Electron. J. Probab. 11 (2006), no. 34, 860–892

    2006

  59. [67]

    Forlano, M

    J. Forlano, M. Okamoto,A remark on norm inflation for nonlinear wave equations, Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ. 17 (2020), no. 4, 3610–381

    2020

  60. [68]

    Forlano, L

    J. Forlano, L. Tolomeo,Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures of negative regularity for fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2025). DOI 10.4171/JEMS/1643

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    P.K. Friz, M. Hairer,A course on rough paths, With an introduction to regularity structures.Second edition. Universitext, Springer, Cham, [2020]©2020. xvi+346 pp

    2020

  62. [70]

    P.K. Friz, B. Seeger,Besov rough path analysis, With an appendix by Pavel Zorin-Kranich. J. Differential Equations 339 (2022), 152–231

    2022

  63. [71]

    P.K. Friz, N. B. Victoir,Multidimensional stochastic processes as rough paths, Theory and applications. Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., 120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. xiv+656 pp

    2010

  64. [72]

    Gaines, T

    J. Gaines, T. J. Lyons,Variable step size control in the numerical solution of stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57 (1997), no. 5, 1455–1484

    1997

  65. [73]

    Ginibre, Y

    J. Ginibre, Y. Tsutsumi, G. Velo,On the Cauchy problem for the Zakharov system, J. Funct. Anal. 151 (1997), no. 2, 384–436

    1997

  66. [74]

    Ginibre, G

    J. Ginibre, G. Velo,Generalized Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation, J. Funct. Anal. 133 (1995), no. 1, 50–68

    1995

  67. [75]

    Greco, M

    D. Greco, M. Gubinelli, S. Liu, T. Oh,Refined global well-posedness for the periodic modulated Korteweg-de Vries equation, preprint

  68. [76]

    Gubinelli,Controlling rough paths, J

    M. Gubinelli,Controlling rough paths, J. Funct. Anal. 216 (2004), no. 1, 86–140

    2004

  69. [77]

    Gubinelli,Rough solutions for the periodic Korteweg–de Vries equation, Commun

    M. Gubinelli,Rough solutions for the periodic Korteweg–de Vries equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 11 (2012), no. 2, 709–733

    2012

  70. [78]

    Gubinelli, P

    M. Gubinelli, P. Imkeller, N. Perkowski,Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs, Forum Math. Pi 3 (2015), e6, 75 pp

    2015

  71. [79]

    Gubinelli, H

    M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh,Renormalization of the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), no. 10, 7335–7359

    2018

  72. [80]

    Gubinelli, H

    M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh,Paracontrolled approach to the three-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equation with quadratic nonlinearity, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 26 (2024), no. 3, 817–874

    2024

  73. [81]

    Gubinelli, H

    M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, T. Oh, L. Tolomeo,Global dynamics for the two-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equations, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2022, no. 21, 16954–16999

    2022

  74. [82]

    Gubinelli, A

    M. Gubinelli, A. Lejay, S. Tindel,Young integrals and SPDEs, Potential Anal. 25 (2006), no. 4, 307–326

    2006

  75. [83]

    Gubinelli, S

    M. Gubinelli, S. Tindel,Rough evolution equations, Ann. Probab. 38 (2010), no. 1, 1–75

    2010

  76. [84]

    Z. Guo, S. Kwon, T. Oh,Poincar´ e-Dulac normal form reduction for unconditional well-posedness of the periodic cubic NLS, Comm. Math. Phys. 322 (2013), no.1, 19–48

    2013

  77. [85]

    Hadac, S

    M. Hadac, S. Herr, H. Koch,Well-posedness and scattering for the KP-II equation in a critical space, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 26 (2009), no. 3, 917–941; Erratum, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 27 (2010), no. 3, 971–972

    2009

  78. [86]

    Hairer,Rough stochastic PDEs, Comm

    M. Hairer,Rough stochastic PDEs, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 11, 1547–1585

    2011

  79. [87]

    Hairer,A theory of regularity structures, Invent

    M. Hairer,A theory of regularity structures, Invent. Math. 198 (2014), no. 2, 269–504

    2014

  80. [88]

    Hairer, H

    M. Hairer, H. Weber,Rough Burgers-like equations with multiplicative noise, Probab. Theory Related Fields 155 (2013), no. 1-2, 71–126; Erratum, Probab. Theory Related Fields 157 (2013), no. 3-4, 1011–1013

    2013

  81. [89]

    Hajek,Stochastic equations of hyperbolic type and a two-parameter Stratonovich calculus, Ann

    B. Hajek,Stochastic equations of hyperbolic type and a two-parameter Stratonovich calculus, Ann. Probab. 10 (1982), no. 2, 451–463

    1982

  82. [90]

    S. Herr, D. Tataru, N. Tzvetkov,Global well-posedness of the energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with small initial data inH 1(T3), Duke Math. J. 159 (2011), no. 2, 329–349

    2011

  83. [91]

    Hocquet, A

    A. Hocquet, A. Blessing,Quasilinear rough evolution equations, Ann. Appl. Probab. 34 (2024), no. 5, 4268–4309

    2024

  84. [92]

    Huang, T

    J. Huang, T. Oh, M. Okamoto,On the local linearization of the one-dimensional stochastic wave equation with a multiplicative space-time white noise forcing, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B 11 (2024), 378–389

    2024

  85. [93]

    Hyt¨ onen, J

    T. Hyt¨ onen, J. van Neerven, M. C. Veraar, L. Weis,Analysis in Banach Spaces. Vol. I. Martingales and Littlewood-Paley theory,Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd S...

    2016

  86. [94]

    Hyt¨ onen, J

    T. Hyt¨ onen, J. van Neerven, M. C. Veraar, L. Weis,Analysis in Banach Spaces. Vol. II. Probabilistic Methods and Operator Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge / A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, 67. Springer, Cham, 2017. xxi+616 pp

    2017

  87. [95]

    Kaneshiro,A new proof of the abstract random tensor estimate by Deng, Nahmod, and Yue, arXiv:2512.02250 [math.PR]

    C. Kaneshiro,A new proof of the abstract random tensor estimate by Deng, Nahmod, and Yue, arXiv:2512.02250 [math.PR]

  88. [96]

    M. Keel, T. Tao,Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), no. 5, 955–980

    1998

  89. [97]

    Klainerman, M

    S. Klainerman, M. Machedon,Space-time estimates for null forms and the local existence theorem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 46 (1993), 1221–1268

    1993

  90. [98]

    Klainerman, S

    S. Klainerman, S. Selberg,Bilinear estimates and applications to nonlinear wave equations, Commun. Contemp. Math. 4 (2002), no. 2, 223–295

    2002

  91. [99]

    Koch,Nonlinear dispersive equations, 1–137, Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves

    H. Koch,Nonlinear dispersive equations, 1–137, Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves. General- ized Korteweg-de Vries, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger, wave and Schr¨ odinger maps. Oberwolfach Seminars, 45. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014

    2014

  92. [100]

    H. Koch, D. Tataru,Dispersive estimates for principally normal pseudodifferential operators, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58 (2005), no. 2, 217–284

    2005

  93. [101]

    H. Koch, D. Tataru,A priori bounds for the 1D cubic NLS in negative Sobolev spaces, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2007, no. 16, Art. ID rnm053, 36 pp

    2007

  94. [102]

    H. Koch, D. Tataru,Conserved energies for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in one dimension, Duke Math. J. 167 (2018), no. 17, 3207–3313

    2018

  95. [103]

    Kolmogoroff,Wienersche Spiralen und einige andere interessante Kurven im Hilbertschen Raum, C

    A.N. Kolmogoroff,Wienersche Spiralen und einige andere interessante Kurven im Hilbertschen Raum, C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S.) 26 (1940), 115–118

    1940

  96. [104]

    G. Li, J. Li, T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov,Probabilistic well-posedness of dispersive PDEs beyond variance blowup I: Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation, arXiv:2509.02344 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Lindblad, C

    H. Lindblad, C. Sogge,On existence and scattering with minimal regularity for semilinear wave equations, J. Funct. Anal. 130 (1995), no. 2, 357–426

    1995

  98. [106]

    R. Liu, S. Liu, T. Oh,Hyperbolic O(N)linear sigma model and its mean-field limit, arXiv:2511.21950 [math.AP]

  99. [107]

    S. Liu, Y. Hu, X. Wang,Nonlinear stochastic wave equation driven by rough noise, J. Differential Equations 331 (2022), 99–161

    2022

  100. [108]

    Lyons,On the nonexistence of path integrals, Proc

    T.J. Lyons,On the nonexistence of path integrals, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 432 (1991), no. 1885, 281–290

    1991

  101. [109]

    Lyons,Differential equations driven by rough signals, Rev

    T.J. Lyons,Differential equations driven by rough signals, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 14 (1998), no. 2, 215–310

    1998

  102. [110]

    Lyons, M

    T.J. Lyons, M. Caruana, T. L´ evy,Differential equations driven by rough paths, Lectures from the 34th Summer School on Probability Theory held in Saint-Flour, July 6-24, 2004. With an introduction concerning the Summer School by Jean Picard. Lecture Notes in Math., 1908, Spri...

    2004

  103. [111]

    Lyons, Z

    T.J. Lyons, Z. Qian,System control and rough paths, Oxford Science Publications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002. x+216 pp

    2002

  104. [112]

    Mandelbrot, J

    B.B. Mandelbrot, J. W. Van Ness,Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev. 10 (1968), 422–437

    1968

  105. [113]

    Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger

    H.P. McKean,Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger.Comm. Math. Phys. 168 (1995), no. 3, 479–491.Erratum: “Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger”.Comm. Math. Phys. 173 (1995), no. 3, 675

    1995

  106. [114]

    Millet, P.-L

    A. Millet, P.-L. Morien,On a nonlinear stochastic wave equation in the plane: existence and uniqueness of the solution, Ann. Appl. Probab. 11 (2001), no. 3, 922–951

    2001

  107. [115]

    Millet, M

    A. Millet, M. Sanz-Sol´ e,The support of the solution to a hyperbolic SPDE, Probab. Theory Related Fields 98 (1994), no. 3, 361–387

    1994

  108. [116]

    Millet, M

    A. Millet, M. Sanz-Sol´ e,A stochastic wave equation in two space dimension: smoothness of the law, Ann. Probab. 27 (1999), no. 2, 803–844

    1999

  109. [117]

    Millet, M

    A. Millet, M. Sanz-Sol´ e,Global solutions to stochastic wave equations with superlinear coefficients, Stochastic Process. Appl. 139 (2021), 175–211

    2021

  110. [118]

    Mourrat, H

    J.-C. Mourrat, H. Weber,The dynamicΦ 4 3 model comes down from infinity, Comm. Math. Phys. 356 (2017), no. 3, 673–753

    2017

  111. [119]

    Mueller,Long time existence for the wave equation with a noise term, Ann

    C. Mueller,Long time existence for the wave equation with a noise term, Ann. Probab. 25 (1997), no. 1, 133–151. 98 A. CHAPOUTO, J. LI, AND T. OH

    1997

  112. [120]

    Mueller, G

    C. Mueller, G. Richards,Can solutions of the wave equation with nonlinear multiplicative noise blow-up? Open Problems in Mathematics, 2 (2014), 1–4

    2014

  113. [121]

    Nelson,A quartic interaction in two dimensions, 1966 Mathematical Theory of Elementary Particles (Proc

    E. Nelson,A quartic interaction in two dimensions, 1966 Mathematical Theory of Elementary Particles (Proc. Conf., Dedham, Mass., 1965) pp. 69–73 M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass

    1966

  114. [122]

    Norris,Twisted sheets, J

    J. Norris,Twisted sheets, J. Funct. Anal. 132 (1995), no. 2, 273–334

    1995

  115. [123]

    Nourdin, G

    I. Nourdin, G. Peccati,Normal approximations with Malliavin calculus. From Stein’s method to universality, Cambridge Tracts in Math., 192, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, xiv+239 pp

    2012

  116. [124]

    Nualart,Stochastic integration with respect to fractional Brownian motion and applications, Stochastic models (Mexico City, 2002), 3–39

    D. Nualart,Stochastic integration with respect to fractional Brownian motion and applications, Stochastic models (Mexico City, 2002), 3–39. Contemp. Math., 336. Aportaciones Mat.[Mathematical Contributions]. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003

    2002

  117. [125]

    Nualart,The Malliavin calculus and related topics, Second edition, Probab

    D. Nualart,The Malliavin calculus and related topics, Second edition, Probab. Appl. (N. Y.), Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2006. xiv+382 pp

    2006

  118. [126]

    Nualart, P

    D. Nualart, P. Xia,On nonlinear rough paths, ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 17 (2020), no. 1, 545–587

    2020

  119. [127]

    Oh,Periodic stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with additive space-time white noise, Anal

    T. Oh,Periodic stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with additive space-time white noise, Anal. PDE 2 (2009), no. 3, 281–304

    2009

  120. [128]

    Oh,A note on the stochastic nonlinear wave equations with a multiplicative space-time white noise on the circle, https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/∼toh/Files/SNLWmultip 1d.pdf

    T. Oh,A note on the stochastic nonlinear wave equations with a multiplicative space-time white noise on the circle, https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/∼toh/Files/SNLWmultip 1d.pdf

  121. [129]

    T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo,FocusingΦ 4 3-model with a Hartree-type nonlinearity, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 304 (2024), no. 1529, vi+143 pp

    2024

  122. [130]

    T. Oh, M. Okamoto, L. Tolomeo,Stochastic quantization of theΦ 3 3-model, Mem. Eur. Math. Soc., 16. EMS Press, Berlin, 2025, viii+145 pp

    2025

  123. [131]

    T. Oh, M. Okamoto, N. Tzvetkov,Uniqueness and non-uniqueness of the Gaussian free field evolution under the two-dimensional Wick ordered cubic wave equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 60 (2024), no. 3, 1684–1728

    2024

  124. [132]

    T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu,Probabilistic global well-posedness of the energy-critical defocusing quintic nonlinear wave equation onR 3, J. Math. Pures Appl. 105 (2016), 342–366

    2016

  125. [133]

    T. Oh, O. Pocovnicu, Y. Wang,On the stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with non-smooth additive noise, Kyoto J. Math. 60 (2020), no. 4, 1227–1243

    2020

  126. [134]

    T. Oh, T. Robert, N. Tzvetkov,Stochastic nonlinear wave dynamics on compact surfaces, Ann. H. Lebesgue 6 (2023), 161–223

    2023

  127. [135]

    T. Oh, T. Robert, Y. Wang,On the parabolic and hyperbolic Liouville equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 387 (2021), no. 3 1281–1351

    2021

  128. [136]

    T. Oh, Y. Shao,Sewing lemma approach to the 1- d periodic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation I, in preparation

  129. [137]

    T. Oh, P. Sosoe, N. Tzvetkov,An optimal regularity result on the quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. ´Ec. polytech. Math. 5 (2018), 793–841

    2018

  130. [138]

    T. Oh, L. Thomann,A pedestrian approach to the invariant Gibbs measures for the 2-d defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 6 (2018), 397–445

    2018

  131. [139]

    T. Oh, L. Thomann,Invariant Gibbs measures for the 2- d defocusing nonlinear wave equations, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 29 (2020), no. 1, 1–26

    2020

  132. [140]

    T. Oh, L. Tolomeo, Y. Wang, G. Zheng,Hyperbolic P (Φ)2-model on the plane, Comm. Math. Phys. 407 (2026), no. 2, Paper No. 34

    2026

  133. [141]

    T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov,Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the two-dimensional defocusing cubic nonlinear wave equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 22 (2020), no. 6, 1785–1826

    2020

  134. [142]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang,Normal form approach to the one-dimensional periodic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in almost critical Fourier-Lebesgue spaces, J. Anal. Math. 143 (2021), no. 2, 723–762

    2021

  135. [143]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang,Revisiting Bourgain’s probabilistic construction of solutions to the 2-d cubic NLS, arXiv:2505.24271 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  136. [144]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang, Y. Zine,Three-dimensional stochastic cubic nonlinear wave equation with almost space-time white noise, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 10 (2022), no. 3, 898–963

    2022

  137. [145]

    Ondrej´ at,Uniqueness for stochastic evolution equations in Banach spaces, Dissertationes Math

    M. Ondrej´ at,Uniqueness for stochastic evolution equations in Banach spaces, Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 426 (2004), 63 pp

    2004

  138. [146]

    Ondrej´ at,Stochastic wave equation with critical nonlinearities: temporal regularity and uniqueness, J

    M. Ondrej´ at,Stochastic wave equation with critical nonlinearities: temporal regularity and uniqueness, J. Differential Equations 248 (2010), no. 7, 1579–1602. FOURIER RESTRICTION NORM METHOD ADAPTED TO CONTROLLED PATHS 99

    2010

  139. [147]

    Ondrej´ at,Stochastic nonlinear wave equations in local Sobolev spaces, Electron

    M. Ondrej´ at,Stochastic nonlinear wave equations in local Sobolev spaces, Electron. J. Probab. 15 (2010), no. 33, 1041–1091

    2010

  140. [148]

    F. Otto, H. Weber,Quasilinear SPDEs via rough paths, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 232 (2019), no. 2, 873–950

    2019

  141. [149]

    Peszat, J

    S. Peszat, J. Zabczyk,Nonlinear stochastic wave and heat equations, Probab. Theory Related Fields 116 (2000), no. 3, 421–443

    2000

  142. [150]

    Pisier,Martingales with values in uniformly convex spaces, Israel J

    G. Pisier,Martingales with values in uniformly convex spaces, Israel J. Math. 20 (1975), no. 3-4, 326–350

    1975

  143. [151]

    Pisier,Martingales in Banach spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 155

    G. Pisier,Martingales in Banach spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016. xxviii+561 pp

    2016

  144. [152]

    Pocovnicu,Almost sure global well-posedness for the energy-critical defocusing nonlinear wave equation onR d,d= 4and5,J

    O. Pocovnicu,Almost sure global well-posedness for the energy-critical defocusing nonlinear wave equation onR d,d= 4and5,J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19 (2017), no. 8, 2521–2575

    2017

  145. [153]

    Quer-Sardanyons, S

    L. Quer-Sardanyons, S. Tindel,The 1-d stochastic wave equation driven by a fractional Brownian sheet, Stochastic Process. Appl. 117 (2007), no. 10, 1448–1472

    2007

  146. [154]

    Revuz, M

    D. Revuz, M. Yor,Continuous martingales and Brownian motion. Third edition. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 293. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. xiv+602 pp

    1999

  147. [155]

    Sanz-Sol´ e,Malliavin calculus

    M. Sanz-Sol´ e,Malliavin calculus. With applications to stochastic partial differential equations, Funda- mental Sciences. EPFL Press, Lausanne; distributed by CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005. viii+162 pp

    2005

  148. [156]

    Seidler,Exponential estimates for stochastic convolutions in2-smooth Banach spaces, Electron

    J. Seidler,Exponential estimates for stochastic convolutions in2-smooth Banach spaces, Electron. J. Probab. 15 (2010), no. 50, 1556–1573

    2010

  149. [157]

    Y. Shao, J. Li, T. Oh,A remark on pathwise well-posedness of the 1- d stochastic heat equation, to appear in Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A

  150. [158]

    F. Shao, D. Wei, Z. Zhang,On blow-up for the supercritical defocusing nonlinear wave equation, Forum Math. Pi 13 (2025), Paper No. e15, 59 pp

    2025

  151. [159]

    Simon,The P (φ)2 Euclidean (quantum) field theory, Princeton Series in Physics

    B. Simon,The P (φ)2 Euclidean (quantum) field theory, Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1974. xx+392 pp

    1974

  152. [160]

    Sogge,Lectures on nonlinear wave equations.Monographs in Analysis, II

    C.D. Sogge,Lectures on nonlinear wave equations.Monographs in Analysis, II. International Press, Boston, MA, 1995. vi+159 pp

    1995

  153. [161]

    C. Sun, N. Tzvetkov, W. Xu,Weak universality for a class of nonlinear wave equations, to appear in Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)

  154. [162]

    Tao,Nonlinear dispersive equations

    T. Tao,Nonlinear dispersive equations. Local and global analysis, CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math., 106, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006. xvi+373 pp

    2006

  155. [163]

    Tzvetkov,Random data wave equations, Singular random dynamics, 221–313, Lecture Notes in Math., 2253, Fond

    N. Tzvetkov,Random data wave equations, Singular random dynamics, 221–313, Lecture Notes in Math., 2253, Fond. CIME/CIME Found. Subser., Springer, Cham, [2019],©2019

    2019

  156. [164]

    van Handel,Structured random matrices

    R. van Handel,Structured random matrices. Convexity and concentration, 107–156, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., 161, Springer, New York, 2017

    2017

  157. [165]

    van Neerven, L

    J. van Neerven, L. Weis,Stochastic integration of functions with values in a Banach space,Studia Math. 166 (2005), no. 2, 131–170

    2005

  158. [166]

    Vi¸ san,Dispersive equations, Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves, 223–312, Oberwolfach Seminars,

    M. Vi¸ san,Dispersive equations, Dispersive equations and nonlinear waves, 223–312, Oberwolfach Seminars,

  159. [167]

    xii+312 pp

    Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014. xii+312 pp

    2014

  160. [168]

    Walsh,An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations, ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour, XIV–1984, 265–439

    J.B. Walsh,An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations, ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour, XIV–1984, 265–439. Lecture Notes in Math., 1180, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986

    1984

  161. [169]

    Wiener,The quadratic variation of a function and its Fourier coefficients,Mass

    N. Wiener,The quadratic variation of a function and its Fourier coefficients,Mass. J. of Math. 3 (1924), 72–94

    1924

  162. [170]

    E. Wong, M. Zakai,Martingales and stochastic integrals for processes with a multi-dimensional parameter, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete 29 (1974), 109–122

    1974

  163. [171]

    Young,An inequality of the H¨ older type, connected with Stieltjes integration, Acta Math

    L.C. Young,An inequality of the H¨ older type, connected with Stieltjes integration, Acta Math. 67 (1936), no. 1, 251–282

    1936

  164. [172]

    Zine,Hyperbolic sine-Gordon model beyond the first threshold, arXiv:2504.07944 [math.AP]

    Y. Zine,Hyperbolic sine-Gordon model beyond the first threshold, arXiv:2504.07944 [math.AP]. 100 A. CHAPOUTO, J. LI, AND T. OH Andreia Chapouto, School of Mathematics, The University of Edinburgh, and The Maxwell Institute for the Mathematical Sciences, James Clerk Maxwell Bui...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.