Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Critical thresholds and instantaneous norm inflation for super-diffusive integro-differential equations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a broad class of super-diffusive memory equations, local well-posedness in L^q holds exactly when q ≥ N(ρ−1)(1+α∞)/2, and fails below this threshold via instantaneous norm inflation.

desk verdict Serious dual-scale memory paper with a real proof gap: (H2) does not imply the phase convergence needed in Lemma 3.1, so the general thresholds are conditional, but the architecture is sound and the canonical examples likely survive. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17430 v1 pith:VXMABLTW submitted 2026-07-19 math.AP

Bruno de Andrade This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35R0935R1145K0535B5335B3335A01
keywords integro-differentialequationsanomalousdiffusionsuper-diffusivetransportresolventoperatorspseudo-differentialmultiplierscriticalLebesguespacesinstantaneousnorminflationexponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a nonlinear heat-type equation in which the diffusion term is a time-convolution of the Laplacian with a memory kernel that behaves like a power law with two different exponents at short and long times (super-diffusive transport). It claims that local well-posedness in L^q is exactly limited by the critical index q_c = N(ρ−1)(1+α∞)/2, set by the short-time exponent: if q ≥ q_c, the initial-value problem is locally well-posed (with a smallness condition at q = q_c), and if 1 < q < q_c, the first Picard iterate of arbitrarily small data explodes in norm at arbitrarily small times, so the data-to-solution map is discontinuous at the origin. For global dynamics, the long-time exponent α_0 takes over: the paper identifies a critical global exponent ρ_0 = max(1+2/[N(1+α_0)], (1+α∞)/(1+α0)) such that small data in L^{q_c}∩L^m with m in (q_c/ρ, m_c) yield a unique global mild solution decaying algebraically. The thresholds are derived for a general class of admissible kernels, including pure fractional, multi-term, fractional-retardation, and multi-scale memory models. If correct, these formulas give the precise regularity boundary and global blow-up boundary for a broad family of anomalous transport equations.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on L^q–L^p smoothing bounds for the resolvent operator S(t) obtained by Laplace inversion and scaling of its Fourier symbol. The symbol lies in the pseudo-differential class S^{-2}_{1,0}, giving a gain of exactly two spatial derivatives and enforcing the dimensional restriction 1/q − 1/p < 2/N. The central controlling estimate is the phase separation Φ = (1+α_∞)φ_c in the scaled denominator D(μ,η) = μ + |η|^2 μ^{-α∞}H(t,μ); the structural condition θ_∞ < πα_∞/(1+α_∞) keeps this phase bounded away from π, yielding a uniform coercivity bound |D| ≥ C(r + |η|^2 r^{-α∞}) and hence the required derivative bounds. For ill-posedness, the same denominator controls the first Picard

What would settle it

Find a kernel satisfying (H1)–(H3) whose characteristic denominator D(μ,η) violates the coercivity estimate |D(μ,η)| ≥ C(r + |η|^2 r^{-α∞}) along the branch-cut contour for small t, or exhibit an admissible kernel whose modulation m(t,μ) does not converge to a positive constant as t→0; then Lemma 3.1 fails and the threshold q_c is not valid. A simpler check: for the fractional-retardation kernel, compute the maximum of |D|^{-1} on the deformed contour numerically as t→0; if it grows without bound, the smoothing estimate and the norm-inflation argument collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is that the short-time memory exponent α_∞ sets the local regularity threshold q_c = N(ρ−1)(1+α∞)/2, while the long-time exponent α_0 sets the global blow-up threshold ρ_F = 1+2/[N(1+α_0)]. Local well-posedness holds for q ≥ q_c and fails for 1 < q < q_c, where the data-to-solution map is discontinuous at the origin via instantaneous norm inflation of the first Picard iterate. Global existence with algebraic decay holds for small data in L^{q_c}∩L^m when ρ > max(ρ_F, (1+α∞)/(1+α0)). The theory is developed for a general class of admissible dual-scale kernels and gives explicit thresholds for fractional, multi-term, fractional-retardation, and multi-scale memory models.

Load-bearing premise

The results stand or fall on the uniform coercivity of the scaled resolvent denominator along the deformed contours, specifically the phase-separation bound θ_∞ < πα_∞/(1+α_∞) that keeps the linear and memory terms from cancelling; if an admissible kernel violates this phase bound, the smoothing estimates and both thresholds collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every admissible kernel, the local well-posedness threshold is exactly q_c = N(ρ−1)(1+α_∞)/2: the problem is locally well-posed in L^q for q ≥ q_c (with a smallness condition at equality) and ill-posed for 1 < q < q_c.
  • The global threshold ρ_0 = max(1+2/[N(1+α_0)], (1+α∞)/(1+α0)) separates global existence from failure; if ρ ≤ ρ_0 the contraction framework collapses, and for ρ ≤ ρ_F the long-time integral of the nonlinear source diverges, pointing to finite-time blow-up.
  • When the global solution exists, it decays algebraically at the linear rate: limsup t^{β_{m,p}}‖u(t)‖_{L^p} ≤ C, so the memory tail governs the long-time profile.
  • The same abstract thresholds are computed explicitly for pure fractional, multi-term, fractional-retardation (with α_0 = 0), and multi-scale memory kernels, providing ready-to-use critical exponents in those models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A concrete test of the threshold: in the fractional-retardation model with α_∞=1/3, α_0=0, N=3, and cubic source, the paper predicts q_c=4; direct numerical simulation of the Picard iterate at times t_k = τ* λ_k^{-2/(1+α∞)} should show the L^4-norm of the first iterate diverging as λ_k^{δ} with δ = 2(q_c−q)/(q(1+α∞)) for q just below 4.
  • The paper establishes global existence but not finite-time blow-up for ρ ≤ ρ_F; extending the classical critical-exponent blow-up argument to two-scale memory kernels would complete the global picture and is not addressed here.
  • Because the S^{-2} symbol is the only mechanism generating the thresholds, one may expect the same q_c formula for other power-like sources; verifying the persistence of the threshold for non-power nonlinearities would test the universality of the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the semilinear integro-differential Cauchy problem (1.1) with a dual-scale memory kernel. The main claims are: (i) local Hadamard well-posedness in L^q for q ≥ q_c := N(ρ−1)(1+α_∞)/2 (Theorem 4.1); (ii) instantaneous norm inflation, hence ill-posedness, for 1<q<q_c (Theorem 4.2); and (iii) global existence with algebraic decay for small initial data in L^{q_c}∩L^m when ρ > ρ_0 := max(ρ_F, (1+α_∞)/(1+α_0)) (Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.4). The linear tool is an L^q−L^p smoothing estimate for the resolvent S(t), obtained by deforming the Bromwich contour and interpreting the high-frequency symbol as a Hörmander S^{-2}_{1,0} multiplier.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, they give an essentially complete critical Lebesgue theory for a broad class of super-diffusive memory equations, including the first sharp ill-posedness threshold below q_c and a Fujita-type exponent for the dual-scale model. The paper is ambitious and mostly self-contained, with detailed fixed-point arguments and a concrete application to Cole-Cole kernels. The thresholds are explicit and not fitted to data, and the examples are physically meaningful. However, the central linear estimate rests on a phase-coercivity step that is not justified by the stated hypotheses, and the ill-posedness theorem contains a logical gap in passing from Picard-iterate blow-up to discontinuity of the solution map.

major comments (4)
  1. The proof asserts that 'hypothesis (H2) dictates' that m(t,μ)=t^{-α_∞}ĝ(μ/t) converges as t→0+ to a positive real constant C_1, so that the phase of m is approximately −α_∞φ_c and the phase separation Φ=(1+α_∞)φ_c is uniformly bounded away from π and 2π. Hypothesis (2.2) is only a two-sided magnitude bound and contains no information on arg ĝ(λ) or on the limit of ĝ(λ)λ^{α_∞}. A kernel such as ĝ(λ)=λ^{-α_∞}e^{iε log(λ/i)} (with a low-frequency cutoff to satisfy (H3)) satisfies (2.2) but has phase varying with log(1/t), so no fixed φ_c can give the uniform bound cos Φ ≥ −1+δ_0. The coercivity |D(μ,η)| ≥ C(r+|η|^2 r^{-α_∞}), and hence the S^{-2}_{1,0} estimate, is therefore not established under the hypotheses as stated. This is load-bearing for Theorems 4.1, 4.2, and 5.1. Either add an explicit phase-asymptotics hypothesis, e.g. ĝ(λ)λ^{α_∞}→C_1∈(0,∞) uniformly in a sector, and verify it f
  2. The verification of (H1) for the Cole-Cole and Prabhakar kernels only checks that the characteristic equation has no roots on the negative real axis. The hypothesis (H1) also requires a uniform sector aperture θ_∞ < πα_∞/(1+α_∞) and containment of all roots in |arg λ|≤π−θ(|λ|) with θ(|λ|)→θ_∞>0. For the Cole-Cole kernel, the large-frequency roots have argument tending to π/(1+α), exactly at the boundary of the region controlled by the aperture. A separate argument is needed to show that a uniform strict inequality θ_∞<πα_∞/(1+α_∞) holds; the absence of branch-cut zeros is not by itself sufficient. Without this, the canonical examples are not proved admissible, and the claim that the abstract framework applies to them is not yet justified.
  3. The proof constructs data for which the first Picard iterate N_1(u_{0,k})(t_k) diverges in L^q norm. The theorem then concludes that the data-to-solution map fails to be uniformly continuous at the origin. The implication is not established. Continuity of the actual solution map does not imply the asserted uniform estimate ∥N_1(u_0)(t)∥_{L^q}≤C∥u_0∥_{L^q}^ρ, because N_1 uses the linear evolution S(s)u_0 inside the nonlinearity rather than the actual solution u(s). A standard CCT ill-posedness proof either constructs actual solutions with growing norm or proves a quantitative bound linking the first Picard iterate to the solution map. As written, the result rigorously proves norm inflation for the first Picard iterates only; the statement about the solution map is stronger than the argument supports.
  4. The coercive lower bound |D(μ,η)|≥C(r+|η|^2 r^{-α_∞}) is asserted for all r along the deformed rays μ=re^{±iφ_c}. For r near 0 the argument |μ/t| is not large, so (H2) does not apply. In the Cole-Cole example, for small μ one has m(t,μ)=t^{-α_∞}ĝ(μ/t)→t^{-α_∞}γ^{-1}, so |m| is bounded and the term |η|^2 r^{-α_∞} in the lower bound is not present. The subsequent estimate ∫_0^1 r^{α_∞}dr/(C|η|^2) is therefore not justified as written. A separate treatment of the contour integral near the origin is needed; this might use (H3) or analyticity, but (H3) is not assumed in Lemma 3.1. This is another load-bearing gap in the derivation of the S^{-2}_{1,0} bound.
minor comments (5)
  1. The critical exponent q_c = N(ρ−1)(1+α_∞)/2 may be smaller than 1 for small N and ρ close to 1. The paper repeatedly states the theory for 1≤q<∞, so the critical case q=q_c would then be outside the Banach-space setting. Please clarify the range of parameters where q_c>1, or state the modifications for q<1.
  2. The remark asserts that 'the multi-scale kernel dictates the structural crossover α_0<α_∞' and that m_c<q_c unconditionally. This is not true for Example 2 (multi-term fractional diffusion), where α_0=α>β=α_∞. The spectral-bridge condition ρ>(1+α_∞)/(1+α_0) is still meaningful when α_0>α_∞, but the stated inequality m_c<q_c and the accompanying 'tighter upper bound' discussion should be corrected or qualified.
  3. The sentence 'the local contribution near the origin, controlled via (H3), is of order O(t^{-(1+α_0)}|ξ|^{-2})' is terse; the derivation of this specific rate and its uniformity over |ξ|≥1 should be spelled out, because it is used to justify the high-frequency branch estimate.
  4. The term 'Hadamard well-posedness' is used to justify a uniform continuity assumption at the origin. In Theorem 4.1 the map is actually Lipschitz, so it would be cleaner to argue directly from the Lipschitz estimate and to state explicitly what regularity of the solution map is being assumed in the contradiction argument.
  5. There are occasional notation inconsistencies, e.g. α_∞ vs α∞ and the use of both 'q_c' and 'm_c' before their formal definitions in Section 5. These do not affect the mathematics but should be harmonized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: q_c, ρ_F, and ρ0 are derived outputs of the resolvent and contraction estimates; the noted phase-asymptotics gap in Lemma 3.1 is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

None of the paper's central claims is obtained by defining an input in terms of the target output or by fitting parameters to data. The threshold q_c enters Theorem 4.1 as an index bound derived from the requirements γ_{r,p}<1, ργ_{q,p}<1, and the dimensional restriction 1/q−1/p<2/N; it is then shown sharp by the independent norm-inflation construction in Theorem 4.2 using the scaling exponent σ=2/(1+α∞). Similarly, ρ_F and the spectral-bridge constraint ρ>(1+α∞)/(1+α0) are obtained in Remark 5.2 by requiring the Volterra integrals ∫_0^1 s^{−ργ_{q_c,p}}ds and ∫_1^∞ s^{−ρβ_{m,p}}ds to converge and the interval (q_c/ρ, m_c) to be nonempty; they are not assumed. The author's earlier works [8,10,11,12] appear only as background citations and in Remark 5.3 as a pointer to a projected non-existence argument explicitly left open; none is used to force the well-posedness/ill-posedness conclusions. The skeptic's objection about Lemma 3.1 Step 2 — that (H2) is only a magnitude bound and does not by itself give the phase convergence m(t,μ)→C_1∈R_+ — identifies a possible missing hypothesis in the proof of uniform coercivity of D(μ,η), but this is a correctness/completeness concern, not a circularity: the claimed estimate does not reduce to (H2) by definition; if the phase hypothesis fails, the proof would be invalid rather than circular. Hence no circular step qualifies under the required standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the admissible-kernel class (H1)-(H3), standard harmonic-analysis theorems, and contour-deformation assumptions. No fitted free parameters or invented physical entities appear in the paper.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Kernel class (H1)-(H3): Laplace transform ĝ is sectorial with θ∞ < πα∞/(1+α∞), |ĝ(λ)| ≍ |λ|^{−α∞} at high frequency and ≍ |λ|^{−α0} at low frequency.
    All theorems presuppose the memory kernel lies in this class; the examples are claimed to satisfy it, but only absence of branch-cut roots is actually checked.
  • standard math Mikhlin–Hörmander multiplier theorem and Sobolev embedding W^{2,q} → L^p under the strict dimensional restriction 1/q − 1/p < 2/N.
    This is the bridge from S^{−2}_{1,0} symbol estimates to L^q−L^p resolvent bounds in Lemma 3.1; the strict inequality is essential to the claimed lack of infinite smoothing.
  • domain assumption Bromwich contour deformation and residue/branch-cut decomposition are legitimate uniformly in t under (H1).
    Used throughout Lemmas 3.1 and 3.4 to convert Laplace-domain root/sector information into temporal decay estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical thresholds and instantaneous norm inflation for super-diffusive integro-differential equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VXMABLTW

@misc{pith2026260717430,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical thresholds and instantaneous norm inflation for super-diffusive integro-differential equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VXMABLTW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17430}
}
abstract

This manuscript investigates the Cauchy problem for a class of nonlinear integro-differential equations governing anomalous super-diffusive transport in $\mathbb{R}^N$. The linear dynamics are driven by a dual-scale memory kernel whose Laplace transform is sectorial and exhibits distinct power-law asymptotics at high and low frequencies. This super-diffusive structure precludes the infinite regularizing capacity characteristic of classical parabolic theory; consequently, the associated resolvent operator possesses a heavy algebraic tail in Fourier space, acting as a pseudo-differential operator in the H\"ormander class $S^{-2}_{1,0}$ and restricting spatial smoothing. By establishing rigorous $L^q-L^p$ multiplier estimates, the critical Lebesgue threshold $q_c$ for local well-posedness is determined. To demonstrate the sharpness of this threshold, instantaneous norm inflation -- and consequent ill-posedness -- is proven in the supercritical regime $1 < q < q_c$. Furthermore, tracking the structural crossover to the long-time relaxation parameter resolves the global asymptotic dynamics. The nonlocal Fujita-type critical exponent $\rho_F$ is identified, and global-in-time existence along with algebraic decay is established for small initial data in intersection spaces, provided the nonlinearity remains supercritical and overcomes the structural algebraic barrier connecting the dual scales. This general framework applies directly to canonical physical models, including Cole-Cole fractional retardation and multi-scale Prabhakar memory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Navier-Stokes equations with dual-scale hereditary viscosity: supercritical norm inflation and global well-posedness in critical spaces

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dual-scale hereditary Navier–Stokes is ill-posed for p < pc = N(1+α∞)/(1−α∞) by norm inflation, and globally well-posed for small high-frequency-adherent data in Ḃ^{−κ}_{∞,∞} with κ=(1−α∞)/(1+α∞).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Arendt, C

    W. Arendt, C. J. K. Batty, M. Hieber, and F. Neubrander,Vector-valued Laplace Transforms and Cauchy Problems, 2nd ed., Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 96, Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2011

    2011

  2. [2]

    Baeumer and M

    B. Baeumer and M. M. Meerschaert,Stochastic solutions for fractional Cauchy problems, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.,4(2001), no. 4, 481–500

    2001

  3. [3]

    E. G. Bajlekova,Fractional Evolution Equations in Banach Spaces, Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 2001

    2001

  4. [4]

    Bergh and J

    J. Bergh and J. L¨ ofstr¨ om,Interpolation Spaces: An Introduction, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 223, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    1976

  5. [5]

    Cazenave, F

    T. Cazenave, F. Dickstein, and F. B. Weissler,An equation whose Fujita critical exponent is not given by scaling, Nonlinear Anal.,68(2008), no. 4, 862–874

    2008

  6. [6]

    Christ, J

    M. Christ, J. Colliander, and T. Tao,Asymptotics, frequency modulation, and low regularity ill-posedness for canonical dispersive equations, Amer. J. Math.,125(2003), 1235–1293

    2003

  7. [7]

    K. S. Cole and R. H. Cole,Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics, J. Chem. Phys.,9(1941), 341–351

    1941

  8. [8]

    Costa, C

    M. Costa, C. Cuevas, and B. de Andrade,Fractional diffusion-wave equations with critical nonlinearities in Lebesgue spaces, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2602.06461

    arXiv 2026

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    D’Abbicco, M

    M. D’Abbicco, M. R. Ebert, and T. H. Picon,The critical exponent(s) for the semilinear fractional diffusive equation, J. Fourier Anal. Appl.,25(2019), 696–731

    2019

  2. [10]

    de Andrade,Explicit blow-up thresholds for the fractional diffusion-wave equation in critical Lebesgue spaces, Phys

    B. de Andrade,Explicit blow-up thresholds for the fractional diffusion-wave equation in critical Lebesgue spaces, Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom., To appear

  3. [11]

    de Andrade and N

    B. de Andrade and N. dos Santos,Well-posedness and regularity theory for the fractional diffusion-wave equation in Lebesgue spaces, Bull. Sci. Math.,207(2026), 103767

    2026

  4. [12]

    de Andrade, G

    B. de Andrade, G. Siracusa, and A. Viana,A nonlinear fractional diffusion equation: Well-posedness, comparison results, and blow-up, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,505(2022), 125524

    2022

  5. [13]

    L. C. F. Ferreira and E. J. Villamizar-Roa,Self-similar solutions, uniqueness and long-time asymptotic behavior for semilinear heat equations, Differ. Integral Equ.,19(2006), no. 12, 1349–1370

    2006

  6. [14]

    Fino and M

    A. Fino and M. Kirane,Qualitative properties of solutions to a time-space fractional evolution equation, Quart. Appl. Math.,70(2012), 133–157

    2012

  7. [15]

    G. B. Folland,Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Pure and Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999

    1999

  8. [16]

    Fujita,On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy problem foru t = ∆u+u 1+α, J

    H. Fujita,On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy problem foru t = ∆u+u 1+α, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. I,13(1966), 109–124

    1966

  9. [17]

    Giga,Solutions for semilinear parabolic equations inL p and regularity of weak solutions of the Navier- Stokes system, J

    Y. Giga,Solutions for semilinear parabolic equations inL p and regularity of weak solutions of the Navier- Stokes system, J. Differential Equations,62(1986), no. 2, 186–212. 34 B. DE ANDRADE

    1986

  10. [18]

    Giusti, I

    A. Giusti, I. Colombaro, R. Garra, R. Garrappa, F. Mainardi, M. Mentrelli, and Z. Tomovski,A practical guide to Prabhakar fractional calculus, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal.,23(2020), 9–54

    2020

  11. [19]

    Grafakos,Modern Fourier Analysis, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol

    L. Grafakos,Modern Fourier Analysis, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 250, Springer, New York, 2009

    2009

  12. [20]

    Guedda and M

    M. Guedda and M. Kirane,Criticality for some evolution equations, Differ. Equ.,37(2001), 540–550

    2001

  13. [21]

    M. E. Gurtin and A. C. Pipkin,A general theory of heat conduction with finite wave speeds, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,31(1968), 113–126

    1968

  14. [22]

    Henry,Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    D. Henry,Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 840, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981

    1981

  15. [23]

    Kato,Blow-up of solutions of some nonlinear hyperbolic equations, Commun

    T. Kato,Blow-up of solutions of some nonlinear hyperbolic equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math.,33 (1980), 501–505

    1980

  16. [24]

    Kemppainen, J

    J. Kemppainen, J. Siljander, and R. Zacher,Representation of solutions and large-time behavior for fully nonlocal diffusion equations, J. Differential Equations,263(2017), 149–201

    2017

  17. [25]

    A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo,Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2006

    2006

  18. [26]

    Lunardi,Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, vol

    A. Lunardi,Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, vol. 16, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1995

    1995

  19. [27]

    Mainardi,Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity, Imperial College Press, London, 2010

    F. Mainardi,Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity, Imperial College Press, London, 2010

    2010

  20. [28]

    M. M. Meerschaert and A. Sikorskii,Stochastic Models for Fractional Calculus, De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 43, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    Metzler and J

    R. Metzler and J. Klafter,The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach, Phys. Rep.,339(2000), 1–77

    2000

  22. [30]

    R. K. Miller,An integrodifferential equation for rigid heat conductors with memory, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,66(1978), 313–332

    1978

  23. [31]

    J. W. Nunziato,On heat conduction in materials with memory, Quart. Appl. Math.,29(1971), 187–204

    1971

  24. [32]

    T. R. Prabhakar,A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel, Yokohama Math. J.,19(1971), 7–15

    1971

  25. [33]

    Pr¨ uss,Evolutionary Integral Equations and Applications, Monographs in Mathematics, vol

    J. Pr¨ uss,Evolutionary Integral Equations and Applications, Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 87, Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1993

    1993

  26. [34]

    W. R. Schneider and W. Wyss,Fractional diffusion and wave equations, J. Math. Phys.,30(1989), 134–144

    1989

  27. [35]

    E. M. Stein,Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970

    1970

  28. [36]

    Vergara and R

    V. Vergara and R. Zacher,Optimal decay estimates for time-fractional and other nonlocal subdiffusion equations via energy methods, SIAM J. Math. Anal.,47(2015), 210–239

    2015

  29. [37]

    F. B. Weissler,Existence and nonexistence of global solutions for a semilinear heat equation, Israel J. Math.,38(1981), 29–40

    1981

  30. [38]

    D. V. Widder,The Laplace Transform, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 6, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1941. (B. de Andrade)Departamento de Matem´atica, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, S˜ao Crist´ov˜ao - SE, Brazil. Email address:bruno@mat.ufs.br

    1941

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.