Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Automorphisms of Twisted Chevalley Groups of type ${}^2 A_\ell \ (\ell \geq 5)$ over Local Rings

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that every automorphism of a twisted Chevalley group of type ²Aℓ (ℓ≥5) over a local ring with 2 invertible is standard.

desk verdict A genuine first: standard automorphisms for twisted Chevalley groups of type ^2A_l over local rings, with a proof that is structured and checkable but rests on one very recent external normal-subgroup theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22284 v1 pith:PKVNHSIM submitted 2026-07-24 math.GR

Elena I. Bunina , Deep H. Makadiya This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GR MSC 20G35
keywords twistedChevalleygroupsautomorphismsstandardlocalrings²Aℓtypeunitarycongruencesubgroupsnormal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper initiates the classification of automorphisms of twisted Chevalley groups over commutative rings. Its central result is that for type ²Aℓ with ℓ≥5 over a local ring containing 1/2, every automorphism of the adjoint elementary twisted group is standard: a strictly inner automorphism followed by a ring automorphism. The same conclusion is extended to arbitrary elementary twisted groups (inner plus ring) and to full twisted groups (inner, central, and ring). This matters because it carries the classical Steinberg field theory over to rings, giving the first structural classification for these unitary-like groups and opening the door to isomorphism questions and other twisted types.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the congruence subgroup N_J = E'_ad,σ(Φ,R) ∩ G_ad,σ(Φ,J), where J is the Jacobson radical. By the normal-subgroup classification, N_J is the unique largest proper normal subgroup of E'_ad,σ(Φ,R), so any automorphism induces an automorphism of the residue-field group E'_ad,σ(Φ,k). The proof then works in the matrix realizations SU_{ℓ+1}(R) and PGL_{ℓ+1}(R), using elements x[α](t), w[α](t), h[α](-1) as generators. A key identity is that the matrices u[α] (the images of x[α](1)) generate the full matrix algebra, so any matrix commuting projectively with all of them is scalar; this forces the conjugating element to belong to the fixed-point subgroup G_ad,σ(Φ,R).

What would settle it

Find a local ring R with 2∈R× and a θ-invariant ideal I such that the relative elementary subgroup E'_ad,σ(Φ,R,I) is not the unique maximal proper normal subgroup of E'_ad,σ(Φ,R), contradicting Lemma 4.1; or exhibit an automorphism of E'_ad,σ(Φ,R) that does not preserve the principal congruence subgroup N_J. Concretely, for the ring of p-adic integers Z_p with p odd and ℓ=5, compute whether every automorphism fixes N_p; if any automorphism fails to preserve N_p, the theorem is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 3.2: if R is a local ring with 2∈R× and G=E'_ad,σ(Φ,R) is the adjoint elementary twisted Chevalley group of type ²Aℓ (ℓ≥5), then every automorphism of G is the composition of a strictly inner automorphism and a ring automorphism. The proof reduces modulo the Jacobson radical to the residue field, where Steinberg's theorem describes the induced automorphism, then conjugates step by step so that the automorphism fixes the distinguished elements h[α](-1), w[α](1), and x[α](1). Once these are fixed, commutator relations force the remaining root parameters to transform by a single ring automorphism µ commuting with the involution θ. Theorems 3.3 and 3.4 extend

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on the published classification of normal subgroups of twisted Chevalley groups [33, Theorem 2.8], which states that every subgroup normalized by the elementary group is sandwiched between the relative elementary subgroup and the full congruence subgroup for a unique θ-invariant ideal; if that result fails for this type, the reduction to the residue field cannot start.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every adjoint elementary twisted Chevalley group of type ²Aℓ (ℓ≥5) over a local ring with 1/2∈R, the automorphism group is generated by strictly inner automorphisms and ring automorphisms.
  • For elementary twisted groups on arbitrary weight lattices, the same holds with inner automorphisms induced by elements of an overring, so diagonal automorphisms are inner in the generalized sense.
  • For full twisted groups, every automorphism is inner followed by ring and central; the central factor is the only new phenomenon.
  • The description of normal subgroups of twisted Chevalley groups is sufficient to start an automorphism classification, and the same scheme is announced for other twisted types.
  • The quotient by the congruence subgroup modulo the Jacobson radical is isomorphic to the field-valued twisted group, giving a well-defined reduction of automorphisms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the normal-subgroup classification is extended to ranks ℓ=3,4, the same normalization strategy should yield standard automorphisms for those cases; the paper explicitly excludes them only because the required congruence subgroup description is missing.
  • A corollary the authors leave implicit: over a local ring, any isomorphism between two such twisted groups should reduce to a ring isomorphism plus a central twist, so the isomorphism problem for these groups is essentially equivalent to the automorphism problem solved here.
  • The 1/2∈R hypothesis is probably not just technical: in the untwisted setting, small-rank exceptions occur exactly when 2-torsion appears, and one would expect analogous exotic automorphisms for ²Aℓ over rings of characteristic 2.
  • The proof's normalization steps suggest a concrete testable recipe: any automorphism is determined by its action on h[α](-1), w[α](1), and x[α](1); computing those images for a candidate automorphism decides its standardness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves that every automorphism of an adjoint elementary twisted Chevalley group of type ^2A_l (l ≥ 5) over a local ring R with 2 ∈ R^× is standard, i.e. a composition of a strictly inner automorphism and a ring automorphism (Theorem 3.2). The result is then extended in Theorem 3.3 to arbitrary elementary twisted groups (inner + ring) and in Theorem 3.4 to full twisted groups (inner + central + ring). The proof reduces modulo the Jacobson radical to Steinberg's field-case theorem, isolates the residual field automorphism, and then performs a long sequence of matrix normalizations over GL_{l+1}(R) to show that the automorphism is induced by a ring automorphism. The paper is explicitly a first part of a series; the cases ^2A_2 and ^2A_l for l = 3,4 are excluded, and the proof relies on the normal-subgroup sandwich theorem of the recent paper [33].

Significance. If the proof is correct, this is the first systematic automorphism classification for twisted Chevalley groups over commutative rings, and it opens the way for the announced sequel papers on other twisted types. The paper has real strengths: it gives explicit matrix realizations, a clear reduction to the field case, detailed normalization arguments, and a transparent statement of the external normal-subgroup input [33, Theorem 2.8]. The reliance on [33] is genuine but is not circular: [33] is a published classification of subgroups, not of automorphisms, and the present paper does not use its main theorem as an input. However, I found a load-bearing issue in Section 4 in the way the σ-fixed-point condition is written for the element C_1 u_{[α]} C_1^{-1}; this needs to be corrected or justified before the main conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, after Step (E-3)] The fixed-point condition for A = C_1 u_{[α]} C_1^{-1} is written as Q A Q^{-1} = λ A^{-t}. According to the definition in §3.2–3.3, the twisted involution is σ(A) = Q(\bar A^{-t})Q^{-1}, where \bar A = θ(A). The displayed identity is the fixed-point condition for the graph automorphism ρ alone, not for σ = ρ∘θ. Consequently, the subsequent argument showing D = Q^{-1} C_1^t Q C_1 = λI proves at most that [C_1] is fixed by ρ, and the conclusion [C_1] ∈ G_{ad,σ}(R) does not follow as written. This step is load-bearing: it is what turns the normalized automorphism into a strictly inner automorphism. Please correct the σ-action and the definition of D (e.g. replace C_1^t by \bar C_1^t where appropriate), or supply an additional argument that [C_1] is θ-fixed, for instance via the normalizer theorem [34].
  2. [§4, Lemma 4.1] The reduction modulo J rests entirely on Corollary 2.9, which is the external normal-subgroup sandwich theorem [33, Theorem 2.8]. In particular, Lemma 4.1(a) uses the fact that every proper normal subgroup is contained in N_J. I did not find a circularity: [33] concerns subgroups, not automorphisms. Still, since [33] is very recent and is co-authored by one of the present authors, the paper should state explicitly in §4 that the present proof does not reprove this classification and should confirm that Theorem 2.8 of [33] has no hidden exception for ^2A_l (l ≥ 5) over local rings with 2 ∈ R^×. This is a correctness-risk concern, not an accusation of an internal inconsistency.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1.1] The notation 'L−/∫hortrightarrowgl(V)' is corrupted; it should be 'L → gl(V)'.
  2. [§2.2] Several displays, e.g. 'w (α)|Vρ =w ˆα|Vρ', have spacing/rendering artifacts that make the text hard to read. Please clean up the mathematical formatting.
  3. [§3.3 vs §4] Because the σ-action in §3.3 includes θ, the notation 'fixed by σ' should be used consistently. In particular, the line 'Q(C_1uC_1^{-1})Q^{-1} = λ(C_1uC_1^{-1})^{-t}' should either carry the appropriate ar symbols or an explicit convention saying that ar C_1 is understood. This is related to Major Comment 1.
  4. [§7.3.1, case m=3] In the m=3 case the text says A_1 ∈ M_4 and A_2 ∈ M_3 correspond to B_1 ⊕ B_2 and B_3 ⊕ B_4. For ℓ=6, B_4 is one-dimensional, so B_3 ⊕ B_4 has dimension 3; this is consistent, but the wording is easy to misread. Please add the dimensions.
  5. [Introduction/§4] A short paragraph in §4 stating exactly which results of [33] are used and which are proved here would greatly help the reader and would make the external dependence of the proof transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proof uses an independent external normal-subgroup classification and never assumes the automorphism conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The main reduction (Lemma 4.1) relies on Corollary 2.9, i.e. the external normal-subgroup sandwich theorem [33, Theorem 2.8], to identify N_J as the greatest proper normal subgroup and thereby force an induced automorphism on the residue-field group. That theorem concerns normal subgroups, not automorphisms; it does not assume or contain the theorem being proved, and its stated hypotheses do not include the target result. The field case is supplied by Steinberg's independent theorem (Theorem 2.10), and the matrix normalizations in Sections 5–8 are direct computations with fixed generators. Step (C) derives the ring automorphism mu from root-element images using Chevalley commutator formulas, rather than postulating the conclusion. No equation in the proof reduces to the stated theorem, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The fact that [33] has an overlapping author makes the reliance on it a self-citation, but it is independent support: it is a published, parameter-free classification of normal subgroups, externally falsifiable outside the present paper's construction. The paper also honestly excludes the ranks where the required normal-subgroup input is unavailable. Accordingly, no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The new content is the automorphism theorem; all structural inputs are prior published results, so the ledger is a list of domain assumptions rather than fitted quantities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Normal subgroup classification for twisted Chevalley groups [33, Theorem 2.8]: for every θ-invariant ideal I, E'_σ(R,I)⊆H⊆G_σ(R,I) gives all subgroups normalized by E'_σ.
    Invoked in Lemma 4.1 and Corollary 2.9 to identify N_J as the greatest proper normal subgroup and to get the ideal-quotient sandwich. This is an external published theorem, not proved here.
  • domain assumption Steinberg's theorem [58, Theorem 36] that every automorphism of an elementary twisted Chevalley group over a field is a product of inner, diagonal, and field automorphisms.
    Used in Section 4 after reducing modulo the Jacobson radical; diagonal automorphisms are treated as inner in this paper's convention.
  • domain assumption Suzuki's theorem [64] that adjoint elementary twisted Chevalley groups over the rings considered here have trivial center.
    Used in Lemma 2.7 to identify the kernel of E'_sc→E'_ad with the center, and in Lemma 4.1 to identify full and principal congruence subgroups in the adjoint case.
  • domain assumption Perfectness of E'_π,σ and characteristicity of E'_π,σ in G_π,σ [33, Corollaries 6.6 and A.2].
    Used to lift automorphisms from adjoint to arbitrary lattices (Theorem 3.3), to construct y in Lemma 4.2, and to force central automorphisms in Theorem 3.4.
  • domain assumption Structural decomposition G_π,σ(R)=T_π,σ(R)E'_π,σ(R) for semilocal/local rings [33, Proposition 5.8].
    Used in Lemma 2.6 and in the proof of Theorems 3.3/3.4 to factor elements as torus times elementary.
  • domain assumption Chevalley basis with sign conventions [2, Proposition 3.1] and twisted commutator formulas from [33].
    Throughout Sections 5–8 the normalization arguments rely on explicit commutation/conjugation relations for twisted root elements; these are taken from [2] and [33] rather than proved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Automorphisms of Twisted Chevalley Groups of type ${}^2 A_\ell \ (\ell \geq 5)$ over Local Rings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PKVNHSIM

@misc{pith2026260722284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Automorphisms of Twisted Chevalley Groups of type $^2 A_\ell \ (\ell \geq 5)$ over Local Rings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PKVNHSIM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22284}
}
abstract

This paper is the first in a series devoted to the classification of automorphisms and isomorphisms of twisted Chevalley groups over commutative rings. In the present paper, we prove that every automorphism of a twisted Chevalley group of type ${}^2A_\ell$ $(\ell \geq 5)$ over a local ring in which $2$ is invertible is standard.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automorphisms of Twisted Chevalley Groups of type ${}^2 D_\ell \ (\ell \geq 4)$ over Local Rings

    math.GR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Every automorphism of a twisted Chevalley group of type ^2D_l (ℓ≥4) over a local ring containing 1/2 is a composition of inner, diagonal, ring, and central automorphisms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [33]

    Garge and Deep H

    Shripad M. Garge and Deep H. Makadiya,On Normal Subgroups of Twisted Chevalley Groups over Commutative Rings, J. Algebra, Vol. 688 (2026), 587–659

    2026

  2. [34]

    Garge and Deep H

    Shripad M. Garge and Deep H. Makadiya,Normalizer of Twisted Chevalley Groups over Commutative Rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, Vol. 229, No. 11 (2025), Paper No. 108094, 14 pp

    2025

  3. [1]

    Petersburg Math

    Eiichi Abe,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, St. Petersburg Math. J. (2), Vol. 5 (1994), 287–300; translated from Algebra i Analiz (2), Vol. 5 (1993), 74–90

    1994

  4. [2]

    Eiichi Abe,Coverings of twisted Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku Sect. A, Vol. 13 (1977), 194–218

    1977

  5. [3]

    Eiichi Abe,Chevalley groups over local rings, Tohoku Math. J. (2), Vol. 21 (1969), 474–494

    1969

  6. [4]

    1988, Sendai Conf., Vol

    Eiichi Abe,Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Radical theory, Proc. 1988, Sendai Conf., Vol. 83 (1989), 1–23

    1988

  7. [5]

    Normal subgroups and automorphisms, Second International Conference on Algebra (Barnaul, 1991), Contemp

    Eiichi Abe,Chevalley groups over commutative rings. Normal subgroups and automorphisms, Second International Conference on Algebra (Barnaul, 1991), Contemp. Math., Vol. 184 (1995), 13–23

    1991

  8. [6]

    Hurley,Centers of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Comm

    Eiichi Abe and James F. Hurley,Centers of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Comm. Algebra, Vol. 16 (1988), 57–74

    1988

Show all 69 references
  1. [7]

    Eiichi Abe and Kazuo Suzuki,On normal subgroups of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Tohoku Math. J. (2), Vol. 28 (1976), 185–198

    1976

  2. [8]

    Armand Borel,Linear algebraic groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York (1991)

    1991

  3. [9]

    131 (1970), 1–55

    Armand Borel,Properties and linear representations of Chevalley groups, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 131 (1970), 1–55

    1970

  4. [10]

    abstraits

    Armand Borel and Jacques Tits, Homomorphismes “abstraits” de groupes alg´ ebriques simples, Ann. of Math. (2), Vol. 97 (1973), 499–571

    1973

  5. [11]

    Chapters 1–7, Elements of Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998)

    Nicolas Bourbaki,Commutative algebra. Chapters 1–7, Elements of Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998)

    1998

  6. [12]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Comm

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Comm. Algebra, Vol. 52 (2024), 2313–2327

    2024

  7. [13]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of different types over commutative rings, J

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of different types over commutative rings, J. Algebra, Vol. 355 (2012), 154–170

    2012

  8. [14]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of certain types over local rings, Uspekhi Mat

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of certain types over local rings, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, Vol. 62 (2007), 143–144

    2007

  9. [15]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typesB 2 andG 2 over local rings, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typesB 2 andG 2 over local rings, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 155, No. 6 (2008), 795–814

    2008

  10. [16]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of elementary adjoint Chevalley groups of typesA l, Dl, El over local rings with1/2, Algebra and Logic, Vol

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of elementary adjoint Chevalley groups of typesA l, Dl, El over local rings with1/2, Algebra and Logic, Vol. 48, No. 4 (2009), 250–267

    2009

  11. [17]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typesA l, Dl,orE l over local rings with1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typesA l, Dl,orE l over local rings with1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 167, No. 6 (2010), 749–766

    2010

  12. [18]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typesA l, Dl, El over local rings without1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typesA l, Dl, El over local rings without1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 169, No. 5 (2010), 589–613

    2010

  13. [19]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typeB l over local rings with1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typeB l over local rings with1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 169, No. 5 (2010), 557–588

    2010

  14. [20]

    Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typeF 4 over local rings with1/2, Journal of Algebra, Vol

    Elena I. Bunina,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typeF 4 over local rings with1/2, Journal of Algebra, Vol. 323, No. 8 (2010), 2270–2289

    2010

  15. [21]

    Bunina and P

    Elena I. Bunina and P. A. Veryovkin,Normalizers of Chevalley groups of typeG 2 over local rings without1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 201, No. 4 (2014), 446–449

    2014

  16. [22]

    Bunina and P

    Elena I. Bunina and P. A. Veryovkin,Automorphisms of Chevalley groups of typeG 2 over local rings without1/2, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 197, No. 4 (2014), 479–491

    2014

  17. [23]

    Bunina and M

    Elena I. Bunina and M. A. Vladykina,Automorphisms of a Chevalley group of typeG 2 over a commu- tative ringRwith1/3generated by the invertible elements and2R, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 284, No. 4 (2024), 431–441

    2024

  18. [24]

    Carter,Simple Groups of Lie Type, Wiley Classics Library, Wiley (1989)

    Roger W. Carter,Simple Groups of Lie Type, Wiley Classics Library, Wiley (1989)

    1989

  19. [25]

    Carter and Yu Chen,Automorphisms of affine Kac–Moody groups and related Chevalley groups over rings, J

    Roger W. Carter and Yu Chen,Automorphisms of affine Kac–Moody groups and related Chevalley groups over rings, J. Algebra, Vol. 155, No. 1 (1993), 44–94. 62

    1993

  20. [26]

    Yu Chen,Isomorphic Chevalley groups over integral domains, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, Vol. 92 (1994), 231–237

    1994

  21. [27]

    Yu Chen,Automorphisms of simple Chevalley groups overQ-algebras, Tohoku Math. J. (2), Vol. 47 (1995), No. 1, 81–97

    1995

  22. [28]

    Yu Chen,Isomorphisms of adjoint Chevalley groups over integral domains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 348 (1996), No. 2, 521–541

    1996

  23. [29]

    Algebra, Vol

    Yu Chen,Isomorphisms of Chevalley groups over algebras, J. Algebra, Vol. 226 (2000), No. 2, 719–741

    2000

  24. [30]

    Claude Chevalley,Certains sch´ emas de groupes semi-simples, inS´ eminaire Bourbaki, 1960–1961, Vol. 6, Exp. No. 219, 219–234, Soc. Math. France, Paris (1995)

    1960

  25. [31]

    Curtis and Irving Reiner,Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1988)

    Charles W. Curtis and Irving Reiner,Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1988)

    1988

  26. [32]

    Jean Dieudonn´ e,On the automorphisms of the classical groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., No. 2 (1951)

    1951

  27. [35]

    Garge and Deep H

    Shripad M. Garge and Deep H. Makadiya,Triangular and Unitriangular Factorization of Twisted Chevalley Groups, accepted for publication in Israel J. Math., arXiv:2505.20224 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Golubchik and A

    Igor Z. Golubchik and A. V. Mikhal¨ ev,Isomorphisms of the general linear group over an associative ring, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh., No. 3 (1983), 61–72

    1983

  29. [37]

    Golubchik and A

    Igor Z. Golubchik and A. V. Mikhal¨ ev,Isomorphisms of unitary groups over associative rings, J. Math. Sci., Vol. 30 (1985), 1863–1871

    1985

  30. [38]

    L. K. Hua and Irving Reiner,Automorphisms of the unimodular group, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 71 (1951), 331–348

    1951

  31. [39]

    L. K. Hua,On the automorphisms of the symplectic group over any field, Ann. of Math. (2), Vol. 49 (1948), 739–759

    1948

  32. [40]

    Humphreys,On the automorphisms of infinite Chevalley groups, Canadian J

    James E. Humphreys,On the automorphisms of infinite Chevalley groups, Canadian J. Math., Vol. 21 (1969), 908–911

    1969

  33. [41]

    Humphreys,Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin (1972)

    James E. Humphreys,Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin (1972)

    1972

  34. [42]

    Humphreys,Linear Algebraic Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1975)

    James E. Humphreys,Linear Algebraic Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg (1975)

    1975

  35. [43]

    Klyachko,Automorphisms and isomorphisms of Chevalley groups and algebras, J

    Anton A. Klyachko,Automorphisms and isomorphisms of Chevalley groups and algebras, J. Algebra, Vol. 324 (2010), 2608–2619

    2010

  36. [44]

    Joseph Landin and Irving Reiner,Automorphisms of the general linear group over a principal ideal domain, Ann. of Math. (2), Vol. 65 (1957), 519–526

    1957

  37. [45]

    Reid, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 8, Cambridge Univ

    Hideyuki Matsumura,Commutative ring theory, translated from the Japanese by M. Reid, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 8, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986

    1986

  38. [46]

    McDonald and J

    Bernard R. McDonald and J. Pomfret,Automorphisms ofGL n(R), Ra local ring, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 173 (1972), 379–388

    1972

  39. [47]

    McDonald and L

    Bernard R. McDonald and L. McQueen,Automorphisms of the symplectic group over a local ring, J. Algebra30(1974), 485–495

    1974

  40. [48]

    Timothy O’Meara,The automorphisms of the linear groups over any integral domain, J

    O. Timothy O’Meara,The automorphisms of the linear groups over any integral domain, J. Reine Angew. Math., Vol. 223 (1966), 56–100

    1966

  41. [49]

    Timothy O’Meara,The automorphisms of the standard symplectic group over any integral domain, J

    O. Timothy O’Meara,The automorphisms of the standard symplectic group over any integral domain, J. Reine Angew. Math.230(1968), 104–138

    1968

  42. [50]

    Petechuk,Automorphisms of the groupsSL n,GL n over certain local rings, Mat

    Vasilij M. Petechuk,Automorphisms of the groupsSL n,GL n over certain local rings, Mat. Zametki, Vol. 28 (1980), No. 2, 187–204, 318

    1980

  43. [51]

    Petechuk,Automorphisms of matrix groups over commutative rings, Mat

    Vasilij M. Petechuk,Automorphisms of matrix groups over commutative rings, Mat. Sb. (N.S.), Vol. 117(159) (1982), No. 4, 534–547, 560

    1982

  44. [52]

    Petechuk,Isomorphisms of symplectic groups over commutative rings, Algebra i Logika, Vol

    Vasilij M. Petechuk,Isomorphisms of symplectic groups over commutative rings, Algebra i Logika, Vol. 22 (1983), No. 5, 551–562

    1983

  45. [53]

    Petechuk and J

    Vasilij M. Petechuk and J. V. Petechuk,Isomorphisms of matrix groups over commutative rings, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), Vol. 83 (2017), No. 1–2, 113–123

    2017

  46. [54]

    Vavilov,Chevalley groups over commutative rings

    Eugene Plotkin and Nikolai A. Vavilov,Chevalley groups over commutative rings. I. Elementary calculations, Acta Appl. Math., Vol. 45 (1996), 73–113

    1996

  47. [55]

    C. E. Rickart, Isomorphic groups of linear transformations, Amer. J. Math., Vol. 72 (1950), 451–464

    1950

  48. [56]

    C. E. Rickart, Isomorphic groups of linear transformations. II, Amer. J. Math., Vol. 73 (1951), 697–716

    1951

  49. [57]

    Springer,Linear algebraic groups, 2nd edition, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA (1998)

    Tonny A. Springer,Linear algebraic groups, 2nd edition, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA (1998). 63

    1998

  50. [58]

    Robert Steinberg,Lectures on Chevalley Groups, Yale University, New Haven (1968), mimeographed lecture notes

    1968

  51. [59]

    Math., Vol

    Robert Steinberg,Automorphisms of finite linear groups, Canadian J. Math., Vol. 12 (1960), 606–615

    1960

  52. [60]

    Math., Vol

    Robert Steinberg,Variations on a Theme of Chevalley, Pacific J. Math., Vol. 9 (1959), 875–891

    1959

  53. [61]

    Algebra, Vol

    Robert Steinberg,The isomorphism and isogeny theorems for reductive algebraic groups, J. Algebra, Vol. 216 (1999), No. 1, 366–383

    1999

  54. [62]

    Kazuo Suzuki,On Normal Subgroups of Twisted Chevalley Groups over Local Rings, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku Sect. A, Vol. 13 (1977), 238–249

    1977

  55. [63]

    Algebra, Vol

    Kazuo Suzuki,Normality of the Elementary Subgroups of Twisted Chevalley Groups over Commutative Rings, J. Algebra, Vol. 175 (1995), 526–536

    1995

  56. [64]

    Math., Vol

    Kazuo Suzuki,Centers of Twisted Chevalley Groups over Commutative Rings, Kumamoto J. Math., Vol. 6 (1993), 1–9

    1993

  57. [65]

    Giovanni Taddei,Normalit´ e des groupes ´ el´ ementaires dans les groupes de Chevalley sur un anneau, Contemp. Math. (2), Vol. 55 (1986), 693–710

    1986

  58. [66]

    Vaserstein,On normal subgroups of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Tohoku Math

    Leonid N. Vaserstein,On normal subgroups of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Tohoku Math. J. (2), Vol. 38 (1986), 219–230

    1986

  59. [67]

    Vavilov,Structure of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Nonassociative algebras and related topics (Hiroshima, 1990), World Sci

    Nikolai A. Vavilov,Structure of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Nonassociative algebras and related topics (Hiroshima, 1990), World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ (1991), 219–335

    1990

  60. [68]

    W. C. Waterhouse,Automorphisms ofGL n(R), Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 79 (1980), No. 3, 347– 351

    1980

  61. [69]

    Zelmanov,Isomorphisms of linear groups over an associative ring, Sibirsk

    Efim I. Zelmanov,Isomorphisms of linear groups over an associative ring, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh., Vol. 26 (1985), No. 4, 49–67, 204. Department of Mathematics, Bar–Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel Email address:helenbunina@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, Bar–Ilan University, ...

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.