pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0207270 · v1 · submitted 2002-07-12 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

No observational proof of the black-hole event-horizon

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords proofblack-holeexistenceobservationalobservationsveryaccuratelyapplies
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recently, several ways of obtaining observational proof of the existence of black-hole horizons have been proposed. We argue here that such proof is fundamentally impossible: observations can provide arguments, sometimes very strong ones, in favour of the existence of the event horizon, but they cannot prove it. This applies also to future observations, which will trace very accurately the details of the spacetime metric of a body suspected of being a black hole.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analytic thin disks and rings in a class of nonasymptotically flat static spacetimes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    External quadrupolar distortion imprints on orbital dynamics and accretion structure in thin disks around deformed compact objects, with the radiating region's outer edge tied to the radiation-to-gas pressure transition.

  2. Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    gr-qc 2019-04 accept novelty 2.0

    Current and future observations can test whether dark compact objects are Kerr black holes or exotic alternatives, with null results strengthening the black hole paradigm.