Recognition: unknown
Spectroscopic Identification of Massive Galaxies at z~2.3 with Strongly Suppressed Star Formation
read the original abstract
We present first results of a spectroscopic survey targeting K-selected galaxies at z=2.0-2.7 using the GNIRS instrument on Gemini-South. We obtained near-infrared spectra with a wavelength coverage of 1.0-2.5 micron for 26 K-bright galaxies (K<19.7) selected from the MUSYC survey using photometric redshifts. We successfully derived spectroscopic redshifts for all 26 galaxies using rest-frame optical emission lines or the redshifted Balmer/4000 Angstrom break. Twenty galaxies have spectroscopic redshifts in the range 2.0<z<2.7, for which bright emission lines like Halpha and [OIII] fall in atmospheric windows. Surprisingly, we detected no emission lines for nine of these 20 galaxies. The median 2 sigma upper limit on the rest-frame equivalent width of Halpha for these nine galaxies is ~10 Angstrom. The stellar continuum emission of these same nine galaxies is best fitted by evolved stellar population models. The best-fit star formation rate (SFR) is zero for five out of nine galaxies, and consistent with zero within 1 sigma for the remaining four. Thus, both the Halpha measurements and the independent stellar continuum modeling imply that 45% of our K-selected galaxies are not forming stars intensely. This high fraction of galaxies without detected line emission and low SFRs may imply that the suppression of star formation in massive galaxies occurs at higher redshift than is predicted by current CDM galaxy formation models. However, obscured star formation may have been missed, and deep mid-infrared imaging is needed to clarify this situation.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots
A source 660 million years after the Big Bang is interpreted as a black hole star with a dust-free dense gas atmosphere, implying Little Red Dots have black hole masses overestimated by orders of magnitude.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.