pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0702542 · v3 · submitted 2007-02-20 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

Tainted Evidence: Cosmological Model Selection vs. Fitting

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords selectionmodelcosmologicalleadnumberpriorapplyblindly
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Interpretation of cosmological data to determine the number and values of parameters describing the universe must not rely solely on statistics but involve physical insight. When statistical techniques such as "model selection" or "integrated survey optimization" blindly apply Occam's Razor, this can lead to painful results. We emphasize that the sensitivity to prior probabilities and to the number of models compared can lead to "prior selection" rather than robust model selection. A concrete example demonstrates that Information Criteria can in fact misinform over a large region of parameter space.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent consistency tests of DESI DR2 BAO and SN Ia

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DESI DR2 BAO and Pantheon+/Union3 SN Ia datasets are mutually consistent at 1-2 sigma using crossing statistics, supporting a reconstruction suggestive of evolving dark energy at low redshift.