Understanding Data Better with Bayesian and Global Statistical Methods
classification
🌌 astro-ph
keywords
bayesianbetterdatastatisticaltraditionaladvancedapparentlyastronomers
read the original abstract
To understand their data better, astronomers need to use statistical tools that are more advanced than traditional ``freshman lab'' statistics. As an illustration, the problem of combining apparently incompatible measurements of a quantity is presented from both the traditional, and a more sophisticated Bayesian, perspective. Explicit formulas are given for both treatments. Results are shown for the value of the Hubble Constant, and a 95% confidence interval of 66 < H0 < 82 (km/s/Mpc) is obtained.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Combining the Mass--Radius Posteriors of J0030+0451 Allowing for Unknown Model Systematics
A Bayesian combination of eight M-R posteriors for PSR J0030+0451 yields M = 1.46^{+0.09}_{-0.08} M_⊙, R = 12.69^{+0.64}_{-0.55} km while marginalizing over unknown model systematics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.