pith. sign in

arxiv: cs/0604113 · v1 · submitted 2006-04-28 · 💻 cs.CC

One-in-Two-Matching Problem is NP-complete

classification 💻 cs.CC
keywords problemmatchingdimensionalreductiongraphlinearnp-completeproblems
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

2-dimensional Matching Problem, which requires to find a matching of left- to right-vertices in a balanced $2n$-vertex bipartite graph, is a well-known polynomial problem, while various variants, like the 3-dimensional analogoue (3DM, with triangles on a tripartite graph), or the Hamiltonian Circuit Problem (HC, a restriction to ``unicyclic'' matchings) are among the main examples of NP-hard problems, since the first Karp reduction series of 1972. The same holds for the weighted variants of these problems, the Linear Assignment Problem being polynomial, and the Numerical 3-Dimensional Matching and Travelling Salesman Problem being NP-complete. In this paper we show that a small modification of the 2-dimensional Matching and Assignment Problems in which for each $i \leq n/2$ it is required that either $\pi(2i-1)=2i-1$ or $\pi(2i)=2i$, is a NP-complete problem. The proof is by linear reduction from SAT (or NAE-SAT), with the size $n$ of the Matching Problem being four times the number of edges in the factor graph representation of the boolean problem. As a corollary, in combination with the simple linear reduction of One-in-Two Matching to 3-Dimensional Matching, we show that SAT can be linearly reduced to 3DM, while the original Karp reduction was only cubic.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Team Order Problem: Maximizing the Probability of Matching Being Large Enough

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A PTAS is presented for the team order problem to find an ordering achieving winning probability within epsilon of the optimum, plus tractability results for special cases and a bound on maximum-weight matching performance.