XGBoost and Random Forest can distinguish ChatGPT-written cybersecurity paragraphs from human Wikipedia paragraphs with 81 to 83% accuracy, and a narrow XGBoost model beat GPTZero in a three-class test, yet the benchmark rests on a small unreleased dataset.
Advancing Object Detection in Transportation with Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs): A Comprehensive Review and Empirical Testing
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This study aims to comprehensively review and empirically evaluate the application of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and Large Vision Models (VLMs) in object detection for transportation systems. In the first fold, we provide a background about the potential benefits of MLLMs in transportation applications and conduct a comprehensive review of current MLLM technologies in previous studies. We highlight their effectiveness and limitations in object detection within various transportation scenarios. The second fold involves providing an overview of the taxonomy of end-to-end object detection in transportation applications and future directions. Building on this, we proposed empirical analysis for testing MLLMs on three real-world transportation problems that include object detection tasks namely, road safety attributes extraction, safety-critical event detection, and visual reasoning of thermal images. Our findings provide a detailed assessment of MLLM performance, uncovering both strengths and areas for improvement. Finally, we discuss practical limitations and challenges of MLLMs in enhancing object detection in transportation, thereby offering a roadmap for future research and development in this critical area.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Detecting AI-Generated Text in Educational Content: Leveraging Machine Learning and Explainable AI for Academic Integrity
XGBoost and Random Forest can distinguish ChatGPT-written cybersecurity paragraphs from human Wikipedia paragraphs with 81 to 83% accuracy, and a narrow XGBoost model beat GPTZero in a three-class test, yet the benchmark rests on a small unreleased dataset.